Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

Grok 4.3 vs Granite 4.2 8B

Grok 4.3 leads Granite 4.2 8B on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, 24.9 to 11.1, and Granite 4.2 8B costs 12.5x less per output token ($0.20 vs $2.50 per million). Updated October 22, 2026; 27 benchmarks have a result for both.

Grok 4.3xAI
Coding
37.4
Overall
53.1
Output $/M
$2.50
26
Granite 4.2 8BIBM Granite
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$0.20
1
vs boards won of 27 shared

Grok 4.3 or Granite 4.2 8B: which to pick

Only Grok 4.3 has a coding score, 37.4 on the Vibe Coding Index; Granite 4.2 8B has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Pick Granite 4.2 8B for output tokens 12.5x cheaper ($0.20 vs $2.50 per million) and work measured by LMArena Text: expert, where it leads.

Shared results
27
Grok 4.3 only
78
Granite 4.2 8B only
0
Like-for-like categories
6 of 9

Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
Grok 4.3 37.4 from 3 benchmarks, Granite 4.2 8B not benchmarked.
Widest category
General, 16.3 points apart on average over 12 shared benchmarks.
Widest single gap
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR): Grok 4.3 75.0% against Granite 4.2 8B 45.0%, 30.0 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
Grok 4.3 $2.50 against Granite 4.2 8B $0.20 per million output tokens, 12.5x apart.
Context window
Grok 4.3 takes 1M tokens, Granite 4.2 8B 131K.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryGrok 4.3BarsGranite 4.2 8BTies
Coding40
Intelligence10
Agentic work10
Reasoning41
Knowledge40
General120
All shared boards261
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index40
Coding benchmarks for Grok 4.3 and Granite 4.2 8B
BenchmarkGrok 4.3Granite 4.2 8BLeader
LMArena WebDev1358Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
AA Coding Index42.222.4Grok 4.3
LiveCodeBench (Vals AI)84.5%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
SWE-bench Verified (Vals AI)71.4%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI)19.4%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
Code migration (Vals AI)6.8%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
ProgramBench (Vals AI)0.0%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals AI)42.0%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
SkillsBench (Vals AI)40.6%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
SciCode48.3%31.5%Grok 4.3
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)37.9%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
WeirdML49.9%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
ALE-Bench944.2Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
LMArena Text: coding14151378Grok 4.3
LMArena Text: software and IT14161367Grok 4.3
LMArena WebDev: React1353Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
LMArena WebDev: HTML1367Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
LMArena WebDev: from an image1375Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 21 boards here
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index10
Intelligence benchmarks for Grok 4.3 and Granite 4.2 8B
BenchmarkGrok 4.3Granite 4.2 8BLeader
AA Intelligence Index24.911.1Grok 4.3
Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here
Agentic workLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index10
Agentic work benchmarks for Grok 4.3 and Granite 4.2 8B
BenchmarkGrok 4.3Granite 4.2 8BLeader
AA Agentic Index15.51.3Grok 4.3
Design Arena: agents building web apps1126Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
Design Arena: agents building full-stack apps1006Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
Design Arena: agents building mobile apps1058Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
Design Arena: agents building Android apps962Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
Design Arena: agents building Godot games914Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
Design Arena: agents building games1007Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
Design Arena: HTML slides959Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
Design Arena: PowerPoint slides989Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
Design Arena: spreadsheets927Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
Finance Agent (Vals AI)37.7%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
Tax Agent Bench (Vals AI)6.2%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
Legal Research Bench (Vals AI)15.4%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
Excel Modeling Benchmark (Vals AI)18.4%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
τ²-Bench Telecom97.7%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
Vending-Bench 2$35Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
LMArena Search1166Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 24 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index41
Reasoning benchmarks for Grok 4.3 and Granite 4.2 8B
BenchmarkGrok 4.3Granite 4.2 8BLeader
GPQA Diamond91.4%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
MMMU Pro (Vals AI)83.1%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)90.1%63.1%Grok 4.3
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)37.2%9.7%Grok 4.3
GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run)88.8%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
Chess puzzles18.0%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts13961327Grok 4.3
LMArena Text: expert13841386Granite 4.2 8B
LMArena Text: hard prompts in English14021345Grok 4.3
LMArena Vision: diagrams1241Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
LMArena Vision: homework1241Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 11 boards here
MathDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index6 boards, none shared
Math benchmarks for Grok 4.3 and Granite 4.2 8B
BenchmarkGrok 4.3Granite 4.2 8BLeader
OTIS Mock AIME93.3%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
FrontierMath, tiers 1 to 342.8%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
FrontierMath, tier 414.6%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
ProofBench11.0%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
LMArena Text: math1387Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
LMArena Text: mathematical work1396Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 7 boards here
KnowledgeLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index40
Knowledge benchmarks for Grok 4.3 and Granite 4.2 8B
BenchmarkGrok 4.3Granite 4.2 8BLeader
MMLU Pro85.8%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
LegalBench (Vals AI)84.5%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
CaseLaw (Vals AI)79.3%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
CorpFin (Vals AI)68.5%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
TaxEval (Vals AI)70.8%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
MortgageTax (Vals AI)48.3%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
MedCode (Vals AI)38.1%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
SimpleQA Verified33.2%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
LMArena Text: science13991336Grok 4.3
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare13841336Grok 4.3
LMArena Text: legal and government13861327Grok 4.3
LMArena Text: business and finance13811322Grok 4.3
Neither model has a result on the other 6 boards here
Web designDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index8 boards, none shared
Web design benchmarks for Grok 4.3 and Granite 4.2 8B
BenchmarkGrok 4.3Granite 4.2 8BLeader
Design Arena: websites1196Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
Design Arena: UI components1190Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
Design Arena: game dev1173Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
Design Arena: data viz1180Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
Design Arena: 3D1124Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
Design Arena: all code categories1186Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
Design Arena: SVG1080Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
Design Arena: ASCII art1125Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index120
General benchmarks for Grok 4.3 and Granite 4.2 8B
BenchmarkGrok 4.3Granite 4.2 8BLeader
Public Benefits Bench (Vals AI)51.7%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
SAGE (Vals AI)19.7%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
MedScribe (Vals AI)74.4%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
Vals Multimodal Index43.3%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
IFBench83.3%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)75.0%45.0%Grok 4.3
DTBench90.7%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
LMCA38.3%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
LMArena Text13971319Grok 4.3
LMArena Text: instruction following13661300Grok 4.3
LMArena Text: creative writing13801236Grok 4.3
LMArena Vision1229Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
LMArena Text: English14041337Grok 4.3
LMArena Text: non-English13851301Grok 4.3
LMArena Text: Chinese14221367Grok 4.3
LMArena Text: German1395Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
LMArena Text: Japanese1379Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
LMArena Text: Korean1354Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
LMArena Text: French1411Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
LMArena Text: Spanish1399Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
LMArena Text: Russian13991282Grok 4.3
LMArena Text: Polish1398Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
LMArena Text: multi-turn14061301Grok 4.3
LMArena Text: longer queries13931325Grok 4.3
LMArena Text: writing and language13851269Grok 4.3
LMArena Text: entertainment and media13701271Grok 4.3
LMArena Vision: English1235Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
LMArena Vision: Chinese1257Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
LMArena Vision: reading text1235Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
LMArena Vision: humor1222Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
LMArena Vision: recognizing things1217Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
LMArena Vision: creative writing1237Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 14 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for Grok 4.3 and Granite 4.2 8B
BenchmarkGrok 4.3Granite 4.2 8BLeader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

