Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

GLM 4.5V vs GPT-5.4

GPT-5.4 leads GLM 4.5V on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, 39.0 to 7.6, and GLM 4.5V costs 8.3x less per output token ($1.80 vs $15.00 per million). Updated October 21, 2026; 37 benchmarks have a result for both.

Replace GLM 4.5V Replace GPT-5.4
GLM 4.5VZ.ai
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$1.80
0
GPT-5.4OpenAI
Coding
64.4
Overall
69.6
Output $/M
$15.00
37
vs boards won of 37 shared

GLM 4.5V or GPT-5.4: which to pick

Only GPT-5.4 has a coding score, 64.4 on the Vibe Coding Index; GLM 4.5V has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Pick GLM 4.5V for output tokens 8.3x cheaper ($1.80 vs $15.00 per million).

Model AGLM 4.5VZ.aiNot benchmarkedNo coding benchmarkNo cost per solved taskModel BGPT-5.4OpenAI64.4/1003 independent benchmarks$1.02 per solved task
Shared results
37
GLM 4.5V only
4
GPT-5.4 only
73
Like-for-like categories
7 of 9

Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
GLM 4.5V not benchmarked, GPT-5.4 64.4 from 3 benchmarks.
Widest category
Agentic work, 64.6 points apart on average over 1 shared benchmark.
Widest single gap
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR): GLM 4.5V 0.0% against GPT-5.4 82.0%, 82.0 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
GLM 4.5V $1.80 against GPT-5.4 $15.00 per million output tokens, 8.3x apart.
Context window
GLM 4.5V takes 66K tokens, GPT-5.4 1.05M.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryGLM 4.5VBarsGPT-5.4Ties
Coding03
Intelligence01
Agentic work01
Reasoning08
Math02
Knowledge04
General018
All shared boards037
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index03
Coding benchmarks for GLM 4.5V and GPT-5.4
BenchmarkGLM 4.5VGPT-5.4Leader
LMArena WebDevNot measured1464Only GPT-5.4 measured
AA Coding IndexNot measured71.1Only GPT-5.4 measured
LiveCodeBench (Vals AI)Not measured84.1%Only GPT-5.4 measured
SWE-bench Verified (Vals AI)Not measured78.2%Only GPT-5.4 measured
Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI)Not measured67.4%Only GPT-5.4 measured
Code migration (Vals AI)Not measured35.0%Only GPT-5.4 measured
ProgramBench (Vals AI)Not measured0.5%Only GPT-5.4 measured
SkillsBench (Vals AI)Not measured51.7%Only GPT-5.4 measured
LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run)60.4%Not measuredOnly GLM 4.5V measured
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)6.8%57.6%GPT-5.4
Terminal-BenchNot measured81.8%Only GPT-5.4 measured
GSO-BenchNot measured31.4%Only GPT-5.4 measured
WeirdMLNot measured77.7%Only GPT-5.4 measured
MirrorCodeNot measured15.6%Only GPT-5.4 measured
ALE-BenchNot measured1607.0Only GPT-5.4 measured
LMArena Text: coding13471496GPT-5.4
LMArena Text: software and IT13531491GPT-5.4
LMArena WebDev: ReactNot measured1454Only GPT-5.4 measured
LMArena WebDev: HTMLNot measured1478Only GPT-5.4 measured
LMArena WebDev: from an imageNot measured1436Only GPT-5.4 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 19 boards here
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
Intelligence benchmarks for GLM 4.5V and GPT-5.4
BenchmarkGLM 4.5VGPT-5.4Leader
AA Intelligence Index7.639.0GPT-5.4
Epoch Capabilities IndexNot measured157.3Only GPT-5.4 measured
Agentic workLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
Agentic work benchmarks for GLM 4.5V and GPT-5.4
BenchmarkGLM 4.5VGPT-5.4Leader
Design Arena: agents building web appsNot measured1059Only GPT-5.4 measured
Design Arena: agents building full-stack appsNot measured1017Only GPT-5.4 measured
Design Arena: agents building mobile appsNot measured1087Only GPT-5.4 measured
Design Arena: agents building Android appsNot measured1030Only GPT-5.4 measured
Design Arena: agents building Godot gamesNot measured1135Only GPT-5.4 measured
τ²-Bench Telecom22.5%87.1%GPT-5.4
APEX-AgentsNot measured52.4%Only GPT-5.4 measured
METR time horizonsNot measured74.3%Only GPT-5.4 measured
DeepResearch BenchNot measured35.1%Only GPT-5.4 measured
PostTrainBenchNot measured19.0%Only GPT-5.4 measured
Vending-Bench 2Not measured$6,144Only GPT-5.4 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 30 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index08
Reasoning benchmarks for GLM 4.5V and GPT-5.4
BenchmarkGLM 4.5VGPT-5.4Leader
GPQA DiamondNot measured91.7%Only GPT-5.4 measured
MMMU Pro (Vals AI)Not measured87.5%Only GPT-5.4 measured
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)68.4%92.0%GPT-5.4
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)6.3%43.7%GPT-5.4
GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run)Not measured93.3%Only GPT-5.4 measured
ARC-AGINot measured93.7%Only GPT-5.4 measured
ARC-AGI-2Not measured74.0%Only GPT-5.4 measured
