Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

Grok 4.3 vs MiniMax M2

Grok 4.3 leads MiniMax M2 on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, 24.9 to 18.6, and MiniMax M2 costs 2.5x less per output token ($1.02 vs $2.50 per million). Updated October 22, 2026; 43 benchmarks have a result for both.

Grok 4.3xAI
Coding
37.4
Overall
53.1
Output $/M
$2.50
41
MiniMax M2MiniMax
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$1.02
2
vs boards won of 43 shared

Grok 4.3 or MiniMax M2: which to pick

Only Grok 4.3 has a coding score, 37.4 on the Vibe Coding Index; MiniMax M2 has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Pick MiniMax M2 for output tokens 2.5x cheaper ($1.02 vs $2.50 per million) and work measured by Vending-Bench 2 or Design Arena: SVG, where it leads.

Shared results
43
Grok 4.3 only
62
MiniMax M2 only
7
Like-for-like categories
8 of 9

Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
Grok 4.3 37.4 from 3 benchmarks, MiniMax M2 not benchmarked.
Widest category
Reasoning, 10.9 points apart on average over 5 shared benchmarks.
Widest single gap
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run): Grok 4.3 37.2% against MiniMax M2 13.7%, 23.5 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
Grok 4.3 $2.50 against MiniMax M2 $1.02 per million output tokens, 2.5x apart.
Context window
Grok 4.3 takes 1M tokens, MiniMax M2 205K.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryGrok 4.3BarsMiniMax M2Ties
Coding50
Intelligence10
Agentic work11
Reasoning50
Math20
Knowledge40
Web design61
General170
All shared boards412
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index50
Coding benchmarks for Grok 4.3 and MiniMax M2
BenchmarkGrok 4.3MiniMax M2Leader
SWE-bench VerifiedNot measured61.0%Only MiniMax M2 measured
LMArena WebDev13581297Grok 4.3
AA Coding Index42.2Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
LiveCodeBench (Vals AI)84.5%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
SWE-bench Verified (Vals AI)71.4%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI)19.4%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
Code migration (Vals AI)6.8%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
ProgramBench (Vals AI)0.0%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals AI)42.0%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
SkillsBench (Vals AI)40.6%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured82.6%Only MiniMax M2 measured
SciCode48.3%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)37.9%25.8%Grok 4.3
Terminal-BenchNot measured30.0%Only MiniMax M2 measured
WeirdML49.9%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
ALE-Bench944.2Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
LMArena Text: coding14151371Grok 4.3
LMArena Text: software and IT14161373Grok 4.3
LMArena WebDev: React1353Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
LMArena WebDev: HTML13671306Grok 4.3
LMArena WebDev: from an image1375Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 18 boards here
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index10
Intelligence benchmarks for Grok 4.3 and MiniMax M2
BenchmarkGrok 4.3MiniMax M2Leader
AA Intelligence Index24.918.6Grok 4.3
Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here
Agentic workLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index11
Agentic work benchmarks for Grok 4.3 and MiniMax M2
BenchmarkGrok 4.3MiniMax M2Leader
AA Agentic Index15.5Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
Design Arena: agents building web apps1126Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
Design Arena: agents building full-stack apps1006Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
Design Arena: agents building mobile apps1058Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
Design Arena: agents building Android apps962Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
Design Arena: agents building Godot games914Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
Design Arena: agents building games1007Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
Design Arena: HTML slides959Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
Design Arena: PowerPoint slides989Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
Design Arena: spreadsheets927Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
Finance Agent (Vals AI)37.7%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
Tax Agent Bench (Vals AI)6.2%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
Legal Research Bench (Vals AI)15.4%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
Excel Modeling Benchmark (Vals AI)18.4%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
τ²-Bench Telecom97.7%86.8%Grok 4.3
Vending-Bench 2$35$161MiniMax M2
LMArena Search1166Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 24 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index50
Reasoning benchmarks for Grok 4.3 and MiniMax M2
BenchmarkGrok 4.3MiniMax M2Leader
GPQA Diamond91.4%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
MMMU Pro (Vals AI)83.1%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)90.1%77.7%Grok 4.3
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)37.2%13.7%Grok 4.3
GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run)88.8%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
Chess puzzles18.0%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts13961357Grok 4.3
LMArena Text: expert13841338Grok 4.3
LMArena Text: hard prompts in English14021376Grok 4.3
LMArena Vision: diagrams1241Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
LMArena Vision: homework1241Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
Kagi LLM BenchmarkNot measured57.8%Only MiniMax M2 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 10 boards here
MathLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index20
Math benchmarks for Grok 4.3 and MiniMax M2
BenchmarkGrok 4.3MiniMax M2Leader
AA Math IndexNot measured78.3Only MiniMax M2 measured
AIME 2025 (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured78.3%Only MiniMax M2 measured
OTIS Mock AIME93.3%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
FrontierMath, tiers 1 to 342.8%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
FrontierMath, tier 414.6%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
ProofBench11.0%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
LMArena Text: math13871351Grok 4.3
LMArena Text: mathematical work13961368Grok 4.3
Neither model has a result on the other 5 boards here
KnowledgeLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index40
Knowledge benchmarks for Grok 4.3 and MiniMax M2
BenchmarkGrok 4.3MiniMax M2Leader
MMLU Pro85.8%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
LegalBench (Vals AI)84.5%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
CaseLaw (Vals AI)79.3%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
CorpFin (Vals AI)68.5%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
TaxEval (Vals AI)70.8%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
MortgageTax (Vals AI)48.3%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
MedCode (Vals AI)38.1%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
MMLU Pro (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured82.0%Only MiniMax M2 measured
SimpleQA Verified33.2%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
LMArena Text: science13991348Grok 4.3
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare13841367Grok 4.3
LMArena Text: legal and government13861349Grok 4.3
LMArena Text: business and finance13811336Grok 4.3
Neither model has a result on the other 5 boards here
Web designLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index61
Web design benchmarks for Grok 4.3 and MiniMax M2
BenchmarkGrok 4.3MiniMax M2Leader
Design Arena: websites11961143Grok 4.3
Design Arena: UI components11901134Grok 4.3
Design Arena: game dev11731118Grok 4.3
Design Arena: data viz11801140Grok 4.3
Design Arena: 3D11241098Grok 4.3
Design Arena: all code categories11861135Grok 4.3
Design Arena: SVG10801100MiniMax M2
Design Arena: ASCII art1125Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index170
General benchmarks for Grok 4.3 and MiniMax M2
BenchmarkGrok 4.3MiniMax M2Leader
Public Benefits Bench (Vals AI)51.7%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
SAGE (Vals AI)19.7%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
MedScribe (Vals AI)74.4%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
Vals Multimodal Index43.3%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
IFBench83.3%72.3%Grok 4.3
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)75.0%64.3%Grok 4.3
DTBench90.7%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
LMCA38.3%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
LMArena Text13971340Grok 4.3
LMArena Text: instruction following13661329Grok 4.3
LMArena Text: creative writing13801286Grok 4.3
LMArena Vision1229Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
LMArena Text: English14041364Grok 4.3
LMArena Text: non-English13851313Grok 4.3
LMArena Text: Chinese14221366Grok 4.3
LMArena Text: German13951357Grok 4.3
LMArena Text: Japanese1379Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
LMArena Text: Korean1354Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
LMArena Text: French14111336Grok 4.3
LMArena Text: Spanish13991326Grok 4.3
LMArena Text: Russian13991330Grok 4.3
LMArena Text: Polish13981312Grok 4.3
LMArena Text: multi-turn14061361Grok 4.3
LMArena Text: longer queries13931331Grok 4.3
LMArena Text: writing and language13851295Grok 4.3
LMArena Text: entertainment and media13701298Grok 4.3
LMArena Vision: English1235Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
LMArena Vision: Chinese1257Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
LMArena Vision: reading text1235Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
LMArena Vision: humor1222Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
LMArena Vision: recognizing things1217Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
LMArena Vision: creative writing1237Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 14 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for Grok 4.3 and MiniMax M2
BenchmarkGrok 4.3MiniMax M2Leader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

