Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

Grok 4.3 vs Mercury 2.5

Grok 4.3 leads Mercury 2.5 on coding, 37.4 to 1.6 on the Vibe Coding Index, and Mercury 2.5 costs 16.7x less per output token ($0.15 vs $2.50 per million). Updated October 22, 2026; 18 benchmarks have a result for both.

Grok 4.3xAI
Coding
37.4
Overall
53.1
Output $/M
$2.50
18
Mercury 2.5Inception
Coding
1.6
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$0.15
0
vs boards won of 18 shared

Grok 4.3 or Mercury 2.5: which to pick

Pick Grok 4.3 for coding: it scores 37.4 on the Vibe Coding Index against 1.6 for Mercury 2.5.

Pick Mercury 2.5 for output tokens 16.7x cheaper ($0.15 vs $2.50 per million).

Shared results
18
Grok 4.3 only
87
Mercury 2.5 only
4
Like-for-like categories
7 of 9

Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
Grok 4.3 37.4 from 3 benchmarks, Mercury 2.5 1.6 from 2 benchmarks.
Widest category
Reasoning, 25.4 points apart on average over 1 shared benchmark.
Widest single gap
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run): Grok 4.3 37.2% against Mercury 2.5 11.8%, 25.4 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
Grok 4.3 $2.50 against Mercury 2.5 $0.15 per million output tokens, 16.7x apart.
Context window
Grok 4.3 takes 1M tokens, Mercury 2.5 260K.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryGrok 4.3BarsMercury 2.5Ties
Coding60
Intelligence10
Agentic work40
Reasoning10
Math10
Knowledge20
General30
All shared boards180
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index60
Coding benchmarks for Grok 4.3 and Mercury 2.5
BenchmarkGrok 4.3Mercury 2.5Leader
LMArena WebDev1358Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
AA Coding Index42.2Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
LiveCodeBench (Vals AI)84.5%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
SWE-bench Verified (Vals AI)71.4%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
Terminal-Bench 4 (Vals AI)Not measured0.0%Only Mercury 2.5 measured
Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI)19.4%3.7%Grok 4.3
Code migration (Vals AI)6.8%4.5%Grok 4.3
ProgramBench (Vals AI)0.0%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
IOI (Vals AI)Not measured2.4%Only Mercury 2.5 measured
Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals AI)42.0%34.5%Grok 4.3
SkillsBench (Vals AI)40.6%18.1%Grok 4.3
CyberBench (Vals AI)Not measured45.5%Only Mercury 2.5 measured
SciCode48.3%38.5%Grok 4.3
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)37.9%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
WeirdML49.9%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
ALE-Bench944.2301.6Grok 4.3
LMArena Text: coding1415Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
LMArena Text: software and IT1416Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
LMArena WebDev: React1353Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
LMArena WebDev: HTML1367Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
LMArena WebDev: from an image1375Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 18 boards here
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index10
Intelligence benchmarks for Grok 4.3 and Mercury 2.5
BenchmarkGrok 4.3Mercury 2.5Leader
AA Intelligence Index24.912.3Grok 4.3
Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here
Agentic workLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index40
Agentic work benchmarks for Grok 4.3 and Mercury 2.5
BenchmarkGrok 4.3Mercury 2.5Leader
AA Agentic Index15.5Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
Design Arena: agents building web apps1126Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
Design Arena: agents building full-stack apps1006Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
Design Arena: agents building mobile apps1058Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
Design Arena: agents building Android apps962Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
Design Arena: agents building Godot games914Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
Design Arena: agents building games1007Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
Design Arena: HTML slides959Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
Design Arena: PowerPoint slides988Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
Design Arena: spreadsheets879Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
Finance Agent (Vals AI)37.7%18.9%Grok 4.3
Tax Agent Bench (Vals AI)6.2%2.5%Grok 4.3
Legal Research Bench (Vals AI)15.4%4.3%Grok 4.3
Excel Modeling Benchmark (Vals AI)18.4%8.8%Grok 4.3
Terminal-Bench-Science (Vals AI)Not measured0.0%Only Mercury 2.5 measured
τ²-Bench Telecom97.7%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
Vending-Bench 2$35Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
LMArena Search1166Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 23 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index10
Reasoning benchmarks for Grok 4.3 and Mercury 2.5
BenchmarkGrok 4.3Mercury 2.5Leader
GPQA Diamond91.4%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
MMMU Pro (Vals AI)83.1%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)90.1%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)37.2%11.8%Grok 4.3
GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run)88.8%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
Chess puzzles18.0%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts1396Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
LMArena Text: expert1384Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts in English1402Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
LMArena Vision: diagrams1241Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
LMArena Vision: homework1241Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 11 boards here
MathLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index10
Math benchmarks for Grok 4.3 and Mercury 2.5
BenchmarkGrok 4.3Mercury 2.5Leader
OTIS Mock AIME93.3%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
FrontierMath, tiers 1 to 342.8%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
FrontierMath, tier 414.6%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
ProofBench11.0%3.0%Grok 4.3
LMArena Text: math1387Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
LMArena Text: mathematical work1396Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 7 boards here
KnowledgeLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index20
Knowledge benchmarks for Grok 4.3 and Mercury 2.5
BenchmarkGrok 4.3Mercury 2.5Leader
MMLU Pro85.8%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
LegalBench (Vals AI)84.5%83.1%Grok 4.3
CaseLaw (Vals AI)79.3%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
CorpFin (Vals AI)68.5%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
TaxEval (Vals AI)70.8%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
MortgageTax (Vals AI)48.3%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
MedCode (Vals AI)38.1%31.3%Grok 4.3
SimpleQA Verified33.2%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
LMArena Text: science1399Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare1384Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
LMArena Text: legal and government1386Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
LMArena Text: business and finance1381Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 6 boards here
Web designDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index8 boards, none shared
Web design benchmarks for Grok 4.3 and Mercury 2.5
BenchmarkGrok 4.3Mercury 2.5Leader
Design Arena: websites1196Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
Design Arena: UI components1190Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
Design Arena: game dev1173Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
Design Arena: data viz1179Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
Design Arena: 3D1124Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
Design Arena: all code categories1186Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
Design Arena: SVG1080Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
Design Arena: ASCII art1125Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index30
General benchmarks for Grok 4.3 and Mercury 2.5
BenchmarkGrok 4.3Mercury 2.5Leader
Public Benefits Bench (Vals AI)51.7%45.3%Grok 4.3
SAGE (Vals AI)19.7%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
MedScribe (Vals AI)74.4%55.1%Grok 4.3
Vals Multimodal Index43.3%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
IFBench83.3%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)75.0%71.7%Grok 4.3
DTBench90.7%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
LMCA38.3%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
LMArena Text1397Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
LMArena Text: instruction following1366Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
LMArena Text: creative writing1380Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
LMArena Vision1229Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
LMArena Text: English1404Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
LMArena Text: non-English1385Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
LMArena Text: Chinese1422Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
LMArena Text: German1395Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
LMArena Text: Japanese1379Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
LMArena Text: Korean1354Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
LMArena Text: French1411Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
LMArena Text: Spanish1399Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
LMArena Text: Russian1399Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
LMArena Text: Polish1398Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
LMArena Text: multi-turn1406Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
LMArena Text: longer queries1393Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
LMArena Text: writing and language1385Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
LMArena Text: entertainment and media1370Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
LMArena Vision: English1235Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
LMArena Vision: Chinese1257Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
LMArena Vision: reading text1235Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
LMArena Vision: humor1222Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
LMArena Vision: recognizing things1217Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
LMArena Vision: creative writing1237Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 14 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for Grok 4.3 and Mercury 2.5
BenchmarkGrok 4.3Mercury 2.5Leader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

