LLMBenchmark.ai

Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

Mercury 2 vs Mistral Large 4

Updated October 21, 2026. 35 benchmarks have a result for both. Coding is ranked on the Vibe Coding Index; every other board is shown as published.

Mercury 2Inception
Coding
0.0
Overall
10.8
Output $/M
$0.75
0
Mistral Large 4Mistral AI
Coding
55.3
Overall
38.4
Output $/M
$4.18
35
vs boards won of 35 shared

Decision reading

Pick Mistral Large 4 for coding: it scores 55.3 on the Vibe Coding Index against 0.0 for Mercury 2.

Pick Mercury 2 when output tokens cost 5.6x less.

Shared results
35
Mercury 2 only
7
Mistral Large 4 only
46
Like-for-like categories
6 of 9

Shared results can support a head-to-head reading. Results only one model has describe coverage, not superiority.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
Mercury 2 0.0 from 1 benchmark, Mistral Large 4 55.3 from 2 benchmarks.
Widest category
Coding, 31.8 points apart on average over 7 shared benchmarks.
Widest single gap
LMArena WebDev: React: Mercury 2 1160 against Mistral Large 4 1559, 66.5 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
Mercury 2 $0.75 against Mistral Large 4 $4.18 per million output tokens, 5.6x apart.
Context window
Mercury 2 takes 128K tokens, Mistral Large 4 1.05M.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryMercury 2BarsMistral Large 4Ties
Coding07
Intelligence01
Reasoning04
Knowledge03
Web design08
General012
All shared boards035
CodingLike-for-likeFour of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index07
Coding benchmarks for Mercury 2 and Mistral Large 4
BenchmarkMercury 2Mistral Large 4Leader
LiveBench codingNot measured60.0%Only Mistral Large 4 measured
LMArena WebDev11711543Mistral Large 4
AA Coding Index31.1Not measuredOnly Mercury 2 measured
Terminal-Bench 4 (Vals AI)Not measured27.8%Only Mistral Large 4 measured
Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI)Not measured78.4%Only Mistral Large 4 measured
Code migration (Vals AI)Not measured30.6%Only Mistral Large 4 measured
IOI (Vals AI)Not measured45.3%Only Mistral Large 4 measured
SWE-bench Multimodal (Vals AI)Not measured33.1%Only Mistral Large 4 measured
Vibe Code Bench 1-100 (Vals AI)Not measured14.3%Only Mistral Large 4 measured
SciCode37.7%54.2%Mistral Large 4
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)26.5%Not measuredOnly Mercury 2 measured
FrontierCodeNot measured39.4%Only Mistral Large 4 measured
WeirdML43.2%Not measuredOnly Mercury 2 measured
ALE-Bench785.61213.2Mistral Large 4
LMArena Text: coding13901478Mistral Large 4
LMArena Text: software and IT13851467Mistral Large 4
LMArena WebDev: React11601559Mistral Large 4
LMArena WebDev: HTML11991487Mistral Large 4
Neither model has a result on the other 20 boards here
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
Intelligence benchmarks for Mercury 2 and Mistral Large 4
BenchmarkMercury 2Mistral Large 4Leader
AA Intelligence Index10.838.4Mistral Large 4
Epoch Capabilities IndexNot measured150.0Only Mistral Large 4 measured
Agentic workDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index11 boards, none shared
Agentic work benchmarks for Mercury 2 and Mistral Large 4
BenchmarkMercury 2Mistral Large 4Leader
AA Agentic Index1.6Not measuredOnly Mercury 2 measured
LiveBench researchNot measured28.1%Only Mistral Large 4 measured
LiveBench browserNot measured8.0%Only Mistral Large 4 measured
LiveBench long agenticNot measured11.8%Only Mistral Large 4 measured
Finance Agent (Vals AI)Not measured54.7%Only Mistral Large 4 measured
Tax Agent Bench (Vals AI)Not measured30.4%Only Mistral Large 4 measured
Legal Research Bench (Vals AI)Not measured31.7%Only Mistral Large 4 measured
Harvey's Legal Agent Benchmark (Vals AI)Not measured17.5%Only Mistral Large 4 measured
Excel Modeling Benchmark (Vals AI)Not measured56.2%Only Mistral Large 4 measured
BioMysteryBench (Vals AI)Not measured67.0%Only Mistral Large 4 measured
τ²-Bench Telecom70.8%Not measuredOnly Mercury 2 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 28 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index04
Reasoning benchmarks for Mercury 2 and Mistral Large 4
BenchmarkMercury 2Mistral Large 4Leader
LiveBench reasoningNot measured83.9%Only Mistral Large 4 measured
MysteryMechanism (Vals AI)Not measured12.2%Only Mistral Large 4 measured
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)77.0%Not measuredOnly Mercury 2 measured
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)17.1%35.0%Mistral Large 4
GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run)Not measured88.1%Only Mistral Large 4 measured
Chess puzzlesNot measured33.0%Only Mistral Large 4 measured
Mystery game puzzlesNot measured17.0%Only Mistral Large 4 measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts13621444Mistral Large 4
LMArena Text: expert13581444Mistral Large 4
LMArena Text: hard prompts in English13741442Mistral Large 4
LMArena Vision: diagramsNot measured1288Only Mistral Large 4 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 10 boards here
MathDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index6 boards, none shared
Math benchmarks for Mercury 2 and Mistral Large 4
BenchmarkMercury 2Mistral Large 4Leader
OTIS Mock AIMENot measured98.3%Only Mistral Large 4 measured
FrontierMath, tiers 1 to 3Not measured58.6%Only Mistral Large 4 measured
FrontierMath, tier 4Not measured26.8%Only Mistral Large 4 measured
ProofBenchNot measured10.0%Only Mistral Large 4 measured
LMArena Text: mathNot measured1469Only Mistral Large 4 measured
LMArena Text: mathematical workNot measured1462Only Mistral Large 4 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 7 boards here
KnowledgeLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index03
Knowledge benchmarks for Mercury 2 and Mistral Large 4
BenchmarkMercury 2Mistral Large 4Leader
MedCode (Vals AI)Not measured40.7%Only Mistral Large 4 measured
SimpleQA VerifiedNot measured20.0%Only Mistral Large 4 measured
LMArena Text: science13431448Mistral Large 4
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare13631433Mistral Large 4
LMArena Text: legal and governmentNot measured1425Only Mistral Large 4 measured
LMArena Text: business and finance13491439Mistral Large 4
Neither model has a result on the other 11 boards here
Web designLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index08
Web design benchmarks for Mercury 2 and Mistral Large 4
BenchmarkMercury 2Mistral Large 4Leader
Design Arena: websites10361258Mistral Large 4
Design Arena: UI components9981275Mistral Large 4
Design Arena: game dev9851226Mistral Large 4
Design Arena: data viz10091274Mistral Large 4
Design Arena: 3D9821253Mistral Large 4
Design Arena: all code categories10221259Mistral Large 4
Design Arena: SVG9981232Mistral Large 4
Design Arena: ASCII art9901203Mistral Large 4
LiveBench designNot measured65.6%Only Mistral Large 4 measured
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index012
General benchmarks for Mercury 2 and Mistral Large 4
BenchmarkMercury 2Mistral Large 4Leader
LiveBench data analysisNot measured76.5%Only Mistral Large 4 measured
MedScribe (Vals AI)Not measured80.4%Only Mistral Large 4 measured
IFBench69.8%Not measuredOnly Mercury 2 measured
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)43.7%81.3%Mistral Large 4
DTBenchNot measured88.2%Only Mistral Large 4 measured
LMCANot measured35.8%Only Mistral Large 4 measured
Surface Evolver BenchNot measured28.1%Only Mistral Large 4 measured
Furniture assemblyNot measured20.8%Only Mistral Large 4 measured
LMArena Text13541431Mistral Large 4
LMArena Text: instruction following13281422Mistral Large 4
LMArena Text: creative writing12861363Mistral Large 4
LMArena VisionNot measured1272Only Mistral Large 4 measured
LMArena Text: English13781433Mistral Large 4
LMArena Text: non-English13301422Mistral Large 4
LMArena Text: Chinese14141492Mistral Large 4
LMArena Text: JapaneseNot measured1415Only Mistral Large 4 measured
LMArena Text: FrenchNot measured1492Only Mistral Large 4 measured
LMArena Text: SpanishNot measured1455Only Mistral Large 4 measured
LMArena Text: Russian13041417Mistral Large 4
LMArena Text: multi-turn13571435Mistral Large 4
LMArena Text: longer queries13291428Mistral Large 4
LMArena Text: writing and language13001386Mistral Large 4
LMArena Text: entertainment and media13141378Mistral Large 4
LMArena Vision: EnglishNot measured1283Only Mistral Large 4 measured
LMArena Vision: reading textNot measured1284Only Mistral Large 4 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 21 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for Mercury 2 and Mistral Large 4
BenchmarkMercury 2Mistral Large 4Leader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

