LLMBenchmark.ai

Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

GPT-5.4 vs Kimi K2.7 Code

Updated October 21, 2026. 42 benchmarks have a result for both. Coding is ranked on the Vibe Coding Index; every other board is shown as published.

GPT-5.4OpenAI
Coding
37.7
Overall
39.0
Output $/M
$15.00
24
Kimi K2.7 CodeMoonshot AI
Coding
39.1
Overall
25.8
Output $/M
$3.35
17
vs boards won of 42 shared, 1 tied

Decision reading

GPT-5.4 and Kimi K2.7 Code are level for coding, 37.7 against 39.1 on the Vibe Coding Index, so price and context decide.

Pick GPT-5.4 when the context window is larger, 1.05M against 262K tokens, or when what matters is AA Coding Index or LiveCodeBench (Vals AI), where it leads. Pick Kimi K2.7 Code when output tokens cost 4.5x less, or when a solved task costs $0.35 against $1.02.

Shared results
42
GPT-5.4 only
67
Kimi K2.7 Code only
9
Like-for-like categories
8 of 9

Shared results can support a head-to-head reading. Results only one model has describe coverage, not superiority.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
GPT-5.4 37.7 from 1 benchmark, Kimi K2.7 Code 39.1 from 1 benchmark.
Widest category
Math, 21.2 points apart on average over 3 shared benchmarks.
Widest single gap
FrontierMath, tier 4: GPT-5.4 49.0% against Kimi K2.7 Code 12.2%, 36.8 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
GPT-5.4 $15.00 against Kimi K2.7 Code $3.35 per million output tokens, 4.5x apart.
Context window
GPT-5.4 takes 1.05M tokens, Kimi K2.7 Code 262K.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryGPT-5.4BarsKimi K2.7 CodeTies
Coding1031 tie
Intelligence20
Agentic work26
Reasoning40
Math30
Knowledge10
Web design08
General20
All shared boards24171 tie
CodingLike-for-likeFour of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index103
Coding benchmarks for GPT-5.4 and Kimi K2.7 Code
BenchmarkGPT-5.4Kimi K2.7 CodeLeader
LMArena WebDev14641474Kimi K2.7 Code
AA Coding Index71.160.8GPT-5.4
LiveCodeBench (Vals AI)84.1%82.0%GPT-5.4
SWE-bench Verified (Vals AI)78.2%78.2%Tie
Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI)67.4%47.2%GPT-5.4
Code migration (Vals AI)35.0%25.4%GPT-5.4
ProgramBench (Vals AI)0.5%0.0%GPT-5.4
Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals AI)Not measured67.0%Only Kimi K2.7 Code measured
SkillsBench (Vals AI)51.7%50.0%GPT-5.4
SciCodeNot measured47.8%Only Kimi K2.7 Code measured
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)57.6%44.7%GPT-5.4
Terminal-Bench81.8%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 measured
FrontierCodeNot measured30.1%Only Kimi K2.7 Code measured
GSO-Bench31.4%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 measured
WeirdML77.7%54.1%GPT-5.4
MirrorCode15.6%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 measured
ALE-Bench1607.0886.2GPT-5.4
LMArena Text: coding1496Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 measured
LMArena Text: software and IT1491Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 measured
LMArena WebDev: React14541475Kimi K2.7 Code
LMArena WebDev: HTML14781451GPT-5.4
LMArena WebDev: from an image14361513Kimi K2.7 Code
Neither model has a result on the other 16 boards here
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index20
Intelligence benchmarks for GPT-5.4 and Kimi K2.7 Code
BenchmarkGPT-5.4Kimi K2.7 CodeLeader
AA Intelligence Index39.025.8GPT-5.4
Epoch Capabilities Index157.3150.1GPT-5.4
Agentic workLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index26
Agentic work benchmarks for GPT-5.4 and Kimi K2.7 Code
BenchmarkGPT-5.4Kimi K2.7 CodeLeader
AA Agentic IndexNot measured21.0Only Kimi K2.7 Code measured
Design Arena: agents building web apps10591176Kimi K2.7 Code
Design Arena: agents building full-stack apps10171175Kimi K2.7 Code
Design Arena: agents building mobile apps10871143Kimi K2.7 Code
Design Arena: agents building Android apps10371143Kimi K2.7 Code
Design Arena: agents building Godot games11351147Kimi K2.7 Code
Design Arena: agents building gamesNot measured1130Only Kimi K2.7 Code measured
Design Arena: HTML slidesNot measured1201Only Kimi K2.7 Code measured
Design Arena: PowerPoint slidesNot measured1154Only Kimi K2.7 Code measured
τ²-Bench Telecom87.1%90.1%Kimi K2.7 Code
APEX-Agents52.4%37.6%GPT-5.4
METR time horizons74.3%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 measured
DeepResearch Bench35.1%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 measured
PostTrainBench19.0%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 measured
Vending-Bench 2$6,144$5,083GPT-5.4
Neither model has a result on the other 24 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index40
Reasoning benchmarks for GPT-5.4 and Kimi K2.7 Code
BenchmarkGPT-5.4Kimi K2.7 CodeLeader
GPQA Diamond91.7%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 measured
MMMU Pro (Vals AI)87.5%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 measured
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)92.0%89.6%GPT-5.4
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)43.7%35.0%GPT-5.4
GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run)93.3%87.9%GPT-5.4
ARC-AGI93.7%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 measured
ARC-AGI-274.0%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 measured
SimpleBenchNot measured57.9%Only Kimi K2.7 Code measured
Chess puzzles48.0%14.0%GPT-5.4
Mystery game puzzles37.0%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 measured
EBR-bench25.4%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts1485Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 measured
LMArena Text: expert1507Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts in English1479Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 measured
LMArena Vision: diagrams1327Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 measured