Grok 4.3$0.0025Fits in one request
Mercury 2.5$0.0001Fits in one request

Mercury 2.5 costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

Grok 4.3$0.070Fits in one request
Mercury 2.5$0.0024Fits in one request

Mercury 2.5 costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

Grok 4.3$0.275Fits in one request
Mercury 2.5$0.0095Fits in one request

Mercury 2.5 costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of Grok 4.3 and Mercury 2.5
SpecificationSpaceXAI Grok 4.3Inception Mercury 2.5
MakerxAIInception
WeightsNo public weights listedNo public weights listed
ReleasedApril 30, 2026September 8, 2026
Context window1M260K
Input $/Mtok$1.25$0.04
Output $/Mtok$2.50$0.15
Coding index37.41.6
Independent measurements behind it32
Cost per solved task$0.31Not computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is Grok 4.3 better than Mercury 2.5 for coding?

Pick Grok 4.3 for coding: it scores 37.4 on the Vibe Coding Index against 1.6 for Mercury 2.5. Pick Mercury 2.5 for output tokens 16.7x cheaper ($0.15 vs $2.50 per million).

Which is cheaper, Grok 4.3 or Mercury 2.5?

Grok 4.3 costs $1.25 per million input tokens and $2.50 per million output tokens; Mercury 2.5 costs $0.04 and $0.15. Cost per solved task is known for Grok 4.3 only.

Which has the bigger context window, Grok 4.3 or Mercury 2.5?

Grok 4.3, with 1M tokens against 260K.

How many benchmarks is the Grok 4.3 vs Mercury 2.5 comparison based on?

18 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 22, 2026. Grok 4.3's coding index rests on 3 independent benchmarks and Mercury 2.5's on 2. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next

Embed this comparison on your site

Free under CC BY 4.0, while the source link stays visible. Preview the frame · Terms and other embeds

<iframe src="https://llmbenchmark.ai/embed/compare/grok-4-3-vs-inception-mercury-2-5" title="Grok 4.3 vs Mercury 2.5, LLMBenchmark.ai" width="100%" height="360" style="border:0;max-width:100%" loading="lazy"></iframe>
<p style="font:13px/1.4 sans-serif;margin:6px 0 0">Source: <a href="https://llmbenchmark.ai/compare/grok-4-3-vs-inception-mercury-2-5">LLMBenchmark.ai, Grok 4.3 vs Mercury 2.5</a></p>