Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

Gemma 4 26B A4B vs MiMo-V2.6-Flash

MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads Gemma 4 26B A4B on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, 37.9 to 16.7, and MiMo-V2.6-Flash costs 2.1x less per output token ($0.28 vs $0.60 per million). Updated October 22, 2026; 38 benchmarks have a result for both.

Replace Gemma 4 26B A4B Replace MiMo-V2.6-Flash
Gemma 4 26B A4BGoogle
Coding
No data
Overall
54.7
Output $/M
$0.60
5
MiMo-V2.6-FlashXiaomi
Coding
54.7
Overall
60.8
Output $/M
$0.28
33
vs boards won of 38 shared

Gemma 4 26B A4B or MiMo-V2.6-Flash: which to pick

Only MiMo-V2.6-Flash has a coding score, 54.7 on the Vibe Coding Index; Gemma 4 26B A4B has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Pick Gemma 4 26B A4B for work measured by LMArena Vision: homework or LMArena Text: legal and government, where it leads.

Model AGemma 4 26B A4BGoogleNot benchmarked1 independent benchmarkNo cost per solved taskModel BMiMo-V2.6-FlashXiaomi54.7/1003 independent benchmarksNo cost per solved task
Shared results
38
Gemma 4 26B A4B only
17
MiMo-V2.6-Flash only
28
Like-for-like categories
6 of 9

Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
Gemma 4 26B A4B not benchmarked, MiMo-V2.6-Flash 54.7 from 3 benchmarks.
Widest category
Coding, 22.6 points apart on average over 7 shared benchmarks.
Widest single gap
LMArena WebDev: React: Gemma 4 26B A4B 1351 against MiMo-V2.6-Flash 1648, 41.5 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
Gemma 4 26B A4B $0.60 against MiMo-V2.6-Flash $0.28 per million output tokens, 2.1x apart.
Context window
Gemma 4 26B A4B takes 262K tokens, MiMo-V2.6-Flash 1.05M.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryGemma 4 26B A4BBarsMiMo-V2.6-FlashTies
Coding07
Intelligence01
Reasoning15
Math02
Knowledge13
General315
All shared boards533
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index07
Coding benchmarks for Gemma 4 26B A4B and MiMo-V2.6-Flash
BenchmarkGemma 4 26B A4BMiMo-V2.6-FlashLeader
LMArena WebDev13601634MiMo-V2.6-Flash
AA Coding Index39.3Not measuredOnly Gemma 4 26B A4B measured
Terminal-Bench 4 (Vals AI)Not measured24.2%Only MiMo-V2.6-Flash measured
Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI)Not measured79.0%Only MiMo-V2.6-Flash measured
Code migration (Vals AI)Not measured40.9%Only MiMo-V2.6-Flash measured
ProgramBench (Vals AI)Not measured0.5%Only MiMo-V2.6-Flash measured
IOI (Vals AI)Not measured47.7%Only MiMo-V2.6-Flash measured
Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals AI)Not measured76.4%Only MiMo-V2.6-Flash measured
CyberBench (Vals AI)Not measured75.4%Only MiMo-V2.6-Flash measured
SciCode40.0%51.3%MiMo-V2.6-Flash
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)25.0%Not measuredOnly Gemma 4 26B A4B measured
WeirdML35.2%Not measuredOnly Gemma 4 26B A4B measured
ALE-Bench927.21244.2MiMo-V2.6-Flash
LMArena Text: coding14461499MiMo-V2.6-Flash
LMArena Text: software and IT14541497MiMo-V2.6-Flash
LMArena WebDev: React13511648MiMo-V2.6-Flash
LMArena WebDev: HTML13621641MiMo-V2.6-Flash
LMArena WebDev: from an imageNot measured1596Only MiMo-V2.6-Flash measured
Neither model has a result on the other 21 boards here
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
Intelligence benchmarks for Gemma 4 26B A4B and MiMo-V2.6-Flash
BenchmarkGemma 4 26B A4BMiMo-V2.6-FlashLeader
AA Intelligence Index16.737.9MiMo-V2.6-Flash
Epoch Capabilities Index141.9Not measuredOnly Gemma 4 26B A4B measured
Agentic workDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index11 boards, none shared
Agentic work benchmarks for Gemma 4 26B A4B and MiMo-V2.6-Flash
BenchmarkGemma 4 26B A4BMiMo-V2.6-FlashLeader
AA Agentic Index2.9Not measuredOnly Gemma 4 26B A4B measured
SREBench (Vals AI)Not measured4.2%Only MiMo-V2.6-Flash measured
Finance Agent (Vals AI)Not measured56.3%Only MiMo-V2.6-Flash measured
Tax Agent Bench (Vals AI)Not measured28.5%Only MiMo-V2.6-Flash measured
Legal Research Bench (Vals AI)Not measured38.0%Only MiMo-V2.6-Flash measured
Harvey's Legal Agent Benchmark (Vals AI)Not measured13.3%Only MiMo-V2.6-Flash measured
Excel Modeling Benchmark (Vals AI)Not measured65.5%Only MiMo-V2.6-Flash measured
BioMysteryBench (Vals AI)Not measured69.3%Only MiMo-V2.6-Flash measured
Terminal-Bench-Science (Vals AI)Not measured4.3%Only MiMo-V2.6-Flash measured
Vals Science IndexNot measured31.7%Only MiMo-V2.6-Flash measured
τ²-Bench Telecom43.6%Not measuredOnly Gemma 4 26B A4B measured
Neither model has a result on the other 30 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index15
Reasoning benchmarks for Gemma 4 26B A4B and MiMo-V2.6-Flash
BenchmarkGemma 4 26B A4BMiMo-V2.6-FlashLeader
MysteryMechanism (Vals AI)Not measured21.6%Only MiMo-V2.6-Flash measured
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)79.2%Not measuredOnly Gemma 4 26B A4B measured
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)19.3%35.1%MiMo-V2.6-Flash
GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run)73.2%Not measuredOnly Gemma 4 26B A4B measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts14381475MiMo-V2.6-Flash
LMArena Text: expert14471496MiMo-V2.6-Flash
LMArena Text: hard prompts in English14481493MiMo-V2.6-Flash
LMArena Vision: diagrams12641276MiMo-V2.6-Flash
LMArena Vision: homework12931283Gemma 4 26B A4B
Neither model has a result on the other 13 boards here
MathLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index02
Math benchmarks for Gemma 4 26B A4B and MiMo-V2.6-Flash
BenchmarkGemma 4 26B A4BMiMo-V2.6-FlashLeader
OTIS Mock AIME82.2%Not measuredOnly Gemma 4 26B A4B measured
ProofBenchNot measured63.0%Only MiMo-V2.6-Flash measured
LMArena Text: math14701476MiMo-V2.6-Flash
LMArena Text: mathematical work14751478MiMo-V2.6-Flash
Neither model has a result on the other 9 boards here
KnowledgeLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index13
Knowledge benchmarks for Gemma 4 26B A4B and MiMo-V2.6-Flash
BenchmarkGemma 4 26B A4BMiMo-V2.6-FlashLeader
MedCode (Vals AI)Not measured41.1%Only MiMo-V2.6-Flash measured
LMArena Text: science14461462MiMo-V2.6-Flash
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare14281439MiMo-V2.6-Flash
LMArena Text: legal and government14571441Gemma 4 26B A4B
LMArena Text: business and finance14291454MiMo-V2.6-Flash
FACTS Benchmark Suite42.7%Not measuredOnly Gemma 4 26B A4B measured
Neither model has a result on the other 12 boards here
Web designNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Web design benchmarks for Gemma 4 26B A4B and MiMo-V2.6-Flash
BenchmarkGemma 4 26B A4BMiMo-V2.6-FlashLeader
Neither model has a result on 9 boards here
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index315
General benchmarks for Gemma 4 26B A4B and MiMo-V2.6-Flash
BenchmarkGemma 4 26B A4BMiMo-V2.6-FlashLeader
Vals IndexNot measured54.8%Only MiMo-V2.6-Flash measured
Public Benefits Bench (Vals AI)Not measured67.6%Only MiMo-V2.6-Flash measured
SAGE (Vals AI)Not measured43.5%Only MiMo-V2.6-Flash measured
MedScribe (Vals AI)Not measured85.3%Only MiMo-V2.6-Flash measured
IFBench72.4%Not measuredOnly Gemma 4 26B A4B measured
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)65.7%74.3%MiMo-V2.6-Flash
DTBench74.9%Not measuredOnly Gemma 4 26B A4B measured
LMCA29.7%Not measuredOnly Gemma 4 26B A4B measured
LMArena Text14341453MiMo-V2.6-Flash
LMArena Text: instruction following14201452MiMo-V2.6-Flash
LMArena Text: creative writing14001403MiMo-V2.6-Flash
LMArena Vision12601256Gemma 4 26B A4B
LMArena Text: English14441476MiMo-V2.6-Flash
LMArena Text: non-English14211431MiMo-V2.6-Flash
LMArena Text: Chinese14951509MiMo-V2.6-Flash
LMArena Text: GermanNot measured1458Only MiMo-V2.6-Flash measured
LMArena Text: JapaneseNot measured1359Only MiMo-V2.6-Flash measured
LMArena Text: KoreanNot measured1425Only MiMo-V2.6-Flash measured
LMArena Text: French14601480MiMo-V2.6-Flash
LMArena Text: Spanish14151453MiMo-V2.6-Flash
LMArena Text: Russian14341409Gemma 4 26B A4B
LMArena Text: PolishNot measured1455Only MiMo-V2.6-Flash measured
LMArena Text: multi-turn14411447MiMo-V2.6-Flash
LMArena Text: longer queries14271459MiMo-V2.6-Flash
LMArena Text: writing and language14051424MiMo-V2.6-Flash
LMArena Text: entertainment and media14031415MiMo-V2.6-Flash
LMArena Vision: English12561269MiMo-V2.6-Flash
LMArena Vision: Chinese1312Not measuredOnly Gemma 4 26B A4B measured
LMArena Vision: reading text12681270MiMo-V2.6-Flash
LMArena Vision: humor1272Not measuredOnly Gemma 4 26B A4B measured
LMArena Vision: captioning1297Not measuredOnly Gemma 4 26B A4B measured
LMArena Vision: recognizing things1191Not measuredOnly Gemma 4 26B A4B measured
LMArena Vision: creative writing12561231Gemma 4 26B A4B
Neither model has a result on the other 13 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for Gemma 4 26B A4B and MiMo-V2.6-Flash
BenchmarkGemma 4 26B A4BMiMo-V2.6-FlashLeader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

