Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

GPT-5 Nano vs Qwen3.6 27B

Qwen3.6 27B leads GPT-5 Nano on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, 21.4 to 13.0, and GPT-5 Nano costs 6.8x less per output token ($0.40 vs $2.70 per million). Updated October 22, 2026; 18 benchmarks have a result for both.

GPT-5 NanoOpenAI
Coding
No data
Overall
35.6
Output $/M
$0.40
1
Qwen3.6 27BQwen
Coding
36.8
Overall
45.3
Output $/M
$2.70
16
vs boards won of 18 shared, 1 tied

GPT-5 Nano or Qwen3.6 27B: which to pick

Only Qwen3.6 27B has a coding score, 36.8 on the Vibe Coding Index; GPT-5 Nano has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Pick GPT-5 Nano for output tokens 6.8x cheaper ($0.40 vs $2.70 per million) and a lower cost per solved task ($0.109 against $1.30).

Shared results
18
GPT-5 Nano only
70
Qwen3.6 27B only
7
Like-for-like categories
7 of 9

Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
GPT-5 Nano not benchmarked, Qwen3.6 27B 36.8 from 2 benchmarks.
Widest category
Agentic work, 57.6 points apart on average over 1 shared benchmark.
Widest single gap
τ²-Bench Telecom: GPT-5 Nano 36.5% against Qwen3.6 27B 94.2%, 57.6 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
GPT-5 Nano $0.40 against Qwen3.6 27B $2.70 per million output tokens, 6.8x apart.
Context window
GPT-5 Nano takes 400K tokens, Qwen3.6 27B 262K.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryGPT-5 NanoBarsQwen3.6 27BTies
Coding01
Intelligence02
Agentic work01
Reasoning13
Math02
Knowledge03
General041 tie
All shared boards1161 tie
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index01
Coding benchmarks for GPT-5 Nano and Qwen3.6 27B
BenchmarkGPT-5 NanoQwen3.6 27BLeader
SWE-bench Verified34.8%Not measuredOnly GPT-5 Nano measured
AA Coding IndexNot measured53.7Only Qwen3.6 27B measured
LiveCodeBench (Vals AI)70.2%Not measuredOnly GPT-5 Nano measured
SWE-bench Verified (Vals AI)Not measured70.0%Only Qwen3.6 27B measured
Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI)Not measured11.9%Only Qwen3.6 27B measured
LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run)78.9%Not measuredOnly GPT-5 Nano measured
SciCodeNot measured42.8%Only Qwen3.6 27B measured
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)17.4%34.8%Qwen3.6 27B
Terminal-Bench21.8%Not measuredOnly GPT-5 Nano measured
WeirdML38.1%Not measuredOnly GPT-5 Nano measured
LMArena Text: coding1351Not measuredOnly GPT-5 Nano measured
LMArena Text: software and IT1345Not measuredOnly GPT-5 Nano measured
Neither model has a result on the other 31 boards here
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index02
Intelligence benchmarks for GPT-5 Nano and Qwen3.6 27B
BenchmarkGPT-5 NanoQwen3.6 27BLeader
AA Intelligence Index13.021.4Qwen3.6 27B
Epoch Capabilities Index139.2146.2Qwen3.6 27B
Agentic workLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
Agentic work benchmarks for GPT-5 Nano and Qwen3.6 27B
BenchmarkGPT-5 NanoQwen3.6 27BLeader
AA Agentic IndexNot measured18.5Only Qwen3.6 27B measured
τ²-Bench Telecom36.5%94.2%Qwen3.6 27B
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard (BFCL)51.4%Not measuredOnly GPT-5 Nano measured
Neither model has a result on the other 39 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index13
Reasoning benchmarks for GPT-5 Nano and Qwen3.6 27B
BenchmarkGPT-5 NanoQwen3.6 27BLeader
GPQA Diamond63.4%Not measuredOnly GPT-5 Nano measured
MMMU Pro (Vals AI)70.9%Not measuredOnly GPT-5 Nano measured
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)67.6%84.2%Qwen3.6 27B
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)9.5%23.1%Qwen3.6 27B
GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run)69.4%85.9%Qwen3.6 27B
ARC-AGI20.7%Not measuredOnly GPT-5 Nano measured
ARC-AGI-22.6%Not measuredOnly GPT-5 Nano measured
Chess puzzles22.0%Not measuredOnly GPT-5 Nano measured
Mystery game puzzles9.0%7.0%GPT-5 Nano
VPCT37.2%Not measuredOnly GPT-5 Nano measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts1328Not measuredOnly GPT-5 Nano measured
LMArena Text: expert1321Not measuredOnly GPT-5 Nano measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts in English1338Not measuredOnly GPT-5 Nano measured
LMArena Vision: diagrams1141Not measuredOnly GPT-5 Nano measured
LMArena Vision: homework1157Not measuredOnly GPT-5 Nano measured
Kagi LLM Benchmark62.2%Not measuredOnly GPT-5 Nano measured
Neither model has a result on the other 7 boards here
MathLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index02
Math benchmarks for GPT-5 Nano and Qwen3.6 27B
