Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

GPT-5 Mini vs Beam 1.0 501B A23B

Updated October 21, 2026. 25 benchmarks have a result for both. Coding is ranked on the Vibe Coding Index; every other board is shown as published.

GPT-5 MiniOpenAI
Coding
59.8
Overall
20.6
Output $/M
$2.00
1
R Beam 1.0 501B A23BReflection
Coding
33.8
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$1.00
24
vs boards won of 25 shared

Decision reading

Pick GPT-5 Mini for coding: it scores 59.8 on the Vibe Coding Index against 33.8 for Beam 1.0 501B A23B.

Pick Beam 1.0 501B A23B when output tokens cost 2.0x less, or when the context window is larger, 1.05M against 400K tokens.

Shared results
25
GPT-5 Mini only
73
Beam 1.0 501B A23B only
3
Like-for-like categories
6 of 9

Shared results can support a head-to-head reading. Results only one model has describe coverage, not superiority.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
GPT-5 Mini 59.8 from 1 benchmark, Beam 1.0 501B A23B 33.8 from 1 benchmark.
Widest category
Math, 14.7 points apart on average over 2 shared benchmarks.
Widest single gap
Design Arena: websites: GPT-5 Mini 1125 against Beam 1.0 501B A23B 1253, 16.0 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
GPT-5 Mini $2.00 against Beam 1.0 501B A23B $1.00 per million output tokens, 2.0x apart.
Context window
GPT-5 Mini takes 400K tokens, Beam 1.0 501B A23B 1.05M.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryGPT-5 MiniBarsBeam 1.0 501B A23BTies
Coding02
Reasoning03
Math02
Knowledge13
Web design02
General012
All shared boards124
CodingLike-for-likeFour of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index02
Coding benchmarks for GPT-5 Mini and Beam 1.0 501B A23B
BenchmarkGPT-5 MiniBeam 1.0 501B A23BLeader
SWE-bench Verified59.8%Not measuredOnly GPT-5 Mini measured
SWE-bench Multilingual39.7%Not measuredOnly GPT-5 Mini measured
LMArena WebDevNot measured1437Only Beam 1.0 501B A23B measured
LiveCodeBench (Vals AI)86.6%Not measuredOnly GPT-5 Mini measured
SWE-bench Verified (Vals AI)60.8%Not measuredOnly GPT-5 Mini measured
Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI)14.2%Not measuredOnly GPT-5 Mini measured
LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run)83.8%Not measuredOnly GPT-5 Mini measured
SciCode39.0%Not measuredOnly GPT-5 Mini measured
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)33.3%Not measuredOnly GPT-5 Mini measured
Terminal-Bench34.8%Not measuredOnly GPT-5 Mini measured
WeirdML52.7%Not measuredOnly GPT-5 Mini measured
LMArena Text: coding14061473Beam 1.0 501B A23B
LMArena Text: software and IT13941461Beam 1.0 501B A23B
LMArena WebDev: ReactNot measured1443Only Beam 1.0 501B A23B measured
LMArena WebDev: HTMLNot measured1436Only Beam 1.0 501B A23B measured
Neither model has a result on the other 23 boards here
IntelligenceDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index2 boards, none shared
Intelligence benchmarks for GPT-5 Mini and Beam 1.0 501B A23B
BenchmarkGPT-5 MiniBeam 1.0 501B A23BLeader
AA Intelligence Index20.6Not measuredOnly GPT-5 Mini measured
Epoch Capabilities Index145.3Not measuredOnly GPT-5 Mini measured
Agentic workDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index2 boards, none shared
Agentic work benchmarks for GPT-5 Mini and Beam 1.0 501B A23B
BenchmarkGPT-5 MiniBeam 1.0 501B A23BLeader
τ²-Bench Telecom71.1%Not measuredOnly GPT-5 Mini measured
Vending-Bench 2-$31Not measuredOnly GPT-5 Mini measured
Neither model has a result on the other 37 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index03
Reasoning benchmarks for GPT-5 Mini and Beam 1.0 501B A23B
BenchmarkGPT-5 MiniBeam 1.0 501B A23BLeader
GPQA Diamond80.3%Not measuredOnly GPT-5 Mini measured
MMMU Pro (Vals AI)78.9%Not measuredOnly GPT-5 Mini measured
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)82.8%Not measuredOnly GPT-5 Mini measured
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)21.5%Not measuredOnly GPT-5 Mini measured
GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run)75.0%Not measuredOnly GPT-5 Mini measured
ARC-AGI54.3%Not measuredOnly GPT-5 Mini measured
ARC-AGI-24.4%Not measuredOnly GPT-5 Mini measured
Chess puzzles24.0%Not measuredOnly GPT-5 Mini measured
Mystery game puzzles10.0%Not measuredOnly GPT-5 Mini measured
VPCT40.2%Not measuredOnly GPT-5 Mini measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts13801442Beam 1.0 501B A23B
LMArena Text: expert13791447Beam 1.0 501B A23B
LMArena Text: hard prompts in English13831451Beam 1.0 501B A23B
LMArena Vision: diagrams1202Not measuredOnly GPT-5 Mini measured
LMArena Vision: homework1210Not measuredOnly GPT-5 Mini measured
Neither model has a result on the other 6 boards here
MathLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index02
Math benchmarks for GPT-5 Mini and Beam 1.0 501B A23B
