Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

GPT-3.5 Turbo vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro

MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads GPT-3.5 Turbo on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, 46.3 to 5.5, and MiMo-V2.6-Pro costs 1.7x less per output token ($0.87 vs $1.50 per million). Updated October 22, 2026; 1 benchmarks have a result for both.

GPT-3.5 TurboOpenAI
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$1.50
0
MiMo-V2.6-ProXiaomi
Coding
65.4
Overall
68.4
Output $/M
$0.87
1
vs boards won of 1 shared

GPT-3.5 Turbo or MiMo-V2.6-Pro: which to pick

Only MiMo-V2.6-Pro has a coding score, 65.4 on the Vibe Coding Index; GPT-3.5 Turbo has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Compare them on price, context and the boards below.

Shared results
1
GPT-3.5 Turbo only
12
MiMo-V2.6-Pro only
72
Like-for-like categories
1 of 9

Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
GPT-3.5 Turbo not benchmarked, MiMo-V2.6-Pro 65.4 from 4 benchmarks.
Widest category
Intelligence, 40.8 points apart on average over 1 shared benchmark.
Widest single gap
AA Intelligence Index: GPT-3.5 Turbo 5.5 against MiMo-V2.6-Pro 46.3, 40.8 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
GPT-3.5 Turbo $1.50 against MiMo-V2.6-Pro $0.87 per million output tokens, 1.7x apart.
Context window
GPT-3.5 Turbo takes 16K tokens, MiMo-V2.6-Pro 1.05M.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryGPT-3.5 TurboBarsMiMo-V2.6-ProTies
Intelligence01
All shared boards01
CodingDirectional onlySix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index19 boards, none shared
Coding benchmarks for GPT-3.5 Turbo and MiMo-V2.6-Pro
BenchmarkGPT-3.5 TurboMiMo-V2.6-ProLeader
LiveBench codingNot measured81.5%Only MiMo-V2.6-Pro measured
LMArena WebDevNot measured1625Only MiMo-V2.6-Pro measured
AA Coding Index10.7Not measuredOnly GPT-3.5 Turbo measured
Terminal-Bench 4 (Vals AI)Not measured31.3%Only MiMo-V2.6-Pro measured
Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI)Not measured85.2%Only MiMo-V2.6-Pro measured
Code migration (Vals AI)Not measured43.0%Only MiMo-V2.6-Pro measured
ProgramBench (Vals AI)Not measured0.5%Only MiMo-V2.6-Pro measured
IOI (Vals AI)Not measured39.3%Only MiMo-V2.6-Pro measured
Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals AI)Not measured67.8%Only MiMo-V2.6-Pro measured
SWE-bench Multimodal (Vals AI)Not measured41.3%Only MiMo-V2.6-Pro measured
CyberBench (Vals AI)Not measured72.9%Only MiMo-V2.6-Pro measured
SciCodeNot measured60.9%Only MiMo-V2.6-Pro measured
ALE-BenchNot measured1158.1Only MiMo-V2.6-Pro measured
LMArena Text: codingNot measured1533Only MiMo-V2.6-Pro measured
LMArena Text: software and ITNot measured1528Only MiMo-V2.6-Pro measured
LMArena WebDev: ReactNot measured1639Only MiMo-V2.6-Pro measured
LMArena WebDev: HTMLNot measured1616Only MiMo-V2.6-Pro measured
LMArena WebDev: from an imageNot measured1598Only MiMo-V2.6-Pro measured
SciCode0.0%Not measuredOnly GPT-3.5 Turbo measured
Neither model has a result on the other 24 boards here
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
Intelligence benchmarks for GPT-3.5 Turbo and MiMo-V2.6-Pro
BenchmarkGPT-3.5 TurboMiMo-V2.6-ProLeader
AA Intelligence Index5.546.3MiMo-V2.6-Pro
Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here
Agentic workDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index12 boards, none shared
Agentic work benchmarks for GPT-3.5 Turbo and MiMo-V2.6-Pro
BenchmarkGPT-3.5 TurboMiMo-V2.6-ProLeader
Design Arena: agents building web appsNot measured1290Only MiMo-V2.6-Pro measured
LiveBench researchNot measured76.7%Only MiMo-V2.6-Pro measured
LiveBench browserNot measured88.0%Only MiMo-V2.6-Pro measured
LiveBench long agenticNot measured47.5%Only MiMo-V2.6-Pro measured
SREBench (Vals AI)Not measured3.0%Only MiMo-V2.6-Pro measured
Finance Agent (Vals AI)Not measured57.3%Only MiMo-V2.6-Pro measured
Tax Agent Bench (Vals AI)Not measured32.4%Only MiMo-V2.6-Pro measured
Legal Research Bench (Vals AI)Not measured47.1%Only MiMo-V2.6-Pro measured
Harvey's Legal Agent Benchmark (Vals AI)Not measured13.8%Only MiMo-V2.6-Pro measured
Excel Modeling Benchmark (Vals AI)Not measured62.9%Only MiMo-V2.6-Pro measured
Terminal-Bench-Science (Vals AI)Not measured2.9%Only MiMo-V2.6-Pro measured
APEX-AgentsNot measured54.4%Only MiMo-V2.6-Pro measured
Neither model has a result on the other 30 boards here
ReasoningDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index11 boards, none shared
Reasoning benchmarks for GPT-3.5 Turbo and MiMo-V2.6-Pro
BenchmarkGPT-3.5 TurboMiMo-V2.6-ProLeader
GPQA Diamond30.6%Not measuredOnly GPT-3.5 Turbo measured
LiveBench reasoningNot measured79.6%Only MiMo-V2.6-Pro measured
