Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

GLM 5.3 FlashX vs Grok 4.3

Updated October 21, 2026. No benchmark has tested both models yet. Coding is ranked on the Vibe Coding Index; every other board is shown as published.

GLM 5.3 FlashXZ.ai
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$1.25
Grok 4.3xAI
Coding
37.4
Overall
24.9
Output $/M
$2.50
vs $1.25 vs $2.50 per 1M output tokens. GLM 5.3 FlashX is 2.0x cheaper.

Decision reading

Only Grok 4.3 has a coding score, 37.4 on the Vibe Coding Index; GLM 5.3 FlashX has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

GLM 5.3 FlashX has the edge where output tokens cost 2.0x less, and where the context window is larger, 1.05M against 1M tokens.

No benchmark has tested both yet. GLM 5.3 FlashX has none yet; Grok 4.3 on LMArena WebDev, AA Coding Index and LiveCodeBench (Vals AI). Compare them on price and context instead.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
GLM 5.3 FlashX not benchmarked, Grok 4.3 37.4 from 3 benchmarks.
Widest category
None yet: no category has been tested on both models.
Widest single gap
None yet: no benchmark has tested both models.
Output price
GLM 5.3 FlashX $1.25 against Grok 4.3 $2.50 per million output tokens, 2.0x apart.
Context window
GLM 5.3 FlashX takes 1.05M tokens, Grok 4.3 1M.

Benchmark by benchmark

Every board either model has a result on, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale. Only one model is measured on each, so no row names a leader.