Chess puzzlesNot measured48.0%Only GPT-5.4 measured
Mystery game puzzlesNot measured37.0%Only GPT-5.4 measured
EBR-benchNot measured25.4%Only GPT-5.4 measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts13351485GPT-5.4
LMArena Text: expert13531507GPT-5.4
LMArena Text: hard prompts in English13571479GPT-5.4
LMArena Vision: diagrams11511327GPT-5.4
LMArena Vision: homework11631336GPT-5.4
Kagi LLM Benchmark59.8%63.8%GPT-5.4
Neither model has a result on the other 6 boards here
MathLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index02
Math benchmarks for GLM 4.5V and GPT-5.4
BenchmarkGLM 4.5VGPT-5.4Leader
AIMENot measured96.7%Only GPT-5.4 measured
AA Math Index73.0Not measuredOnly GLM 4.5V measured
AIME 2025 (Artificial Analysis run)73.0%Not measuredOnly GLM 4.5V measured
OTIS Mock AIMENot measured97.8%Only GPT-5.4 measured
FrontierMath, tiers 1 to 3Not measured78.6%Only GPT-5.4 measured
FrontierMath, tier 4Not measured49.0%Only GPT-5.4 measured
ProofBenchNot measured56.0%Only GPT-5.4 measured
LMArena Text: math13541488GPT-5.4
LMArena Text: mathematical work13361497GPT-5.4
Neither model has a result on the other 4 boards here
KnowledgeLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index04
Knowledge benchmarks for GLM 4.5V and GPT-5.4
BenchmarkGLM 4.5VGPT-5.4Leader
MMLU ProNot measured87.5%Only GPT-5.4 measured
LegalBench (Vals AI)Not measured86.0%Only GPT-5.4 measured
CaseLaw (Vals AI)Not measured63.8%Only GPT-5.4 measured
CorpFin (Vals AI)Not measured65.3%Only GPT-5.4 measured
TaxEval (Vals AI)Not measured74.0%Only GPT-5.4 measured
MortgageTax (Vals AI)Not measured68.3%Only GPT-5.4 measured
MedQA (Vals AI)Not measured96.1%Only GPT-5.4 measured
MedCode (Vals AI)Not measured41.3%Only GPT-5.4 measured
MMLU Pro (Artificial Analysis run)78.8%Not measuredOnly GLM 4.5V measured
SimpleQA VerifiedNot measured45.1%Only GPT-5.4 measured
LMArena Text: science13301479GPT-5.4
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare13491458GPT-5.4
LMArena Text: legal and government13381486GPT-5.4
LMArena Text: business and finance13091474GPT-5.4
Neither model has a result on the other 4 boards here
Web designDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index8 boards, none shared
Web design benchmarks for GLM 4.5V and GPT-5.4
BenchmarkGLM 4.5VGPT-5.4Leader
Design Arena: websitesNot measured1199Only GPT-5.4 measured
Design Arena: UI componentsNot measured1215Only GPT-5.4 measured
Design Arena: game devNot measured1195Only GPT-5.4 measured
Design Arena: data vizNot measured1196Only GPT-5.4 measured
Design Arena: 3DNot measured1066Only GPT-5.4 measured
Design Arena: all code categoriesNot measured1180Only GPT-5.4 measured
Design Arena: SVGNot measured1142Only GPT-5.4 measured
Design Arena: ASCII artNot measured1188Only GPT-5.4 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index018
General benchmarks for GLM 4.5V and GPT-5.4
BenchmarkGLM 4.5VGPT-5.4Leader
SAGE (Vals AI)Not measured43.3%Only GPT-5.4 measured
MedScribe (Vals AI)Not measured77.5%Only GPT-5.4 measured
IFBench34.2%73.9%GPT-5.4
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)0.0%82.0%GPT-5.4
DTBenchNot measured94.4%Only GPT-5.4 measured
LMCANot measured52.0%Only GPT-5.4 measured
CL-benchNot measured27.9%Only GPT-5.4 measured
Furniture assemblyNot measured37.5%Only GPT-5.4 measured
CL-bench LifeNot measured21.7%Only GPT-5.4 measured
LMArena Text13331469GPT-5.4
LMArena Text: instruction following13111469GPT-5.4
LMArena Text: creative writing12941439GPT-5.4
LMArena Vision11541303GPT-5.4
LMArena Text: English13621467GPT-5.4
LMArena Text: non-English13031465GPT-5.4
LMArena Text: Chinese13371520GPT-5.4
LMArena Text: GermanNot measured1472Only GPT-5.4 measured
LMArena Text: JapaneseNot measured1485Only GPT-5.4 measured
LMArena Text: KoreanNot measured1449Only GPT-5.4 measured
LMArena Text: FrenchNot measured1493Only GPT-5.4 measured
LMArena Text: Spanish13361452GPT-5.4
LMArena Text: Russian12981480GPT-5.4
LMArena Text: Polish13021472GPT-5.4
LMArena Text: multi-turn13331482GPT-5.4
LMArena Text: longer queries13051473GPT-5.4
LMArena Text: writing and language13021458GPT-5.4
LMArena Text: entertainment and media13031438GPT-5.4
LMArena Vision: English11831301GPT-5.4
LMArena Vision: ChineseNot measured1354Only GPT-5.4 measured
LMArena Vision: reading text11511312GPT-5.4
LMArena Vision: humorNot measured1284Only GPT-5.4 measured
LMArena Vision: recognizing thingsNot measured1251Only GPT-5.4 measured
LMArena Vision: creative writingNot measured1283Only GPT-5.4 measured
LMArena DocumentNot measured1471Only GPT-5.4 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 12 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for GLM 4.5V and GPT-5.4
BenchmarkGLM 4.5VGPT-5.4Leader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

