Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

Grok 4.3 vs Step 3.5 Flash

Grok 4.3 leads Step 3.5 Flash on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, 24.9 to 17.0, and Step 3.5 Flash costs 8.3x less per output token ($0.30 vs $2.50 per million). Updated October 21, 2026; 35 benchmarks have a result for both.

Grok 4.3xAI
Coding
37.4
Overall
24.9
Output $/M
$2.50
16
Step 3.5 FlashStepFun
Coding
No data
Overall
17.0
Output $/M
$0.30
19
vs boards won of 35 shared

Grok 4.3 or Step 3.5 Flash: which to pick

Only Grok 4.3 has a coding score, 37.4 on the Vibe Coding Index; Step 3.5 Flash has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Pick Step 3.5 Flash for output tokens 8.3x cheaper ($0.30 vs $2.50 per million) and work measured by LMArena Text: coding or LMArena Text: software and IT, where it leads.

Shared results
35
Grok 4.3 only
69
Step 3.5 Flash only
0
Like-for-like categories
7 of 9

Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
Grok 4.3 37.4 from 3 benchmarks, Step 3.5 Flash not benchmarked.
Widest category
Intelligence, 7.9 points apart on average over 1 shared benchmark.
Widest single gap
IFBench: Grok 4.3 83.3% against Step 3.5 Flash 66.5%, 16.8 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
Grok 4.3 $2.50 against Step 3.5 Flash $0.30 per million output tokens, 8.3x apart.
Context window
Grok 4.3 takes 1M tokens, Step 3.5 Flash 262K.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryGrok 4.3BarsStep 3.5 FlashTies
Coding12
Intelligence10
Agentic work10
Reasoning23
Math02
Knowledge04
General118
All shared boards1619
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index12
Coding benchmarks for Grok 4.3 and Step 3.5 Flash
BenchmarkGrok 4.3Step 3.5 FlashLeader
LMArena WebDev1358Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
AA Coding Index42.2Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
LiveCodeBench (Vals AI)84.5%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
SWE-bench Verified (Vals AI)71.4%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI)19.4%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
Code migration (Vals AI)6.8%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
ProgramBench (Vals AI)0.0%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals AI)42.0%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
SkillsBench (Vals AI)40.6%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
SciCode48.3%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)37.9%32.6%Grok 4.3
WeirdML49.9%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
ALE-Bench944.2Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
LMArena Text: coding14151436Step 3.5 Flash
LMArena Text: software and IT14161434Step 3.5 Flash
LMArena WebDev: React1353Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
LMArena WebDev: HTML1367Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
LMArena WebDev: from an image1375Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 20 boards here
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index10
Intelligence benchmarks for Grok 4.3 and Step 3.5 Flash
BenchmarkGrok 4.3Step 3.5 FlashLeader
AA Intelligence Index24.917.0Grok 4.3
Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here
Agentic workLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index10
Agentic work benchmarks for Grok 4.3 and Step 3.5 Flash
BenchmarkGrok 4.3Step 3.5 FlashLeader
AA Agentic Index15.5Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
Design Arena: agents building web apps1126Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
Design Arena: agents building full-stack apps1006Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
Design Arena: agents building mobile apps1059Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
Design Arena: agents building Android apps961Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
Design Arena: agents building Godot games914Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
Design Arena: agents building games1007Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
Design Arena: HTML slides1008Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
Design Arena: PowerPoint slides1013Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
Finance Agent (Vals AI)37.7%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
Tax Agent Bench (Vals AI)6.2%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
Legal Research Bench (Vals AI)15.4%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
Excel Modeling Benchmark (Vals AI)18.4%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
τ²-Bench Telecom97.7%94.4%Grok 4.3
Vending-Bench 2$35Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
LMArena Search1166Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 23 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index23
Reasoning benchmarks for Grok 4.3 and Step 3.5 Flash
BenchmarkGrok 4.3Step 3.5 FlashLeader
GPQA Diamond91.4%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
MMMU Pro (Vals AI)83.1%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)90.1%83.1%Grok 4.3
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)37.2%24.5%Grok 4.3
GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run)88.8%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
Chess puzzles18.0%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts13961411Step 3.5 Flash
LMArena Text: expert13841421Step 3.5 Flash
LMArena Text: hard prompts in English14021421Step 3.5 Flash
LMArena Vision: diagrams1241Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
LMArena Vision: homework1241Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 10 boards here
MathLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index02
Math benchmarks for Grok 4.3 and Step 3.5 Flash
BenchmarkGrok 4.3Step 3.5 FlashLeader
OTIS Mock AIME93.3%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
FrontierMath, tiers 1 to 342.8%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
FrontierMath, tier 414.6%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
ProofBench11.0%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
LMArena Text: math13871408Step 3.5 Flash
LMArena Text: mathematical work13961421Step 3.5 Flash
Neither model has a result on the other 7 boards here
KnowledgeLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index04
Knowledge benchmarks for Grok 4.3 and Step 3.5 Flash
BenchmarkGrok 4.3Step 3.5 FlashLeader
MMLU Pro85.8%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
LegalBench (Vals AI)84.5%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
CaseLaw (Vals AI)79.3%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
CorpFin (Vals AI)68.5%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
TaxEval (Vals AI)70.8%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
MortgageTax (Vals AI)48.3%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
MedCode (Vals AI)38.1%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
SimpleQA Verified33.2%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
LMArena Text: science13991415Step 3.5 Flash
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare13841408Step 3.5 Flash
LMArena Text: legal and government13861408Step 3.5 Flash
LMArena Text: business and finance13811394Step 3.5 Flash
Neither model has a result on the other 5 boards here
Web designDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index8 boards, none shared
Web design benchmarks for Grok 4.3 and Step 3.5 Flash
BenchmarkGrok 4.3Step 3.5 FlashLeader
Design Arena: websites1196Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
Design Arena: UI components1192Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
Design Arena: game dev1174Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
Design Arena: data viz1179Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
Design Arena: 3D1125Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
Design Arena: all code categories1187Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
Design Arena: SVG1081Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
Design Arena: ASCII art1125Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index118
General benchmarks for Grok 4.3 and Step 3.5 Flash
BenchmarkGrok 4.3Step 3.5 FlashLeader
Public Benefits Bench (Vals AI)51.7%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
SAGE (Vals AI)19.7%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
MedScribe (Vals AI)74.4%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
Vals Multimodal Index43.3%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
IFBench83.3%66.5%Grok 4.3
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)75.0%63.0%Grok 4.3
DTBench90.7%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
LMCA38.3%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
LMArena Text13971403Step 3.5 Flash
LMArena Text: instruction following13661385Step 3.5 Flash
LMArena Text: creative writing13801357Grok 4.3
LMArena Vision1229Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
LMArena Text: English14041417Step 3.5 Flash
LMArena Text: non-English13851385Grok 4.3
LMArena Text: Chinese14221446Step 3.5 Flash
LMArena Text: German13951405Step 3.5 Flash
LMArena Text: Japanese13791353Grok 4.3
LMArena Text: Korean13541351Grok 4.3
LMArena Text: French14111421Step 3.5 Flash
LMArena Text: Spanish13991419Step 3.5 Flash
LMArena Text: Russian13991385Grok 4.3
LMArena Text: Polish13981389Grok 4.3
LMArena Text: multi-turn14061404Grok 4.3
LMArena Text: longer queries13931402Step 3.5 Flash
LMArena Text: writing and language13851372Grok 4.3
LMArena Text: entertainment and media13701360Grok 4.3
LMArena Vision: English1235Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
LMArena Vision: Chinese1257Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
LMArena Vision: reading text1235Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
LMArena Vision: humor1222Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
LMArena Vision: recognizing things1217Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
LMArena Vision: creative writing1237Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 14 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for Grok 4.3 and Step 3.5 Flash
BenchmarkGrok 4.3Step 3.5 FlashLeader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

