Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

GPT-5.4 vs Hy-MT2-30B-A3B

Hy-MT2-30B-A3B costs 50.8x less per output token than GPT-5.4 ($0.295 vs $15.00 per million). Updated October 22, 2026; no benchmark has tested both models yet.

GPT-5.4OpenAI
Coding
64.4
Overall
69.6
Output $/M
$15.00
Hy-MT2-30B-A3BTencent
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$0.295
vs $15.00 vs $0.295 per 1M output tokens. Hy-MT2-30B-A3B is 50.8x cheaper.

GPT-5.4 or Hy-MT2-30B-A3B: which to pick

Only GPT-5.4 has a coding score, 64.4 on the Vibe Coding Index; Hy-MT2-30B-A3B has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Pick Hy-MT2-30B-A3B for output tokens 50.8x cheaper ($0.295 vs $15.00 per million).

No benchmark has tested both yet. GPT-5.4 has results on LMArena WebDev, AA Coding Index and LiveCodeBench (Vals AI); Hy-MT2-30B-A3B has none yet. Compare them on price and context instead.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
GPT-5.4 64.4 from 3 benchmarks, Hy-MT2-30B-A3B not benchmarked.
Widest category
None yet: no category has been tested on both models.
Widest single gap
None yet: no benchmark has tested both models.
Output price
GPT-5.4 $15.00 against Hy-MT2-30B-A3B $0.295 per million output tokens, 50.8x apart.
Context window
GPT-5.4 takes 1.05M tokens, Hy-MT2-30B-A3B 8K.

Benchmark by benchmark

Every board either model has a result on, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale. Only one model is measured on each, so no row names a leader.

CodingDirectional onlySix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index22 boards measured
Coding benchmarks for GPT-5.4 and Hy-MT2-30B-A3B
BenchmarkGPT-5.4Hy-MT2-30B-A3BLeader
LMArena WebDev1464Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 measured
AA Coding Index71.1Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 measured
LiveCodeBench (Vals AI)84.1%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 measured
SWE-bench Verified (Vals AI)78.2%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 measured
Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI)67.4%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 measured
Code migration (Vals AI)35.0%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 measured
ProgramBench (Vals AI)0.5%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 measured
SkillsBench (Vals AI)51.7%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 measured
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)57.6%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 measured
Terminal-Bench81.8%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 measured
GSO-Bench31.4%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 measured
WeirdML77.7%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 measured
MirrorCode15.6%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 measured
ALE-Bench1607.0Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 measured
LMArena Text: coding1496Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 measured
LMArena Text: software and IT1491Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 measured
LMArena WebDev: React1454Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 measured
LMArena WebDev: HTML1478Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 measured
LMArena WebDev: from an image1436Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 measured
SWE Atlas: Codebase QnA40.8%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 measured
SWE Atlas: Refactoring44.3%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 measured
SWE Atlas: Test Writing44.4%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 21 boards here
IntelligenceDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index2 boards measured
Intelligence benchmarks for GPT-5.4 and Hy-MT2-30B-A3B
BenchmarkGPT-5.4Hy-MT2-30B-A3BLeader
AA Intelligence Index39.0Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 measured
Epoch Capabilities Index157.3Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 measured
Agentic workDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index12 boards measured
Agentic work benchmarks for GPT-5.4 and Hy-MT2-30B-A3B
BenchmarkGPT-5.4Hy-MT2-30B-A3BLeader
Design Arena: agents building web apps1059Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 measured
Design Arena: agents building full-stack apps1017Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 measured
Design Arena: agents building mobile apps1086Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 measured
Design Arena: agents building Android apps1031Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 measured
Design Arena: agents building Godot games1135Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 measured
τ²-Bench Telecom87.1%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 measured
APEX-Agents52.4%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 measured
METR time horizons74.3%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 measured
DeepResearch Bench35.1%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 measured
PostTrainBench19.0%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 measured
Vending-Bench 2$6,144Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 measured
MCP Atlas70.6%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 30 boards here
ReasoningDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index16 boards measured
Reasoning benchmarks for GPT-5.4 and Hy-MT2-30B-A3B
BenchmarkGPT-5.4Hy-MT2-30B-A3BLeader
GPQA Diamond91.7%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 measured
MMMU Pro (Vals AI)87.5%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 measured
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)92.0%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 measured
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)43.7%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 measured
GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run)93.3%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 measured
ARC-AGI93.7%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 measured
ARC-AGI-274.0%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 measured
Chess puzzles48.0%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 measured
Mystery game puzzles37.0%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 measured
EBR-bench25.4%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts1485Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 measured
LMArena Text: expert1507Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts in English1479Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 measured
LMArena Vision: diagrams1327Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 measured
LMArena Vision: homework1336Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 measured
Kagi LLM Benchmark63.8%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 7 boards here
MathDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index8 boards measured
Math benchmarks for GPT-5.4 and Hy-MT2-30B-A3B
BenchmarkGPT-5.4Hy-MT2-30B-A3BLeader
AIME96.7%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 measured
OTIS Mock AIME97.8%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 measured
FrontierMath, tiers 1 to 378.6%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 measured
FrontierMath, tier 449.0%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 measured
ProofBench56.0%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 measured
LMArena Text: math1488Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 measured
LMArena Text: mathematical work1497Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 measured
MathArena37.2%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 6 boards here
KnowledgeDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index15 boards measured
Knowledge benchmarks for GPT-5.4 and Hy-MT2-30B-A3B
BenchmarkGPT-5.4Hy-MT2-30B-A3BLeader
MMLU Pro87.5%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 measured
LegalBench (Vals AI)86.0%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 measured
CaseLaw (Vals AI)63.8%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 measured
CorpFin (Vals AI)65.3%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 measured
TaxEval (Vals AI)74.0%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 measured
MortgageTax (Vals AI)68.3%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 measured
MedQA (Vals AI)96.1%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 measured
MedCode (Vals AI)41.3%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 measured
SimpleQA Verified45.1%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 measured
LMArena Text: science1479Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 measured
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare1458Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 measured
LMArena Text: legal and government1486Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 measured
LMArena Text: business and finance1474Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 measured
PRBench Finance45.6%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 measured
PRBench Legal44.4%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 5 boards here
Web designDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index8 boards measured
Web design benchmarks for GPT-5.4 and Hy-MT2-30B-A3B
BenchmarkGPT-5.4Hy-MT2-30B-A3BLeader
Design Arena: websites1198Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 measured
Design Arena: UI components1213Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 measured
Design Arena: game dev1194Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 measured
Design Arena: data viz1196Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 measured
Design Arena: 3D1065Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 measured
Design Arena: all code categories1179Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 measured
Design Arena: SVG1141Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 measured
Design Arena: ASCII art1188Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here
GeneralDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index35 boards measured
General benchmarks for GPT-5.4 and Hy-MT2-30B-A3B
BenchmarkGPT-5.4Hy-MT2-30B-A3BLeader
SAGE (Vals AI)43.3%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 measured
MedScribe (Vals AI)77.5%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 measured
IFBench73.9%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 measured
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)82.0%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 measured
DTBench94.4%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 measured
LMCA52.0%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 measured
CL-bench27.9%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 measured
Furniture assembly37.5%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 measured
CL-bench Life21.7%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 measured
LMArena Text1469Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 measured
LMArena Text: instruction following1469Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 measured
LMArena Text: creative writing1439Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 measured
LMArena Vision1303Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 measured
LMArena Text: English1467Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 measured
LMArena Text: non-English1465Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 measured
LMArena Text: Chinese1520Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 measured
LMArena Text: German1472Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 measured
LMArena Text: Japanese1485Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 measured
LMArena Text: Korean1449Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 measured
LMArena Text: French1493Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 measured
LMArena Text: Spanish1452Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 measured
LMArena Text: Russian1480Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 measured
LMArena Text: Polish1472Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 measured
LMArena Text: multi-turn1482Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 measured
LMArena Text: longer queries1473Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 measured
LMArena Text: writing and language1458Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 measured
LMArena Text: entertainment and media1438Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 measured
LMArena Vision: English1301Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 measured
LMArena Vision: Chinese1354Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 measured
LMArena Vision: reading text1312Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 measured
LMArena Vision: humor1284Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 measured
LMArena Vision: recognizing things1251Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 measured
LMArena Vision: creative writing1283Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 measured
LMArena Document1471Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 measured
EQ-Bench 41272Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 13 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