GLM 4.5V$0.0015Fits in one request
GPT-5.4$0.010Fits in one request

GLM 4.5V costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

GLM 4.5V$0.035Fits in one request
GPT-5.4$0.170Fits in one request

GLM 4.5V costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

GLM 4.5V$0.138Exceeds the context window
GPT-5.4$0.650Fits in one request

GLM 4.5V costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of GLM 4.5V and GPT-5.4
SpecificationZ.ai GLM 4.5VOpenAI GPT-5.4
MakerZ.aiOpenAI
WeightsOpen weightsNo public weights listed
ReleasedAugust 11, 2025March 5, 2026
Context window66K1.05M
Input $/Mtok$0.60$2.50
Output $/Mtok$1.80$15.00
Coding indexNot benchmarked64.4
Independent measurements behind it03
Cost per solved taskNot computable$1.02
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is GLM 4.5V better than GPT-5.4 for coding?

Only GPT-5.4 has a coding score, 64.4 on the Vibe Coding Index; GLM 4.5V has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Pick GLM 4.5V for output tokens 8.3x cheaper ($1.80 vs $15.00 per million).

Which is cheaper, GLM 4.5V or GPT-5.4?

GLM 4.5V costs $0.60 per million input tokens and $1.80 per million output tokens; GPT-5.4 costs $2.50 and $15.00. Cost per solved task is known for GPT-5.4 only.

Which has the bigger context window, GLM 4.5V or GPT-5.4?

GPT-5.4, with 1.05M tokens against 66K.

How many benchmarks is the GLM 4.5V vs GPT-5.4 comparison based on?

37 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 21, 2026. GLM 4.5V's coding index rests on 0 independent benchmarks and GPT-5.4's on 3. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next