BenchmarkGPT-5 MiniBeam 1.0 501B A23BLeader
AIME91.5%Not measuredOnly GPT-5 Mini measured
MATH 500 (Vals AI)94.8%Not measuredOnly GPT-5 Mini measured
MGSM (Vals AI)92.6%Not measuredOnly GPT-5 Mini measured
AA Math Index90.7Not measuredOnly GPT-5 Mini measured
AIME 2025 (Artificial Analysis run)90.7%Not measuredOnly GPT-5 Mini measured
OTIS Mock AIME86.7%Not measuredOnly GPT-5 Mini measured
FrontierMath, tiers 1 to 346.7%Not measuredOnly GPT-5 Mini measured
FrontierMath, tier 412.2%Not measuredOnly GPT-5 Mini measured
ProofBench9.0%Not measuredOnly GPT-5 Mini measured
MATH level 597.8%Not measuredOnly GPT-5 Mini measured
LMArena Text: math13781459Beam 1.0 501B A23B
LMArena Text: mathematical work13801475Beam 1.0 501B A23B
Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here
KnowledgeLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index13
Knowledge benchmarks for GPT-5 Mini and Beam 1.0 501B A23B
BenchmarkGPT-5 MiniBeam 1.0 501B A23BLeader
MMLU Pro82.2%Not measuredOnly GPT-5 Mini measured
LegalBench (Vals AI)81.8%Not measuredOnly GPT-5 Mini measured
CaseLaw (Vals AI)68.5%Not measuredOnly GPT-5 Mini measured
CorpFin (Vals AI)60.2%Not measuredOnly GPT-5 Mini measured
TaxEval (Vals AI)75.2%Not measuredOnly GPT-5 Mini measured
MortgageTax (Vals AI)66.9%Not measuredOnly GPT-5 Mini measured
MedQA (Vals AI)96.1%Not measuredOnly GPT-5 Mini measured
MedCode (Vals AI)43.0%Not measuredOnly GPT-5 Mini measured
MMLU Pro (Artificial Analysis run)83.7%Not measuredOnly GPT-5 Mini measured
SimpleQA Verified21.6%Not measuredOnly GPT-5 Mini measured
LMArena Text: science13711430Beam 1.0 501B A23B
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare13801376GPT-5 Mini
LMArena Text: legal and government13751433Beam 1.0 501B A23B
LMArena Text: business and finance13581430Beam 1.0 501B A23B
Neither model has a result on the other 3 boards here
Web designLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index02
Web design benchmarks for GPT-5 Mini and Beam 1.0 501B A23B
BenchmarkGPT-5 MiniBeam 1.0 501B A23BLeader
Design Arena: websites11251253Beam 1.0 501B A23B
Design Arena: UI components1106Not measuredOnly GPT-5 Mini measured
Design Arena: game dev11301222Beam 1.0 501B A23B
Design Arena: data viz1131Not measuredOnly GPT-5 Mini measured
Design Arena: 3D1037Not measuredOnly GPT-5 Mini measured
Design Arena: all code categories1115Not measuredOnly GPT-5 Mini measured
Design Arena: SVG1091Not measuredOnly GPT-5 Mini measured
Design Arena: ASCII art1124Not measuredOnly GPT-5 Mini measured
Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index012
General benchmarks for GPT-5 Mini and Beam 1.0 501B A23B
BenchmarkGPT-5 MiniBeam 1.0 501B A23BLeader
SAGE (Vals AI)43.0%Not measuredOnly GPT-5 Mini measured
MedScribe (Vals AI)80.6%Not measuredOnly GPT-5 Mini measured
IFBench75.4%Not measuredOnly GPT-5 Mini measured
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)72.3%Not measuredOnly GPT-5 Mini measured
DTBench80.5%Not measuredOnly GPT-5 Mini measured
LMCA34.2%Not measuredOnly GPT-5 Mini measured
Fiction.LiveBench69.4%Not measuredOnly GPT-5 Mini measured
Creative writing (Lech Mazur)83.1%Not measuredOnly GPT-5 Mini measured
LMArena Text13731425Beam 1.0 501B A23B
LMArena Text: instruction following13571430Beam 1.0 501B A23B
LMArena Text: creative writing13251390Beam 1.0 501B A23B
LMArena Vision1202Not measuredOnly GPT-5 Mini measured
LMArena Text: English13791436Beam 1.0 501B A23B
LMArena Text: non-English13631413Beam 1.0 501B A23B
LMArena Text: Chinese13861424Beam 1.0 501B A23B
LMArena Text: German1366Not measuredOnly GPT-5 Mini measured
LMArena Text: Japanese1341Not measuredOnly GPT-5 Mini measured
LMArena Text: Korean1308Not measuredOnly GPT-5 Mini measured
LMArena Text: French13861461Beam 1.0 501B A23B
LMArena Text: Spanish1354Not measuredOnly GPT-5 Mini measured
LMArena Text: Russian13621412Beam 1.0 501B A23B
LMArena Text: Polish1378Not measuredOnly GPT-5 Mini measured
LMArena Text: multi-turn13631414Beam 1.0 501B A23B
LMArena Text: longer queries13551429Beam 1.0 501B A23B
LMArena Text: writing and language13441400Beam 1.0 501B A23B
LMArena Text: entertainment and media13401399Beam 1.0 501B A23B
LMArena Vision: English1216Not measuredOnly GPT-5 Mini measured
LMArena Vision: Chinese1214Not measuredOnly GPT-5 Mini measured
LMArena Vision: reading text1199Not measuredOnly GPT-5 Mini measured
LMArena Vision: humor1205Not measuredOnly GPT-5 Mini measured
LMArena Vision: captioning1217Not measuredOnly GPT-5 Mini measured
LMArena Vision: recognizing things1226Not measuredOnly GPT-5 Mini measured
LMArena Vision: creative writing1181Not measuredOnly GPT-5 Mini measured
Neither model has a result on the other 13 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for GPT-5 Mini and Beam 1.0 501B A23B
BenchmarkGPT-5 MiniBeam 1.0 501B A23BLeader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