GPT-5.4$0.010Fits in one request
Hy-MT2-30B-A3B$0.0002Fits in one request

Hy-MT2-30B-A3B costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

GPT-5.4$0.170Fits in one request
Hy-MT2-30B-A3B$0.0046Exceeds the context window

Hy-MT2-30B-A3B costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

GPT-5.4$0.650Fits in one request
Hy-MT2-30B-A3B$0.018Exceeds the context window

Hy-MT2-30B-A3B costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of GPT-5.4 and Hy-MT2-30B-A3B
SpecificationOpenAI GPT-5.4Tencent Hy-MT2-30B-A3B
MakerOpenAITencent
WeightsNo public weights listedOpen weights
ReleasedMarch 5, 2026August 20, 2026
Context window1.05M8K
Input $/Mtok$2.50$0.074
Output $/Mtok$15.00$0.295
Coding index64.4Not benchmarked
Independent measurements behind it30
Cost per solved task$1.02Not computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is GPT-5.4 better than Hy-MT2-30B-A3B for coding?

Only GPT-5.4 has a coding score, 64.4 on the Vibe Coding Index; Hy-MT2-30B-A3B has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Pick Hy-MT2-30B-A3B for output tokens 50.8x cheaper ($0.295 vs $15.00 per million).

Which is cheaper, GPT-5.4 or Hy-MT2-30B-A3B?

GPT-5.4 costs $2.50 per million input tokens and $15.00 per million output tokens; Hy-MT2-30B-A3B costs $0.074 and $0.295. Cost per solved task is known for GPT-5.4 only.

Which has the bigger context window, GPT-5.4 or Hy-MT2-30B-A3B?

GPT-5.4, with 1.05M tokens against 8K.

Has any benchmark tested both GPT-5.4 and Hy-MT2-30B-A3B?

No benchmark has tested both yet. GPT-5.4 has results on LMArena WebDev, AA Coding Index and LiveCodeBench (Vals AI); Hy-MT2-30B-A3B has none yet. Compare them on price and context instead. Data as of October 22, 2026.

Compare next