Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

GPT-4o vs Muse Spark 1.3

Muse Spark 1.3 costs 2.4x less per output token than GPT-4o ($4.25 vs $10.00 per million). Updated October 22, 2026; 11 benchmarks have a result for both.

GPT-4oOpenAI
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$10.00
0
Muse Spark 1.3Meta
Coding
57.4
Overall
68.6
Output $/M
$4.25
11
vs boards won of 11 shared

GPT-4o or Muse Spark 1.3: which to pick

Only Muse Spark 1.3 has a coding score, 57.4 on the Vibe Coding Index; GPT-4o has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Compare them on price, context and the boards below.

Shared results
11
GPT-4o only
16
Muse Spark 1.3 only
81
Like-for-like categories
3 of 9

Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
GPT-4o not benchmarked, Muse Spark 1.3 57.4 from 4 benchmarks.
Widest category
Web design, 60.0 points apart on average over 6 shared benchmarks.
Widest single gap
Design Arena: websites: GPT-4o 831 against Muse Spark 1.3 1356, 65.6 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
GPT-4o $10.00 against Muse Spark 1.3 $4.25 per million output tokens, 2.4x apart.
Context window
GPT-4o takes 128K tokens, Muse Spark 1.3 1.05M.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryGPT-4oBarsMuse Spark 1.3Ties
Reasoning02
Web design06
General03
All shared boards011
CodingDirectional onlySix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index25 boards, none shared
Coding benchmarks for GPT-4o and Muse Spark 1.3
BenchmarkGPT-4oMuse Spark 1.3Leader
SWE-bench Verified38.8%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o measured
SWE-bench Lite38.0%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o measured
SWE-bench (full test set)18.8%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o measured
SWE-bench Multimodal30.4%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o measured
LiveBench codingNot measured90.2%Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
LMArena WebDevNot measured1659Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
AA Coding IndexNot measured75.8Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
Terminal-Bench 4 (Vals AI)Not measured10.6%Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI)Not measured82.9%Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
Code migration (Vals AI)Not measured27.6%Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
ProgramBench (Vals AI)Not measured0.5%Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
IOI (Vals AI)Not measured43.9%Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals AI)Not measured72.3%Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
CyberBench (Vals AI)Not measured69.4%Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run)30.9%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o measured
SciCodeNot measured59.7%Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)8.3%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o measured
FrontierSWENot measured25.8%Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
ALE-BenchNot measured1688.3Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
LMArena Text: codingNot measured1510Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
LMArena Text: software and ITNot measured1511Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
LMArena WebDev: ReactNot measured1672Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
LMArena WebDev: HTMLNot measured1653Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
LMArena WebDev: from an imageNot measured1640Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
SciCode1.5%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o measured
Neither model has a result on the other 14 boards here
IntelligenceDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index2 boards, none shared
Intelligence benchmarks for GPT-4o and Muse Spark 1.3
BenchmarkGPT-4oMuse Spark 1.3Leader
AA Intelligence IndexNot measured48.1Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
Epoch Capabilities IndexNot measured157.2Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
Agentic workDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index18 boards, none shared
Agentic work benchmarks for GPT-4o and Muse Spark 1.3
BenchmarkGPT-4oMuse Spark 1.3Leader
AA Agentic IndexNot measured55.5Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
Design Arena: agents building web appsNot measured1297Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
Design Arena: agents building full-stack appsNot measured1295Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
Design Arena: agents building mobile appsNot measured1218Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
Design Arena: agents building Godot gamesNot measured1241Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
Design Arena: PowerPoint slidesNot measured1219Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
Design Arena: spreadsheetsNot measured1062Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
LiveBench researchNot measured68.6%Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
LiveBench browserNot measured80.0%Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
LiveBench long agenticNot measured40.4%Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
Finance Agent (Vals AI)Not measured58.9%Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
Tax Agent Bench (Vals AI)Not measured36.0%Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
Legal Research Bench (Vals AI)Not measured40.9%Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
Excel Modeling Benchmark (Vals AI)Not measured62.7%Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
Terminal-Bench-Science (Vals AI)Not measured4.3%Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
τ²-Bench Telecom25.1%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o measured
APEX-AgentsNot measured58.6%Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
GDPval9.9%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o measured
Neither model has a result on the other 23 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index02
Reasoning benchmarks for GPT-4o and Muse Spark 1.3
BenchmarkGPT-4oMuse Spark 1.3Leader
LiveBench reasoningNot measured89.7%Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)54.3%94.1%Muse Spark 1.3
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)2.4%48.7%Muse Spark 1.3
ARC-AGI4.5%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o measured
ARC-AGI-20.0%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o measured
Chess puzzlesNot measured37.0%Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
Mystery game puzzlesNot measured25.0%Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
LMArena Text: hard promptsNot measured1503Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
LMArena Text: expertNot measured1519Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts in EnglishNot measured1500Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
LMArena Vision: diagramsNot measured1330Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
LMArena Vision: homeworkNot measured1296Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 10 boards here
MathDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index8 boards, none shared
Math benchmarks for GPT-4o and Muse Spark 1.3
BenchmarkGPT-4oMuse Spark 1.3Leader
AA Math Index6.0Not measuredOnly GPT-4o measured
AIME 2025 (Artificial Analysis run)6.0%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o measured
OTIS Mock AIMENot measured99.2%Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
FrontierMath, tiers 1 to 3Not measured74.4%Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
FrontierMath, tier 4Not measured46.3%Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
ProofBenchNot measured58.0%Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
LMArena Text: mathNot measured1497Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
LMArena Text: mathematical workNot measured1491Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 5 boards here
KnowledgeDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index6 boards, none shared
Knowledge benchmarks for GPT-4o and Muse Spark 1.3
BenchmarkGPT-4oMuse Spark 1.3Leader
MMLU Pro (Artificial Analysis run)74.8%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o measured
MMLU88.1%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o measured
LMArena Text: scienceNot measured1507Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcareNot measured1493Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
LMArena Text: legal and governmentNot measured1499Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
LMArena Text: business and financeNot measured1490Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 12 boards here
Web designLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index06
Web design benchmarks for GPT-4o and Muse Spark 1.3
BenchmarkGPT-4oMuse Spark 1.3Leader
Design Arena: websites8311356Muse Spark 1.3
Design Arena: UI components8821349Muse Spark 1.3
Design Arena: game dev9061328Muse Spark 1.3
Design Arena: data viz8581343Muse Spark 1.3
Design Arena: 3D8681358Muse Spark 1.3
Design Arena: all code categories8601352Muse Spark 1.3
Design Arena: SVGNot measured1301Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
Design Arena: ASCII artNot measured1278Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
LiveBench designNot measured74.8%Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index03
General benchmarks for GPT-4o and Muse Spark 1.3
BenchmarkGPT-4oMuse Spark 1.3Leader
LiveBench data analysisNot measured79.6%Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
IFBench34.3%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o measured
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)49.3%83.0%Muse Spark 1.3
DTBench64.5%96.5%Muse Spark 1.3
LMCA16.6%53.9%Muse Spark 1.3
LMArena TextNot measured1490Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
LMArena Text: instruction followingNot measured1479Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
LMArena Text: creative writingNot measured1462Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
LMArena VisionNot measured1308Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
LMArena Text: EnglishNot measured1495Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
LMArena Text: non-EnglishNot measured1481Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
LMArena Text: ChineseNot measured1532Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
LMArena Text: GermanNot measured1513Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
LMArena Text: JapaneseNot measured1470Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
LMArena Text: KoreanNot measured1490Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
LMArena Text: FrenchNot measured1511Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
LMArena Text: SpanishNot measured1496Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
LMArena Text: RussianNot measured1491Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
LMArena Text: PolishNot measured1490Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
LMArena Text: multi-turnNot measured1487Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
LMArena Text: longer queriesNot measured1488Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
LMArena Text: writing and languageNot measured1470Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
LMArena Text: entertainment and mediaNot measured1457Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
LMArena Vision: EnglishNot measured1298Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
LMArena Vision: ChineseNot measured1384Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
LMArena Vision: reading textNot measured1319Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
LMArena Vision: humorNot measured1293Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
LMArena Vision: creative writingNot measured1296Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 18 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for GPT-4o and Muse Spark 1.3
BenchmarkGPT-4oMuse Spark 1.3Leader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