Gemma 4 26B A4B$0.0004Fits in one request
MiMo-V2.6-Flash$0.0003Fits in one request

MiMo-V2.6-Flash costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

Gemma 4 26B A4B$0.0093Fits in one request
MiMo-V2.6-Flash$0.0078Fits in one request

MiMo-V2.6-Flash costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

Gemma 4 26B A4B$0.036Fits in one request
MiMo-V2.6-Flash$0.031Fits in one request

MiMo-V2.6-Flash costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of Gemma 4 26B A4B and MiMo-V2.6-Flash
SpecificationGoogle Gemma 4 26B A4BXiaomi MiMo-V2.6-Flash
MakerGoogleXiaomi
WeightsOpen weightsOpen weights
ReleasedApril 3, 2026September 21, 2026
Context window262K1.05M
Input $/Mtok$0.15$0.14
Output $/Mtok$0.60$0.28
Coding indexNot benchmarked54.7
Independent measurements behind it13
Cost per solved taskNot computableNot computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is Gemma 4 26B A4B better than MiMo-V2.6-Flash for coding?

Only MiMo-V2.6-Flash has a coding score, 54.7 on the Vibe Coding Index; Gemma 4 26B A4B has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Pick Gemma 4 26B A4B for work measured by LMArena Vision: homework or LMArena Text: legal and government, where it leads.

Which is cheaper, Gemma 4 26B A4B or MiMo-V2.6-Flash?

Gemma 4 26B A4B costs $0.15 per million input tokens and $0.60 per million output tokens; MiMo-V2.6-Flash costs $0.14 and $0.28. Cost per solved task is known for neither of them.

Which has the bigger context window, Gemma 4 26B A4B or MiMo-V2.6-Flash?

MiMo-V2.6-Flash, with 1.05M tokens against 262K.

How many benchmarks is the Gemma 4 26B A4B vs MiMo-V2.6-Flash comparison based on?

38 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 22, 2026. Gemma 4 26B A4B's coding index rests on 1 independent benchmark and MiMo-V2.6-Flash's on 3. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next