LLMBenchmark.ai

Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

GPT-5.4 vs Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B

Updated October 21, 2026. 47 benchmarks have a result for both. Coding is ranked on the Vibe Coding Index; every other board is shown as published.

GPT-5.4OpenAI
Coding
37.7
Overall
39.0
Output $/M
$15.00
47
Qwen3 Coder 480B A35BQwen
Coding
50.0
Overall
11.9
Output $/M
$1.00
0
vs boards won of 47 shared

Decision reading

Pick Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B for coding: it scores 50.0 on the Vibe Coding Index against 37.7 for GPT-5.4.

Pick GPT-5.4 when the context window is larger, 1.05M against 262K tokens, or when what matters is LMArena WebDev or Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run), where it leads.

Shared results
47
GPT-5.4 only
62
Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B only
5
Like-for-like categories
8 of 9

Shared results can support a head-to-head reading. Results only one model has describe coverage, not superiority.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
GPT-5.4 37.7 from 1 benchmark, Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B 50.0 from 2 benchmarks.
Widest category
Agentic work, 43.6 points apart on average over 1 shared benchmark.
Widest single gap
Terminal-Bench: GPT-5.4 81.8% against Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B 27.2%, 54.6 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
GPT-5.4 $15.00 against Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B $1.00 per million output tokens, 15.0x apart.
Context window
GPT-5.4 takes 1.05M tokens, Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B 262K.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryGPT-5.4BarsQwen3 Coder 480B A35BTies
Coding100
Intelligence10
Agentic work10
Reasoning50
Math20
Knowledge40
Web design50
General190
All shared boards470
CodingLike-for-likeFour of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index100
Coding benchmarks for GPT-5.4 and Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B
BenchmarkGPT-5.4Qwen3 Coder 480B A35BLeader
SWE-bench VerifiedNot measured69.6%Only Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B measured
LMArena WebDev14641275GPT-5.4
AA Coding Index71.1Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 measured
LiveCodeBench (Vals AI)84.1%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 measured
SWE-bench Verified (Vals AI)78.2%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 measured
Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI)67.4%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 measured
Code migration (Vals AI)35.0%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 measured
ProgramBench (Vals AI)0.5%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 measured
SkillsBench (Vals AI)51.7%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 measured
LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured58.5%Only Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B measured
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)57.6%18.9%GPT-5.4
Terminal-Bench81.8%27.2%GPT-5.4
GSO-Bench31.4%4.9%GPT-5.4
WeirdML77.7%41.2%GPT-5.4
MirrorCode15.6%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 measured
ALE-Bench1607.0461.4GPT-5.4
LMArena Text: coding14961412GPT-5.4
LMArena Text: software and IT14911393GPT-5.4
LMArena WebDev: React14541257GPT-5.4
LMArena WebDev: HTML14781287GPT-5.4
LMArena WebDev: from an image1436Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 17 boards here
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index10
Intelligence benchmarks for GPT-5.4 and Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B
BenchmarkGPT-5.4Qwen3 Coder 480B A35BLeader
AA Intelligence Index39.011.9GPT-5.4
Epoch Capabilities Index157.3Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 measured
Agentic workLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index10
Agentic work benchmarks for GPT-5.4 and Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B
BenchmarkGPT-5.4Qwen3 Coder 480B A35BLeader
Design Arena: agents building web apps1059Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 measured
Design Arena: agents building full-stack apps1017Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 measured
Design Arena: agents building mobile apps1087Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 measured
Design Arena: agents building Android apps1037Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 measured
Design Arena: agents building Godot games1135Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 measured
τ²-Bench Telecom87.1%43.6%GPT-5.4
APEX-Agents52.4%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 measured
METR time horizons74.3%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 measured
DeepResearch Bench35.1%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 measured
PostTrainBench19.0%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 measured
Vending-Bench 2$6,144Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 28 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index50
Reasoning benchmarks for GPT-5.4 and Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B
BenchmarkGPT-5.4Qwen3 Coder 480B A35BLeader
GPQA Diamond91.7%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 measured
MMMU Pro (Vals AI)87.5%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 measured
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)92.0%61.8%GPT-5.4
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)43.7%4.5%GPT-5.4
GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run)93.3%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 measured
ARC-AGI93.7%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 measured
ARC-AGI-274.0%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 measured
Chess puzzles48.0%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 measured
Mystery game puzzles37.0%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 measured
EBR-bench25.4%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts14851372GPT-5.4
LMArena Text: expert15071338GPT-5.4
LMArena Text: hard prompts in English14791380GPT-5.4
LMArena Vision: diagrams1327Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 measured
LMArena Vision: homework1336Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 6 boards here
MathLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index20
Math benchmarks for GPT-5.4 and Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B
BenchmarkGPT-5.4Qwen3 Coder 480B A35BLeader
AIME96.7%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 measured
AA Math IndexNot measured39.3Only Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B measured
AIME 2025 (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured39.3%Only Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B measured
OTIS Mock AIME97.8%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 measured
FrontierMath, tiers 1 to 378.6%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 measured
FrontierMath, tier 449.0%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 measured
ProofBench56.0%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 measured
LMArena Text: math14881365GPT-5.4
LMArena Text: mathematical work14971367GPT-5.4
Neither model has a result on the other 4 boards here
KnowledgeLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index40
Knowledge benchmarks for GPT-5.4 and Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B
BenchmarkGPT-5.4Qwen3 Coder 480B A35BLeader
MMLU Pro87.5%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 measured
LegalBench (Vals AI)86.0%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 measured
CaseLaw (Vals AI)63.8%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 measured
CorpFin (Vals AI)65.3%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 measured
TaxEval (Vals AI)74.0%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 measured
MortgageTax (Vals AI)68.3%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 measured
MedQA (Vals AI)96.1%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 measured
MedCode (Vals AI)41.3%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 measured
MMLU Pro (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured78.8%Only Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B measured
SimpleQA Verified45.1%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 measured
LMArena Text: science14791347GPT-5.4
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare14581347GPT-5.4
LMArena Text: legal and government14861358GPT-5.4
LMArena Text: business and finance14741343GPT-5.4
Neither model has a result on the other 3 boards here
Web designLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index50
Web design benchmarks for GPT-5.4 and Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B
BenchmarkGPT-5.4Qwen3 Coder 480B A35BLeader
Design Arena: websites11991159GPT-5.4
Design Arena: UI components12151112GPT-5.4
Design Arena: game dev11951099GPT-5.4
Design Arena: data viz11961084GPT-5.4
Design Arena: 3D1065Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 measured
Design Arena: all code categories11801143GPT-5.4
Design Arena: SVG1141Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 measured
Design Arena: ASCII art1188Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index190
General benchmarks for GPT-5.4 and Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B
BenchmarkGPT-5.4Qwen3 Coder 480B A35BLeader
SAGE (Vals AI)43.3%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 measured
MedScribe (Vals AI)77.5%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 measured
IFBench73.9%40.5%GPT-5.4
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)82.0%45.7%GPT-5.4
DTBench94.4%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 measured
LMCA52.0%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 measured
CL-bench27.9%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 measured
Furniture assembly37.5%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 measured
CL-bench Life21.7%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 measured
LMArena Text14691357GPT-5.4
LMArena Text: instruction following14691355GPT-5.4
LMArena Text: creative writing14391333GPT-5.4
LMArena Vision1303Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 measured
LMArena Text: English14671359GPT-5.4
LMArena Text: non-English14651346GPT-5.4
LMArena Text: Chinese15201357GPT-5.4
LMArena Text: German14721325GPT-5.4
LMArena Text: Japanese14851311GPT-5.4
LMArena Text: Korean14491305GPT-5.4
LMArena Text: French14931398GPT-5.4
LMArena Text: Spanish14521360GPT-5.4
LMArena Text: Russian14801366GPT-5.4
LMArena Text: Polish14721344GPT-5.4
LMArena Text: multi-turn14821366GPT-5.4
LMArena Text: longer queries14731378GPT-5.4
LMArena Text: writing and language14581340GPT-5.4
LMArena Text: entertainment and media14381317GPT-5.4
LMArena Vision: English1301Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 measured
LMArena Vision: Chinese1354Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 measured
LMArena Vision: reading text1312Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 measured
LMArena Vision: humor1284Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 measured
LMArena Vision: recognizing things1251Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 measured
LMArena Vision: creative writing1283Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 measured
LMArena Document1471Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 12 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for GPT-5.4 and Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B
BenchmarkGPT-5.4Qwen3 Coder 480B A35BLeader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

