GPT-5.4 Mini vs MiniMax M2
GPT-5.4 Mini leads MiniMax M2 on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, 24.1 to 18.6, and MiniMax M2 costs 4.4x less per output token ($1.02 vs $4.50 per million). Updated October 22, 2026; 36 benchmarks have a result for both.
GPT-5.4 Mini or MiniMax M2: which to pick
Only GPT-5.4 Mini has a coding score, 35.8 on the Vibe Coding Index; MiniMax M2 has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.
Pick MiniMax M2 for output tokens 4.4x cheaper ($1.02 vs $4.50 per million) and work measured by τ²-Bench Telecom or Kagi LLM Benchmark, where it leads.
- Shared results
- 36
- GPT-5.4 Mini only
- 53
- MiniMax M2 only
- 14
- Like-for-like categories
- 7 of 9
Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.
Which one for your work
Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.
Coding
Vibe Coding Index, six public coding benchmarks
No call
Only GPT-5.4 Mini has a coding score, so no call is made.
One side not measured
Intelligence
AA Intelligence Index
GPT-5.4 Mini
GPT-5.4 Mini leads, 24.1 against 18.6.
Same board, both measured
Agentic work
AA Agentic Index
No call
Only GPT-5.4 Mini has a AA Agentic Index result, 17.9.
Directional only
Reasoning
GPQA Diamond
No call
Only GPT-5.4 Mini has a GPQA Diamond result, 83.1%.
Directional only
Math
AIME
No call
Only GPT-5.4 Mini has a AIME result, 95.6%.
Directional only
Knowledge
MMLU Pro
No call
Only GPT-5.4 Mini has a MMLU Pro result, 84.5%.
Directional only
Web design
Design Arena: websites
No call
Only MiniMax M2 has a Design Arena: websites result, 1143.
Directional only
Long documents
Listed context window
GPT-5.4 Mini
GPT-5.4 Mini takes 400K tokens against 205K.
Listed by OpenRouter
Everyday cost
1K input + 500 output tokens
MiniMax M2
GPT-5.4 Mini $0.0030, MiniMax M2 $0.0008 per turn.
List prices
Cost per solved task
One SWE-bench Verified task, solved
GPT-5.4 Mini
GPT-5.4 Mini $0.70, MiniMax M2 $0.702.
Published attempt cost and pass rate
At a glance
- Coding index
- GPT-5.4 Mini 35.8 from 5 benchmarks, MiniMax M2 not benchmarked.
- Widest category
- Coding, 16.3 points apart on average over 5 shared benchmarks.
- Widest single gap
- Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run): GPT-5.4 Mini 52.3% against MiniMax M2 25.8%, 26.5 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
- Output price
- GPT-5.4 Mini $4.50 against MiniMax M2 $1.02 per million output tokens, 4.4x apart.
- Context window
- GPT-5.4 Mini takes 400K tokens, MiniMax M2 205K.
Benchmark by benchmark
First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.
