GPT-5.2 Pro vs GPT-5.4
GPT-5.4 costs 11.2x less per output token than GPT-5.2 Pro ($15.00 vs $168.00 per million). Updated October 21, 2026; 6 benchmarks have a result for both.
GPT-5.2 Pro or GPT-5.4: which to pick
Only GPT-5.4 has a coding score, 64.4 on the Vibe Coding Index; GPT-5.2 Pro has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.
Pick GPT-5.2 Pro for work measured by Chess puzzles, where it leads.
- Shared results
- 6
- GPT-5.2 Pro only
- 1
- GPT-5.4 only
- 104
- Like-for-like categories
- 3 of 9
Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.
Which one for your work
Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.
Coding
Vibe Coding Index, six public coding benchmarks
No call
Only GPT-5.4 has a coding score, so no call is made.
One side not measured
Intelligence
AA Intelligence Index
No call
Only GPT-5.4 has a AA Intelligence Index result, 39.0.
Directional only
Reasoning
GPQA Diamond
No call
Only GPT-5.4 has a GPQA Diamond result, 91.7%.
Directional only
Math
AIME
No call
Only GPT-5.4 has a AIME result, 96.7%.
Directional only
Knowledge
MMLU Pro
No call
Only GPT-5.4 has a MMLU Pro result, 87.5%.
Directional only
Web design
Design Arena: websites
No call
Only GPT-5.4 has a Design Arena: websites result, 1199.
Directional only
Long documents
Listed context window
GPT-5.4
GPT-5.4 takes 1.05M tokens against 400K.
Listed by OpenRouter
Everyday cost
1K input + 500 output tokens
GPT-5.4
GPT-5.2 Pro $0.105, GPT-5.4 $0.010 per turn.
List prices
Cost per solved task
One SWE-bench Verified task, solved
No call
Only GPT-5.4 has the number, $1.02.
Directional only
At a glance
- Coding index
- GPT-5.2 Pro not benchmarked, GPT-5.4 64.4 from 3 benchmarks.
- Widest category
- Reasoning, 11.7 points apart on average over 3 shared benchmarks.
- Widest single gap
- ARC-AGI-2: GPT-5.2 Pro 54.2% against GPT-5.4 74.0%, 19.8 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
- Output price
- GPT-5.2 Pro $168.00 against GPT-5.4 $15.00 per million output tokens, 11.2x apart.
- Context window
- GPT-5.2 Pro takes 400K tokens, GPT-5.4 1.05M.
Benchmark by benchmark
First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.
| Category | GPT-5.2 Pro | Bars | GPT-5.4 | Ties |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence | 0 | 1 | ||
| Reasoning | 1 | 2 | ||
| Math | 0 | 2 | ||
| All shared boards | 1 | 5 |
CodingDirectional onlySix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index19 boards, none shared
| Benchmark | GPT-5.2 Pro | GPT-5.4 | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| LMArena WebDev | Not measured | 1464 | Only GPT-5.4 measured |
| AA Coding Index | Not measured | 71.1 | Only GPT-5.4 measured |
| LiveCodeBench (Vals AI) | Not measured | 84.1% | Only GPT-5.4 measured |
| SWE-bench Verified (Vals AI) | Not measured | 78.2% | Only GPT-5.4 measured |
| Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI) | Not measured | 67.4% | Only GPT-5.4 measured |
| Code migration (Vals AI) | Not measured | 35.0% | Only GPT-5.4 measured |
| ProgramBench (Vals AI) | Not measured | 0.5% | Only GPT-5.4 measured |
| SkillsBench (Vals AI) | Not measured | 51.7% | Only GPT-5.4 measured |
| Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run) | Not measured | 57.6% | Only GPT-5.4 measured |
| Terminal-Bench | Not measured | 81.8% | Only GPT-5.4 measured |
| GSO-Bench | Not measured | 31.4% | Only GPT-5.4 measured |
| WeirdML | Not measured | 77.7% | Only GPT-5.4 measured |
| MirrorCode | Not measured | 15.6% | Only GPT-5.4 measured |
| ALE-Bench | Not measured | 1607.0 | Only GPT-5.4 measured |