CodingDirectional onlySix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index18 boards measured
Coding benchmarks for GLM 5.3 FlashX and Grok 4.3
BenchmarkGLM 5.3 FlashXGrok 4.3Leader
LMArena WebDevNot measured1358Only Grok 4.3 measured
AA Coding IndexNot measured42.2Only Grok 4.3 measured
LiveCodeBench (Vals AI)Not measured84.5%Only Grok 4.3 measured
SWE-bench Verified (Vals AI)Not measured71.4%Only Grok 4.3 measured
Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI)Not measured19.4%Only Grok 4.3 measured
Code migration (Vals AI)Not measured6.8%Only Grok 4.3 measured
ProgramBench (Vals AI)Not measured0.0%Only Grok 4.3 measured
Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals AI)Not measured42.0%Only Grok 4.3 measured
SkillsBench (Vals AI)Not measured40.6%Only Grok 4.3 measured
SciCodeNot measured48.3%Only Grok 4.3 measured
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured37.9%Only Grok 4.3 measured
WeirdMLNot measured49.9%Only Grok 4.3 measured
ALE-BenchNot measured944.2Only Grok 4.3 measured
LMArena Text: codingNot measured1415Only Grok 4.3 measured
LMArena Text: software and ITNot measured1416Only Grok 4.3 measured
LMArena WebDev: ReactNot measured1353Only Grok 4.3 measured
LMArena WebDev: HTMLNot measured1367Only Grok 4.3 measured
LMArena WebDev: from an imageNot measured1375Only Grok 4.3 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 20 boards here
IntelligenceDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index1 board measured
Intelligence benchmarks for GLM 5.3 FlashX and Grok 4.3
BenchmarkGLM 5.3 FlashXGrok 4.3Leader
AA Intelligence IndexNot measured24.9Only Grok 4.3 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here
Agentic workDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index16 boards measured
Agentic work benchmarks for GLM 5.3 FlashX and Grok 4.3
BenchmarkGLM 5.3 FlashXGrok 4.3Leader
AA Agentic IndexNot measured15.5Only Grok 4.3 measured
Design Arena: agents building web appsNot measured1126Only Grok 4.3 measured
Design Arena: agents building full-stack appsNot measured1006Only Grok 4.3 measured
Design Arena: agents building mobile appsNot measured1059Only Grok 4.3 measured
Design Arena: agents building Android appsNot measured968Only Grok 4.3 measured
Design Arena: agents building Godot gamesNot measured914Only Grok 4.3 measured
Design Arena: agents building gamesNot measured1007Only Grok 4.3 measured
Design Arena: HTML slidesNot measured1008Only Grok 4.3 measured
Design Arena: PowerPoint slidesNot measured1013Only Grok 4.3 measured
Finance Agent (Vals AI)Not measured37.7%Only Grok 4.3 measured
Tax Agent Bench (Vals AI)Not measured6.2%Only Grok 4.3 measured
Legal Research Bench (Vals AI)Not measured15.4%Only Grok 4.3 measured
Excel Modeling Benchmark (Vals AI)Not measured18.4%Only Grok 4.3 measured
τ²-Bench TelecomNot measured97.7%Only Grok 4.3 measured
Vending-Bench 2Not measured$35Only Grok 4.3 measured
LMArena SearchNot measured1166Only Grok 4.3 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 23 boards here
ReasoningDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index11 boards measured
Reasoning benchmarks for GLM 5.3 FlashX and Grok 4.3
BenchmarkGLM 5.3 FlashXGrok 4.3Leader
GPQA DiamondNot measured91.4%Only Grok 4.3 measured
MMMU Pro (Vals AI)Not measured83.1%Only Grok 4.3 measured
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured90.1%Only Grok 4.3 measured
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured37.2%Only Grok 4.3 measured
GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run)Not measured88.8%Only Grok 4.3 measured
Chess puzzlesNot measured18.0%Only Grok 4.3 measured
LMArena Text: hard promptsNot measured1396Only Grok 4.3 measured
LMArena Text: expertNot measured1384Only Grok 4.3 measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts in EnglishNot measured1402Only Grok 4.3 measured
LMArena Vision: diagramsNot measured1241Only Grok 4.3 measured
LMArena Vision: homeworkNot measured1241Only Grok 4.3 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 10 boards here
MathDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index6 boards measured
Math benchmarks for GLM 5.3 FlashX and Grok 4.3
BenchmarkGLM 5.3 FlashXGrok 4.3Leader
OTIS Mock AIMENot measured93.3%Only Grok 4.3 measured
FrontierMath, tiers 1 to 3Not measured42.8%Only Grok 4.3 measured
FrontierMath, tier 4Not measured14.6%Only Grok 4.3 measured
ProofBenchNot measured11.0%Only Grok 4.3 measured
LMArena Text: mathNot measured1387Only Grok 4.3 measured
LMArena Text: mathematical workNot measured1396Only Grok 4.3 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 7 boards here
KnowledgeDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index12 boards measured
Knowledge benchmarks for GLM 5.3 FlashX and Grok 4.3
BenchmarkGLM 5.3 FlashXGrok 4.3Leader
MMLU ProNot measured85.8%Only Grok 4.3 measured
LegalBench (Vals AI)Not measured84.5%Only Grok 4.3 measured
CaseLaw (Vals AI)Not measured79.3%Only Grok 4.3 measured
CorpFin (Vals AI)Not measured68.5%Only Grok 4.3 measured
TaxEval (Vals AI)Not measured70.8%Only Grok 4.3 measured
MortgageTax (Vals AI)Not measured48.3%Only Grok 4.3 measured
MedCode (Vals AI)Not measured38.1%Only Grok 4.3 measured
SimpleQA VerifiedNot measured33.2%Only Grok 4.3 measured
LMArena Text: scienceNot measured1399Only Grok 4.3 measured
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcareNot measured1384Only Grok 4.3 measured
LMArena Text: legal and governmentNot measured1386Only Grok 4.3 measured
LMArena Text: business and financeNot measured1381Only Grok 4.3 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 5 boards here
Web designDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index8 boards measured
Web design benchmarks for GLM 5.3 FlashX and Grok 4.3
BenchmarkGLM 5.3 FlashXGrok 4.3Leader
Design Arena: websitesNot measured1196Only Grok 4.3 measured
Design Arena: UI componentsNot measured1192Only Grok 4.3 measured
Design Arena: game devNot measured1174Only Grok 4.3 measured
Design Arena: data vizNot measured1180Only Grok 4.3 measured
Design Arena: 3DNot measured1125Only Grok 4.3 measured
Design Arena: all code categoriesNot measured1187Only Grok 4.3 measured
Design Arena: SVGNot measured1082Only Grok 4.3 measured
Design Arena: ASCII artNot measured1125Only Grok 4.3 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here
GeneralDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index32 boards measured
General benchmarks for GLM 5.3 FlashX and Grok 4.3
BenchmarkGLM 5.3 FlashXGrok 4.3Leader
Public Benefits Bench (Vals AI)Not measured51.7%Only Grok 4.3 measured
SAGE (Vals AI)Not measured19.7%Only Grok 4.3 measured
MedScribe (Vals AI)Not measured74.4%Only Grok 4.3 measured
Vals Multimodal IndexNot measured43.3%Only Grok 4.3 measured
IFBenchNot measured83.3%Only Grok 4.3 measured
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)Not measured75.0%Only Grok 4.3 measured
DTBenchNot measured90.7%Only Grok 4.3 measured
LMCANot measured38.3%Only Grok 4.3 measured
LMArena TextNot measured1397Only Grok 4.3 measured
LMArena Text: instruction followingNot measured1366Only Grok 4.3 measured
LMArena Text: creative writingNot measured1380Only Grok 4.3 measured
LMArena VisionNot measured1229Only Grok 4.3 measured
LMArena Text: EnglishNot measured1404Only Grok 4.3 measured
LMArena Text: non-EnglishNot measured1385Only Grok 4.3 measured
LMArena Text: ChineseNot measured1422Only Grok 4.3 measured
LMArena Text: GermanNot measured1395Only Grok 4.3 measured
LMArena Text: JapaneseNot measured1379Only Grok 4.3 measured
LMArena Text: KoreanNot measured1354Only Grok 4.3 measured
LMArena Text: FrenchNot measured1411Only Grok 4.3 measured
LMArena Text: SpanishNot measured1399Only Grok 4.3 measured
LMArena Text: RussianNot measured1399Only Grok 4.3 measured
LMArena Text: PolishNot measured1398Only Grok 4.3 measured
LMArena Text: multi-turnNot measured1406Only Grok 4.3 measured
LMArena Text: longer queriesNot measured1393Only Grok 4.3 measured
LMArena Text: writing and languageNot measured1385Only Grok 4.3 measured
LMArena Text: entertainment and mediaNot measured1370Only Grok 4.3 measured
LMArena Vision: EnglishNot measured1235Only Grok 4.3 measured
LMArena Vision: ChineseNot measured1257Only Grok 4.3 measured
LMArena Vision: reading textNot measured1235Only Grok 4.3 measured
LMArena Vision: humorNot measured1222Only Grok 4.3 measured
LMArena Vision: recognizing thingsNot measured1217Only Grok 4.3 measured
LMArena Vision: creative writingNot measured1237Only Grok 4.3 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 14 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

