Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

GPT-5.4 Mini vs Moondream 3 Preview

Moondream 3 Preview costs 1.8x less per output token than GPT-5.4 Mini ($2.50 vs $4.50 per million). Updated October 21, 2026; no benchmark has tested both models yet.

GPT-5.4 MiniOpenAI
Coding
35.8
Overall
24.1
Output $/M
$4.50
M Moondream 3 PreviewMoondream
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$2.50
vs $4.50 vs $2.50 per 1M output tokens. Moondream 3 Preview is 1.8x cheaper.

GPT-5.4 Mini or Moondream 3 Preview: which to pick

Only GPT-5.4 Mini has a coding score, 35.8 on the Vibe Coding Index; Moondream 3 Preview has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Pick Moondream 3 Preview for output tokens 1.8x cheaper ($2.50 vs $4.50 per million).

No benchmark has tested both yet. GPT-5.4 Mini has results on LMArena WebDev, AA Coding Index and LiveCodeBench (Vals AI); Moondream 3 Preview has none yet. Compare them on price and context instead.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
GPT-5.4 Mini 35.8 from 5 benchmarks, Moondream 3 Preview not benchmarked.
Widest category
None yet: no category has been tested on both models.
Widest single gap
None yet: no benchmark has tested both models.
Output price
GPT-5.4 Mini $4.50 against Moondream 3 Preview $2.50 per million output tokens, 1.8x apart.
Context window
GPT-5.4 Mini takes 400K tokens, Moondream 3 Preview 32K.

Benchmark by benchmark

Every board either model has a result on, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale. Only one model is measured on each, so no row names a leader.

CodingDirectional onlySix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index18 boards measured
Coding benchmarks for GPT-5.4 Mini and Moondream 3 Preview
BenchmarkGPT-5.4 MiniMoondream 3 PreviewLeader
LMArena WebDev1397Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Mini measured
AA Coding Index56.1Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Mini measured
LiveCodeBench (Vals AI)81.5%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Mini measured
SWE-bench Verified (Vals AI)73.0%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Mini measured
Terminal-Bench 4 (Vals AI)2.5%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Mini measured
Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI)48.0%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Mini measured
Code migration (Vals AI)12.9%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Mini measured
ProgramBench (Vals AI)0.0%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Mini measured
Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals AI)54.7%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Mini measured
SciCode52.1%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Mini measured
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)52.3%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Mini measured
FrontierCode27.0%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Mini measured
WeirdML60.3%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Mini measured
ALE-Bench1188.6Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Mini measured
LMArena Text: coding1438Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Mini measured
LMArena Text: software and IT1436Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Mini measured
LMArena WebDev: React1386Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Mini measured
LMArena WebDev: HTML1419Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Mini measured
Neither model has a result on the other 20 boards here
IntelligenceDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index2 boards measured
Intelligence benchmarks for GPT-5.4 Mini and Moondream 3 Preview
BenchmarkGPT-5.4 MiniMoondream 3 PreviewLeader
AA Intelligence Index24.1Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Mini measured
Epoch Capabilities Index148.7Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Mini measured
Agentic workDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index7 boards measured
Agentic work benchmarks for GPT-5.4 Mini and Moondream 3 Preview
BenchmarkGPT-5.4 MiniMoondream 3 PreviewLeader
AA Agentic Index17.9Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Mini measured
Finance Agent (Vals AI)45.4%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Mini measured
Tax Agent Bench (Vals AI)8.8%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Mini measured
Legal Research Bench (Vals AI)12.5%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Mini measured
Excel Modeling Benchmark (Vals AI)45.4%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Mini measured
τ²-Bench Telecom83.3%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Mini measured
DeepResearch Bench36.3%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Mini measured
Neither model has a result on the other 32 boards here
ReasoningDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index14 boards measured
Reasoning benchmarks for GPT-5.4 Mini and Moondream 3 Preview
BenchmarkGPT-5.4 MiniMoondream 3 PreviewLeader
GPQA Diamond83.1%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Mini measured
MMMU Pro (Vals AI)79.3%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Mini measured
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)87.5%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Mini measured
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)28.1%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Mini measured
GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run)86.9%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Mini measured
ARC-AGI63.7%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Mini measured
ARC-AGI-218.9%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Mini measured
Chess puzzles23.0%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Mini measured
Mystery game puzzles11.0%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Mini measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts1424Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Mini measured
LMArena Text: expert1435Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Mini measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts in English1420Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Mini measured
LMArena Vision: diagrams1266Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Mini measured
LMArena Vision: homework1285Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Mini measured
Neither model has a result on the other 7 boards here
MathDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index7 boards measured
Math benchmarks for GPT-5.4 Mini and Moondream 3 Preview
BenchmarkGPT-5.4 MiniMoondream 3 PreviewLeader
AIME95.6%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Mini measured
OTIS Mock AIME88.9%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Mini measured
FrontierMath, tiers 1 to 351.2%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Mini measured
FrontierMath, tier 49.8%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Mini measured
ProofBench21.0%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Mini measured
LMArena Text: math1418Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Mini measured
LMArena Text: mathematical work1429Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Mini measured
Neither model has a result on the other 6 boards here
KnowledgeDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index10 boards measured
Knowledge benchmarks for GPT-5.4 Mini and Moondream 3 Preview
BenchmarkGPT-5.4 MiniMoondream 3 PreviewLeader
MMLU Pro84.5%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Mini measured
CaseLaw (Vals AI)51.7%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Mini measured
CorpFin (Vals AI)60.9%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Mini measured
TaxEval (Vals AI)71.2%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Mini measured
MortgageTax (Vals AI)63.5%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Mini measured
SimpleQA Verified29.4%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Mini measured
LMArena Text: science1417Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Mini measured
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare1395Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Mini measured
LMArena Text: legal and government1414Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Mini measured
LMArena Text: business and finance1418Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Mini measured
Neither model has a result on the other 7 boards here
GeneralDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index30 boards measured
General benchmarks for GPT-5.4 Mini and Moondream 3 Preview
BenchmarkGPT-5.4 MiniMoondream 3 PreviewLeader
SAGE (Vals AI)50.8%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Mini measured
Vals Multimodal Index54.2%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Mini measured
IFBench73.3%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Mini measured
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)77.0%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Mini measured
DTBench80.0%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Mini measured
LMCA40.8%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Mini measured
LMArena Text1412Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Mini measured
LMArena Text: instruction following1405Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Mini measured
LMArena Text: creative writing1370Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Mini measured
LMArena Vision1245Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Mini measured
LMArena Text: English1412Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Mini measured
LMArena Text: non-English1405Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Mini measured
LMArena Text: Chinese1446Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Mini measured
LMArena Text: German1408Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Mini measured
LMArena Text: Japanese1375Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Mini measured
LMArena Text: Korean1370Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Mini measured
LMArena Text: French1441Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Mini measured
LMArena Text: Spanish1405Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Mini measured
LMArena Text: Russian1417Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Mini measured
LMArena Text: Polish1415Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Mini measured
LMArena Text: multi-turn1429Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Mini measured
LMArena Text: longer queries1408Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Mini measured
LMArena Text: writing and language1393Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Mini measured
LMArena Text: entertainment and media1373Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Mini measured
LMArena Vision: English1244Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Mini measured
LMArena Vision: Chinese1286Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Mini measured
LMArena Vision: reading text1253Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Mini measured
LMArena Vision: humor1235Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Mini measured
LMArena Vision: recognizing things1218Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Mini measured
LMArena Vision: creative writing1222Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Mini measured
Neither model has a result on the other 16 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

