Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

GLM 4.5 Air vs Hy4 preview

GLM 4.5 Air costs 2.3x less per output token than Hy4 preview ($1.10 vs $2.501 per million). Updated October 22, 2026; no benchmark has tested both models yet.

GLM 4.5 AirZ.ai
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$1.10
Hy4 previewTencent
Coding
44.3
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$2.501
vs $1.10 vs $2.501 per 1M output tokens. GLM 4.5 Air is 2.3x cheaper.

GLM 4.5 Air or Hy4 preview: which to pick

Only Hy4 preview has a coding score, 44.3 on the Vibe Coding Index; GLM 4.5 Air has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Pick GLM 4.5 Air for output tokens 2.3x cheaper ($1.10 vs $2.501 per million).

No benchmark has tested both yet. GLM 4.5 Air has results on LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run), Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run) and GSO-Bench; Hy4 preview on LMArena WebDev, Terminal-Bench 4 (Vals AI) and Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI). Compare them on price and context instead.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
GLM 4.5 Air not benchmarked, Hy4 preview 44.3 from 3 benchmarks.
Widest category
None yet: no category has been tested on both models.
Widest single gap
None yet: no benchmark has tested both models.
Output price
GLM 4.5 Air $1.10 against Hy4 preview $2.501 per million output tokens, 2.3x apart.
Context window
GLM 4.5 Air takes 131K tokens, Hy4 preview 1.05M.

Benchmark by benchmark

Every board either model has a result on, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale. Only one model is measured on each, so no row names a leader.

CodingDirectional onlySix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index15 boards measured
Coding benchmarks for GLM 4.5 Air and Hy4 preview
BenchmarkGLM 4.5 AirHy4 previewLeader
LMArena WebDevNot measured1631Only Hy4 preview measured
Terminal-Bench 4 (Vals AI)Not measured8.1%Only Hy4 preview measured
Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI)Not measured77.5%Only Hy4 preview measured
Code migration (Vals AI)Not measured47.4%Only Hy4 preview measured
ProgramBench (Vals AI)Not measured0.0%Only Hy4 preview measured
IOI (Vals AI)Not measured59.3%Only Hy4 preview measured
Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals AI)Not measured55.1%Only Hy4 preview measured
CyberBench (Vals AI)Not measured65.4%Only Hy4 preview measured
LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run)68.4%Not measuredOnly GLM 4.5 Air measured
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)20.5%Not measuredOnly GLM 4.5 Air measured
GSO-Bench2.9%Not measuredOnly GLM 4.5 Air measured
LMArena Text: coding1397Not measuredOnly GLM 4.5 Air measured
LMArena Text: software and IT1401Not measuredOnly GLM 4.5 Air measured
LMArena WebDev: ReactNot measured1653Only Hy4 preview measured
LMArena WebDev: HTMLNot measured1620Only Hy4 preview measured
Neither model has a result on the other 24 boards here
IntelligenceDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index1 board measured
Intelligence benchmarks for GLM 4.5 Air and Hy4 preview
BenchmarkGLM 4.5 AirHy4 previewLeader
AA Intelligence Index11.1Not measuredOnly GLM 4.5 Air measured
Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here
Agentic workDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index9 boards measured
Agentic work benchmarks for GLM 4.5 Air and Hy4 preview
BenchmarkGLM 4.5 AirHy4 previewLeader
SREBench (Vals AI)Not measured2.3%Only Hy4 preview measured
Finance Agent (Vals AI)Not measured55.1%Only Hy4 preview measured
Tax Agent Bench (Vals AI)Not measured32.6%Only Hy4 preview measured
Legal Research Bench (Vals AI)Not measured45.2%Only Hy4 preview measured
Harvey's Legal Agent Benchmark (Vals AI)Not measured8.8%Only Hy4 preview measured
Excel Modeling Benchmark (Vals AI)Not measured58.1%Only Hy4 preview measured
BioMysteryBench (Vals AI)Not measured69.3%Only Hy4 preview measured
Terminal-Bench-Science (Vals AI)Not measured1.4%Only Hy4 preview measured
τ²-Bench Telecom46.5%Not measuredOnly GLM 4.5 Air measured
Neither model has a result on the other 32 boards here
ReasoningDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index6 boards measured
Reasoning benchmarks for GLM 4.5 Air and Hy4 preview
BenchmarkGLM 4.5 AirHy4 previewLeader
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)73.3%Not measuredOnly GLM 4.5 Air measured
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)7.0%Not measuredOnly GLM 4.5 Air measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts1379Not measuredOnly GLM 4.5 Air measured
LMArena Text: expert1370Not measuredOnly GLM 4.5 Air measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts in English1388Not measuredOnly GLM 4.5 Air measured
Kagi LLM Benchmark43.0%Not measuredOnly GLM 4.5 Air measured
Neither model has a result on the other 16 boards here
MathDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index5 boards measured
Math benchmarks for GLM 4.5 Air and Hy4 preview
BenchmarkGLM 4.5 AirHy4 previewLeader
AA Math Index80.7Not measuredOnly GLM 4.5 Air measured
AIME 2025 (Artificial Analysis run)80.7%Not measuredOnly GLM 4.5 Air measured
ProofBenchNot measured75.0%Only Hy4 preview measured
LMArena Text: math1396Not measuredOnly GLM 4.5 Air measured
LMArena Text: mathematical work1396Not measuredOnly GLM 4.5 Air measured
Neither model has a result on the other 8 boards here
KnowledgeDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index7 boards measured
Knowledge benchmarks for GLM 4.5 Air and Hy4 preview
BenchmarkGLM 4.5 AirHy4 previewLeader
LegalBench (Vals AI)Not measured83.8%Only Hy4 preview measured
MedCode (Vals AI)Not measured43.3%Only Hy4 preview measured
MMLU Pro (Artificial Analysis run)81.5%Not measuredOnly GLM 4.5 Air measured
LMArena Text: science1407Not measuredOnly GLM 4.5 Air measured
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare1402Not measuredOnly GLM 4.5 Air measured
LMArena Text: legal and government1382Not measuredOnly GLM 4.5 Air measured
LMArena Text: business and finance1371Not measuredOnly GLM 4.5 Air measured
Neither model has a result on the other 11 boards here
Web designDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index7 boards measured
Web design benchmarks for GLM 4.5 Air and Hy4 preview
BenchmarkGLM 4.5 AirHy4 previewLeader
Design Arena: websites1146Not measuredOnly GLM 4.5 Air measured
Design Arena: UI components1120Not measuredOnly GLM 4.5 Air measured
Design Arena: game dev1094Not measuredOnly GLM 4.5 Air measured
Design Arena: data viz1186Not measuredOnly GLM 4.5 Air measured
Design Arena: 3D1122Not measuredOnly GLM 4.5 Air measured
Design Arena: all code categories1137Not measuredOnly GLM 4.5 Air measured
Design Arena: SVG1071Not measuredOnly GLM 4.5 Air measured
Neither model has a result on the other 2 boards here
GeneralDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index22 boards measured
General benchmarks for GLM 4.5 Air and Hy4 preview
BenchmarkGLM 4.5 AirHy4 previewLeader
Vals IndexNot measured53.2%Only Hy4 preview measured
Public Benefits Bench (Vals AI)Not measured68.6%Only Hy4 preview measured
MedScribe (Vals AI)Not measured83.6%Only Hy4 preview measured
IFBench37.6%Not measuredOnly GLM 4.5 Air measured
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)46.7%Not measuredOnly GLM 4.5 Air measured
LMArena Text1384Not measuredOnly GLM 4.5 Air measured
LMArena Text: instruction following1354Not measuredOnly GLM 4.5 Air measured
LMArena Text: creative writing1343Not measuredOnly GLM 4.5 Air measured
LMArena Text: English1397Not measuredOnly GLM 4.5 Air measured
LMArena Text: non-English1366Not measuredOnly GLM 4.5 Air measured
LMArena Text: Chinese1426Not measuredOnly GLM 4.5 Air measured
LMArena Text: German1377Not measuredOnly GLM 4.5 Air measured
LMArena Text: Japanese1348Not measuredOnly GLM 4.5 Air measured
LMArena Text: Korean1308Not measuredOnly GLM 4.5 Air measured
LMArena Text: French1400Not measuredOnly GLM 4.5 Air measured
LMArena Text: Spanish1385Not measuredOnly GLM 4.5 Air measured
LMArena Text: Russian1373Not measuredOnly GLM 4.5 Air measured
LMArena Text: Polish1368Not measuredOnly GLM 4.5 Air measured
LMArena Text: multi-turn1371Not measuredOnly GLM 4.5 Air measured
LMArena Text: longer queries1366Not measuredOnly GLM 4.5 Air measured
LMArena Text: writing and language1354Not measuredOnly GLM 4.5 Air measured
LMArena Text: entertainment and media1339Not measuredOnly GLM 4.5 Air measured
Neither model has a result on the other 24 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

