Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

GPT-4o (2024-05-13) vs Muse Spark Open

Muse Spark Open costs 3.5x less per output token than GPT-4o (2024-05-13) ($4.25 vs $15.00 per million). Updated October 22, 2026; 2 benchmarks have a result for both.

GPT-4o (2024-05-13)OpenAI
Coding
No data
Overall
27.1
Output $/M
$15.00
0
Muse Spark OpenMeta
Coding
47.4
Overall
44.9
Output $/M
$4.25
2
vs boards won of 2 shared

GPT-4o (2024-05-13) or Muse Spark Open: which to pick

Only Muse Spark Open has a coding score, 47.4 on the Vibe Coding Index; GPT-4o (2024-05-13) has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Compare them on price, context and the boards below.

Shared results
2
GPT-4o (2024-05-13) only
42
Muse Spark Open only
31
Like-for-like categories
1 of 9

Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
GPT-4o (2024-05-13) not benchmarked, Muse Spark Open 47.4 from 4 benchmarks.
Widest category
Reasoning, 39.3 points apart on average over 2 shared benchmarks.
Widest single gap
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run): GPT-4o (2024-05-13) 1.8% against Muse Spark Open 43.9%, 42.1 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
GPT-4o (2024-05-13) $15.00 against Muse Spark Open $4.25 per million output tokens, 3.5x apart.
Context window
GPT-4o (2024-05-13) takes 128K tokens, Muse Spark Open 1.05M.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryGPT-4o (2024-05-13)BarsMuse Spark OpenTies
Reasoning02
All shared boards02
CodingDirectional onlySix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index14 boards, none shared
Coding benchmarks for GPT-4o (2024-05-13) and Muse Spark Open
BenchmarkGPT-4o (2024-05-13)Muse Spark OpenLeader
LiveBench codingNot measured73.6%Only Muse Spark Open measured
LMArena WebDevNot measured1528Only Muse Spark Open measured
AA Coding Index24.2Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-05-13) measured
Terminal-Bench 4 (Vals AI)Not measured6.6%Only Muse Spark Open measured
Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI)Not measured76.2%Only Muse Spark Open measured
Code migration (Vals AI)Not measured21.2%Only Muse Spark Open measured
LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run)33.4%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-05-13) measured
SciCodeNot measured58.4%Only Muse Spark Open measured
ALE-BenchNot measured1590.1Only Muse Spark Open measured
LMArena Text: coding1297Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-05-13) measured
LMArena Text: software and IT1297Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-05-13) measured
LMArena WebDev: ReactNot measured1529Only Muse Spark Open measured
LMArena WebDev: HTMLNot measured1495Only Muse Spark Open measured
SWE-Bench Pro V2Not measured95.0%Only Muse Spark Open measured
Neither model has a result on the other 29 boards here
IntelligenceDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index2 boards, none shared
Intelligence benchmarks for GPT-4o (2024-05-13) and Muse Spark Open
BenchmarkGPT-4o (2024-05-13)Muse Spark OpenLeader
AA Intelligence Index7.3Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-05-13) measured
Epoch Capabilities IndexNot measured155.1Only Muse Spark Open measured
Agentic workDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index11 boards, none shared
Agentic work benchmarks for GPT-4o (2024-05-13) and Muse Spark Open
BenchmarkGPT-4o (2024-05-13)Muse Spark OpenLeader
LiveBench researchNot measured80.3%Only Muse Spark Open measured
LiveBench browserNot measured36.0%Only Muse Spark Open measured
LiveBench long agenticNot measured18.9%Only Muse Spark Open measured
Finance Agent (Vals AI)Not measured61.3%Only Muse Spark Open measured
Tax Agent Bench (Vals AI)Not measured26.3%Only Muse Spark Open measured
Legal Research Bench (Vals AI)Not measured38.5%Only Muse Spark Open measured
Harvey's Legal Agent Benchmark (Vals AI)Not measured25.0%Only Muse Spark Open measured
Excel Modeling Benchmark (Vals AI)Not measured53.7%Only Muse Spark Open measured
APEX-AgentsNot measured33.4%Only Muse Spark Open measured
METR time horizons40.8%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-05-13) measured
BALROG32.3%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-05-13) measured
Neither model has a result on the other 31 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index02
Reasoning benchmarks for GPT-4o (2024-05-13) and Muse Spark Open
BenchmarkGPT-4o (2024-05-13)Muse Spark OpenLeader
GPQA Diamond50.2%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-05-13) measured
LiveBench reasoningNot measured73.7%Only Muse Spark Open measured
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)52.6%89.0%Muse Spark Open
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)1.8%43.9%Muse Spark Open
GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run)48.9%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-05-13) measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts1281Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-05-13) measured
LMArena Text: expert1250Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-05-13) measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts in English1293Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-05-13) measured
Humanity's Last Exam (Scale run)Not measured28.0%Only Muse Spark Open measured
Neither model has a result on the other 14 boards here
MathDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index5 boards, none shared
Math benchmarks for GPT-4o (2024-05-13) and Muse Spark Open
BenchmarkGPT-4o (2024-05-13)Muse Spark OpenLeader
OTIS Mock AIME6.3%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-05-13) measured
MATH level 551.0%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-05-13) measured
LMArena Text: math1284Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-05-13) measured
LMArena Text: mathematical work1284Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-05-13) measured
MathArenaNot measured33.6%Only Muse Spark Open measured
Neither model has a result on the other 9 boards here
KnowledgeDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index7 boards, none shared
Knowledge benchmarks for GPT-4o (2024-05-13) and Muse Spark Open
BenchmarkGPT-4o (2024-05-13)Muse Spark OpenLeader
MMLU Pro (Artificial Analysis run)74.0%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-05-13) measured
MMLU84.2%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-05-13) measured
LMArena Text: science1295Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-05-13) measured
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare1278Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-05-13) measured
LMArena Text: legal and government1314Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-05-13) measured
LMArena Text: business and finance1262Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-05-13) measured
PRBench LegalNot measured59.8%Only Muse Spark Open measured
Neither model has a result on the other 13 boards here
Web designDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index3 boards, none shared
Web design benchmarks for GPT-4o (2024-05-13) and Muse Spark Open
BenchmarkGPT-4o (2024-05-13)Muse Spark OpenLeader
Design Arena: websitesNot measured1317Only Muse Spark Open measured
Design Arena: game devNot measured1286Only Muse Spark Open measured
LiveBench designNot measured60.3%Only Muse Spark Open measured
Neither model has a result on the other 6 boards here
GeneralDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index24 boards, none shared
General benchmarks for GPT-4o (2024-05-13) and Muse Spark Open
BenchmarkGPT-4o (2024-05-13)Muse Spark OpenLeader
Vals IndexNot measured48.6%Only Muse Spark Open measured
LiveBench data analysisNot measured60.2%Only Muse Spark Open measured
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)Not measured78.3%Only Muse Spark Open measured
LMArena Text1300Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-05-13) measured
LMArena Text: instruction following1278Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-05-13) measured
LMArena Text: creative writing1291Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-05-13) measured
LMArena Vision1137Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-05-13) measured
LMArena Text: English1312Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-05-13) measured
LMArena Text: non-English1283Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-05-13) measured
LMArena Text: Chinese1277Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-05-13) measured
LMArena Text: German1283Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-05-13) measured
LMArena Text: Japanese1257Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-05-13) measured
LMArena Text: Korean1234Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-05-13) measured
LMArena Text: French1304Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-05-13) measured
LMArena Text: Spanish1292Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-05-13) measured
LMArena Text: Russian1285Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-05-13) measured
LMArena Text: Polish1365Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-05-13) measured
LMArena Text: multi-turn1302Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-05-13) measured
LMArena Text: longer queries1288Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-05-13) measured
LMArena Text: writing and language1298Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-05-13) measured
LMArena Text: entertainment and media1289Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-05-13) measured
LMArena Vision: English1147Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-05-13) measured
LMArena Vision: Chinese1132Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-05-13) measured
MultiChallengeNot measured74.2%Only Muse Spark Open measured
Neither model has a result on the other 24 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for GPT-4o (2024-05-13) and Muse Spark Open
BenchmarkGPT-4o (2024-05-13)Muse Spark OpenLeader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