BenchmarkGPT-5 NanoQwen3.6 27BLeader
AIME81.2%Not measuredOnly GPT-5 Nano measured
MATH 500 (Vals AI)93.8%Not measuredOnly GPT-5 Nano measured
MGSM (Vals AI)89.3%Not measuredOnly GPT-5 Nano measured
AA Math Index83.7Not measuredOnly GPT-5 Nano measured
AIME 2025 (Artificial Analysis run)83.7%Not measuredOnly GPT-5 Nano measured
OTIS Mock AIME81.1%91.1%Qwen3.6 27B
FrontierMath, tiers 1 to 320.0%35.1%Qwen3.6 27B
FrontierMath, tier 42.4%Not measuredOnly GPT-5 Nano measured
ProofBench12.0%Not measuredOnly GPT-5 Nano measured
MATH level 595.2%Not measuredOnly GPT-5 Nano measured
LMArena Text: math1317Not measuredOnly GPT-5 Nano measured
LMArena Text: mathematical work1326Not measuredOnly GPT-5 Nano measured
MathArena12.8%Not measuredOnly GPT-5 Nano measured
Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here
KnowledgeLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index03
Knowledge benchmarks for GPT-5 Nano and Qwen3.6 27B
BenchmarkGPT-5 NanoQwen3.6 27BLeader
MMLU Pro76.1%Not measuredOnly GPT-5 Nano measured
LegalBench (Vals AI)50.1%Not measuredOnly GPT-5 Nano measured
CaseLaw (Vals AI)52.6%53.2%Qwen3.6 27B
CorpFin (Vals AI)Not measured62.3%Only Qwen3.6 27B measured
TaxEval (Vals AI)67.4%71.3%Qwen3.6 27B
MortgageTax (Vals AI)53.6%68.3%Qwen3.6 27B
MedQA (Vals AI)93.3%Not measuredOnly GPT-5 Nano measured
MedCode (Vals AI)30.4%Not measuredOnly GPT-5 Nano measured
MMLU Pro (Artificial Analysis run)78.0%Not measuredOnly GPT-5 Nano measured
SimpleQA Verified11.7%Not measuredOnly GPT-5 Nano measured
LMArena Text: science1318Not measuredOnly GPT-5 Nano measured
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare1335Not measuredOnly GPT-5 Nano measured
LMArena Text: legal and government1298Not measuredOnly GPT-5 Nano measured
LMArena Text: business and finance1311Not measuredOnly GPT-5 Nano measured
Neither model has a result on the other 6 boards here
Web designDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index6 boards, none shared
Web design benchmarks for GPT-5 Nano and Qwen3.6 27B
BenchmarkGPT-5 NanoQwen3.6 27BLeader
Design Arena: websites1101Not measuredOnly GPT-5 Nano measured
Design Arena: UI components1064Not measuredOnly GPT-5 Nano measured
Design Arena: game dev1044Not measuredOnly GPT-5 Nano measured
Design Arena: data viz1056Not measuredOnly GPT-5 Nano measured
Design Arena: 3D965Not measuredOnly GPT-5 Nano measured
Design Arena: all code categories1084Not measuredOnly GPT-5 Nano measured
Neither model has a result on the other 3 boards here
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index04
General benchmarks for GPT-5 Nano and Qwen3.6 27B
BenchmarkGPT-5 NanoQwen3.6 27BLeader
SAGE (Vals AI)30.4%45.6%Qwen3.6 27B
MedScribe (Vals AI)72.9%Not measuredOnly GPT-5 Nano measured
IFBench67.6%67.6%Tie
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)45.0%77.3%Qwen3.6 27B
DTBench62.7%78.1%Qwen3.6 27B
LMCA7.9%34.5%Qwen3.6 27B
Fiction.LiveBench44.4%Not measuredOnly GPT-5 Nano measured
LMArena Text1320Not measuredOnly GPT-5 Nano measured
LMArena Text: instruction following1306Not measuredOnly GPT-5 Nano measured
LMArena Text: creative writing1249Not measuredOnly GPT-5 Nano measured
LMArena Vision1159Not measuredOnly GPT-5 Nano measured
LMArena Text: English1321Not measuredOnly GPT-5 Nano measured
LMArena Text: non-English1313Not measuredOnly GPT-5 Nano measured
LMArena Text: Chinese1356Not measuredOnly GPT-5 Nano measured
LMArena Text: German1327Not measuredOnly GPT-5 Nano measured
LMArena Text: Japanese1227Not measuredOnly GPT-5 Nano measured
LMArena Text: Korean1269Not measuredOnly GPT-5 Nano measured
LMArena Text: Spanish1360Not measuredOnly GPT-5 Nano measured
LMArena Text: Russian1296Not measuredOnly GPT-5 Nano measured
LMArena Text: Polish1314Not measuredOnly GPT-5 Nano measured
LMArena Text: multi-turn1311Not measuredOnly GPT-5 Nano measured
LMArena Text: longer queries1312Not measuredOnly GPT-5 Nano measured
LMArena Text: writing and language1283Not measuredOnly GPT-5 Nano measured
LMArena Text: entertainment and media1268Not measuredOnly GPT-5 Nano measured
LMArena Vision: English1170Not measuredOnly GPT-5 Nano measured
LMArena Vision: Chinese1176Not measuredOnly GPT-5 Nano measured
LMArena Vision: reading text1152Not measuredOnly GPT-5 Nano measured
LMArena Vision: humor1110Not measuredOnly GPT-5 Nano measured
EQ-Bench 4Not measured1026Only Qwen3.6 27B measured
Neither model has a result on the other 19 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for GPT-5 Nano and Qwen3.6 27B
BenchmarkGPT-5 NanoQwen3.6 27BLeader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