Mercury 2$0.0006Fits in one request
Mistral Large 4$0.0034Fits in one request

Mercury 2 costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

Mercury 2$0.015Fits in one request
Mistral Large 4$0.081Fits in one request

Mercury 2 costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

Mercury 2$0.058Exceeds the context window
Mistral Large 4$0.314Fits in one request

Mercury 2 costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of Mercury 2 and Mistral Large 4
SpecificationInception Mercury 2Mistral Large 4
MakerInceptionMistral AI
WeightsNo public weights listedNo public weights listed
ReleasedMarch 4, 2026October 6, 2026
Context window128K1.05M
Input $/Mtok$0.25$1.36
Output $/Mtok$0.75$4.18
Coding index0.055.3
Independent measurements behind it12
Cost per solved taskNot computableNot computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is Mercury 2 better than Mistral Large 4 for coding?

Pick Mistral Large 4 for coding: it scores 55.3 on the Vibe Coding Index against 0.0 for Mercury 2. Pick Mercury 2 when output tokens cost 5.6x less.

Which is cheaper, Mercury 2 or Mistral Large 4?

Mercury 2 costs $0.25 per million input tokens and $0.75 per million output tokens; Mistral Large 4 costs $1.36 and $4.18. Cost per solved task is known for neither of them.

Which has the bigger context window, Mercury 2 or Mistral Large 4?

Mistral Large 4, with 1.05M tokens against 128K.

How many benchmarks is the Mercury 2 vs Mistral Large 4 comparison based on?

35 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 21, 2026. Mercury 2's coding index rests on 1 independent benchmark and Mistral Large 4's on 2. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next