Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

GPT-4.1 vs Step 5 Preview

Step 5 Preview leads GPT-4.1 on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, 43.7 to 12.7, and Step 5 Preview costs 3.0x less per output token ($2.70 vs $8.00 per million). Updated October 22, 2026; 33 benchmarks have a result for both.

GPT-4.1OpenAI
Coding
No data
Overall
36.5
Output $/M
$8.00
0
Step 5 PreviewStepFun
Coding
61.1
Overall
60.5
Output $/M
$2.70
33
vs boards won of 33 shared

GPT-4.1 or Step 5 Preview: which to pick

Only Step 5 Preview has a coding score, 61.1 on the Vibe Coding Index; GPT-4.1 has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Compare them on price, context and the boards below.

Shared results
33
GPT-4.1 only
59
Step 5 Preview only
28
Like-for-like categories
6 of 9

Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
GPT-4.1 not benchmarked, Step 5 Preview 61.1 from 4 benchmarks.
Widest category
Intelligence, 31.0 points apart on average over 1 shared benchmark.
Widest single gap
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run): GPT-4.1 4.2% against Step 5 Preview 46.5%, 42.3 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
GPT-4.1 $8.00 against Step 5 Preview $2.70 per million output tokens, 3.0x apart.
Context window
GPT-4.1 takes 1.05M tokens, Step 5 Preview 1.05M.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryGPT-4.1BarsStep 5 PreviewTies
Coding02
Intelligence01
Reasoning06
Math02
Knowledge04
General018
All shared boards033
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index02
Coding benchmarks for GPT-4.1 and Step 5 Preview
BenchmarkGPT-4.1Step 5 PreviewLeader
Aider polyglot52.4%Not measuredOnly GPT-4.1 measured
SWE-bench Verified39.6%Not measuredOnly GPT-4.1 measured
SWE-bench Multimodal31.1%Not measuredOnly GPT-4.1 measured
LiveBench codingNot measured85.6%Only Step 5 Preview measured
LMArena WebDevNot measured1567Only Step 5 Preview measured
LiveCodeBench (Vals AI)54.7%Not measuredOnly GPT-4.1 measured
Terminal-Bench 4 (Vals AI)Not measured31.8%Only Step 5 Preview measured
Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI)Not measured70.4%Only Step 5 Preview measured
Code migration (Vals AI)Not measured39.0%Only Step 5 Preview measured
IOI (Vals AI)Not measured38.1%Only Step 5 Preview measured
SWE-bench Multimodal (Vals AI)Not measured40.8%Only Step 5 Preview measured
LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run)45.7%Not measuredOnly GPT-4.1 measured
SciCodeNot measured58.9%Only Step 5 Preview measured
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)13.6%Not measuredOnly GPT-4.1 measured
WeirdML39.0%Not measuredOnly GPT-4.1 measured
ALE-Bench558.1Not measuredOnly GPT-4.1 measured
LMArena Text: coding13901485Step 5 Preview
LMArena Text: software and IT13911473Step 5 Preview
LMArena WebDev: ReactNot measured1583Only Step 5 Preview measured
LMArena WebDev: HTMLNot measured1556Only Step 5 Preview measured
LMArena WebDev: from an imageNot measured1550Only Step 5 Preview measured
SciCode4.6%Not measuredOnly GPT-4.1 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 17 boards here
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
Intelligence benchmarks for GPT-4.1 and Step 5 Preview
BenchmarkGPT-4.1Step 5 PreviewLeader
AA Intelligence Index12.743.7Step 5 Preview
Epoch Capabilities Index136.7Not measuredOnly GPT-4.1 measured
Agentic workDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index14 boards, none shared
Agentic work benchmarks for GPT-4.1 and Step 5 Preview
BenchmarkGPT-4.1Step 5 PreviewLeader
LiveBench researchNot measured72.8%Only Step 5 Preview measured
LiveBench browserNot measured24.0%Only Step 5 Preview measured
LiveBench long agenticNot measured27.5%Only Step 5 Preview measured
SREBench (Vals AI)Not measured0.4%Only Step 5 Preview measured
Finance Agent (Vals AI)Not measured50.7%Only Step 5 Preview measured
Tax Agent Bench (Vals AI)Not measured27.3%Only Step 5 Preview measured
Legal Research Bench (Vals AI)Not measured40.4%Only Step 5 Preview measured
Excel Modeling Benchmark (Vals AI)Not measured57.1%Only Step 5 Preview measured
BioMysteryBench (Vals AI)Not measured67.4%Only Step 5 Preview measured
Terminal-Bench-Science (Vals AI)Not measured2.9%Only Step 5 Preview measured
Vals Science IndexNot measured29.6%Only Step 5 Preview measured
τ²-Bench Telecom47.1%Not measuredOnly GPT-4.1 measured
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard (BFCL)54.0%Not measuredOnly GPT-4.1 measured
BrowseComp-Plus36.4%Not measuredOnly GPT-4.1 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 27 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index06
Reasoning benchmarks for GPT-4.1 and Step 5 Preview
BenchmarkGPT-4.1Step 5 PreviewLeader
GPQA Diamond65.4%Not measuredOnly GPT-4.1 measured
LiveBench reasoningNot measured83.8%Only Step 5 Preview measured
MysteryMechanism (Vals AI)Not measured18.5%Only Step 5 Preview measured
MMMU Pro (Vals AI)72.4%Not measuredOnly GPT-4.1 measured
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)66.6%Not measuredOnly GPT-4.1 measured
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)4.2%46.5%Step 5 Preview
GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run)66.9%Not measuredOnly GPT-4.1 measured
