LLMBenchmark.ai

Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) vs Qwen3.8 27B

Updated October 21, 2026. 31 benchmarks have a result for both. Coding is ranked on the Vibe Coding Index; every other board is shown as published.

GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18)OpenAI
Coding
3.6
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$0.60
0
Qwen3.8 27BQwen
Coding
73.6
Overall
33.7
Output $/M
$1.35
31
vs boards won of 31 shared

Decision reading

Pick Qwen3.8 27B for coding: it scores 73.6 on the Vibe Coding Index against 3.6 for GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18).

Pick GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) when output tokens cost 2.3x less.

Shared results
31
GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) only
15
Qwen3.8 27B only
54
Like-for-like categories
5 of 9

Shared results can support a head-to-head reading. Results only one model has describe coverage, not superiority.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) 3.6 from 1 benchmark, Qwen3.8 27B 73.6 from 2 benchmarks.
Widest category
Reasoning, 34.4 points apart on average over 3 shared benchmarks.
Widest single gap
LMArena Vision: Chinese: GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) 1033 against Qwen3.8 27B 1326, 48.7 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) $0.60 against Qwen3.8 27B $1.35 per million output tokens, 2.3x apart.
Context window
GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) takes 128K tokens, Qwen3.8 27B 1M.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryGPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18)BarsQwen3.8 27BTies
Coding02
Reasoning03
Math02
Knowledge04
General020
All shared boards031
CodingLike-for-likeFour of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index02
Coding benchmarks for GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) and Qwen3.8 27B
BenchmarkGPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18)Qwen3.8 27BLeader
Aider polyglot3.6%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) measured
LiveBench codingNot measured86.8%Only Qwen3.8 27B measured
LMArena WebDevNot measured1593Only Qwen3.8 27B measured
AA Coding IndexNot measured68.1Only Qwen3.8 27B measured
LiveCodeBench (Vals AI)Not measured84.0%Only Qwen3.8 27B measured
SWE-bench Verified (Vals AI)Not measured86.0%Only Qwen3.8 27B measured
Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI)Not measured64.8%Only Qwen3.8 27B measured
Code migration (Vals AI)Not measured14.2%Only Qwen3.8 27B measured
ProgramBench (Vals AI)Not measured0.0%Only Qwen3.8 27B measured
IOI (Vals AI)Not measured39.1%Only Qwen3.8 27B measured
Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals AI)Not measured58.4%Only Qwen3.8 27B measured
SkillsBench (Vals AI)Not measured38.1%Only Qwen3.8 27B measured
CyberBench (Vals AI)Not measured67.8%Only Qwen3.8 27B measured
SciCodeNot measured46.6%Only Qwen3.8 27B measured
WeirdML11.8%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) measured
LMArena Text: coding12901483Qwen3.8 27B
LMArena Text: software and IT12911478Qwen3.8 27B
LMArena WebDev: ReactNot measured1602Only Qwen3.8 27B measured
LMArena WebDev: HTMLNot measured1570Only Qwen3.8 27B measured
LMArena WebDev: from an imageNot measured1577Only Qwen3.8 27B measured
Neither model has a result on the other 18 boards here
IntelligenceDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index2 boards, none shared
Intelligence benchmarks for GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) and Qwen3.8 27B
BenchmarkGPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18)Qwen3.8 27BLeader
AA Intelligence IndexNot measured33.7Only Qwen3.8 27B measured
Epoch Capabilities IndexNot measured151.7Only Qwen3.8 27B measured
Agentic workDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index11 boards, none shared
Agentic work benchmarks for GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) and Qwen3.8 27B
BenchmarkGPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18)Qwen3.8 27BLeader
AA Agentic IndexNot measured45.8Only Qwen3.8 27B measured
LiveBench researchNot measured59.4%Only Qwen3.8 27B measured
LiveBench browserNot measured32.0%Only Qwen3.8 27B measured
LiveBench long agenticNot measured27.9%Only Qwen3.8 27B measured
Finance Agent (Vals AI)Not measured48.5%Only Qwen3.8 27B measured
Tax Agent Bench (Vals AI)Not measured30.9%Only Qwen3.8 27B measured
Legal Research Bench (Vals AI)Not measured36.1%Only Qwen3.8 27B measured
Excel Modeling Benchmark (Vals AI)Not measured59.7%Only Qwen3.8 27B measured
Terminal-Bench-Science (Vals AI)Not measured0.0%Only Qwen3.8 27B measured
APEX-AgentsNot measured47.5%Only Qwen3.8 27B measured
BALROG17.4%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) measured
Neither model has a result on the other 28 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index03
Reasoning benchmarks for GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) and Qwen3.8 27B
BenchmarkGPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18)Qwen3.8 27BLeader
GPQA DiamondNot measured88.9%Only Qwen3.8 27B measured
LiveBench reasoningNot measured80.0%Only Qwen3.8 27B measured
MMMU Pro (Vals AI)Not measured83.9%Only Qwen3.8 27B measured
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured90.5%Only Qwen3.8 27B measured
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured33.9%Only Qwen3.8 27B measured
GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run)37.7%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) measured
ARC-AGINot measured87.5%Only Qwen3.8 27B measured
ARC-AGI-2Not measured42.4%Only Qwen3.8 27B measured
SimpleBench10.7%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) measured
Chess puzzles3.0%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) measured
Mystery game puzzles12.0%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) measured
VPCT34.0%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts12671459Qwen3.8 27B
LMArena Text: expert12341479Qwen3.8 27B
LMArena Text: hard prompts in English12781461Qwen3.8 27B
LMArena Vision: diagramsNot measured1285Only Qwen3.8 27B measured
LMArena Vision: homeworkNot measured1295Only Qwen3.8 27B measured
Neither model has a result on the other 4 boards here
MathLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index02
Math benchmarks for GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) and Qwen3.8 27B
BenchmarkGPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18)Qwen3.8 27BLeader
OTIS Mock AIME6.9%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) measured
FrontierMath, tiers 1 to 30.7%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) measured
ProofBenchNot measured16.0%Only Qwen3.8 27B measured
MATH level 552.6%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) measured
LMArena Text: math12671455Qwen3.8 27B
LMArena Text: mathematical work12711458Qwen3.8 27B
Neither model has a result on the other 7 boards here
KnowledgeLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index04
Knowledge benchmarks for GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) and Qwen3.8 27B
BenchmarkGPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18)Qwen3.8 27BLeader
MMLU ProNot measured84.3%Only Qwen3.8 27B measured
LegalBench (Vals AI)Not measured82.4%Only Qwen3.8 27B measured
TaxEval (Vals AI)Not measured70.8%Only Qwen3.8 27B measured
MortgageTax (Vals AI)Not measured64.9%Only Qwen3.8 27B measured
MedCode (Vals AI)Not measured28.7%Only Qwen3.8 27B measured
SimpleQA Verified8.3%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) measured
MMLU76.7%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) measured
GeoBench64.0%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) measured
LMArena Text: science12861467Qwen3.8 27B
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare12821437Qwen3.8 27B
LMArena Text: legal and government13051447Qwen3.8 27B
LMArena Text: business and finance12651438Qwen3.8 27B
Neither model has a result on the other 5 boards here
Web designDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index1 board, none shared
Web design benchmarks for GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) and Qwen3.8 27B
BenchmarkGPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18)Qwen3.8 27BLeader
LiveBench designNot measured75.9%Only Qwen3.8 27B measured
Neither model has a result on the other 8 boards here
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index020
General benchmarks for GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) and Qwen3.8 27B
BenchmarkGPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18)Qwen3.8 27BLeader
LiveBench data analysisNot measured76.6%Only Qwen3.8 27B measured
SAGE (Vals AI)Not measured52.4%Only Qwen3.8 27B measured
MedScribe (Vals AI)Not measured83.8%Only Qwen3.8 27B measured
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)Not measured82.0%Only Qwen3.8 27B measured
DTBenchNot measured88.0%Only Qwen3.8 27B measured
LMCANot measured41.4%Only Qwen3.8 27B measured
Creative writing (Lech Mazur)67.2%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) measured
Surface Evolver BenchNot measured45.0%Only Qwen3.8 27B measured
LMArena Text12861440Qwen3.8 27B
LMArena Text: instruction following12581436Qwen3.8 27B
LMArena Text: creative writing12681383Qwen3.8 27B
LMArena Vision10661269Qwen3.8 27B
LMArena Text: English13011448Qwen3.8 27B
LMArena Text: non-English12661428Qwen3.8 27B
LMArena Text: Chinese12651501Qwen3.8 27B
LMArena Text: German12721443Qwen3.8 27B
LMArena Text: Japanese12161387Qwen3.8 27B
LMArena Text: Korean11951384Qwen3.8 27B
LMArena Text: French12971465Qwen3.8 27B
LMArena Text: Spanish12761449Qwen3.8 27B
LMArena Text: Russian12751415Qwen3.8 27B
LMArena Text: Polish12441439Qwen3.8 27B
LMArena Text: multi-turn12851440Qwen3.8 27B
LMArena Text: longer queries12891448Qwen3.8 27B
LMArena Text: writing and language12821405Qwen3.8 27B
LMArena Text: entertainment and media12531393Qwen3.8 27B
LMArena Vision: English10721267Qwen3.8 27B
LMArena Vision: Chinese10331326Qwen3.8 27B
LMArena Vision: reading textNot measured1281Only Qwen3.8 27B measured
LMArena Vision: humorNot measured1235Only Qwen3.8 27B measured
LMArena Vision: creative writingNot measured1237Only Qwen3.8 27B measured
Neither model has a result on the other 15 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) and Qwen3.8 27B
BenchmarkGPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18)Qwen3.8 27BLeader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18)$0.0004Fits in one request
Qwen3.8 27B$0.0007Fits in one request

GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18)$0.0093Fits in one request
Qwen3.8 27B$0.0060Fits in one request

Qwen3.8 27B costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18)$0.036Exceeds the context window
Qwen3.8 27B$0.021Fits in one request

Qwen3.8 27B costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) and Qwen3.8 27B
SpecificationOpenAI GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18)Qwen3.8 27B
MakerOpenAIQwen
WeightsNo public weights listedOpen weights
ReleasedJuly 18, 2024August 14, 2026
Context window128K1M
Input $/Mtok$0.15$0.04
Output $/Mtok$0.60$1.35
Coding index3.673.6
Independent measurements behind it12
Cost per solved taskNot computable$1.26
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) better than Qwen3.8 27B for coding?

Pick Qwen3.8 27B for coding: it scores 73.6 on the Vibe Coding Index against 3.6 for GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18). Pick GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) when output tokens cost 2.3x less.

Which is cheaper, GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) or Qwen3.8 27B?

GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) costs $0.15 per million input tokens and $0.60 per million output tokens; Qwen3.8 27B costs $0.04 and $1.35. Cost per solved task is known for Qwen3.8 27B only.

Which has the bigger context window, GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) or Qwen3.8 27B?

Qwen3.8 27B, with 1M tokens against 128K.

How many benchmarks is the GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) vs Qwen3.8 27B comparison based on?

31 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 21, 2026. GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18)'s coding index rests on 1 independent benchmark and Qwen3.8 27B's on 2. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next