LMArena Vision: homework1336Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 5 boards here
MathLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index30
Math benchmarks for GPT-5.4 and Kimi K2.7 Code
BenchmarkGPT-5.4Kimi K2.7 CodeLeader
AIME96.7%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 measured
OTIS Mock AIME97.8%95.6%GPT-5.4
FrontierMath, tiers 1 to 378.6%54.0%GPT-5.4
FrontierMath, tier 449.0%12.2%GPT-5.4
ProofBench56.0%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 measured
LMArena Text: math1488Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 measured
LMArena Text: mathematical work1497Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 6 boards here
KnowledgeLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index10
Knowledge benchmarks for GPT-5.4 and Kimi K2.7 Code
BenchmarkGPT-5.4Kimi K2.7 CodeLeader
MMLU Pro87.5%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 measured
LegalBench (Vals AI)86.0%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 measured
CaseLaw (Vals AI)63.8%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 measured
CorpFin (Vals AI)65.3%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 measured
TaxEval (Vals AI)74.0%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 measured
MortgageTax (Vals AI)68.3%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 measured
MedQA (Vals AI)96.1%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 measured
MedCode (Vals AI)41.3%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 measured
SimpleQA Verified45.1%36.5%GPT-5.4
LMArena Text: science1479Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 measured
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare1458Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 measured
LMArena Text: legal and government1486Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 measured
LMArena Text: business and finance1474Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 4 boards here
Web designLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index08
Web design benchmarks for GPT-5.4 and Kimi K2.7 Code
BenchmarkGPT-5.4Kimi K2.7 CodeLeader
Design Arena: websites11991264Kimi K2.7 Code
Design Arena: UI components12151259Kimi K2.7 Code
Design Arena: game dev11951220Kimi K2.7 Code
Design Arena: data viz11961226Kimi K2.7 Code
Design Arena: 3D10651241Kimi K2.7 Code
Design Arena: all code categories11801253Kimi K2.7 Code
Design Arena: SVG11411176Kimi K2.7 Code
Design Arena: ASCII art11881196Kimi K2.7 Code
Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index20
General benchmarks for GPT-5.4 and Kimi K2.7 Code
BenchmarkGPT-5.4Kimi K2.7 CodeLeader
SAGE (Vals AI)43.3%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 measured
MedScribe (Vals AI)77.5%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 measured
IFBench73.9%63.1%GPT-5.4
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)82.0%79.3%GPT-5.4
DTBench94.4%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 measured
LMCA52.0%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 measured
CL-bench27.9%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 measured
Surface Evolver BenchNot measured48.8%Only Kimi K2.7 Code measured
Furniture assembly37.5%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 measured
CL-bench Life21.7%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 measured
LMArena Text1469Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 measured
LMArena Text: instruction following1469Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 measured
LMArena Text: creative writing1439Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 measured
LMArena Vision1303Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 measured
LMArena Text: English1467Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 measured
LMArena Text: non-English1465Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 measured
LMArena Text: Chinese1520Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 measured
LMArena Text: German1472Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 measured
LMArena Text: Japanese1485Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 measured
LMArena Text: Korean1449Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 measured
LMArena Text: French1493Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 measured
LMArena Text: Spanish1452Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 measured
LMArena Text: Russian1480Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 measured
LMArena Text: Polish1472Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 measured
LMArena Text: multi-turn1482Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 measured
LMArena Text: longer queries1473Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 measured
LMArena Text: writing and language1458Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 measured
LMArena Text: entertainment and media1438Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 measured
LMArena Vision: English1301Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 measured
LMArena Vision: Chinese1354Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 measured
LMArena Vision: reading text1312Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 measured
LMArena Vision: humor1284Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 measured
LMArena Vision: recognizing things1251Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 measured
LMArena Vision: creative writing1283Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 measured
LMArena Document1471Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 11 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for GPT-5.4 and Kimi K2.7 Code
BenchmarkGPT-5.4Kimi K2.7 CodeLeader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