| Category | GPT-5.4 Mini | Bars | MiniMax M2 | Ties |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Coding | 5 | 0 | ||
| Intelligence | 1 | 0 | ||
| Agentic work | 0 | 1 | ||
| Reasoning | 5 | 1 | ||
| Math | 2 | 0 | ||
| Knowledge | 4 | 0 | ||
| General | 17 | 0 | ||
| All shared boards | 34 | 2 |
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index50
| Benchmark | GPT-5.4 Mini | MiniMax M2 | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| SWE-bench Verified | Not measured | 61.0% | Only MiniMax M2 measured |
| LMArena WebDev | 1397 | 1297 | GPT-5.4 Mini |
| AA Coding Index | 56.1 | Not measured | Only GPT-5.4 Mini measured |
| LiveCodeBench (Vals AI) | 81.5% | Not measured | Only GPT-5.4 Mini measured |
| SWE-bench Verified (Vals AI) | 73.0% | Not measured | Only GPT-5.4 Mini measured |
| Terminal-Bench 4 (Vals AI) | 2.5% | Not measured | Only GPT-5.4 Mini measured |
| Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI) | 48.0% | Not measured | Only GPT-5.4 Mini measured |
| Code migration (Vals AI) | 12.9% | Not measured | Only GPT-5.4 Mini measured |
| ProgramBench (Vals AI) | 0.0% | Not measured | Only GPT-5.4 Mini measured |
| Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals AI) | 54.7% | Not measured | Only GPT-5.4 Mini measured |
| LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run) | Not measured | 82.6% | Only MiniMax M2 measured |
| SciCode | 52.1% | Not measured | Only GPT-5.4 Mini measured |
| Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run) | 52.3% | 25.8% | GPT-5.4 Mini |
| Terminal-Bench | Not measured | 30.0% | Only MiniMax M2 measured |
| FrontierCode | 27.0% | Not measured | Only GPT-5.4 Mini measured |
| WeirdML | 60.3% | Not measured | Only GPT-5.4 Mini measured |
| ALE-Bench | 1188.6 | Not measured | Only GPT-5.4 Mini measured |
| LMArena Text: coding | 1438 | 1371 | GPT-5.4 Mini |
| LMArena Text: software and IT | 1436 | 1373 | GPT-5.4 Mini |
| LMArena WebDev: React | 1386 | Not measured | Only GPT-5.4 Mini measured |
| LMArena WebDev: HTML | 1419 | 1306 | GPT-5.4 Mini |
| Neither model has a result on the other 18 boards here | |||
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index10
| Benchmark | GPT-5.4 Mini | MiniMax M2 | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| AA Intelligence Index | 24.1 | 18.6 | GPT-5.4 Mini |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 148.7 | Not measured | Only GPT-5.4 Mini measured |
Agentic workLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
| Benchmark | GPT-5.4 Mini | MiniMax M2 | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| AA Agentic Index | 17.9 | Not measured | Only GPT-5.4 Mini measured |
| Finance Agent (Vals AI) | 45.4% | Not measured | Only GPT-5.4 Mini measured |
| Tax Agent Bench (Vals AI) | 8.8% | Not measured | Only GPT-5.4 Mini measured |
| Legal Research Bench (Vals AI) | 12.5% | Not measured | Only GPT-5.4 Mini measured |
| Excel Modeling Benchmark (Vals AI) | 45.4% | Not measured | Only GPT-5.4 Mini measured |
| τ²-Bench Telecom | 83.3% | 86.8% | MiniMax M2 |
| DeepResearch Bench | 36.3% | Not measured | Only GPT-5.4 Mini measured |
| Vending-Bench 2 | Not measured | $161 | Only MiniMax M2 measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 33 boards here | |||
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index51
| Benchmark | GPT-5.4 Mini | MiniMax M2 | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 83.1% | Not measured | Only GPT-5.4 Mini measured |
| MMMU Pro (Vals AI) | 79.3% | Not measured | Only GPT-5.4 Mini measured |
| GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run) | 87.5% | 77.7% | GPT-5.4 Mini |
| Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run) | 28.1% | 13.7% | GPT-5.4 Mini |
| GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run) | 86.9% | Not measured | Only GPT-5.4 Mini measured |