MysteryMechanism (Vals AI)Not measured15.3%Only MiMo-V2.6-Pro measured
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)29.7%Not measuredOnly GPT-3.5 Turbo measured
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured49.4%Only MiMo-V2.6-Pro measured
BIG-Bench Hard61.6%Not measuredOnly GPT-3.5 Turbo measured
LMArena Text: hard promptsNot measured1511Only MiMo-V2.6-Pro measured
LMArena Text: expertNot measured1541Only MiMo-V2.6-Pro measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts in EnglishNot measured1520Only MiMo-V2.6-Pro measured
LMArena Vision: diagramsNot measured1281Only MiMo-V2.6-Pro measured
LMArena Vision: homeworkNot measured1264Only MiMo-V2.6-Pro measured
Neither model has a result on the other 12 boards here
MathDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index4 boards, none shared
Math benchmarks for GPT-3.5 Turbo and MiMo-V2.6-Pro
BenchmarkGPT-3.5 TurboMiMo-V2.6-ProLeader
ProofBenchNot measured70.0%Only MiMo-V2.6-Pro measured
GSM8K57.8%Not measuredOnly GPT-3.5 Turbo measured
LMArena Text: mathNot measured1500Only MiMo-V2.6-Pro measured
LMArena Text: mathematical workNot measured1511Only MiMo-V2.6-Pro measured
Neither model has a result on the other 10 boards here
KnowledgeDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index9 boards, none shared
Knowledge benchmarks for GPT-3.5 Turbo and MiMo-V2.6-Pro
BenchmarkGPT-3.5 TurboMiMo-V2.6-ProLeader
LegalBench (Vals AI)64.4%Not measuredOnly GPT-3.5 Turbo measured
MedQA (Vals AI)58.5%Not measuredOnly GPT-3.5 Turbo measured
MedCode (Vals AI)Not measured45.0%Only MiMo-V2.6-Pro measured
MMLU Pro (Artificial Analysis run)46.2%Not measuredOnly GPT-3.5 Turbo measured
MMLU68.5%Not measuredOnly GPT-3.5 Turbo measured
LMArena Text: scienceNot measured1506Only MiMo-V2.6-Pro measured
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcareNot measured1497Only MiMo-V2.6-Pro measured
LMArena Text: legal and governmentNot measured1485Only MiMo-V2.6-Pro measured
LMArena Text: business and financeNot measured1468Only MiMo-V2.6-Pro measured
Neither model has a result on the other 11 boards here
Web designDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index7 boards, none shared
Web design benchmarks for GPT-3.5 Turbo and MiMo-V2.6-Pro
BenchmarkGPT-3.5 TurboMiMo-V2.6-ProLeader
Design Arena: websitesNot measured1307Only MiMo-V2.6-Pro measured
Design Arena: UI componentsNot measured1337Only MiMo-V2.6-Pro measured
Design Arena: game devNot measured1313Only MiMo-V2.6-Pro measured
Design Arena: data vizNot measured1337Only MiMo-V2.6-Pro measured
Design Arena: 3DNot measured1329Only MiMo-V2.6-Pro measured
Design Arena: all code categoriesNot measured1316Only MiMo-V2.6-Pro measured
LiveBench designNot measured78.5%Only MiMo-V2.6-Pro measured
Neither model has a result on the other 2 boards here
GeneralDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index22 boards, none shared
General benchmarks for GPT-3.5 Turbo and MiMo-V2.6-Pro
BenchmarkGPT-3.5 TurboMiMo-V2.6-ProLeader
Vals IndexNot measured57.8%Only MiMo-V2.6-Pro measured
LiveBench data analysisNot measured72.3%Only MiMo-V2.6-Pro measured
Public Benefits Bench (Vals AI)Not measured68.9%Only MiMo-V2.6-Pro measured
SAGE (Vals AI)Not measured45.0%Only MiMo-V2.6-Pro measured
MedScribe (Vals AI)Not measured88.3%Only MiMo-V2.6-Pro measured
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)Not measured86.3%Only MiMo-V2.6-Pro measured
DTBench48.5%Not measuredOnly GPT-3.5 Turbo measured
LMCA9.7%Not measuredOnly GPT-3.5 Turbo measured
LMArena TextNot measured1491Only MiMo-V2.6-Pro measured
LMArena Text: instruction followingNot measured1491Only MiMo-V2.6-Pro measured
LMArena Text: creative writingNot measured1466Only MiMo-V2.6-Pro measured
LMArena VisionNot measured1263Only MiMo-V2.6-Pro measured
LMArena Text: EnglishNot measured1504Only MiMo-V2.6-Pro measured
LMArena Text: non-EnglishNot measured1474Only MiMo-V2.6-Pro measured
LMArena Text: ChineseNot measured1529Only MiMo-V2.6-Pro measured
LMArena Text: RussianNot measured1479Only MiMo-V2.6-Pro measured
LMArena Text: multi-turnNot measured1466Only MiMo-V2.6-Pro measured
LMArena Text: longer queriesNot measured1501Only MiMo-V2.6-Pro measured
LMArena Text: writing and languageNot measured1470Only MiMo-V2.6-Pro measured
LMArena Text: entertainment and mediaNot measured1465Only MiMo-V2.6-Pro measured
LMArena Vision: EnglishNot measured1268Only MiMo-V2.6-Pro measured
LMArena Vision: reading textNot measured1270Only MiMo-V2.6-Pro measured
Neither model has a result on the other 26 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for GPT-3.5 Turbo and MiMo-V2.6-Pro
BenchmarkGPT-3.5 TurboMiMo-V2.6-ProLeader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