Grok 4.3$0.0025Fits in one request
Step 3.5 Flash$0.0003Fits in one request

Step 3.5 Flash costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

Grok 4.3$0.070Fits in one request
Step 3.5 Flash$0.0059Fits in one request

Step 3.5 Flash costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

Grok 4.3$0.275Fits in one request
Step 3.5 Flash$0.023Fits in one request

Step 3.5 Flash costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of Grok 4.3 and Step 3.5 Flash
SpecificationSpaceXAI Grok 4.3StepFun Step 3.5 Flash
MakerxAIStepFun
WeightsNo public weights listedOpen weights
ReleasedApril 30, 2026January 29, 2026
Context window1M262K
Input $/Mtok$1.25$0.10
Output $/Mtok$2.50$0.30
Coding index37.4Not benchmarked
Independent measurements behind it30
Cost per solved task$0.31Not computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is Grok 4.3 better than Step 3.5 Flash for coding?

Only Grok 4.3 has a coding score, 37.4 on the Vibe Coding Index; Step 3.5 Flash has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Pick Step 3.5 Flash for output tokens 8.3x cheaper ($0.30 vs $2.50 per million) and work measured by LMArena Text: coding or LMArena Text: software and IT, where it leads.

Which is cheaper, Grok 4.3 or Step 3.5 Flash?

Grok 4.3 costs $1.25 per million input tokens and $2.50 per million output tokens; Step 3.5 Flash costs $0.10 and $0.30. Cost per solved task is known for Grok 4.3 only.

Which has the bigger context window, Grok 4.3 or Step 3.5 Flash?

Grok 4.3, with 1M tokens against 262K.

How many benchmarks is the Grok 4.3 vs Step 3.5 Flash comparison based on?

35 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 21, 2026. Grok 4.3's coding index rests on 3 independent benchmarks and Step 3.5 Flash's on 0. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next