| ARC-AGI | 63.7% | Not measured | Only GPT-5.4 Mini measured |
| ARC-AGI-2 | 18.9% | Not measured | Only GPT-5.4 Mini measured |
| Chess puzzles | 23.0% | Not measured | Only GPT-5.4 Mini measured |
| Mystery game puzzles | 11.0% | Not measured | Only GPT-5.4 Mini measured |
| LMArena Text: hard prompts | 1424 | 1357 | GPT-5.4 Mini |
| LMArena Text: expert | 1435 | 1338 | GPT-5.4 Mini |
| LMArena Text: hard prompts in English | 1420 | 1376 | GPT-5.4 Mini |
| LMArena Vision: diagrams | 1266 | Not measured | Only GPT-5.4 Mini measured |
| LMArena Vision: homework | 1285 | Not measured | Only GPT-5.4 Mini measured |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 37.9% | 57.8% | MiniMax M2 |
| Neither model has a result on the other 7 boards here | |||
MathLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index20
| Benchmark | GPT-5.4 Mini | MiniMax M2 | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| AIME | 95.6% | Not measured | Only GPT-5.4 Mini measured |
| AA Math Index | Not measured | 78.3 | Only MiniMax M2 measured |
| AIME 2025 (Artificial Analysis run) | Not measured | 78.3% | Only MiniMax M2 measured |
| OTIS Mock AIME | 88.9% | Not measured | Only GPT-5.4 Mini measured |
| FrontierMath, tiers 1 to 3 | 51.2% | Not measured | Only GPT-5.4 Mini measured |
| FrontierMath, tier 4 | 9.8% | Not measured | Only GPT-5.4 Mini measured |
| ProofBench | 21.0% | Not measured | Only GPT-5.4 Mini measured |
| LMArena Text: math | 1418 | 1351 | GPT-5.4 Mini |
| LMArena Text: mathematical work | 1429 | 1368 | GPT-5.4 Mini |
| Neither model has a result on the other 4 boards here | |||
KnowledgeLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index40
| Benchmark | GPT-5.4 Mini | MiniMax M2 | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| MMLU Pro | 84.5% | Not measured | Only GPT-5.4 Mini measured |
| CaseLaw (Vals AI) | 51.7% | Not measured | Only GPT-5.4 Mini measured |
| CorpFin (Vals AI) | 60.9% | Not measured | Only GPT-5.4 Mini measured |
| TaxEval (Vals AI) | 71.2% | Not measured | Only GPT-5.4 Mini measured |
| MortgageTax (Vals AI) | 63.5% | Not measured | Only GPT-5.4 Mini measured |
| MMLU Pro (Artificial Analysis run) | Not measured | 82.0% | Only MiniMax M2 measured |
| SimpleQA Verified | 29.4% | Not measured | Only GPT-5.4 Mini measured |
| LMArena Text: science | 1417 | 1348 | GPT-5.4 Mini |
| LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare | 1395 | 1367 | GPT-5.4 Mini |
| LMArena Text: legal and government | 1414 | 1349 | GPT-5.4 Mini |
| LMArena Text: business and finance | 1418 | 1336 | GPT-5.4 Mini |
| Neither model has a result on the other 7 boards here | |||
Web designDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index7 boards, none shared
| Benchmark | GPT-5.4 Mini | MiniMax M2 | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| Design Arena: websites | Not measured | 1143 | Only MiniMax M2 measured |
| Design Arena: UI components | Not measured | 1137 | Only MiniMax M2 measured |
| Design Arena: game dev | Not measured | 1118 | Only MiniMax M2 measured |
| Design Arena: data viz | Not measured | 1140 | Only MiniMax M2 measured |
| Design Arena: 3D | Not measured | 1098 | Only MiniMax M2 measured |
| Design Arena: all code categories | Not measured | 1135 | Only MiniMax M2 measured |
| Design Arena: SVG | Not measured | 1100 | Only MiniMax M2 measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 2 boards here | |||
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index170
| Benchmark | GPT-5.4 Mini | MiniMax M2 | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| SAGE (Vals AI) | 50.8% | Not measured | Only GPT-5.4 Mini measured |
| Vals Multimodal Index | 54.2% | Not measured | Only GPT-5.4 Mini measured |
| IFBench | 73.3% | 72.3% | GPT-5.4 Mini |
| Long context reasoning (AA-LCR) | 77.0% | 64.3% | GPT-5.4 Mini |