Grok 4.3$0.0025Fits in one request
Granite 4.2 8B$0.0002Fits in one request

Granite 4.2 8B costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

Grok 4.3$0.070Fits in one request
Granite 4.2 8B$0.0046Fits in one request

Granite 4.2 8B costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

Grok 4.3$0.275Fits in one request
Granite 4.2 8B$0.018Exceeds the context window

Granite 4.2 8B costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of Grok 4.3 and Granite 4.2 8B
SpecificationSpaceXAI Grok 4.3IBM Granite 4.2 8B
MakerxAIIBM Granite
WeightsNo public weights listedOpen weights
ReleasedApril 30, 2026August 31, 2026
Context window1M131K
Input $/Mtok$1.25$0.08
Output $/Mtok$2.50$0.20
Coding index37.4Not benchmarked
Independent measurements behind it30
Cost per solved task$0.31Not computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is Grok 4.3 better than Granite 4.2 8B for coding?

Only Grok 4.3 has a coding score, 37.4 on the Vibe Coding Index; Granite 4.2 8B has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Pick Granite 4.2 8B for output tokens 12.5x cheaper ($0.20 vs $2.50 per million) and work measured by LMArena Text: expert, where it leads.

Which is cheaper, Grok 4.3 or Granite 4.2 8B?

Grok 4.3 costs $1.25 per million input tokens and $2.50 per million output tokens; Granite 4.2 8B costs $0.08 and $0.20. Cost per solved task is known for Grok 4.3 only.

Which has the bigger context window, Grok 4.3 or Granite 4.2 8B?

Grok 4.3, with 1M tokens against 131K.

How many benchmarks is the Grok 4.3 vs Granite 4.2 8B comparison based on?

27 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 22, 2026. Grok 4.3's coding index rests on 3 independent benchmarks and Granite 4.2 8B's on 0. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next