| LMArena Text: coding | Not measured | 1496 | Only GPT-5.4 measured |
| LMArena Text: software and IT | Not measured | 1491 | Only GPT-5.4 measured |
| LMArena WebDev: React | Not measured | 1454 | Only GPT-5.4 measured |
| LMArena WebDev: HTML | Not measured | 1478 | Only GPT-5.4 measured |
| LMArena WebDev: from an image | Not measured | 1436 | Only GPT-5.4 measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 20 boards here | |||
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
| Benchmark | GPT-5.2 Pro | GPT-5.4 | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| AA Intelligence Index | Not measured | 39.0 | Only GPT-5.4 measured |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 156.3 | 157.3 | GPT-5.4 |
Agentic workDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index11 boards, none shared
| Benchmark | GPT-5.2 Pro | GPT-5.4 | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| Design Arena: agents building web apps | Not measured | 1059 | Only GPT-5.4 measured |
| Design Arena: agents building full-stack apps | Not measured | 1017 | Only GPT-5.4 measured |
| Design Arena: agents building mobile apps | Not measured | 1087 | Only GPT-5.4 measured |
| Design Arena: agents building Android apps | Not measured | 1030 | Only GPT-5.4 measured |
| Design Arena: agents building Godot games | Not measured | 1135 | Only GPT-5.4 measured |
| τ²-Bench Telecom | Not measured | 87.1% | Only GPT-5.4 measured |
| APEX-Agents | Not measured | 52.4% | Only GPT-5.4 measured |
| METR time horizons | Not measured | 74.3% | Only GPT-5.4 measured |
| DeepResearch Bench | Not measured | 35.1% | Only GPT-5.4 measured |
| PostTrainBench | Not measured | 19.0% | Only GPT-5.4 measured |
| Vending-Bench 2 | Not measured | $6,144 | Only GPT-5.4 measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 30 boards here | |||
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index12
| Benchmark | GPT-5.2 Pro | GPT-5.4 | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | Not measured | 91.7% | Only GPT-5.4 measured |
| MMMU Pro (Vals AI) | Not measured | 87.5% | Only GPT-5.4 measured |
| GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run) | Not measured | 92.0% | Only GPT-5.4 measured |
| Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run) | Not measured | 43.7% | Only GPT-5.4 measured |
| GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run) | Not measured | 93.3% | Only GPT-5.4 measured |
| ARC-AGI | 90.5% | 93.7% | GPT-5.4 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | 54.2% | 74.0% | GPT-5.4 |
| SimpleBench | 57.4% | Not measured | Only GPT-5.2 Pro measured |
| Chess puzzles | 60.0% | 48.0% | GPT-5.2 Pro |
| Mystery game puzzles | Not measured | 37.0% | Only GPT-5.4 measured |
| EBR-bench | Not measured | 25.4% | Only GPT-5.4 measured |
| LMArena Text: hard prompts | Not measured | 1485 | Only GPT-5.4 measured |
| LMArena Text: expert | Not measured | 1507 | Only GPT-5.4 measured |
| LMArena Text: hard prompts in English | Not measured | 1479 | Only GPT-5.4 measured |
| LMArena Vision: diagrams | Not measured | 1327 | Only GPT-5.4 measured |
| LMArena Vision: homework | Not measured | 1336 | Only GPT-5.4 measured |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | Not measured | 63.8% | Only GPT-5.4 measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 5 boards here | |||
MathLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index02
| Benchmark | GPT-5.2 Pro | GPT-5.4 | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| AIME | Not measured | 96.7% | Only GPT-5.4 measured |
