Gemma 4 31B vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro
MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads Gemma 4 31B on coding, 65.4 to 39.0 on the Vibe Coding Index, and Gemma 4 31B costs 2.2x less per output token ($0.40 vs $0.87 per million). Updated October 22, 2026; 43 benchmarks have a result for both.
Gemma 4 31B or MiMo-V2.6-Pro: which to pick
Pick MiMo-V2.6-Pro for coding: it scores 65.4 on the Vibe Coding Index against 39.0 for Gemma 4 31B.
Pick Gemma 4 31B for output tokens 2.2x cheaper ($0.40 vs $0.87 per million) and work measured by LMArena Vision: diagrams or LMArena Vision: homework, where it leads.
- Shared results
- 43
- Gemma 4 31B only
- 28
- MiMo-V2.6-Pro only
- 30
- Like-for-like categories
- 8 of 9
Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.
Which one for your work
Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.
Coding
Vibe Coding Index, six public coding benchmarks
MiMo-V2.6-Pro
MiMo-V2.6-Pro scores 65.4 against 39.0.
2 and 4 benchmarks behind the scores
Intelligence
AA Intelligence Index
MiMo-V2.6-Pro
MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads, 46.3 against 14.7.
Same board, both measured
Agentic work
AA Agentic Index
No call
Only Gemma 4 31B has a AA Agentic Index result, 4.2.
Directional only
Web design
Design Arena: websites
No call
Only MiMo-V2.6-Pro has a Design Arena: websites result, 1308.
Directional only
General
Vals Index
No call
Only MiMo-V2.6-Pro has a Vals Index result, 57.8%.
Directional only
Long documents
Listed context window
MiMo-V2.6-Pro
MiMo-V2.6-Pro takes 1.05M tokens against 262K.
Listed by OpenRouter
Everyday cost
1K input + 500 output tokens
Gemma 4 31B
Gemma 4 31B $0.0003, MiMo-V2.6-Pro $0.0009 per turn.
List prices
At a glance
- Coding index
- Gemma 4 31B 39.0 from 2 benchmarks, MiMo-V2.6-Pro 65.4 from 4 benchmarks.
- Widest category
- Agentic work, 50.2 points apart on average over 3 shared benchmarks.
- Widest single gap
- LiveBench browser: Gemma 4 31B 4.0% against MiMo-V2.6-Pro 88.0%, 84.0 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
- Output price
- Gemma 4 31B $0.40 against MiMo-V2.6-Pro $0.87 per million output tokens, 2.2x apart.
- Context window
- Gemma 4 31B takes 262K tokens, MiMo-V2.6-Pro 1.05M.
Benchmark by benchmark
First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.
| Category | Gemma 4 31B | Bars | MiMo-V2.6-Pro | Ties |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Coding | 0 | 8 | ||
| Intelligence | 0 | 1 | ||
| Agentic work | 0 | 3 | ||
| Reasoning | 2 | 5 | ||
| Math | 0 | 2 | ||
| Knowledge | 0 | 4 | ||
| Web design | 0 | 1 | ||
| General | 4 | 13 | ||
| All shared boards | 6 | 37 |
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index08
| Benchmark | Gemma 4 31B | MiMo-V2.6-Pro | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| LiveBench coding | 49.0% | 81.5% | MiMo-V2.6-Pro |
| LMArena WebDev | 1367 | 1625 | MiMo-V2.6-Pro |
| AA Coding Index | 43.4 | Not measured | Only Gemma 4 31B measured |
| Terminal-Bench 4 (Vals AI) | Not measured | 31.3% | Only MiMo-V2.6-Pro measured |
| Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI) | Not measured | 85.2% | Only MiMo-V2.6-Pro measured |
| Code migration (Vals AI) | Not measured | 43.0% | Only MiMo-V2.6-Pro measured |
| ProgramBench (Vals AI) | Not measured | 0.5% | Only MiMo-V2.6-Pro measured |
| IOI (Vals AI) | Not measured | 39.3% | Only MiMo-V2.6-Pro measured |
| Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals AI) | Not measured | 67.8% | Only MiMo-V2.6-Pro measured |
| SWE-bench Multimodal (Vals AI) | Not measured | 41.3% | Only MiMo-V2.6-Pro measured |
| CyberBench (Vals AI) | Not measured | 72.9% | Only MiMo-V2.6-Pro measured |
| SciCode | 45.5% | 60.9% | MiMo-V2.6-Pro |
| Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run) | 36.4% | Not measured | Only Gemma 4 31B measured |
| WeirdML | 52.3% | Not measured | Only Gemma 4 31B measured |
| ALE-Bench | 925.5 | 1158.1 | MiMo-V2.6-Pro |
| LMArena Text: coding | 1459 | 1533 | MiMo-V2.6-Pro |
| LMArena Text: software and IT | 1463 | 1528 | MiMo-V2.6-Pro |
| LMArena WebDev: React | 1359 | 1639 | MiMo-V2.6-Pro |
| LMArena WebDev: HTML | 1380 | 1616 | MiMo-V2.6-Pro |
| LMArena WebDev: from an image | Not measured | 1598 | Only MiMo-V2.6-Pro measured |
| SciCode | 8.9% | Not measured | Only Gemma 4 31B measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 18 boards here | |||
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
| Benchmark | Gemma 4 31B | MiMo-V2.6-Pro | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| AA Intelligence Index | 14.7 | 46.3 | MiMo-V2.6-Pro |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 143.0 | Not measured | Only Gemma 4 31B measured |
Agentic workLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index03
| Benchmark | Gemma 4 31B | MiMo-V2.6-Pro | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| AA Agentic Index | 4.2 | Not measured | Only Gemma 4 31B measured |
| Design Arena: agents building web apps | Not measured | 1290 | Only MiMo-V2.6-Pro measured |
| LiveBench research | 44.4% | 76.7% | MiMo-V2.6-Pro |
| LiveBench browser | 4.0% | 88.0% | MiMo-V2.6-Pro |
| LiveBench long agentic | 13.3% | 47.5% | MiMo-V2.6-Pro |
| SREBench (Vals AI) | Not measured | 3.0% | Only MiMo-V2.6-Pro measured |
| Finance Agent (Vals AI) | Not measured | 57.3% | Only MiMo-V2.6-Pro measured |
| Tax Agent Bench (Vals AI) | Not measured | 32.4% | Only MiMo-V2.6-Pro measured |
| Legal Research Bench (Vals AI) | Not measured | 47.1% | Only MiMo-V2.6-Pro measured |
| Harvey's Legal Agent Benchmark (Vals AI) | Not measured | 13.8% | Only MiMo-V2.6-Pro measured |
| Excel Modeling Benchmark (Vals AI) | Not measured | 62.9% | Only MiMo-V2.6-Pro measured |
| Terminal-Bench-Science (Vals AI) | Not measured | 2.9% | Only MiMo-V2.6-Pro measured |
| τ²-Bench Telecom | 65.5% | Not measured | Only Gemma 4 31B measured |
| APEX-Agents | Not measured | 54.4% | Only MiMo-V2.6-Pro measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 27 boards here | |||
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index25
| Benchmark | Gemma 4 31B | MiMo-V2.6-Pro | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| LiveBench reasoning | 68.3% | 79.6% | MiMo-V2.6-Pro |
| MysteryMechanism (Vals AI) | Not measured | 15.3% | Only MiMo-V2.6-Pro measured |
| GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run) | 85.7% | Not measured | Only Gemma 4 31B measured |
| Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run) | 23.6% | 49.4% | MiMo-V2.6-Pro |
| GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run) | 75.8% | Not measured | Only Gemma 4 31B measured |
| LMArena Text: hard prompts | 1448 | 1511 | MiMo-V2.6-Pro |
| LMArena Text: expert | 1464 | 1541 | MiMo-V2.6-Pro |
| LMArena Text: hard prompts in English | 1456 | 1520 | MiMo-V2.6-Pro |
| LMArena Vision: diagrams | 1283 | 1281 | Gemma 4 31B |