GLM 5.3 FlashX$0.0010Fits in one request
Grok 4.3$0.0025Fits in one request

GLM 5.3 FlashX costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

GLM 5.3 FlashX$0.022Fits in one request
Grok 4.3$0.070Fits in one request

GLM 5.3 FlashX costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

GLM 5.3 FlashX$0.086Fits in one request
Grok 4.3$0.275Fits in one request

GLM 5.3 FlashX costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of GLM 5.3 FlashX and Grok 4.3
SpecificationZ.ai GLM 5.3 FlashXSpaceXAI Grok 4.3
MakerZ.aixAI
WeightsNo public weights listedNo public weights listed
ReleasedSeptember 18, 2026April 30, 2026
Context window1.05M1M
Input $/Mtok$0.37$1.25
Output $/Mtok$1.25$2.50
Coding indexNot benchmarked37.4
Independent measurements behind it03
Cost per solved taskNot computable$0.31
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is GLM 5.3 FlashX better than Grok 4.3 for coding?

Only Grok 4.3 has a coding score, 37.4 on the Vibe Coding Index; GLM 5.3 FlashX has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. GLM 5.3 FlashX has the edge where output tokens cost 2.0x less, and where the context window is larger, 1.05M against 1M tokens.

Which is cheaper, GLM 5.3 FlashX or Grok 4.3?

GLM 5.3 FlashX costs $0.37 per million input tokens and $1.25 per million output tokens; Grok 4.3 costs $1.25 and $2.50. Cost per solved task is known for Grok 4.3 only.

Which has the bigger context window, GLM 5.3 FlashX or Grok 4.3?

GLM 5.3 FlashX, with 1.05M tokens against 1M.

Has any benchmark tested both GLM 5.3 FlashX and Grok 4.3?

No benchmark has tested both yet. GLM 5.3 FlashX has none yet; Grok 4.3 on LMArena WebDev, AA Coding Index and LiveCodeBench (Vals AI). Compare them on price and context instead. Data as of October 21, 2026.

Compare next