Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini vs Mistral Large 4

Updated October 21, 2026. 13 benchmarks have a result for both. Coding is ranked on the Vibe Coding Index; every other board is shown as published.

GPT-5.1-Codex-MiniOpenAI
Coding
6.2
Overall
20.4
Output $/M
$2.00
0
Mistral Large 4Mistral AI
Coding
55.3
Overall
38.4
Output $/M
$4.18
13
vs boards won of 13 shared

Decision reading

Pick Mistral Large 4 for coding: it scores 55.3 on the Vibe Coding Index against 6.2 for GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini.

Pick GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini when output tokens cost 2.1x less.

Shared results
13
GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini only
9
Mistral Large 4 only
68
Like-for-like categories
5 of 9

Shared results can support a head-to-head reading. Results only one model has describe coverage, not superiority.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini 6.2 from 1 benchmark, Mistral Large 4 55.3 from 2 benchmarks.
Widest category
Coding, 40.9 points apart on average over 2 shared benchmarks.
Widest single gap
LMArena WebDev: GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini 1244 against Mistral Large 4 1543, 42.7 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini $2.00 against Mistral Large 4 $4.18 per million output tokens, 2.1x apart.
Context window
GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini takes 400K tokens, Mistral Large 4 1.05M.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryGPT-5.1-Codex-MiniBarsMistral Large 4Ties
Coding02
Intelligence01
Reasoning01
Web design08
General01
All shared boards013
CodingLike-for-likeFour of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index02
Coding benchmarks for GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini and Mistral Large 4
BenchmarkGPT-5.1-Codex-MiniMistral Large 4Leader
LiveBench codingNot measured60.0%Only Mistral Large 4 measured
LMArena WebDev12441543Mistral Large 4
Terminal-Bench 4 (Vals AI)Not measured27.8%Only Mistral Large 4 measured
Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI)Not measured78.4%Only Mistral Large 4 measured
Code migration (Vals AI)Not measured30.6%Only Mistral Large 4 measured
IOI (Vals AI)Not measured45.3%Only Mistral Large 4 measured
SWE-bench Multimodal (Vals AI)Not measured33.1%Only Mistral Large 4 measured
Vibe Code Bench 1-100 (Vals AI)Not measured14.3%Only Mistral Large 4 measured
LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run)83.6%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini measured
SciCodeNot measured54.2%Only Mistral Large 4 measured
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)33.3%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini measured
Terminal-Bench61.6%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini measured
FrontierCodeNot measured39.4%Only Mistral Large 4 measured
ALE-BenchNot measured1213.2Only Mistral Large 4 measured
LMArena Text: codingNot measured1478Only Mistral Large 4 measured
LMArena Text: software and ITNot measured1467Only Mistral Large 4 measured
LMArena WebDev: ReactNot measured1559Only Mistral Large 4 measured
LMArena WebDev: HTML12531487Mistral Large 4
Neither model has a result on the other 20 boards here
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
Intelligence benchmarks for GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini and Mistral Large 4
BenchmarkGPT-5.1-Codex-MiniMistral Large 4Leader
AA Intelligence Index20.438.4Mistral Large 4
Epoch Capabilities IndexNot measured150.0Only Mistral Large 4 measured
Agentic workDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index10 boards, none shared
Agentic work benchmarks for GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini and Mistral Large 4
BenchmarkGPT-5.1-Codex-MiniMistral Large 4Leader
LiveBench researchNot measured28.1%Only Mistral Large 4 measured
LiveBench browserNot measured8.0%Only Mistral Large 4 measured
LiveBench long agenticNot measured11.8%Only Mistral Large 4 measured
Finance Agent (Vals AI)Not measured54.7%Only Mistral Large 4 measured
Tax Agent Bench (Vals AI)Not measured30.4%Only Mistral Large 4 measured
Legal Research Bench (Vals AI)Not measured31.7%Only Mistral Large 4 measured
Harvey's Legal Agent Benchmark (Vals AI)Not measured17.5%Only Mistral Large 4 measured
Excel Modeling Benchmark (Vals AI)Not measured56.2%Only Mistral Large 4 measured
BioMysteryBench (Vals AI)Not measured67.0%Only Mistral Large 4 measured
τ²-Bench Telecom62.9%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini measured
Neither model has a result on the other 29 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
Reasoning benchmarks for GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini and Mistral Large 4
BenchmarkGPT-5.1-Codex-MiniMistral Large 4Leader
LiveBench reasoningNot measured83.9%Only Mistral Large 4 measured
MysteryMechanism (Vals AI)Not measured12.2%Only Mistral Large 4 measured
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)81.3%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini measured
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)18.5%35.0%Mistral Large 4
GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run)Not measured88.1%Only Mistral Large 4 measured
Chess puzzlesNot measured33.0%Only Mistral Large 4 measured
Mystery game puzzlesNot measured17.0%Only Mistral Large 4 measured
LMArena Text: hard promptsNot measured1444Only Mistral Large 4 measured
LMArena Text: expertNot measured1444Only Mistral Large 4 measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts in EnglishNot measured1442Only Mistral Large 4 measured
LMArena Vision: diagramsNot measured1288Only Mistral Large 4 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 10 boards here
MathDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index8 boards, none shared
Math benchmarks for GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini and Mistral Large 4
BenchmarkGPT-5.1-Codex-MiniMistral Large 4Leader
AA Math Index91.7Not measuredOnly GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini measured
AIME 2025 (Artificial Analysis run)91.7%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini measured
OTIS Mock AIMENot measured98.3%Only Mistral Large 4 measured
FrontierMath, tiers 1 to 3Not measured58.6%Only Mistral Large 4 measured
FrontierMath, tier 4Not measured26.8%Only Mistral Large 4 measured
ProofBenchNot measured10.0%Only Mistral Large 4 measured
LMArena Text: mathNot measured1469Only Mistral Large 4 measured
LMArena Text: mathematical workNot measured1462Only Mistral Large 4 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 5 boards here
KnowledgeDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index7 boards, none shared
Knowledge benchmarks for GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini and Mistral Large 4
BenchmarkGPT-5.1-Codex-MiniMistral Large 4Leader
MedCode (Vals AI)Not measured40.7%Only Mistral Large 4 measured
MMLU Pro (Artificial Analysis run)82.0%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini measured
SimpleQA VerifiedNot measured20.0%Only Mistral Large 4 measured
LMArena Text: scienceNot measured1448Only Mistral Large 4 measured
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcareNot measured1433Only Mistral Large 4 measured
LMArena Text: legal and governmentNot measured1425Only Mistral Large 4 measured
LMArena Text: business and financeNot measured1439Only Mistral Large 4 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 10 boards here
Web designLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index08
Web design benchmarks for GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini and Mistral Large 4
BenchmarkGPT-5.1-Codex-MiniMistral Large 4Leader
Design Arena: websites11111258Mistral Large 4
Design Arena: UI components10811275Mistral Large 4
Design Arena: game dev10931226Mistral Large 4
Design Arena: data viz10971274Mistral Large 4
Design Arena: 3D9881253Mistral Large 4
Design Arena: all code categories10941259Mistral Large 4
Design Arena: SVG9771232Mistral Large 4
Design Arena: ASCII art11041203Mistral Large 4
LiveBench designNot measured65.6%Only Mistral Large 4 measured
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
General benchmarks for GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini and Mistral Large 4
BenchmarkGPT-5.1-Codex-MiniMistral Large 4Leader
LiveBench data analysisNot measured76.5%Only Mistral Large 4 measured
MedScribe (Vals AI)Not measured80.4%Only Mistral Large 4 measured
IFBench67.9%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini measured
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)66.7%81.3%Mistral Large 4
DTBenchNot measured88.2%Only Mistral Large 4 measured
LMCANot measured35.8%Only Mistral Large 4 measured
Surface Evolver BenchNot measured28.1%Only Mistral Large 4 measured
Furniture assemblyNot measured20.8%Only Mistral Large 4 measured
LMArena TextNot measured1431Only Mistral Large 4 measured
LMArena Text: instruction followingNot measured1422Only Mistral Large 4 measured
LMArena Text: creative writingNot measured1363Only Mistral Large 4 measured
LMArena VisionNot measured1272Only Mistral Large 4 measured
LMArena Text: EnglishNot measured1433Only Mistral Large 4 measured
LMArena Text: non-EnglishNot measured1422Only Mistral Large 4 measured
LMArena Text: ChineseNot measured1492Only Mistral Large 4 measured
LMArena Text: JapaneseNot measured1415Only Mistral Large 4 measured
LMArena Text: FrenchNot measured1492Only Mistral Large 4 measured
LMArena Text: SpanishNot measured1455Only Mistral Large 4 measured
LMArena Text: RussianNot measured1417Only Mistral Large 4 measured
LMArena Text: multi-turnNot measured1435Only Mistral Large 4 measured
LMArena Text: longer queriesNot measured1428Only Mistral Large 4 measured
LMArena Text: writing and languageNot measured1386Only Mistral Large 4 measured
LMArena Text: entertainment and mediaNot measured1378Only Mistral Large 4 measured
LMArena Vision: EnglishNot measured1283Only Mistral Large 4 measured
LMArena Vision: reading textNot measured1284Only Mistral Large 4 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 21 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini and Mistral Large 4
BenchmarkGPT-5.1-Codex-MiniMistral Large 4Leader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini$0.0013Fits in one request
Mistral Large 4$0.0034Fits in one request

GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini$0.018Fits in one request
Mistral Large 4$0.081Fits in one request

GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini$0.070Fits in one request
Mistral Large 4$0.314Fits in one request

GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini and Mistral Large 4
SpecificationOpenAI GPT-5.1-Codex-MiniMistral Large 4
MakerOpenAIMistral AI
WeightsNo public weights listedNo public weights listed
ReleasedNovember 13, 2025October 6, 2026
Context window400K1.05M
Input $/Mtok$0.25$1.36
Output $/Mtok$2.00$4.18
Coding index6.255.3
Independent measurements behind it12
Cost per solved taskNot computableNot computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini better than Mistral Large 4 for coding?

Pick Mistral Large 4 for coding: it scores 55.3 on the Vibe Coding Index against 6.2 for GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini. Pick GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini when output tokens cost 2.1x less.

Which is cheaper, GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini or Mistral Large 4?

GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini costs $0.25 per million input tokens and $2.00 per million output tokens; Mistral Large 4 costs $1.36 and $4.18. Cost per solved task is known for neither of them.

Which has the bigger context window, GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini or Mistral Large 4?

Mistral Large 4, with 1.05M tokens against 400K.

How many benchmarks is the GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini vs Mistral Large 4 comparison based on?

13 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 21, 2026. GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini's coding index rests on 1 independent benchmark and Mistral Large 4's on 2. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next