GPT-5 Mini$0.0013Fits in one request
Beam 1.0 501B A23B$0.0008Fits in one request

Beam 1.0 501B A23B costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

GPT-5 Mini$0.018Fits in one request
Beam 1.0 501B A23B$0.018Fits in one request

Beam 1.0 501B A23B costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

GPT-5 Mini$0.070Fits in one request
Beam 1.0 501B A23B$0.070Fits in one request

Same cost

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of GPT-5 Mini and Beam 1.0 501B A23B
SpecificationOpenAI GPT-5 MiniReflection Beam 1.0 501B A23B
MakerOpenAIReflection
WeightsNo public weights listedOpen weights
ReleasedAugust 7, 2025October 16, 2026
Context window400K1.05M
Input $/Mtok$0.25$0.30
Output $/Mtok$2.00$1.00
Coding index59.833.8
Independent measurements behind it11
Cost per solved task$0.08Not computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is GPT-5 Mini better than Beam 1.0 501B A23B for coding?

Pick GPT-5 Mini for coding: it scores 59.8 on the Vibe Coding Index against 33.8 for Beam 1.0 501B A23B. Pick Beam 1.0 501B A23B when output tokens cost 2.0x less, or when the context window is larger, 1.05M against 400K tokens.

Which is cheaper, GPT-5 Mini or Beam 1.0 501B A23B?

GPT-5 Mini costs $0.25 per million input tokens and $2.00 per million output tokens; Beam 1.0 501B A23B costs $0.30 and $1.00. Cost per solved task is known for GPT-5 Mini only.

Which has the bigger context window, GPT-5 Mini or Beam 1.0 501B A23B?

Beam 1.0 501B A23B, with 1.05M tokens against 400K.

How many benchmarks is the GPT-5 Mini vs Beam 1.0 501B A23B comparison based on?

25 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 21, 2026. GPT-5 Mini's coding index rests on 1 independent benchmark and Beam 1.0 501B A23B's on 1. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next