GPT-5 Nano$0.0003Fits in one request
Qwen3.6 27B$0.0018Fits in one request

GPT-5 Nano costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

GPT-5 Nano$0.0037Fits in one request
Qwen3.6 27B$0.031Fits in one request

GPT-5 Nano costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

GPT-5 Nano$0.014Fits in one request
Qwen3.6 27B$0.117Fits in one request

GPT-5 Nano costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of GPT-5 Nano and Qwen3.6 27B
SpecificationOpenAI GPT-5 NanoQwen3.6 27B
MakerOpenAIQwen
WeightsNo public weights listedOpen weights
ReleasedAugust 7, 2025April 27, 2026
Context window400K262K
Input $/Mtok$0.05$0.45
Output $/Mtok$0.40$2.70
Coding indexNot benchmarked36.8
Independent measurements behind it02
Cost per solved task$0.109$1.30
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is GPT-5 Nano better than Qwen3.6 27B for coding?

Only Qwen3.6 27B has a coding score, 36.8 on the Vibe Coding Index; GPT-5 Nano has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Pick GPT-5 Nano for output tokens 6.8x cheaper ($0.40 vs $2.70 per million) and a lower cost per solved task ($0.109 against $1.30).

Which is cheaper, GPT-5 Nano or Qwen3.6 27B?

GPT-5 Nano costs $0.05 per million input tokens and $0.40 per million output tokens; Qwen3.6 27B costs $0.45 and $2.70. Per solved SWE-bench Verified task, GPT-5 Nano costs $0.109 and Qwen3.6 27B $1.30.

Which has the bigger context window, GPT-5 Nano or Qwen3.6 27B?

GPT-5 Nano, with 400K tokens against 262K.

How many benchmarks is the GPT-5 Nano vs Qwen3.6 27B comparison based on?

18 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 22, 2026. GPT-5 Nano's coding index rests on 0 independent benchmarks and Qwen3.6 27B's on 2. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next