GPT-5.4$0.010Fits in one request
Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B$0.0008Fits in one request

Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

GPT-5.4$0.170Fits in one request
Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B$0.018Fits in one request

Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

GPT-5.4$0.650Fits in one request
Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B$0.070Fits in one request

Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of GPT-5.4 and Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B
SpecificationOpenAI GPT-5.4Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B
MakerOpenAIQwen
WeightsNo public weights listedOpen weights
ReleasedMarch 5, 2026July 23, 2025
Context window1.05M262K
Input $/Mtok$2.50$0.30
Output $/Mtok$15.00$1.00
Coding index37.750.0
Independent measurements behind it12
Cost per solved task$1.02Not computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is GPT-5.4 better than Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B for coding?

Pick Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B for coding: it scores 50.0 on the Vibe Coding Index against 37.7 for GPT-5.4. Pick GPT-5.4 when the context window is larger, 1.05M against 262K tokens, or when what matters is LMArena WebDev or Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run), where it leads.

Which is cheaper, GPT-5.4 or Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B?

GPT-5.4 costs $2.50 per million input tokens and $15.00 per million output tokens; Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B costs $0.30 and $1.00. Cost per solved task is known for GPT-5.4 only.

Which has the bigger context window, GPT-5.4 or Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B?

GPT-5.4, with 1.05M tokens against 262K.

How many benchmarks is the GPT-5.4 vs Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B comparison based on?

47 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 21, 2026. GPT-5.4's coding index rests on 1 independent benchmark and Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B's on 2. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next