Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

Grok Build 0.1 vs Hy4 preview

Grok Build 0.1 costs 1.3x less per output token than Hy4 preview ($2.00 vs $2.501 per million). Updated October 22, 2026; 1 benchmarks have a result for both.

Grok Build 0.1xAI
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$2.00
0
Hy4 previewTencent
Coding
44.3
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$2.501
1
vs boards won of 1 shared

Grok Build 0.1 or Hy4 preview: which to pick

Only Hy4 preview has a coding score, 44.3 on the Vibe Coding Index; Grok Build 0.1 has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Pick Grok Build 0.1 for output tokens 1.3x cheaper ($2.00 vs $2.501 per million).

Shared results
1
Grok Build 0.1 only
2
Hy4 preview only
23
Like-for-like categories
1 of 9

Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
Grok Build 0.1 not benchmarked, Hy4 preview 44.3 from 3 benchmarks.
Widest category
Coding, 64.1 points apart on average over 1 shared benchmark.
Widest single gap
Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI): Grok Build 0.1 13.4% against Hy4 preview 77.5%, 64.1 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
Grok Build 0.1 $2.00 against Hy4 preview $2.501 per million output tokens, 1.3x apart.
Context window
Grok Build 0.1 takes 256K tokens, Hy4 preview 1.05M.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryGrok Build 0.1BarsHy4 previewTies
Coding01
All shared boards01
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index01
Coding benchmarks for Grok Build 0.1 and Hy4 preview
BenchmarkGrok Build 0.1Hy4 previewLeader
LMArena WebDevNot measured1631Only Hy4 preview measured
AA Coding Index51.5Not measuredOnly Grok Build 0.1 measured
Terminal-Bench 4 (Vals AI)Not measured8.1%Only Hy4 preview measured
Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI)13.4%77.5%Hy4 preview
Code migration (Vals AI)Not measured47.4%Only Hy4 preview measured
ProgramBench (Vals AI)Not measured0.0%Only Hy4 preview measured
IOI (Vals AI)Not measured59.3%Only Hy4 preview measured
Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals AI)Not measured55.1%Only Hy4 preview measured
CyberBench (Vals AI)Not measured65.4%Only Hy4 preview measured
LMArena WebDev: ReactNot measured1653Only Hy4 preview measured
LMArena WebDev: HTMLNot measured1620Only Hy4 preview measured
Neither model has a result on the other 28 boards here
IntelligenceDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index1 board, none shared
Intelligence benchmarks for Grok Build 0.1 and Hy4 preview
BenchmarkGrok Build 0.1Hy4 previewLeader
AA Intelligence Index27.2Not measuredOnly Grok Build 0.1 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here
Agentic workDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index8 boards, none shared
Agentic work benchmarks for Grok Build 0.1 and Hy4 preview
BenchmarkGrok Build 0.1Hy4 previewLeader
SREBench (Vals AI)Not measured2.3%Only Hy4 preview measured
Finance Agent (Vals AI)Not measured55.1%Only Hy4 preview measured
Tax Agent Bench (Vals AI)Not measured32.6%Only Hy4 preview measured
Legal Research Bench (Vals AI)Not measured45.2%Only Hy4 preview measured
Harvey's Legal Agent Benchmark (Vals AI)Not measured8.8%Only Hy4 preview measured
Excel Modeling Benchmark (Vals AI)Not measured58.1%Only Hy4 preview measured
BioMysteryBench (Vals AI)Not measured69.3%Only Hy4 preview measured
Terminal-Bench-Science (Vals AI)Not measured1.4%Only Hy4 preview measured
Neither model has a result on the other 33 boards here
ReasoningNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Reasoning benchmarks for Grok Build 0.1 and Hy4 preview
BenchmarkGrok Build 0.1Hy4 previewLeader
Neither model has a result on 22 boards here
MathDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index1 board, none shared
Math benchmarks for Grok Build 0.1 and Hy4 preview
BenchmarkGrok Build 0.1Hy4 previewLeader
ProofBenchNot measured75.0%Only Hy4 preview measured
Neither model has a result on the other 12 boards here
KnowledgeDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index2 boards, none shared
Knowledge benchmarks for Grok Build 0.1 and Hy4 preview
BenchmarkGrok Build 0.1Hy4 previewLeader
LegalBench (Vals AI)Not measured83.8%Only Hy4 preview measured
MedCode (Vals AI)Not measured43.3%Only Hy4 preview measured
Neither model has a result on the other 16 boards here
Web designNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Web design benchmarks for Grok Build 0.1 and Hy4 preview
BenchmarkGrok Build 0.1Hy4 previewLeader
Neither model has a result on 9 boards here
GeneralDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index3 boards, none shared
General benchmarks for Grok Build 0.1 and Hy4 preview
BenchmarkGrok Build 0.1Hy4 previewLeader
Vals IndexNot measured53.2%Only Hy4 preview measured
Public Benefits Bench (Vals AI)Not measured68.6%Only Hy4 preview measured
MedScribe (Vals AI)Not measured83.6%Only Hy4 preview measured
Neither model has a result on the other 43 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for Grok Build 0.1 and Hy4 preview
BenchmarkGrok Build 0.1Hy4 previewLeader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

Grok Build 0.1$0.0020Fits in one request
Hy4 preview$0.0021Fits in one request

Grok Build 0.1 costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

Grok Build 0.1$0.056Fits in one request
Hy4 preview$0.049Fits in one request

Hy4 preview costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

Grok Build 0.1$0.220Fits in one request
Hy4 preview$0.192Fits in one request

Hy4 preview costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of Grok Build 0.1 and Hy4 preview
SpecificationSpaceXAI Grok Build 0.1Tencent Hy4 preview
MakerxAITencent
WeightsNo public weights listedOpen weights
ReleasedMay 20, 2026August 28, 2026
Context window256K1.05M
Input $/Mtok$1.00$0.834
Output $/Mtok$2.00$2.501
Coding indexNot benchmarked44.3
Independent measurements behind it13
Cost per solved taskNot computableNot computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is Grok Build 0.1 better than Hy4 preview for coding?

Only Hy4 preview has a coding score, 44.3 on the Vibe Coding Index; Grok Build 0.1 has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Pick Grok Build 0.1 for output tokens 1.3x cheaper ($2.00 vs $2.501 per million).

Which is cheaper, Grok Build 0.1 or Hy4 preview?

Grok Build 0.1 costs $1.00 per million input tokens and $2.00 per million output tokens; Hy4 preview costs $0.834 and $2.501. Cost per solved task is known for neither of them.

Which has the bigger context window, Grok Build 0.1 or Hy4 preview?

Hy4 preview, with 1.05M tokens against 256K.

How many benchmarks is the Grok Build 0.1 vs Hy4 preview comparison based on?

1 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 22, 2026. Grok Build 0.1's coding index rests on 1 independent benchmark and Hy4 preview's on 3. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next