| DTBench | 80.0% | Not measured | Only GPT-5.4 Mini measured |
| LMCA | 40.8% | Not measured | Only GPT-5.4 Mini measured |
| LMArena Text | 1412 | 1340 | GPT-5.4 Mini |
| LMArena Text: instruction following | 1405 | 1329 | GPT-5.4 Mini |
| LMArena Text: creative writing | 1370 | 1286 | GPT-5.4 Mini |
| LMArena Vision | 1245 | Not measured | Only GPT-5.4 Mini measured |
| LMArena Text: English | 1412 | 1364 | GPT-5.4 Mini |
| LMArena Text: non-English | 1405 | 1313 | GPT-5.4 Mini |
| LMArena Text: Chinese | 1446 | 1366 | GPT-5.4 Mini |
| LMArena Text: German | 1408 | 1357 | GPT-5.4 Mini |
| LMArena Text: Japanese | 1375 | Not measured | Only GPT-5.4 Mini measured |
| LMArena Text: Korean | 1370 | Not measured | Only GPT-5.4 Mini measured |
| LMArena Text: French | 1441 | 1336 | GPT-5.4 Mini |
| LMArena Text: Spanish | 1405 | 1326 | GPT-5.4 Mini |
| LMArena Text: Russian | 1417 | 1330 | GPT-5.4 Mini |
| LMArena Text: Polish | 1415 | 1312 | GPT-5.4 Mini |
| LMArena Text: multi-turn | 1429 | 1361 | GPT-5.4 Mini |
| LMArena Text: longer queries | 1408 | 1331 | GPT-5.4 Mini |
| LMArena Text: writing and language | 1393 | 1295 | GPT-5.4 Mini |
| LMArena Text: entertainment and media | 1373 | 1298 | GPT-5.4 Mini |
| LMArena Vision: English | 1244 | Not measured | Only GPT-5.4 Mini measured |
| LMArena Vision: Chinese | 1286 | Not measured | Only GPT-5.4 Mini measured |
| LMArena Vision: reading text | 1253 | Not measured | Only GPT-5.4 Mini measured |
| LMArena Vision: humor | 1235 | Not measured | Only GPT-5.4 Mini measured |
| LMArena Vision: recognizing things | 1218 | Not measured | Only GPT-5.4 Mini measured |
| LMArena Vision: creative writing | 1222 | Not measured | Only GPT-5.4 Mini measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 16 boards here | |||
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
| Benchmark | GPT-5.4 Mini | MiniMax M2 | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| Neither model has a result on 5 boards here | |||
What each workload costs
Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.
Chat turn
1K input + 500 output tokens
MiniMax M2 costs less
Repository review
50K input + 3K output tokens
MiniMax M2 costs less
Agent loop
200K input + 10K output tokens
MiniMax M2 costs less
Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.
Specification differences
The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.
| Specification | OpenAI GPT-5.4 Mini | MiniMax M2 |
|---|---|---|
| Maker | OpenAI | MiniMax |
| Weights | No public weights listed | Open weights |
| Released | March 17, 2026 | October 23, 2025 |
| Context window | 400K | 205K |
| Input $/Mtok | $0.75 | $0.255 |
| Output $/Mtok | $4.50 | $1.02 |
| Coding index | 35.8 | Not benchmarked |
| Independent measurements behind it | 5 | 1 |
| Cost per solved task | $0.70 | $0.702 |
| Source | OpenRouter listing | OpenRouter listing |
Questions
Is GPT-5.4 Mini better than MiniMax M2 for coding?
Only GPT-5.4 Mini has a coding score, 35.8 on the Vibe Coding Index; MiniMax M2 has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Pick MiniMax M2 for output tokens 4.4x cheaper ($1.02 vs $4.50 per million) and work measured by τ²-Bench Telecom or Kagi LLM Benchmark, where it leads.
Which is cheaper, GPT-5.4 Mini or MiniMax M2?
GPT-5.4 Mini costs $0.75 per million input tokens and $4.50 per million output tokens; MiniMax M2 costs $0.255 and $1.02. Per solved SWE-bench Verified task, GPT-5.4 Mini costs $0.70 and MiniMax M2 $0.702.
Which has the bigger context window, GPT-5.4 Mini or MiniMax M2?
GPT-5.4 Mini, with 400K tokens against 205K.
How many benchmarks is the GPT-5.4 Mini vs MiniMax M2 comparison based on?
36 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 22, 2026. GPT-5.4 Mini's coding index rests on 5 independent benchmarks and MiniMax M2's on 1. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.