Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

GLM 4.6V vs Mistral Large 4

Mistral Large 4 leads GLM 4.6V on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, 38.4 to 11.2, and GLM 4.6V costs 4.6x less per output token ($0.90 vs $4.18 per million). Updated October 21, 2026; 27 benchmarks have a result for both.

GLM 4.6VZ.ai
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$0.90
0
Mistral Large 4Mistral AI
Coding
56.4
Overall
54.6
Output $/M
$4.18
27
vs boards won of 27 shared

GLM 4.6V or Mistral Large 4: which to pick

Only Mistral Large 4 has a coding score, 56.4 on the Vibe Coding Index; GLM 4.6V has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Pick GLM 4.6V for output tokens 4.6x cheaper ($0.90 vs $4.18 per million).

Shared results
27
GLM 4.6V only
11
Mistral Large 4 only
54
Like-for-like categories
5 of 9

Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
GLM 4.6V not benchmarked, Mistral Large 4 56.4 from 5 benchmarks.
Widest category
Intelligence, 27.2 points apart on average over 1 shared benchmark.
Widest single gap
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR): GLM 4.6V 48.7% against Mistral Large 4 81.3%, 32.7 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
GLM 4.6V $0.90 against Mistral Large 4 $4.18 per million output tokens, 4.6x apart.
Context window
GLM 4.6V takes 131K tokens, Mistral Large 4 1.05M.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryGLM 4.6VBarsMistral Large 4Ties
Coding02
Intelligence01
Reasoning05
Knowledge04
General015
All shared boards027
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index02
Coding benchmarks for GLM 4.6V and Mistral Large 4
BenchmarkGLM 4.6VMistral Large 4Leader
LiveBench codingNot measured60.0%Only Mistral Large 4 measured
LMArena WebDevNot measured1543Only Mistral Large 4 measured
Terminal-Bench 4 (Vals AI)Not measured27.8%Only Mistral Large 4 measured
Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI)Not measured78.4%Only Mistral Large 4 measured
Code migration (Vals AI)Not measured30.6%Only Mistral Large 4 measured
IOI (Vals AI)Not measured45.3%Only Mistral Large 4 measured
SWE-bench Multimodal (Vals AI)Not measured33.1%Only Mistral Large 4 measured
Vibe Code Bench 1-100 (Vals AI)Not measured14.3%Only Mistral Large 4 measured
LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run)41.1%Not measuredOnly GLM 4.6V measured
SciCodeNot measured54.2%Only Mistral Large 4 measured
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)14.4%Not measuredOnly GLM 4.6V measured
FrontierCodeNot measured39.4%Only Mistral Large 4 measured
ALE-BenchNot measured1213.2Only Mistral Large 4 measured
LMArena Text: coding13891478Mistral Large 4
LMArena Text: software and IT13911467Mistral Large 4
LMArena WebDev: ReactNot measured1559Only Mistral Large 4 measured
LMArena WebDev: HTMLNot measured1487Only Mistral Large 4 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 22 boards here
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
Intelligence benchmarks for GLM 4.6V and Mistral Large 4
BenchmarkGLM 4.6VMistral Large 4Leader
AA Intelligence Index11.238.4Mistral Large 4
Epoch Capabilities IndexNot measured150.0Only Mistral Large 4 measured
Agentic workDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index10 boards, none shared
Agentic work benchmarks for GLM 4.6V and Mistral Large 4
BenchmarkGLM 4.6VMistral Large 4Leader
LiveBench researchNot measured28.1%Only Mistral Large 4 measured
LiveBench browserNot measured8.0%Only Mistral Large 4 measured
LiveBench long agenticNot measured11.8%Only Mistral Large 4 measured
Finance Agent (Vals AI)Not measured54.7%Only Mistral Large 4 measured
Tax Agent Bench (Vals AI)Not measured30.4%Only Mistral Large 4 measured
Legal Research Bench (Vals AI)Not measured31.7%Only Mistral Large 4 measured
Harvey's Legal Agent Benchmark (Vals AI)Not measured17.5%Only Mistral Large 4 measured
Excel Modeling Benchmark (Vals AI)Not measured56.2%Only Mistral Large 4 measured
BioMysteryBench (Vals AI)Not measured67.0%Only Mistral Large 4 measured
τ²-Bench Telecom31.6%Not measuredOnly GLM 4.6V measured
Neither model has a result on the other 31 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index05
Reasoning benchmarks for GLM 4.6V and Mistral Large 4
BenchmarkGLM 4.6VMistral Large 4Leader
LiveBench reasoningNot measured83.9%Only Mistral Large 4 measured
MysteryMechanism (Vals AI)Not measured12.2%Only Mistral Large 4 measured
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)71.9%Not measuredOnly GLM 4.6V measured
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)9.6%35.0%Mistral Large 4
GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run)Not measured88.1%Only Mistral Large 4 measured
Chess puzzlesNot measured33.0%Only Mistral Large 4 measured
Mystery game puzzlesNot measured17.0%Only Mistral Large 4 measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts13671444Mistral Large 4
LMArena Text: expert13711444Mistral Large 4
LMArena Text: hard prompts in English13911442Mistral Large 4
LMArena Vision: diagrams11821288Mistral Large 4
LMArena Vision: homework1155Not measuredOnly GLM 4.6V measured
Neither model has a result on the other 10 boards here
MathDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index8 boards, none shared
Math benchmarks for GLM 4.6V and Mistral Large 4
BenchmarkGLM 4.6VMistral Large 4Leader
AA Math Index85.3Not measuredOnly GLM 4.6V measured
AIME 2025 (Artificial Analysis run)85.3%Not measuredOnly GLM 4.6V measured
OTIS Mock AIMENot measured98.3%Only Mistral Large 4 measured
FrontierMath, tiers 1 to 3Not measured58.6%Only Mistral Large 4 measured
FrontierMath, tier 4Not measured26.8%Only Mistral Large 4 measured
ProofBenchNot measured10.0%Only Mistral Large 4 measured
LMArena Text: mathNot measured1469Only Mistral Large 4 measured
LMArena Text: mathematical workNot measured1462Only Mistral Large 4 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 5 boards here
KnowledgeLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index04
Knowledge benchmarks for GLM 4.6V and Mistral Large 4
BenchmarkGLM 4.6VMistral Large 4Leader
MedCode (Vals AI)Not measured40.7%Only Mistral Large 4 measured
MMLU Pro (Artificial Analysis run)79.9%Not measuredOnly GLM 4.6V measured
SimpleQA VerifiedNot measured20.0%Only Mistral Large 4 measured
LMArena Text: science13891448Mistral Large 4
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare13891433Mistral Large 4
LMArena Text: legal and government13931425Mistral Large 4
LMArena Text: business and finance13591439Mistral Large 4
Neither model has a result on the other 11 boards here
Web designDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index9 boards, none shared
Web design benchmarks for GLM 4.6V and Mistral Large 4
BenchmarkGLM 4.6VMistral Large 4Leader
Design Arena: websitesNot measured1258Only Mistral Large 4 measured
Design Arena: UI componentsNot measured1275Only Mistral Large 4 measured
Design Arena: game devNot measured1226Only Mistral Large 4 measured
Design Arena: data vizNot measured1274Only Mistral Large 4 measured
Design Arena: 3DNot measured1253Only Mistral Large 4 measured
Design Arena: all code categoriesNot measured1259Only Mistral Large 4 measured
Design Arena: SVGNot measured1233Only Mistral Large 4 measured
Design Arena: ASCII artNot measured1202Only Mistral Large 4 measured
LiveBench designNot measured65.6%Only Mistral Large 4 measured
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index015
General benchmarks for GLM 4.6V and Mistral Large 4
BenchmarkGLM 4.6VMistral Large 4Leader
LiveBench data analysisNot measured76.5%Only Mistral Large 4 measured
MedScribe (Vals AI)Not measured80.4%Only Mistral Large 4 measured
IFBench30.1%Not measuredOnly GLM 4.6V measured
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)48.7%81.3%Mistral Large 4
DTBenchNot measured88.2%Only Mistral Large 4 measured
LMCANot measured35.8%Only Mistral Large 4 measured
Surface Evolver BenchNot measured28.1%Only Mistral Large 4 measured
Furniture assemblyNot measured20.8%Only Mistral Large 4 measured
LMArena Text13761431Mistral Large 4
LMArena Text: instruction following13501422Mistral Large 4
LMArena Text: creative writing13471363Mistral Large 4
LMArena Vision11641272Mistral Large 4
LMArena Text: English13951433Mistral Large 4
LMArena Text: non-English13581422Mistral Large 4
LMArena Text: Chinese14251492Mistral Large 4
LMArena Text: JapaneseNot measured1415Only Mistral Large 4 measured
LMArena Text: FrenchNot measured1492Only Mistral Large 4 measured
LMArena Text: SpanishNot measured1455Only Mistral Large 4 measured
LMArena Text: Russian13391417Mistral Large 4
LMArena Text: multi-turn13591435Mistral Large 4
LMArena Text: longer queries13571428Mistral Large 4
LMArena Text: writing and language13471386Mistral Large 4
LMArena Text: entertainment and media13431378Mistral Large 4
LMArena Vision: English11791283Mistral Large 4
LMArena Vision: Chinese1217Not measuredOnly GLM 4.6V measured
LMArena Vision: reading text11711284Mistral Large 4
LMArena Vision: creative writing1113Not measuredOnly GLM 4.6V measured
Neither model has a result on the other 19 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for GLM 4.6V and Mistral Large 4
BenchmarkGLM 4.6VMistral Large 4Leader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

