LLMBenchmark.ai

Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

GPT-4.1 Mini vs Step 5 Preview

Updated October 21, 2026. 33 benchmarks have a result for both. Coding is ranked on the Vibe Coding Index; every other board is shown as published.

GPT-4.1 MiniOpenAI
Coding
28.5
Overall
10.2
Output $/M
$1.60
0
Step 5 PreviewStepFun
Coding
71.4
Overall
43.7
Output $/M
$2.70
33
vs boards won of 33 shared

Decision reading

Pick Step 5 Preview for coding: it scores 71.4 on the Vibe Coding Index against 28.5 for GPT-4.1 Mini.

Pick GPT-4.1 Mini when output tokens cost 1.7x less.

Shared results
33
GPT-4.1 Mini only
51
Step 5 Preview only
28
Like-for-like categories
6 of 9

Shared results can support a head-to-head reading. Results only one model has describe coverage, not superiority.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
GPT-4.1 Mini 28.5 from 2 benchmarks, Step 5 Preview 71.4 from 2 benchmarks.
Widest category
Intelligence, 33.5 points apart on average over 1 shared benchmark.
Widest single gap
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR): GPT-4.1 Mini 44.0% against Step 5 Preview 88.3%, 44.3 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
GPT-4.1 Mini $1.60 against Step 5 Preview $2.70 per million output tokens, 1.7x apart.
Context window
GPT-4.1 Mini takes 1.05M tokens, Step 5 Preview 1.05M.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryGPT-4.1 MiniBarsStep 5 PreviewTies
Coding02
Intelligence01
Reasoning06
Math02
Knowledge04
General018
All shared boards033
CodingLike-for-likeFour of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index02
Coding benchmarks for GPT-4.1 Mini and Step 5 Preview
BenchmarkGPT-4.1 MiniStep 5 PreviewLeader
Aider polyglot32.4%Not measuredOnly GPT-4.1 Mini measured
SWE-bench Verified23.9%Not measuredOnly GPT-4.1 Mini measured
LiveBench codingNot measured85.6%Only Step 5 Preview measured
LMArena WebDevNot measured1567Only Step 5 Preview measured
AA Coding Index20.2Not measuredOnly GPT-4.1 Mini measured
LiveCodeBench (Vals AI)58.2%Not measuredOnly GPT-4.1 Mini measured
Terminal-Bench 4 (Vals AI)Not measured31.8%Only Step 5 Preview measured
Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI)Not measured70.4%Only Step 5 Preview measured
Code migration (Vals AI)Not measured39.0%Only Step 5 Preview measured
IOI (Vals AI)Not measured38.1%Only Step 5 Preview measured
SWE-bench Multimodal (Vals AI)Not measured40.8%Only Step 5 Preview measured
LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run)48.3%Not measuredOnly GPT-4.1 Mini measured
SciCodeNot measured58.9%Only Step 5 Preview measured
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)7.6%Not measuredOnly GPT-4.1 Mini measured
WeirdML37.6%Not measuredOnly GPT-4.1 Mini measured
LMArena Text: coding13671485Step 5 Preview
LMArena Text: software and IT13601473Step 5 Preview
LMArena WebDev: ReactNot measured1583Only Step 5 Preview measured
LMArena WebDev: HTMLNot measured1556Only Step 5 Preview measured
LMArena WebDev: from an imageNot measured1550Only Step 5 Preview measured
Neither model has a result on the other 18 boards here
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
Intelligence benchmarks for GPT-4.1 Mini and Step 5 Preview
BenchmarkGPT-4.1 MiniStep 5 PreviewLeader
AA Intelligence Index10.243.7Step 5 Preview
Epoch Capabilities Index134.9Not measuredOnly GPT-4.1 Mini measured
Agentic workDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index12 boards, none shared
Agentic work benchmarks for GPT-4.1 Mini and Step 5 Preview
BenchmarkGPT-4.1 MiniStep 5 PreviewLeader
LiveBench researchNot measured72.8%Only Step 5 Preview measured
LiveBench browserNot measured24.0%Only Step 5 Preview measured
LiveBench long agenticNot measured27.5%Only Step 5 Preview measured
SREBench (Vals AI)Not measured0.4%Only Step 5 Preview measured
Finance Agent (Vals AI)Not measured50.7%Only Step 5 Preview measured
Tax Agent Bench (Vals AI)Not measured27.3%Only Step 5 Preview measured
Legal Research Bench (Vals AI)Not measured40.4%Only Step 5 Preview measured
Excel Modeling Benchmark (Vals AI)Not measured57.1%Only Step 5 Preview measured
BioMysteryBench (Vals AI)Not measured67.4%Only Step 5 Preview measured
Terminal-Bench-Science (Vals AI)Not measured2.9%Only Step 5 Preview measured
Vals Science IndexNot measured29.6%Only Step 5 Preview measured
τ²-Bench Telecom52.9%Not measuredOnly GPT-4.1 Mini measured
Neither model has a result on the other 27 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index06
Reasoning benchmarks for GPT-4.1 Mini and Step 5 Preview
BenchmarkGPT-4.1 MiniStep 5 PreviewLeader
GPQA Diamond67.9%Not measuredOnly GPT-4.1 Mini measured
LiveBench reasoningNot measured83.8%Only Step 5 Preview measured
MysteryMechanism (Vals AI)Not measured18.5%Only Step 5 Preview measured
MMMU Pro (Vals AI)70.5%Not measuredOnly GPT-4.1 Mini measured
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)66.4%Not measuredOnly GPT-4.1 Mini measured
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)5.0%46.5%Step 5 Preview
GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run)65.8%Not measuredOnly GPT-4.1 Mini measured
ARC-AGI3.5%Not measuredOnly GPT-4.1 Mini measured