GPT-5.4 Mini$0.0030Fits in one request
Moondream 3 Preview$0.0015Fits in one request

Moondream 3 Preview costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

GPT-5.4 Mini$0.051Fits in one request
Moondream 3 Preview$0.022Exceeds the context window

Moondream 3 Preview costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

GPT-5.4 Mini$0.195Fits in one request
Moondream 3 Preview$0.085Exceeds the context window

Moondream 3 Preview costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of GPT-5.4 Mini and Moondream 3 Preview
SpecificationOpenAI GPT-5.4 MiniMoondream 3 Preview
MakerOpenAIMoondream
WeightsNo public weights listedOpen weights
ReleasedMarch 17, 2026October 15, 2026
Context window400K32K
Input $/Mtok$0.75$0.30
Output $/Mtok$4.50$2.50
Coding index35.8Not benchmarked
Independent measurements behind it50
Cost per solved task$0.70Not computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is GPT-5.4 Mini better than Moondream 3 Preview for coding?

Only GPT-5.4 Mini has a coding score, 35.8 on the Vibe Coding Index; Moondream 3 Preview has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Pick Moondream 3 Preview for output tokens 1.8x cheaper ($2.50 vs $4.50 per million).

Which is cheaper, GPT-5.4 Mini or Moondream 3 Preview?

GPT-5.4 Mini costs $0.75 per million input tokens and $4.50 per million output tokens; Moondream 3 Preview costs $0.30 and $2.50. Cost per solved task is known for GPT-5.4 Mini only.

Which has the bigger context window, GPT-5.4 Mini or Moondream 3 Preview?

GPT-5.4 Mini, with 400K tokens against 32K.

Has any benchmark tested both GPT-5.4 Mini and Moondream 3 Preview?

No benchmark has tested both yet. GPT-5.4 Mini has results on LMArena WebDev, AA Coding Index and LiveCodeBench (Vals AI); Moondream 3 Preview has none yet. Compare them on price and context instead. Data as of October 21, 2026.

Compare next