GPT-3.5 Turbo$0.0013Fits in one request
MiMo-V2.6-Pro$0.0009Fits in one request

MiMo-V2.6-Pro costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

GPT-3.5 Turbo$0.029Exceeds the context window
MiMo-V2.6-Pro$0.024Fits in one request

MiMo-V2.6-Pro costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

GPT-3.5 Turbo$0.115Exceeds the context window
MiMo-V2.6-Pro$0.096Fits in one request

MiMo-V2.6-Pro costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of GPT-3.5 Turbo and MiMo-V2.6-Pro
SpecificationOpenAI GPT-3.5 TurboXiaomi MiMo-V2.6-Pro
MakerOpenAIXiaomi
WeightsNo public weights listedOpen weights
ReleasedMay 28, 2023September 21, 2026
Context window16K1.05M
Input $/Mtok$0.50$0.435
Output $/Mtok$1.50$0.87
Coding indexNot benchmarked65.4
Independent measurements behind it04
Cost per solved taskNot computableNot computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is GPT-3.5 Turbo better than MiMo-V2.6-Pro for coding?

Only MiMo-V2.6-Pro has a coding score, 65.4 on the Vibe Coding Index; GPT-3.5 Turbo has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Compare them on price, context and the boards below.

Which is cheaper, GPT-3.5 Turbo or MiMo-V2.6-Pro?

GPT-3.5 Turbo costs $0.50 per million input tokens and $1.50 per million output tokens; MiMo-V2.6-Pro costs $0.435 and $0.87. Cost per solved task is known for neither of them.

Which has the bigger context window, GPT-3.5 Turbo or MiMo-V2.6-Pro?

MiMo-V2.6-Pro, with 1.05M tokens against 16K.

How many benchmarks is the GPT-3.5 Turbo vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro comparison based on?

1 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 22, 2026. GPT-3.5 Turbo's coding index rests on 0 independent benchmarks and MiMo-V2.6-Pro's on 4. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next