| LMArena Vision: homework | 1310 | 1264 | Gemma 4 31B |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 63.5% | Not measured | Only Gemma 4 31B measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 11 boards here | |||
MathLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index02
| Benchmark | Gemma 4 31B | MiMo-V2.6-Pro | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME | 73.3% | Not measured | Only Gemma 4 31B measured |
| ProofBench | Not measured | 70.0% | Only MiMo-V2.6-Pro measured |
| LMArena Text: math | 1463 | 1500 | MiMo-V2.6-Pro |
| LMArena Text: mathematical work | 1465 | 1511 | MiMo-V2.6-Pro |
| Neither model has a result on the other 9 boards here | |||
KnowledgeLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index04
| Benchmark | Gemma 4 31B | MiMo-V2.6-Pro | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| CaseLaw (Vals AI) | 52.6% | Not measured | Only Gemma 4 31B measured |
| MortgageTax (Vals AI) | 61.4% | Not measured | Only Gemma 4 31B measured |
| MedCode (Vals AI) | Not measured | 45.0% | Only MiMo-V2.6-Pro measured |
| SimpleQA Verified | 10.4% | Not measured | Only Gemma 4 31B measured |
| LMArena Text: science | 1457 | 1506 | MiMo-V2.6-Pro |
| LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare | 1451 | 1497 | MiMo-V2.6-Pro |
| LMArena Text: legal and government | 1438 | 1485 | MiMo-V2.6-Pro |
| LMArena Text: business and finance | 1430 | 1468 | MiMo-V2.6-Pro |
| FACTS Benchmark Suite | 45.3% | Not measured | Only Gemma 4 31B measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 9 boards here | |||
Web designLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
| Benchmark | Gemma 4 31B | MiMo-V2.6-Pro | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| Design Arena: websites | Not measured | 1308 | Only MiMo-V2.6-Pro measured |
| Design Arena: UI components | Not measured | 1340 | Only MiMo-V2.6-Pro measured |
| Design Arena: game dev | Not measured | 1314 | Only MiMo-V2.6-Pro measured |
| Design Arena: data viz | Not measured | 1336 | Only MiMo-V2.6-Pro measured |
| Design Arena: 3D | Not measured | 1330 | Only MiMo-V2.6-Pro measured |
| Design Arena: all code categories | Not measured | 1317 | Only MiMo-V2.6-Pro measured |
| LiveBench design | 58.4% | 78.5% | MiMo-V2.6-Pro |
| Neither model has a result on the other 2 boards here | |||
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index413
| Benchmark | Gemma 4 31B | MiMo-V2.6-Pro | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vals Index | Not measured | 57.8% | Only MiMo-V2.6-Pro measured |
| LiveBench data analysis | 53.3% | 72.3% | MiMo-V2.6-Pro |
| Public Benefits Bench (Vals AI) | Not measured | 68.9% | Only MiMo-V2.6-Pro measured |
| SAGE (Vals AI) | 55.0% | 45.0% | Gemma 4 31B |
| MedScribe (Vals AI) | Not measured | 88.3% | Only MiMo-V2.6-Pro measured |
| IFBench | 75.6% | Not measured | Only Gemma 4 31B measured |
| Long context reasoning (AA-LCR) | 69.7% | 86.3% | MiMo-V2.6-Pro |
| DTBench | 82.7% | Not measured | Only Gemma 4 31B measured |
| LMCA | 39.3% | Not measured | Only Gemma 4 31B measured |
| Surface Evolver Bench | 30.6% | Not measured | Only Gemma 4 31B measured |
| LMArena Text | 1443 | 1491 | MiMo-V2.6-Pro |
| LMArena Text: instruction following | 1433 | 1491 | MiMo-V2.6-Pro |
| LMArena Text: creative writing | 1417 | 1466 | MiMo-V2.6-Pro |
| LMArena Vision | 1276 | 1263 | Gemma 4 31B |
| LMArena Text: English | 1451 | 1504 | MiMo-V2.6-Pro |