GPT-5.4$0.010Fits in one request
Kimi K2.7 Code$0.0023Fits in one request

Kimi K2.7 Code costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

GPT-5.4$0.170Fits in one request
Kimi K2.7 Code$0.044Fits in one request

Kimi K2.7 Code costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

GPT-5.4$0.650Fits in one request
Kimi K2.7 Code$0.168Fits in one request

Kimi K2.7 Code costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of GPT-5.4 and Kimi K2.7 Code
SpecificationOpenAI GPT-5.4MoonshotAI Kimi K2.7 Code
MakerOpenAIMoonshot AI
WeightsNo public weights listedOpen weights
ReleasedMarch 5, 2026June 12, 2026
Context window1.05M262K
Input $/Mtok$2.50$0.6712
Output $/Mtok$15.00$3.35
Coding index37.739.1
Independent measurements behind it11
Cost per solved task$1.02$0.35
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is GPT-5.4 better than Kimi K2.7 Code for coding?

GPT-5.4 and Kimi K2.7 Code are level for coding, 37.7 against 39.1 on the Vibe Coding Index, so price and context decide. Pick GPT-5.4 when the context window is larger, 1.05M against 262K tokens, or when what matters is AA Coding Index or LiveCodeBench (Vals AI), where it leads. Pick Kimi K2.7 Code when output tokens cost 4.5x less, or when a solved task costs $0.35 against $1.02.

Which is cheaper, GPT-5.4 or Kimi K2.7 Code?

GPT-5.4 costs $2.50 per million input tokens and $15.00 per million output tokens; Kimi K2.7 Code costs $0.6712 and $3.35. Per solved SWE-bench Verified task, GPT-5.4 costs $1.02 and Kimi K2.7 Code $0.35.

Which has the bigger context window, GPT-5.4 or Kimi K2.7 Code?

GPT-5.4, with 1.05M tokens against 262K.

How many benchmarks is the GPT-5.4 vs Kimi K2.7 Code comparison based on?

42 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 21, 2026. GPT-5.4's coding index rests on 1 independent benchmark and Kimi K2.7 Code's on 1. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next