GPT-4o (2024-05-13)$0.013Fits in one request
Muse Spark Open$0.0034Fits in one request

Muse Spark Open costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

GPT-4o (2024-05-13)$0.295Fits in one request
Muse Spark Open$0.075Fits in one request

Muse Spark Open costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

GPT-4o (2024-05-13)$1.15Exceeds the context window
Muse Spark Open$0.292Fits in one request

Muse Spark Open costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of GPT-4o (2024-05-13) and Muse Spark Open
SpecificationOpenAI GPT-4o (2024-05-13)Meta Muse Spark Open
MakerOpenAIMeta
WeightsNo public weights listedOpen weights
ReleasedMay 13, 2024October 15, 2026
Context window128K1.05M
Input $/Mtok$5.00$1.25
Output $/Mtok$15.00$4.25
Coding indexNot benchmarked47.4
Independent measurements behind it04
Cost per solved taskNot computableNot computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is GPT-4o (2024-05-13) better than Muse Spark Open for coding?

Only Muse Spark Open has a coding score, 47.4 on the Vibe Coding Index; GPT-4o (2024-05-13) has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Compare them on price, context and the boards below.

Which is cheaper, GPT-4o (2024-05-13) or Muse Spark Open?

GPT-4o (2024-05-13) costs $5.00 per million input tokens and $15.00 per million output tokens; Muse Spark Open costs $1.25 and $4.25. Cost per solved task is known for neither of them.

Which has the bigger context window, GPT-4o (2024-05-13) or Muse Spark Open?

Muse Spark Open, with 1.05M tokens against 128K.

How many benchmarks is the GPT-4o (2024-05-13) vs Muse Spark Open comparison based on?

2 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 22, 2026. GPT-4o (2024-05-13)'s coding index rests on 0 independent benchmarks and Muse Spark Open's on 4. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next