ARC-AGI5.5%Not measuredOnly GPT-4.1 measured
ARC-AGI-20.4%Not measuredOnly GPT-4.1 measured
SimpleBench27.0%Not measuredOnly GPT-4.1 measured
Chess puzzles3.0%Not measuredOnly GPT-4.1 measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts13841461Step 5 Preview
LMArena Text: expert13641485Step 5 Preview
LMArena Text: hard prompts in English13931454Step 5 Preview
LMArena Vision: diagrams12151308Step 5 Preview
LMArena Vision: homework12481265Step 5 Preview
Kagi LLM Benchmark52.3%Not measuredOnly GPT-4.1 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 5 boards here
MathLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index02
Math benchmarks for GPT-4.1 and Step 5 Preview
BenchmarkGPT-4.1Step 5 PreviewLeader
AIME39.6%Not measuredOnly GPT-4.1 measured
MATH 500 (Vals AI)87.2%Not measuredOnly GPT-4.1 measured
MGSM (Vals AI)87.7%Not measuredOnly GPT-4.1 measured
AA Math Index34.7Not measuredOnly GPT-4.1 measured
AIME 2025 (Artificial Analysis run)34.7%Not measuredOnly GPT-4.1 measured
OTIS Mock AIME38.3%Not measuredOnly GPT-4.1 measured
FrontierMath, tiers 1 to 36.0%Not measuredOnly GPT-4.1 measured
ProofBenchNot measured42.0%Only Step 5 Preview measured
MATH level 583.0%Not measuredOnly GPT-4.1 measured
LMArena Text: math13691458Step 5 Preview
LMArena Text: mathematical work13601460Step 5 Preview
Neither model has a result on the other 2 boards here
KnowledgeLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index04
Knowledge benchmarks for GPT-4.1 and Step 5 Preview
BenchmarkGPT-4.1Step 5 PreviewLeader
MMLU Pro80.5%Not measuredOnly GPT-4.1 measured
LegalBench (Vals AI)83.1%Not measuredOnly GPT-4.1 measured
CaseLaw (Vals AI)69.9%Not measuredOnly GPT-4.1 measured
CorpFin (Vals AI)63.0%Not measuredOnly GPT-4.1 measured
TaxEval (Vals AI)75.1%Not measuredOnly GPT-4.1 measured
MortgageTax (Vals AI)65.9%Not measuredOnly GPT-4.1 measured
MedQA (Vals AI)91.2%Not measuredOnly GPT-4.1 measured
MMLU Pro (Artificial Analysis run)80.6%Not measuredOnly GPT-4.1 measured
SimpleQA Verified31.1%Not measuredOnly GPT-4.1 measured
GeoBench72.0%Not measuredOnly GPT-4.1 measured
LMArena Text: science13821454Step 5 Preview
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare13791439Step 5 Preview
LMArena Text: legal and government13991437Step 5 Preview
LMArena Text: business and finance13691435Step 5 Preview
FACTS Benchmark Suite45.8%Not measuredOnly GPT-4.1 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 3 boards here
Web designDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index7 boards, none shared
Web design benchmarks for GPT-4.1 and Step 5 Preview
BenchmarkGPT-4.1Step 5 PreviewLeader
Design Arena: websites1038Not measuredOnly GPT-4.1 measured
Design Arena: UI components997Not measuredOnly GPT-4.1 measured
Design Arena: game dev1079Not measuredOnly GPT-4.1 measured
Design Arena: data viz1104Not measuredOnly GPT-4.1 measured
Design Arena: 3D849Not measuredOnly GPT-4.1 measured
Design Arena: all code categories1025Not measuredOnly GPT-4.1 measured
LiveBench designNot measured76.9%Only Step 5 Preview measured
Neither model has a result on the other 2 boards here
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index018
General benchmarks for GPT-4.1 and Step 5 Preview
BenchmarkGPT-4.1Step 5 PreviewLeader
LiveBench data analysisNot measured63.5%Only Step 5 Preview measured
Public Benefits Bench (Vals AI)Not measured58.1%Only Step 5 Preview measured
IFBench43.0%Not measuredOnly GPT-4.1 measured
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)68.3%88.3%Step 5 Preview
DTBench68.3%Not measuredOnly GPT-4.1 measured
LMCA25.6%Not measuredOnly GPT-4.1 measured
Fiction.LiveBench63.9%Not measuredOnly GPT-4.1 measured
LMArena Text13831440Step 5 Preview
LMArena Text: instruction following13671438Step 5 Preview
LMArena Text: creative writing13631409Step 5 Preview
LMArena Vision12101265Step 5 Preview
LMArena Text: English13921447Step 5 Preview
LMArena Text: non-English13701428Step 5 Preview
LMArena Text: Chinese13821500Step 5 Preview
LMArena Text: German1381Not measuredOnly GPT-4.1 measured
LMArena Text: Japanese13191383Step 5 Preview
LMArena Text: Korean1338Not measuredOnly GPT-4.1 measured
LMArena Text: French13821438Step 5 Preview
LMArena Text: Spanish13761441Step 5 Preview
LMArena Text: Russian13771433Step 5 Preview
LMArena Text: Polish1389Not measuredOnly GPT-4.1 measured
LMArena Text: multi-turn13971437Step 5 Preview
LMArena Text: longer queries13851449Step 5 Preview
LMArena Text: writing and language13711425Step 5 Preview
LMArena Text: entertainment and media13651412Step 5 Preview
LMArena Vision: English12091290Step 5 Preview
LMArena Vision: Chinese1226Not measuredOnly GPT-4.1 measured
LMArena Vision: reading text12181282Step 5 Preview
LMArena Vision: humor1196Not measuredOnly GPT-4.1 measured
LMArena Vision: captioning1207Not measuredOnly GPT-4.1 measured
LMArena Vision: recognizing things1208Not measuredOnly GPT-4.1 measured
LMArena Vision: creative writing1210Not measuredOnly GPT-4.1 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 14 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for GPT-4.1 and Step 5 Preview
BenchmarkGPT-4.1Step 5 PreviewLeader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