ARC-AGI-20.0%Not measuredOnly GPT-4.1 Mini measured
Chess puzzles1.0%Not measuredOnly GPT-4.1 Mini measured
Mystery game puzzles7.0%Not measuredOnly GPT-4.1 Mini measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts13491461Step 5 Preview
LMArena Text: expert13381485Step 5 Preview
LMArena Text: hard prompts in English13621454Step 5 Preview
LMArena Vision: diagrams11821308Step 5 Preview
LMArena Vision: homework12141265Step 5 Preview
Neither model has a result on the other 5 boards here
MathLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index02
Math benchmarks for GPT-4.1 Mini and Step 5 Preview
BenchmarkGPT-4.1 MiniStep 5 PreviewLeader
AIME49.4%Not measuredOnly GPT-4.1 Mini measured
MATH 500 (Vals AI)88.0%Not measuredOnly GPT-4.1 Mini measured
MGSM (Vals AI)87.8%Not measuredOnly GPT-4.1 Mini measured
AA Math Index46.3Not measuredOnly GPT-4.1 Mini measured
AIME 2025 (Artificial Analysis run)46.3%Not measuredOnly GPT-4.1 Mini measured
OTIS Mock AIME44.7%Not measuredOnly GPT-4.1 Mini measured
FrontierMath, tiers 1 to 36.7%Not measuredOnly GPT-4.1 Mini measured
ProofBenchNot measured42.0%Only Step 5 Preview measured
MATH level 587.3%Not measuredOnly GPT-4.1 Mini measured
LMArena Text: math13431458Step 5 Preview
LMArena Text: mathematical work13471460Step 5 Preview
Neither model has a result on the other 2 boards here
KnowledgeLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index04
Knowledge benchmarks for GPT-4.1 Mini and Step 5 Preview
BenchmarkGPT-4.1 MiniStep 5 PreviewLeader
MMLU Pro77.2%Not measuredOnly GPT-4.1 Mini measured
LegalBench (Vals AI)78.0%Not measuredOnly GPT-4.1 Mini measured
CorpFin (Vals AI)57.9%Not measuredOnly GPT-4.1 Mini measured
TaxEval (Vals AI)71.9%Not measuredOnly GPT-4.1 Mini measured
MortgageTax (Vals AI)65.5%Not measuredOnly GPT-4.1 Mini measured
MedQA (Vals AI)84.6%Not measuredOnly GPT-4.1 Mini measured
MMLU Pro (Artificial Analysis run)78.1%Not measuredOnly GPT-4.1 Mini measured
SimpleQA Verified12.7%Not measuredOnly GPT-4.1 Mini measured
LMArena Text: science13281454Step 5 Preview
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare13241439Step 5 Preview
LMArena Text: legal and government13431437Step 5 Preview
LMArena Text: business and finance13221435Step 5 Preview
Neither model has a result on the other 5 boards here
Web designDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index7 boards, none shared
Web design benchmarks for GPT-4.1 Mini and Step 5 Preview
BenchmarkGPT-4.1 MiniStep 5 PreviewLeader
Design Arena: websites997Not measuredOnly GPT-4.1 Mini measured
Design Arena: UI components961Not measuredOnly GPT-4.1 Mini measured
Design Arena: game dev1071Not measuredOnly GPT-4.1 Mini measured
Design Arena: data viz1034Not measuredOnly GPT-4.1 Mini measured
Design Arena: 3D837Not measuredOnly GPT-4.1 Mini measured
Design Arena: all code categories994Not measuredOnly GPT-4.1 Mini measured
LiveBench designNot measured76.9%Only Step 5 Preview measured
Neither model has a result on the other 2 boards here
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index018
General benchmarks for GPT-4.1 Mini and Step 5 Preview
BenchmarkGPT-4.1 MiniStep 5 PreviewLeader
LiveBench data analysisNot measured63.5%Only Step 5 Preview measured
Public Benefits Bench (Vals AI)Not measured58.1%Only Step 5 Preview measured
IFBench38.3%Not measuredOnly GPT-4.1 Mini measured
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)44.0%88.3%Step 5 Preview
DTBench68.8%Not measuredOnly GPT-4.1 Mini measured
LMCA21.1%Not measuredOnly GPT-4.1 Mini measured
Fiction.LiveBench44.4%Not measuredOnly GPT-4.1 Mini measured
LMArena Text13411440Step 5 Preview
LMArena Text: instruction following13331438Step 5 Preview
LMArena Text: creative writing12991409Step 5 Preview
LMArena Vision11811265Step 5 Preview
LMArena Text: English13561447Step 5 Preview
LMArena Text: non-English13181428Step 5 Preview
LMArena Text: Chinese13291500Step 5 Preview
LMArena Text: German1350Not measuredOnly GPT-4.1 Mini measured
LMArena Text: Japanese12901383Step 5 Preview
LMArena Text: Korean1298Not measuredOnly GPT-4.1 Mini measured
LMArena Text: French13581438Step 5 Preview
LMArena Text: Spanish13191441Step 5 Preview
LMArena Text: Russian13241433Step 5 Preview
LMArena Text: Polish1326Not measuredOnly GPT-4.1 Mini measured
LMArena Text: multi-turn13541437Step 5 Preview
LMArena Text: longer queries13441449Step 5 Preview
LMArena Text: writing and language13191425Step 5 Preview
LMArena Text: entertainment and media13001412Step 5 Preview
LMArena Vision: English11911290Step 5 Preview
LMArena Vision: Chinese1186Not measuredOnly GPT-4.1 Mini measured
LMArena Vision: reading text11881282Step 5 Preview
LMArena Vision: humor1182Not measuredOnly GPT-4.1 Mini measured
LMArena Vision: captioning1174Not measuredOnly GPT-4.1 Mini measured
LMArena Vision: recognizing things1187Not measuredOnly GPT-4.1 Mini measured
LMArena Vision: creative writing1182Not measuredOnly GPT-4.1 Mini measured
Neither model has a result on the other 14 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for GPT-4.1 Mini and Step 5 Preview
BenchmarkGPT-4.1 MiniStep 5 PreviewLeader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