GLM 4.5 Air$0.0008Fits in one request
Hy4 preview$0.0021Fits in one request

GLM 4.5 Air costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

GLM 4.5 Air$0.013Fits in one request
Hy4 preview$0.049Fits in one request

GLM 4.5 Air costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

GLM 4.5 Air$0.051Exceeds the context window
Hy4 preview$0.192Fits in one request

GLM 4.5 Air costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of GLM 4.5 Air and Hy4 preview
SpecificationZ.ai GLM 4.5 AirTencent Hy4 preview
MakerZ.aiTencent
WeightsOpen weightsOpen weights
ReleasedJuly 25, 2025August 28, 2026
Context window131K1.05M
Input $/Mtok$0.20$0.834
Output $/Mtok$1.10$2.501
Coding indexNot benchmarked44.3
Independent measurements behind it03
Cost per solved taskNot computableNot computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is GLM 4.5 Air better than Hy4 preview for coding?

Only Hy4 preview has a coding score, 44.3 on the Vibe Coding Index; GLM 4.5 Air has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Pick GLM 4.5 Air for output tokens 2.3x cheaper ($1.10 vs $2.501 per million).

Which is cheaper, GLM 4.5 Air or Hy4 preview?

GLM 4.5 Air costs $0.20 per million input tokens and $1.10 per million output tokens; Hy4 preview costs $0.834 and $2.501. Cost per solved task is known for neither of them.

Which has the bigger context window, GLM 4.5 Air or Hy4 preview?

Hy4 preview, with 1.05M tokens against 131K.

Has any benchmark tested both GLM 4.5 Air and Hy4 preview?

No benchmark has tested both yet. GLM 4.5 Air has results on LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run), Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run) and GSO-Bench; Hy4 preview on LMArena WebDev, Terminal-Bench 4 (Vals AI) and Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI). Compare them on price and context instead. Data as of October 22, 2026.

Compare next