GLM 4.6V$0.0008Fits in one request
Mistral Large 4$0.0034Fits in one request

GLM 4.6V costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

GLM 4.6V$0.018Fits in one request
Mistral Large 4$0.081Fits in one request

GLM 4.6V costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

GLM 4.6V$0.069Exceeds the context window
Mistral Large 4$0.314Fits in one request

GLM 4.6V costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of GLM 4.6V and Mistral Large 4
SpecificationZ.ai GLM 4.6VMistral Large 4
MakerZ.aiMistral AI
WeightsOpen weightsNo public weights listed
ReleasedDecember 8, 2025October 6, 2026
Context window131K1.05M
Input $/Mtok$0.30$1.36
Output $/Mtok$0.90$4.18
Coding indexNot benchmarked56.4
Independent measurements behind it05
Cost per solved taskNot computableNot computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is GLM 4.6V better than Mistral Large 4 for coding?

Only Mistral Large 4 has a coding score, 56.4 on the Vibe Coding Index; GLM 4.6V has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Pick GLM 4.6V for output tokens 4.6x cheaper ($0.90 vs $4.18 per million).

Which is cheaper, GLM 4.6V or Mistral Large 4?

GLM 4.6V costs $0.30 per million input tokens and $0.90 per million output tokens; Mistral Large 4 costs $1.36 and $4.18. Cost per solved task is known for neither of them.

Which has the bigger context window, GLM 4.6V or Mistral Large 4?

Mistral Large 4, with 1.05M tokens against 131K.

How many benchmarks is the GLM 4.6V vs Mistral Large 4 comparison based on?

27 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 21, 2026. GLM 4.6V's coding index rests on 0 independent benchmarks and Mistral Large 4's on 5. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next