GPT-4.1$0.0060Fits in one request
Step 5 Preview$0.0024Fits in one request

Step 5 Preview costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

GPT-4.1$0.124Fits in one request
Step 5 Preview$0.058Fits in one request

Step 5 Preview costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

GPT-4.1$0.480Fits in one request
Step 5 Preview$0.227Fits in one request

Step 5 Preview costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of GPT-4.1 and Step 5 Preview
SpecificationOpenAI GPT-4.1StepFun Step 5 Preview
MakerOpenAIStepFun
WeightsNo public weights listedOpen weights
ReleasedApril 14, 2025October 8, 2026
Context window1.05M1.05M
Input $/Mtok$2.00$1.00
Output $/Mtok$8.00$2.70
Coding indexNot benchmarked61.1
Independent measurements behind it04
Cost per solved task$0.37Not computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is GPT-4.1 better than Step 5 Preview for coding?

Only Step 5 Preview has a coding score, 61.1 on the Vibe Coding Index; GPT-4.1 has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Compare them on price, context and the boards below.

Which is cheaper, GPT-4.1 or Step 5 Preview?

GPT-4.1 costs $2.00 per million input tokens and $8.00 per million output tokens; Step 5 Preview costs $1.00 and $2.70. Cost per solved task is known for GPT-4.1 only.

Which has the bigger context window, GPT-4.1 or Step 5 Preview?

Step 5 Preview, with 1.05M tokens against 1.05M.

How many benchmarks is the GPT-4.1 vs Step 5 Preview comparison based on?

33 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 22, 2026. GPT-4.1's coding index rests on 0 independent benchmarks and Step 5 Preview's on 4. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next