Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

GLM 4.7 Flash vs Muse Spark Open

GLM 4.7 Flash costs 10.6x less per output token than Muse Spark Open ($0.40 vs $4.25 per million). Updated October 21, 2026; 5 benchmarks have a result for both.

GLM 4.7 FlashZ.ai
Coding
No data
Overall
14.9
Output $/M
$0.40
0
Muse Spark OpenMeta
Coding
47.4
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$4.25
5
vs boards won of 5 shared

GLM 4.7 Flash or Muse Spark Open: which to pick

Only Muse Spark Open has a coding score, 47.4 on the Vibe Coding Index; GLM 4.7 Flash has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Pick GLM 4.7 Flash for output tokens 10.6x cheaper ($0.40 vs $4.25 per million).

Shared results
5
GLM 4.7 Flash only
38
Muse Spark Open only
23
Like-for-like categories
3 of 9

Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
GLM 4.7 Flash not benchmarked, Muse Spark Open 47.4 from 4 benchmarks.
Widest category
General, 36.7 points apart on average over 1 shared benchmark.
Widest single gap
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR): GLM 4.7 Flash 41.7% against Muse Spark Open 78.3%, 36.7 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
GLM 4.7 Flash $0.40 against Muse Spark Open $4.25 per million output tokens, 10.6x apart.
Context window
GLM 4.7 Flash takes 200K tokens, Muse Spark Open 1.05M.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryGLM 4.7 FlashBarsMuse Spark OpenTies
Reasoning02
Web design02
General01
All shared boards05
CodingDirectional onlySix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index12 boards, none shared
Coding benchmarks for GLM 4.7 Flash and Muse Spark Open
BenchmarkGLM 4.7 FlashMuse Spark OpenLeader
LiveBench codingNot measured73.6%Only Muse Spark Open measured
LMArena WebDevNot measured1528Only Muse Spark Open measured
Terminal-Bench 4 (Vals AI)Not measured6.6%Only Muse Spark Open measured
Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI)Not measured76.2%Only Muse Spark Open measured
Code migration (Vals AI)Not measured21.2%Only Muse Spark Open measured
SciCodeNot measured58.4%Only Muse Spark Open measured
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)22.0%Not measuredOnly GLM 4.7 Flash measured
ALE-BenchNot measured1590.1Only Muse Spark Open measured
LMArena Text: coding1382Not measuredOnly GLM 4.7 Flash measured
LMArena Text: software and IT1389Not measuredOnly GLM 4.7 Flash measured
LMArena WebDev: ReactNot measured1529Only Muse Spark Open measured
LMArena WebDev: HTMLNot measured1495Only Muse Spark Open measured
Neither model has a result on the other 26 boards here
IntelligenceDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index2 boards, none shared
Intelligence benchmarks for GLM 4.7 Flash and Muse Spark Open
BenchmarkGLM 4.7 FlashMuse Spark OpenLeader
AA Intelligence Index14.9Not measuredOnly GLM 4.7 Flash measured
Epoch Capabilities IndexNot measured155.1Only Muse Spark Open measured
Agentic workDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index10 boards, none shared
Agentic work benchmarks for GLM 4.7 Flash and Muse Spark Open
BenchmarkGLM 4.7 FlashMuse Spark OpenLeader
LiveBench researchNot measured80.3%Only Muse Spark Open measured
LiveBench browserNot measured36.0%Only Muse Spark Open measured
LiveBench long agenticNot measured18.9%Only Muse Spark Open measured
Finance Agent (Vals AI)Not measured61.3%Only Muse Spark Open measured
Tax Agent Bench (Vals AI)Not measured26.3%Only Muse Spark Open measured
Legal Research Bench (Vals AI)Not measured38.5%Only Muse Spark Open measured
Harvey's Legal Agent Benchmark (Vals AI)Not measured25.0%Only Muse Spark Open measured
Excel Modeling Benchmark (Vals AI)Not measured53.7%Only Muse Spark Open measured
τ²-Bench Telecom98.8%Not measuredOnly GLM 4.7 Flash measured
APEX-AgentsNot measured33.4%Only Muse Spark Open measured
Neither model has a result on the other 29 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index02
Reasoning benchmarks for GLM 4.7 Flash and Muse Spark Open
BenchmarkGLM 4.7 FlashMuse Spark OpenLeader
LiveBench reasoningNot measured73.7%Only Muse Spark Open measured
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)58.1%89.0%Muse Spark Open
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)7.6%43.9%Muse Spark Open
GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run)60.5%Not measuredOnly GLM 4.7 Flash measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts1356Not measuredOnly GLM 4.7 Flash measured
LMArena Text: expert1357Not measuredOnly GLM 4.7 Flash measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts in English1369Not measuredOnly GLM 4.7 Flash measured
Neither model has a result on the other 14 boards here
MathDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index3 boards, none shared
Math benchmarks for GLM 4.7 Flash and Muse Spark Open
BenchmarkGLM 4.7 FlashMuse Spark OpenLeader
OTIS Mock AIME58.3%Not measuredOnly GLM 4.7 Flash measured
LMArena Text: math1355Not measuredOnly GLM 4.7 Flash measured
LMArena Text: mathematical work1369Not measuredOnly GLM 4.7 Flash measured
Neither model has a result on the other 10 boards here
KnowledgeDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index4 boards, none shared
Knowledge benchmarks for GLM 4.7 Flash and Muse Spark Open
BenchmarkGLM 4.7 FlashMuse Spark OpenLeader
LMArena Text: science1358Not measuredOnly GLM 4.7 Flash measured
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare1343Not measuredOnly GLM 4.7 Flash measured
LMArena Text: legal and government1357Not measuredOnly GLM 4.7 Flash measured
LMArena Text: business and finance1343Not measuredOnly GLM 4.7 Flash measured
Neither model has a result on the other 13 boards here
Web designLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index02
Web design benchmarks for GLM 4.7 Flash and Muse Spark Open
BenchmarkGLM 4.7 FlashMuse Spark OpenLeader
Design Arena: websites11941317Muse Spark Open
Design Arena: UI components1208Not measuredOnly GLM 4.7 Flash measured
Design Arena: game dev11351294Muse Spark Open
Design Arena: data viz1123Not measuredOnly GLM 4.7 Flash measured
Design Arena: 3D1121Not measuredOnly GLM 4.7 Flash measured
Design Arena: all code categories1178Not measuredOnly GLM 4.7 Flash measured
Design Arena: SVG1038Not measuredOnly GLM 4.7 Flash measured
LiveBench designNot measured60.3%Only Muse Spark Open measured
Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
General benchmarks for GLM 4.7 Flash and Muse Spark Open
BenchmarkGLM 4.7 FlashMuse Spark OpenLeader
Vals IndexNot measured48.6%Only Muse Spark Open measured
LiveBench data analysisNot measured60.2%Only Muse Spark Open measured
IFBench60.8%Not measuredOnly GLM 4.7 Flash measured
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)41.7%78.3%Muse Spark Open
LMArena Text1351Not measuredOnly GLM 4.7 Flash measured
LMArena Text: instruction following1327Not measuredOnly GLM 4.7 Flash measured
LMArena Text: creative writing1296Not measuredOnly GLM 4.7 Flash measured
LMArena Text: English1373Not measuredOnly GLM 4.7 Flash measured
LMArena Text: non-English1330Not measuredOnly GLM 4.7 Flash measured
LMArena Text: Chinese1403Not measuredOnly GLM 4.7 Flash measured
LMArena Text: German1336Not measuredOnly GLM 4.7 Flash measured
LMArena Text: Korean1283Not measuredOnly GLM 4.7 Flash measured
LMArena Text: French1332Not measuredOnly GLM 4.7 Flash measured
LMArena Text: Spanish1350Not measuredOnly GLM 4.7 Flash measured
LMArena Text: Russian1333Not measuredOnly GLM 4.7 Flash measured
LMArena Text: Polish1291Not measuredOnly GLM 4.7 Flash measured
LMArena Text: multi-turn1342Not measuredOnly GLM 4.7 Flash measured
LMArena Text: longer queries1345Not measuredOnly GLM 4.7 Flash measured
LMArena Text: writing and language1320Not measuredOnly GLM 4.7 Flash measured
LMArena Text: entertainment and media1304Not measuredOnly GLM 4.7 Flash measured
Neither model has a result on the other 26 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for GLM 4.7 Flash and Muse Spark Open
BenchmarkGLM 4.7 FlashMuse Spark OpenLeader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