| OTIS Mock AIME | Not measured | 97.8% | Only GPT-5.4 measured |
| FrontierMath, tiers 1 to 3 | 74.0% | 78.6% | GPT-5.4 |
| FrontierMath, tier 4 | 46.0% | 49.0% | GPT-5.4 |
| ProofBench | Not measured | 56.0% | Only GPT-5.4 measured |
| LMArena Text: math | Not measured | 1488 | Only GPT-5.4 measured |
| LMArena Text: mathematical work | Not measured | 1497 | Only GPT-5.4 measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 6 boards here | |||
KnowledgeDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index13 boards, none shared
| Benchmark | GPT-5.2 Pro | GPT-5.4 | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| MMLU Pro | Not measured | 87.5% | Only GPT-5.4 measured |
| LegalBench (Vals AI) | Not measured | 86.0% | Only GPT-5.4 measured |
| CaseLaw (Vals AI) | Not measured | 63.8% | Only GPT-5.4 measured |
| CorpFin (Vals AI) | Not measured | 65.3% | Only GPT-5.4 measured |
| TaxEval (Vals AI) | Not measured | 74.0% | Only GPT-5.4 measured |
| MortgageTax (Vals AI) | Not measured | 68.3% | Only GPT-5.4 measured |
| MedQA (Vals AI) | Not measured | 96.1% | Only GPT-5.4 measured |
| MedCode (Vals AI) | Not measured | 41.3% | Only GPT-5.4 measured |
| SimpleQA Verified | Not measured | 45.1% | Only GPT-5.4 measured |
| LMArena Text: science | Not measured | 1479 | Only GPT-5.4 measured |
| LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare | Not measured | 1458 | Only GPT-5.4 measured |
| LMArena Text: legal and government | Not measured | 1486 | Only GPT-5.4 measured |
| LMArena Text: business and finance | Not measured | 1474 | Only GPT-5.4 measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 5 boards here | |||
Web designDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index8 boards, none shared
| Benchmark | GPT-5.2 Pro | GPT-5.4 | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| Design Arena: websites | Not measured | 1199 | Only GPT-5.4 measured |
| Design Arena: UI components | Not measured | 1215 | Only GPT-5.4 measured |
| Design Arena: game dev | Not measured | 1195 | Only GPT-5.4 measured |
| Design Arena: data viz | Not measured | 1196 | Only GPT-5.4 measured |
| Design Arena: 3D | Not measured | 1066 | Only GPT-5.4 measured |
| Design Arena: all code categories | Not measured | 1180 | Only GPT-5.4 measured |
| Design Arena: SVG | Not measured | 1142 | Only GPT-5.4 measured |
| Design Arena: ASCII art | Not measured | 1188 | Only GPT-5.4 measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here | |||
GeneralDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index34 boards, none shared
| Benchmark | GPT-5.2 Pro | GPT-5.4 | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| SAGE (Vals AI) | Not measured | 43.3% | Only GPT-5.4 measured |
| MedScribe (Vals AI) | Not measured | 77.5% | Only GPT-5.4 measured |
| IFBench | Not measured | 73.9% | Only GPT-5.4 measured |
| Long context reasoning (AA-LCR) | Not measured | 82.0% | Only GPT-5.4 measured |
| DTBench | Not measured | 94.4% | Only GPT-5.4 measured |
| LMCA | Not measured | 52.0% | Only GPT-5.4 measured |
| CL-bench | Not measured | 27.9% | Only GPT-5.4 measured |
| Furniture assembly | Not measured | 37.5% | Only GPT-5.4 measured |
| CL-bench Life | Not measured | 21.7% | Only GPT-5.4 measured |
| LMArena Text | Not measured | 1469 | Only GPT-5.4 measured |
| LMArena Text: instruction following | Not measured | 1469 | Only GPT-5.4 measured |
| LMArena Text: creative writing | Not measured | 1439 | Only GPT-5.4 measured |
| LMArena Vision | Not measured | 1303 | Only GPT-5.4 measured |