GPT-4o$0.0075Fits in one request
Muse Spark 1.3$0.0034Fits in one request

Muse Spark 1.3 costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

GPT-4o$0.155Fits in one request
Muse Spark 1.3$0.075Fits in one request

Muse Spark 1.3 costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

GPT-4o$0.600Exceeds the context window
Muse Spark 1.3$0.292Fits in one request

Muse Spark 1.3 costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of GPT-4o and Muse Spark 1.3
SpecificationOpenAI GPT-4oMeta Muse Spark 1.3
MakerOpenAIMeta
WeightsNo public weights listedNo public weights listed
ReleasedMay 13, 2024September 2, 2026
Context window128K1.05M
Input $/Mtok$2.50$1.25
Output $/Mtok$10.00$4.25
Coding indexNot benchmarked57.4
Independent measurements behind it04
Cost per solved taskNot computableNot computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is GPT-4o better than Muse Spark 1.3 for coding?

Only Muse Spark 1.3 has a coding score, 57.4 on the Vibe Coding Index; GPT-4o has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Compare them on price, context and the boards below.

Which is cheaper, GPT-4o or Muse Spark 1.3?

GPT-4o costs $2.50 per million input tokens and $10.00 per million output tokens; Muse Spark 1.3 costs $1.25 and $4.25. Cost per solved task is known for neither of them.

Which has the bigger context window, GPT-4o or Muse Spark 1.3?

Muse Spark 1.3, with 1.05M tokens against 128K.

How many benchmarks is the GPT-4o vs Muse Spark 1.3 comparison based on?

11 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 22, 2026. GPT-4o's coding index rests on 0 independent benchmarks and Muse Spark 1.3's on 4. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next