GPT-4.1 Mini$0.0012Fits in one request
Step 5 Preview$0.0024Fits in one request

GPT-4.1 Mini costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

GPT-4.1 Mini$0.025Fits in one request
Step 5 Preview$0.058Fits in one request

GPT-4.1 Mini costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

GPT-4.1 Mini$0.096Fits in one request
Step 5 Preview$0.227Fits in one request

GPT-4.1 Mini costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of GPT-4.1 Mini and Step 5 Preview
SpecificationOpenAI GPT-4.1 MiniStepFun Step 5 Preview
MakerOpenAIStepFun
WeightsNo public weights listedOpen weights
ReleasedApril 14, 2025October 8, 2026
Context window1.05M1.05M
Input $/Mtok$0.40$1.00
Output $/Mtok$1.60$2.70
Coding index28.571.4
Independent measurements behind it22
Cost per solved task$1.818Not computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is GPT-4.1 Mini better than Step 5 Preview for coding?

Pick Step 5 Preview for coding: it scores 71.4 on the Vibe Coding Index against 28.5 for GPT-4.1 Mini. Pick GPT-4.1 Mini when output tokens cost 1.7x less.

Which is cheaper, GPT-4.1 Mini or Step 5 Preview?

GPT-4.1 Mini costs $0.40 per million input tokens and $1.60 per million output tokens; Step 5 Preview costs $1.00 and $2.70. Cost per solved task is known for GPT-4.1 Mini only.

Which has the bigger context window, GPT-4.1 Mini or Step 5 Preview?

Step 5 Preview, with 1.05M tokens against 1.05M.

How many benchmarks is the GPT-4.1 Mini vs Step 5 Preview comparison based on?

33 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 21, 2026. GPT-4.1 Mini's coding index rests on 2 independent benchmarks and Step 5 Preview's on 2. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next

Embed this comparison on your site

Free under CC BY 4.0, while the source link stays visible. Preview the frame · Terms and other embeds

<iframe src="https://llmbenchmark.ai/embed/compare/gpt-4-1-mini-vs-stepfun-step-5-preview" title="GPT-4.1 Mini vs Step 5 Preview, LLMBenchmark.ai" width="100%" height="360" style="border:0;max-width:100%" loading="lazy"></iframe>
<p style="font:13px/1.4 sans-serif;margin:6px 0 0">Source: <a href="https://llmbenchmark.ai/compare/gpt-4-1-mini-vs-stepfun-step-5-preview">LLMBenchmark.ai, GPT-4.1 Mini vs Step 5 Preview</a></p>