| LMArena Text: English | Not measured | 1467 | Only GPT-5.4 measured |
| LMArena Text: non-English | Not measured | 1465 | Only GPT-5.4 measured |
| LMArena Text: Chinese | Not measured | 1520 | Only GPT-5.4 measured |
| LMArena Text: German | Not measured | 1472 | Only GPT-5.4 measured |
| LMArena Text: Japanese | Not measured | 1485 | Only GPT-5.4 measured |
| LMArena Text: Korean | Not measured | 1449 | Only GPT-5.4 measured |
| LMArena Text: French | Not measured | 1493 | Only GPT-5.4 measured |
| LMArena Text: Spanish | Not measured | 1452 | Only GPT-5.4 measured |
| LMArena Text: Russian | Not measured | 1480 | Only GPT-5.4 measured |
| LMArena Text: Polish | Not measured | 1472 | Only GPT-5.4 measured |
| LMArena Text: multi-turn | Not measured | 1482 | Only GPT-5.4 measured |
| LMArena Text: longer queries | Not measured | 1473 | Only GPT-5.4 measured |
| LMArena Text: writing and language | Not measured | 1458 | Only GPT-5.4 measured |
| LMArena Text: entertainment and media | Not measured | 1438 | Only GPT-5.4 measured |
| LMArena Vision: English | Not measured | 1301 | Only GPT-5.4 measured |
| LMArena Vision: Chinese | Not measured | 1354 | Only GPT-5.4 measured |
| LMArena Vision: reading text | Not measured | 1312 | Only GPT-5.4 measured |
| LMArena Vision: humor | Not measured | 1284 | Only GPT-5.4 measured |
| LMArena Vision: recognizing things | Not measured | 1251 | Only GPT-5.4 measured |
| LMArena Vision: creative writing | Not measured | 1283 | Only GPT-5.4 measured |
| LMArena Document | Not measured | 1471 | Only GPT-5.4 measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 12 boards here | |||
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
| Benchmark | GPT-5.2 Pro | GPT-5.4 | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| Neither model has a result on 5 boards here | |||
What each workload costs
Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.
Chat turn
1K input + 500 output tokens
GPT-5.4 costs less
Repository review
50K input + 3K output tokens
GPT-5.4 costs less
Agent loop
200K input + 10K output tokens
GPT-5.4 costs less
Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.
Specification differences
The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.
| Specification | OpenAI GPT-5.2 Pro | OpenAI GPT-5.4 |
|---|---|---|
| Maker | OpenAI | OpenAI |
| Weights | No public weights listed | No public weights listed |
| Released | December 10, 2025 | March 5, 2026 |
| Context window | 400K | 1.05M |
| Input $/Mtok | $21.00 | $2.50 |
| Output $/Mtok | $168.00 | $15.00 |
| Coding index | Not benchmarked | 64.4 |
| Independent measurements behind it | 0 | 3 |
| Cost per solved task | Not computable | $1.02 |
| Source | OpenRouter listing | OpenRouter listing |
Questions
Is GPT-5.2 Pro better than GPT-5.4 for coding?
Only GPT-5.4 has a coding score, 64.4 on the Vibe Coding Index; GPT-5.2 Pro has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Pick GPT-5.2 Pro for work measured by Chess puzzles, where it leads.
Which is cheaper, GPT-5.2 Pro or GPT-5.4?
GPT-5.2 Pro costs $21.00 per million input tokens and $168.00 per million output tokens; GPT-5.4 costs $2.50 and $15.00. Cost per solved task is known for GPT-5.4 only.
Which has the bigger context window, GPT-5.2 Pro or GPT-5.4?
GPT-5.4, with 1.05M tokens against 400K.
How many benchmarks is the GPT-5.2 Pro vs GPT-5.4 comparison based on?
6 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 21, 2026. GPT-5.2 Pro's coding index rests on 0 independent benchmarks and GPT-5.4's on 3. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.