GLM 4.7 Flash$0.0003Fits in one request
Muse Spark Open$0.0034Fits in one request

GLM 4.7 Flash costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

GLM 4.7 Flash$0.0045Fits in one request
Muse Spark Open$0.075Fits in one request

GLM 4.7 Flash costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

GLM 4.7 Flash$0.017Exceeds the context window
Muse Spark Open$0.292Fits in one request

GLM 4.7 Flash costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of GLM 4.7 Flash and Muse Spark Open
SpecificationZ.ai GLM 4.7 FlashMeta Muse Spark Open
MakerZ.aiMeta
WeightsOpen weightsOpen weights
ReleasedJanuary 19, 2026October 15, 2026
Context window200K1.05M
Input $/Mtok$0.0653$1.25
Output $/Mtok$0.40$4.25
Coding indexNot benchmarked47.4
Independent measurements behind it04
Cost per solved taskNot computableNot computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is GLM 4.7 Flash better than Muse Spark Open for coding?

Only Muse Spark Open has a coding score, 47.4 on the Vibe Coding Index; GLM 4.7 Flash has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Pick GLM 4.7 Flash for output tokens 10.6x cheaper ($0.40 vs $4.25 per million).

Which is cheaper, GLM 4.7 Flash or Muse Spark Open?

GLM 4.7 Flash costs $0.0653 per million input tokens and $0.40 per million output tokens; Muse Spark Open costs $1.25 and $4.25. Cost per solved task is known for neither of them.

Which has the bigger context window, GLM 4.7 Flash or Muse Spark Open?

Muse Spark Open, with 1.05M tokens against 200K.

How many benchmarks is the GLM 4.7 Flash vs Muse Spark Open comparison based on?

5 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 21, 2026. GLM 4.7 Flash's coding index rests on 0 independent benchmarks and Muse Spark Open's on 4. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next