Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

GLM 5 Turbo vs Mistral Large 4

Mistral Large 4 leads GLM 5 Turbo on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, 38.4 to 26.6, at about the same output price ($4.18 vs $4.00 per million). Updated October 22, 2026; 12 benchmarks have a result for both.

GLM 5 TurboZ.ai
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$4.00
3
Mistral Large 4Mistral AI
Coding
56.4
Overall
54.6
Output $/M
$4.18
9
vs boards won of 12 shared

GLM 5 Turbo or Mistral Large 4: which to pick

Only Mistral Large 4 has a coding score, 56.4 on the Vibe Coding Index; GLM 5 Turbo has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Pick GLM 5 Turbo for output tokens 1.0x cheaper ($4.00 vs $4.18 per million) and work measured by Design Arena: websites or Design Arena: game dev, where it leads.

Shared results
12
GLM 5 Turbo only
4
Mistral Large 4 only
69
Like-for-like categories
5 of 9

Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
GLM 5 Turbo not benchmarked, Mistral Large 4 56.4 from 5 benchmarks.
Widest category
Coding, 19.3 points apart on average over 1 shared benchmark.
Widest single gap
ALE-Bench: GLM 5 Turbo 634.0 against Mistral Large 4 1213.2, 19.3 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
GLM 5 Turbo $4.00 against Mistral Large 4 $4.18 per million output tokens, 1.0x apart.
Context window
GLM 5 Turbo takes 203K tokens, Mistral Large 4 1.05M.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryGLM 5 TurboBarsMistral Large 4Ties
Coding01
Intelligence01
Reasoning01
Web design35
General01
All shared boards39
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index01
Coding benchmarks for GLM 5 Turbo and Mistral Large 4
BenchmarkGLM 5 TurboMistral Large 4Leader
LiveBench codingNot measured60.0%Only Mistral Large 4 measured
LMArena WebDevNot measured1543Only Mistral Large 4 measured
Terminal-Bench 4 (Vals AI)Not measured27.8%Only Mistral Large 4 measured
Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI)Not measured78.4%Only Mistral Large 4 measured
Code migration (Vals AI)Not measured30.6%Only Mistral Large 4 measured
IOI (Vals AI)Not measured45.3%Only Mistral Large 4 measured
SWE-bench Multimodal (Vals AI)Not measured33.1%Only Mistral Large 4 measured
Vibe Code Bench 1-100 (Vals AI)Not measured14.3%Only Mistral Large 4 measured
SciCodeNot measured54.2%Only Mistral Large 4 measured
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)33.3%Not measuredOnly GLM 5 Turbo measured
FrontierCodeNot measured39.4%Only Mistral Large 4 measured
ALE-Bench634.01213.2Mistral Large 4
LMArena Text: codingNot measured1478Only Mistral Large 4 measured
LMArena Text: software and ITNot measured1467Only Mistral Large 4 measured
LMArena WebDev: ReactNot measured1559Only Mistral Large 4 measured
LMArena WebDev: HTMLNot measured1487Only Mistral Large 4 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 23 boards here
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
Intelligence benchmarks for GLM 5 Turbo and Mistral Large 4
BenchmarkGLM 5 TurboMistral Large 4Leader
AA Intelligence Index26.638.4Mistral Large 4
Epoch Capabilities IndexNot measured150.0Only Mistral Large 4 measured
Agentic workDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index10 boards, none shared
Agentic work benchmarks for GLM 5 Turbo and Mistral Large 4
BenchmarkGLM 5 TurboMistral Large 4Leader
LiveBench researchNot measured28.1%Only Mistral Large 4 measured
LiveBench browserNot measured8.0%Only Mistral Large 4 measured
LiveBench long agenticNot measured11.8%Only Mistral Large 4 measured
Finance Agent (Vals AI)Not measured54.7%Only Mistral Large 4 measured
Tax Agent Bench (Vals AI)Not measured30.4%Only Mistral Large 4 measured
Legal Research Bench (Vals AI)Not measured31.7%Only Mistral Large 4 measured
Harvey's Legal Agent Benchmark (Vals AI)Not measured17.5%Only Mistral Large 4 measured
Excel Modeling Benchmark (Vals AI)Not measured56.2%Only Mistral Large 4 measured
BioMysteryBench (Vals AI)Not measured67.0%Only Mistral Large 4 measured
τ²-Bench Telecom98.5%Not measuredOnly GLM 5 Turbo measured
Neither model has a result on the other 31 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
Reasoning benchmarks for GLM 5 Turbo and Mistral Large 4
BenchmarkGLM 5 TurboMistral Large 4Leader
LiveBench reasoningNot measured83.9%Only Mistral Large 4 measured
MysteryMechanism (Vals AI)Not measured12.2%Only Mistral Large 4 measured
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)84.7%Not measuredOnly GLM 5 Turbo measured
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)27.8%35.0%Mistral Large 4
GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run)Not measured88.1%Only Mistral Large 4 measured
Chess puzzlesNot measured33.0%Only Mistral Large 4 measured
Mystery game puzzlesNot measured17.0%Only Mistral Large 4 measured
LMArena Text: hard promptsNot measured1444Only Mistral Large 4 measured
LMArena Text: expertNot measured1444Only Mistral Large 4 measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts in EnglishNot measured1442Only Mistral Large 4 measured
LMArena Vision: diagramsNot measured1288Only Mistral Large 4 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 11 boards here
MathDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index6 boards, none shared
Math benchmarks for GLM 5 Turbo and Mistral Large 4
BenchmarkGLM 5 TurboMistral Large 4Leader
OTIS Mock AIMENot measured98.3%Only Mistral Large 4 measured
FrontierMath, tiers 1 to 3Not measured58.6%Only Mistral Large 4 measured
FrontierMath, tier 4Not measured26.8%Only Mistral Large 4 measured
ProofBenchNot measured10.0%Only Mistral Large 4 measured
LMArena Text: mathNot measured1469Only Mistral Large 4 measured
LMArena Text: mathematical workNot measured1462Only Mistral Large 4 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 7 boards here
KnowledgeDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index6 boards, none shared
Knowledge benchmarks for GLM 5 Turbo and Mistral Large 4
BenchmarkGLM 5 TurboMistral Large 4Leader
MedCode (Vals AI)Not measured40.7%Only Mistral Large 4 measured
SimpleQA VerifiedNot measured20.0%Only Mistral Large 4 measured
LMArena Text: scienceNot measured1448Only Mistral Large 4 measured
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcareNot measured1433Only Mistral Large 4 measured
LMArena Text: legal and governmentNot measured1425Only Mistral Large 4 measured
LMArena Text: business and financeNot measured1439Only Mistral Large 4 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 12 boards here
Web designLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index35
Web design benchmarks for GLM 5 Turbo and Mistral Large 4
BenchmarkGLM 5 TurboMistral Large 4Leader
Design Arena: websites12621257GLM 5 Turbo
Design Arena: UI components12601272Mistral Large 4
Design Arena: game dev12481225GLM 5 Turbo
Design Arena: data viz12641275Mistral Large 4
Design Arena: 3D12471252Mistral Large 4
Design Arena: all code categories12611259GLM 5 Turbo
Design Arena: SVG12051232Mistral Large 4
Design Arena: ASCII art11601202Mistral Large 4
LiveBench designNot measured65.6%Only Mistral Large 4 measured
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
General benchmarks for GLM 5 Turbo and Mistral Large 4
BenchmarkGLM 5 TurboMistral Large 4Leader
LiveBench data analysisNot measured76.5%Only Mistral Large 4 measured
MedScribe (Vals AI)Not measured80.4%Only Mistral Large 4 measured
IFBench73.2%Not measuredOnly GLM 5 Turbo measured
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)71.7%81.3%Mistral Large 4
DTBenchNot measured88.2%Only Mistral Large 4 measured
LMCANot measured35.8%Only Mistral Large 4 measured
Surface Evolver BenchNot measured28.1%Only Mistral Large 4 measured
Furniture assemblyNot measured20.8%Only Mistral Large 4 measured
LMArena TextNot measured1431Only Mistral Large 4 measured
LMArena Text: instruction followingNot measured1422Only Mistral Large 4 measured
LMArena Text: creative writingNot measured1363Only Mistral Large 4 measured
LMArena VisionNot measured1272Only Mistral Large 4 measured
LMArena Text: EnglishNot measured1433Only Mistral Large 4 measured
LMArena Text: non-EnglishNot measured1422Only Mistral Large 4 measured
LMArena Text: ChineseNot measured1492Only Mistral Large 4 measured
LMArena Text: JapaneseNot measured1415Only Mistral Large 4 measured
LMArena Text: FrenchNot measured1492Only Mistral Large 4 measured
LMArena Text: SpanishNot measured1455Only Mistral Large 4 measured
LMArena Text: RussianNot measured1417Only Mistral Large 4 measured
LMArena Text: multi-turnNot measured1435Only Mistral Large 4 measured
LMArena Text: longer queriesNot measured1428Only Mistral Large 4 measured
LMArena Text: writing and languageNot measured1386Only Mistral Large 4 measured
LMArena Text: entertainment and mediaNot measured1378Only Mistral Large 4 measured
LMArena Vision: EnglishNot measured1283Only Mistral Large 4 measured
LMArena Vision: reading textNot measured1284Only Mistral Large 4 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 21 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for GLM 5 Turbo and Mistral Large 4
BenchmarkGLM 5 TurboMistral Large 4Leader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