Grok 4.3$0.0025Fits in one request
MiniMax M2$0.0008Fits in one request

MiniMax M2 costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

Grok 4.3$0.070Fits in one request
MiniMax M2$0.016Fits in one request

MiniMax M2 costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

Grok 4.3$0.275Fits in one request
MiniMax M2$0.061Exceeds the context window

MiniMax M2 costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of Grok 4.3 and MiniMax M2
SpecificationSpaceXAI Grok 4.3MiniMax M2
MakerxAIMiniMax
WeightsNo public weights listedOpen weights
ReleasedApril 30, 2026October 23, 2025
Context window1M205K
Input $/Mtok$1.25$0.255
Output $/Mtok$2.50$1.02
Coding index37.4Not benchmarked
Independent measurements behind it31
Cost per solved task$0.31$0.702
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is Grok 4.3 better than MiniMax M2 for coding?

Only Grok 4.3 has a coding score, 37.4 on the Vibe Coding Index; MiniMax M2 has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Pick MiniMax M2 for output tokens 2.5x cheaper ($1.02 vs $2.50 per million) and work measured by Vending-Bench 2 or Design Arena: SVG, where it leads.

Which is cheaper, Grok 4.3 or MiniMax M2?

Grok 4.3 costs $1.25 per million input tokens and $2.50 per million output tokens; MiniMax M2 costs $0.255 and $1.02. Per solved SWE-bench Verified task, Grok 4.3 costs $0.31 and MiniMax M2 $0.702.

Which has the bigger context window, Grok 4.3 or MiniMax M2?

Grok 4.3, with 1M tokens against 205K.

How many benchmarks is the Grok 4.3 vs MiniMax M2 comparison based on?

43 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 22, 2026. Grok 4.3's coding index rests on 3 independent benchmarks and MiniMax M2's on 1. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next