Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini vs Muse Spark 1.3

Muse Spark 1.3 leads GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, 48.1 to 20.4, and GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini costs 2.1x less per output token ($2.00 vs $4.25 per million). Updated October 22, 2026; 14 benchmarks have a result for both.

GPT-5.1-Codex-MiniOpenAI
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$2.00
0
Muse Spark 1.3Meta
Coding
57.4
Overall
68.6
Output $/M
$4.25
14
vs boards won of 14 shared

GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini or Muse Spark 1.3: which to pick

Only Muse Spark 1.3 has a coding score, 57.4 on the Vibe Coding Index; GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Pick GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini for output tokens 2.1x cheaper ($2.00 vs $4.25 per million).

Shared results
14
GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini only
8
Muse Spark 1.3 only
78
Like-for-like categories
5 of 9

Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini not benchmarked, Muse Spark 1.3 57.4 from 4 benchmarks.
Widest category
Coding, 58.6 points apart on average over 2 shared benchmarks.
Widest single gap
LMArena WebDev: GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini 1244 against Muse Spark 1.3 1659, 59.4 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini $2.00 against Muse Spark 1.3 $4.25 per million output tokens, 2.1x apart.
Context window
GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini takes 400K tokens, Muse Spark 1.3 1.05M.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryGPT-5.1-Codex-MiniBarsMuse Spark 1.3Ties
Coding02
Intelligence01
Reasoning02
Web design08
General01
All shared boards014
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index02
Coding benchmarks for GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini and Muse Spark 1.3
BenchmarkGPT-5.1-Codex-MiniMuse Spark 1.3Leader
LiveBench codingNot measured90.2%Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
LMArena WebDev12441659Muse Spark 1.3
AA Coding IndexNot measured75.8Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
Terminal-Bench 4 (Vals AI)Not measured10.6%Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI)Not measured82.9%Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
Code migration (Vals AI)Not measured27.6%Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
ProgramBench (Vals AI)Not measured0.5%Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
IOI (Vals AI)Not measured43.9%Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals AI)Not measured72.3%Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
CyberBench (Vals AI)Not measured69.4%Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run)83.6%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini measured
SciCodeNot measured59.7%Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)33.3%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini measured
Terminal-Bench61.6%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini measured
FrontierSWENot measured25.8%Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
ALE-BenchNot measured1688.3Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
LMArena Text: codingNot measured1510Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
LMArena Text: software and ITNot measured1511Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
LMArena WebDev: ReactNot measured1672Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
LMArena WebDev: HTML12531653Muse Spark 1.3
LMArena WebDev: from an imageNot measured1640Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 18 boards here
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
Intelligence benchmarks for GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini and Muse Spark 1.3
BenchmarkGPT-5.1-Codex-MiniMuse Spark 1.3Leader
AA Intelligence Index20.448.1Muse Spark 1.3
Epoch Capabilities IndexNot measured157.2Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
Agentic workDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index17 boards, none shared
Agentic work benchmarks for GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini and Muse Spark 1.3
BenchmarkGPT-5.1-Codex-MiniMuse Spark 1.3Leader
AA Agentic IndexNot measured55.5Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
Design Arena: agents building web appsNot measured1297Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
Design Arena: agents building full-stack appsNot measured1295Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
Design Arena: agents building mobile appsNot measured1218Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
Design Arena: agents building Godot gamesNot measured1241Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
Design Arena: PowerPoint slidesNot measured1219Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
Design Arena: spreadsheetsNot measured1062Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
LiveBench researchNot measured68.6%Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
LiveBench browserNot measured80.0%Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
LiveBench long agenticNot measured40.4%Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
Finance Agent (Vals AI)Not measured58.9%Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
Tax Agent Bench (Vals AI)Not measured36.0%Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
Legal Research Bench (Vals AI)Not measured40.9%Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
Excel Modeling Benchmark (Vals AI)Not measured62.7%Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
Terminal-Bench-Science (Vals AI)Not measured4.3%Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
τ²-Bench Telecom62.9%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini measured
APEX-AgentsNot measured58.6%Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 24 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index02
Reasoning benchmarks for GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini and Muse Spark 1.3
BenchmarkGPT-5.1-Codex-MiniMuse Spark 1.3Leader
LiveBench reasoningNot measured89.7%Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)81.3%94.1%Muse Spark 1.3
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)18.5%48.7%Muse Spark 1.3
Chess puzzlesNot measured37.0%Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
Mystery game puzzlesNot measured25.0%Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
LMArena Text: hard promptsNot measured1503Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
LMArena Text: expertNot measured1519Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts in EnglishNot measured1500Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
LMArena Vision: diagramsNot measured1330Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
LMArena Vision: homeworkNot measured1296Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 12 boards here
MathDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index8 boards, none shared
Math benchmarks for GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini and Muse Spark 1.3
BenchmarkGPT-5.1-Codex-MiniMuse Spark 1.3Leader
AA Math Index91.7Not measuredOnly GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini measured
AIME 2025 (Artificial Analysis run)91.7%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini measured
OTIS Mock AIMENot measured99.2%Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
FrontierMath, tiers 1 to 3Not measured74.4%Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
FrontierMath, tier 4Not measured46.3%Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
ProofBenchNot measured58.0%Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
LMArena Text: mathNot measured1497Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
LMArena Text: mathematical workNot measured1491Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 5 boards here
KnowledgeDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index5 boards, none shared
Knowledge benchmarks for GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini and Muse Spark 1.3
BenchmarkGPT-5.1-Codex-MiniMuse Spark 1.3Leader
MMLU Pro (Artificial Analysis run)82.0%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini measured
LMArena Text: scienceNot measured1507Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcareNot measured1493Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
LMArena Text: legal and governmentNot measured1499Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
LMArena Text: business and financeNot measured1490Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 13 boards here
Web designLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index08
Web design benchmarks for GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini and Muse Spark 1.3
BenchmarkGPT-5.1-Codex-MiniMuse Spark 1.3Leader
Design Arena: websites11111356Muse Spark 1.3
Design Arena: UI components10781349Muse Spark 1.3
Design Arena: game dev10921328Muse Spark 1.3
Design Arena: data viz10971343Muse Spark 1.3
Design Arena: 3D9881358Muse Spark 1.3
Design Arena: all code categories10931352Muse Spark 1.3
Design Arena: SVG9781301Muse Spark 1.3
Design Arena: ASCII art11051278Muse Spark 1.3
LiveBench designNot measured74.8%Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
General benchmarks for GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini and Muse Spark 1.3
BenchmarkGPT-5.1-Codex-MiniMuse Spark 1.3Leader
LiveBench data analysisNot measured79.6%Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
IFBench67.9%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini measured
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)66.7%83.0%Muse Spark 1.3
DTBenchNot measured96.5%Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
LMCANot measured53.9%Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
LMArena TextNot measured1490Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
LMArena Text: instruction followingNot measured1479Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
LMArena Text: creative writingNot measured1462Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
LMArena VisionNot measured1308Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
LMArena Text: EnglishNot measured1495Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
LMArena Text: non-EnglishNot measured1481Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
LMArena Text: ChineseNot measured1532Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
LMArena Text: GermanNot measured1513Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
LMArena Text: JapaneseNot measured1470Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
LMArena Text: KoreanNot measured1490Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
LMArena Text: FrenchNot measured1511Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
LMArena Text: SpanishNot measured1496Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
LMArena Text: RussianNot measured1491Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
LMArena Text: PolishNot measured1490Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
LMArena Text: multi-turnNot measured1487Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
LMArena Text: longer queriesNot measured1488Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
LMArena Text: writing and languageNot measured1470Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
LMArena Text: entertainment and mediaNot measured1457Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
LMArena Vision: EnglishNot measured1298Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
LMArena Vision: ChineseNot measured1384Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
LMArena Vision: reading textNot measured1319Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
LMArena Vision: humorNot measured1293Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
LMArena Vision: creative writingNot measured1296Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 18 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini and Muse Spark 1.3
BenchmarkGPT-5.1-Codex-MiniMuse Spark 1.3Leader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini$0.0013Fits in one request
Muse Spark 1.3$0.0034Fits in one request

GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini$0.018Fits in one request
Muse Spark 1.3$0.075Fits in one request

GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini$0.070Fits in one request
Muse Spark 1.3$0.292Fits in one request

GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini and Muse Spark 1.3
SpecificationOpenAI GPT-5.1-Codex-MiniMeta Muse Spark 1.3
MakerOpenAIMeta
WeightsNo public weights listedNo public weights listed
ReleasedNovember 13, 2025September 2, 2026
Context window400K1.05M
Input $/Mtok$0.25$1.25
Output $/Mtok$2.00$4.25
Coding indexNot benchmarked57.4
Independent measurements behind it14
Cost per solved taskNot computableNot computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini better than Muse Spark 1.3 for coding?

Only Muse Spark 1.3 has a coding score, 57.4 on the Vibe Coding Index; GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Pick GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini for output tokens 2.1x cheaper ($2.00 vs $4.25 per million).

Which is cheaper, GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini or Muse Spark 1.3?

GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini costs $0.25 per million input tokens and $2.00 per million output tokens; Muse Spark 1.3 costs $1.25 and $4.25. Cost per solved task is known for neither of them.

Which has the bigger context window, GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini or Muse Spark 1.3?

Muse Spark 1.3, with 1.05M tokens against 400K.

How many benchmarks is the GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini vs Muse Spark 1.3 comparison based on?

14 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 22, 2026. GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini's coding index rests on 1 independent benchmark and Muse Spark 1.3's on 4. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next