GLM 5 Turbo$0.0032Fits in one request
Mistral Large 4$0.0034Fits in one request

GLM 5 Turbo costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

GLM 5 Turbo$0.072Fits in one request
Mistral Large 4$0.081Fits in one request

GLM 5 Turbo costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

GLM 5 Turbo$0.280Exceeds the context window
Mistral Large 4$0.314Fits in one request

GLM 5 Turbo costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of GLM 5 Turbo and Mistral Large 4
SpecificationZ.ai GLM 5 TurboMistral Large 4
MakerZ.aiMistral AI
WeightsNo public weights listedNo public weights listed
ReleasedMarch 15, 2026October 6, 2026
Context window203K1.05M
Input $/Mtok$1.20$1.36
Output $/Mtok$4.00$4.18
Coding indexNot benchmarked56.4
Independent measurements behind it05
Cost per solved taskNot computableNot computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is GLM 5 Turbo better than Mistral Large 4 for coding?

Only Mistral Large 4 has a coding score, 56.4 on the Vibe Coding Index; GLM 5 Turbo has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Pick GLM 5 Turbo for output tokens 1.0x cheaper ($4.00 vs $4.18 per million) and work measured by Design Arena: websites or Design Arena: game dev, where it leads.

Which is cheaper, GLM 5 Turbo or Mistral Large 4?

GLM 5 Turbo costs $1.20 per million input tokens and $4.00 per million output tokens; Mistral Large 4 costs $1.36 and $4.18. Cost per solved task is known for neither of them.

Which has the bigger context window, GLM 5 Turbo or Mistral Large 4?

Mistral Large 4, with 1.05M tokens against 203K.

How many benchmarks is the GLM 5 Turbo vs Mistral Large 4 comparison based on?

12 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 22, 2026. GLM 5 Turbo's coding index rests on 0 independent benchmarks and Mistral Large 4's on 5. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next