| LMArena Text: non-English | 1430 | 1474 | MiMo-V2.6-Pro |
| LMArena Text: Chinese | 1475 | 1529 | MiMo-V2.6-Pro |
| LMArena Text: French | 1436 | Not measured | Only Gemma 4 31B measured |
| LMArena Text: Spanish | 1442 | Not measured | Only Gemma 4 31B measured |
| LMArena Text: Russian | 1460 | 1479 | MiMo-V2.6-Pro |
| LMArena Text: Polish | 1433 | Not measured | Only Gemma 4 31B measured |
| LMArena Text: multi-turn | 1452 | 1466 | MiMo-V2.6-Pro |
| LMArena Text: longer queries | 1446 | 1501 | MiMo-V2.6-Pro |
| LMArena Text: writing and language | 1432 | 1470 | MiMo-V2.6-Pro |
| LMArena Text: entertainment and media | 1405 | 1465 | MiMo-V2.6-Pro |
| LMArena Vision: English | 1271 | 1268 | Gemma 4 31B |
| LMArena Vision: Chinese | 1326 | Not measured | Only Gemma 4 31B measured |
| LMArena Vision: reading text | 1282 | 1270 | Gemma 4 31B |
| LMArena Vision: humor | 1280 | Not measured | Only Gemma 4 31B measured |
| LMArena Vision: captioning | 1218 | Not measured | Only Gemma 4 31B measured |
| LMArena Vision: recognizing things | 1226 | Not measured | Only Gemma 4 31B measured |
| LMArena Vision: creative writing | 1285 | Not measured | Only Gemma 4 31B measured |
| LMArena Document | 1425 | Not measured | Only Gemma 4 31B measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 13 boards here | |||
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
| Benchmark | Gemma 4 31B | MiMo-V2.6-Pro | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| Neither model has a result on 5 boards here | |||
What each workload costs
Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.
Chat turn
1K input + 500 output tokens
Gemma 4 31B costs less
Repository review
50K input + 3K output tokens
Gemma 4 31B costs less
Agent loop
200K input + 10K output tokens
Gemma 4 31B costs less
Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.
Specification differences
The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.
| Specification | Google Gemma 4 31B | Xiaomi MiMo-V2.6-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Maker | Xiaomi | |
| Weights | Open weights | Open weights |
| Released | April 2, 2026 | September 21, 2026 |
| Context window | 262K | 1.05M |
| Input $/Mtok | $0.14 | $0.435 |
| Output $/Mtok | $0.40 | $0.87 |
| Coding index | 39.0 | 65.4 |
| Independent measurements behind it | 2 | 4 |
| Cost per solved task | Not computable | Not computable |
| Source | OpenRouter listing | OpenRouter listing |
Questions
Is Gemma 4 31B better than MiMo-V2.6-Pro for coding?
Pick MiMo-V2.6-Pro for coding: it scores 65.4 on the Vibe Coding Index against 39.0 for Gemma 4 31B. Pick Gemma 4 31B for output tokens 2.2x cheaper ($0.40 vs $0.87 per million) and work measured by LMArena Vision: diagrams or LMArena Vision: homework, where it leads.
Which is cheaper, Gemma 4 31B or MiMo-V2.6-Pro?
Gemma 4 31B costs $0.14 per million input tokens and $0.40 per million output tokens; MiMo-V2.6-Pro costs $0.435 and $0.87. Cost per solved task is known for neither of them.
Which has the bigger context window, Gemma 4 31B or MiMo-V2.6-Pro?
MiMo-V2.6-Pro, with 1.05M tokens against 262K.
How many benchmarks is the Gemma 4 31B vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro comparison based on?
43 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 22, 2026. Gemma 4 31B's coding index rests on 2 independent benchmarks and MiMo-V2.6-Pro's on 4. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.