Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

Gemma 4 26B A4B vs Mistral Large 4

Mistral Large 4 leads Gemma 4 26B A4B on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, 38.4 to 16.7, and Gemma 4 26B A4B costs 7.0x less per output token ($0.60 vs $4.18 per million). Updated October 22, 2026; 41 benchmarks have a result for both.

Gemma 4 26B A4BGoogle
Coding
No data
Overall
54.7
Output $/M
$0.60
13
Mistral Large 4Mistral AI
Coding
56.4
Overall
54.6
Output $/M
$4.18
28
vs boards won of 41 shared

Gemma 4 26B A4B or Mistral Large 4: which to pick

Only Mistral Large 4 has a coding score, 56.4 on the Vibe Coding Index; Gemma 4 26B A4B has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Pick Gemma 4 26B A4B for output tokens 7.0x cheaper ($0.60 vs $4.18 per million) and work measured by LMArena Text: expert or LMArena Text: hard prompts in English, where it leads.

Shared results
41
Gemma 4 26B A4B only
14
Mistral Large 4 only
40
Like-for-like categories
6 of 9

Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
Gemma 4 26B A4B not benchmarked, Mistral Large 4 56.4 from 5 benchmarks.
Widest category
Coding, 16.1 points apart on average over 7 shared benchmarks.
Widest single gap
LMArena WebDev: React: Gemma 4 26B A4B 1351 against Mistral Large 4 1559, 34.6 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
Gemma 4 26B A4B $0.60 against Mistral Large 4 $4.18 per million output tokens, 7.0x apart.
Context window
Gemma 4 26B A4B takes 262K tokens, Mistral Large 4 1.05M.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryGemma 4 26B A4BBarsMistral Large 4Ties
Coding07
Intelligence02
Reasoning24
Math21
Knowledge13
General811
All shared boards1328
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index07
Coding benchmarks for Gemma 4 26B A4B and Mistral Large 4
BenchmarkGemma 4 26B A4BMistral Large 4Leader
LiveBench codingNot measured60.0%Only Mistral Large 4 measured
LMArena WebDev13601543Mistral Large 4
AA Coding Index39.3Not measuredOnly Gemma 4 26B A4B measured
Terminal-Bench 4 (Vals AI)Not measured27.8%Only Mistral Large 4 measured
Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI)Not measured78.4%Only Mistral Large 4 measured
Code migration (Vals AI)Not measured30.6%Only Mistral Large 4 measured
IOI (Vals AI)Not measured45.3%Only Mistral Large 4 measured
SWE-bench Multimodal (Vals AI)Not measured33.1%Only Mistral Large 4 measured
Vibe Code Bench 1-100 (Vals AI)Not measured14.3%Only Mistral Large 4 measured
SciCode40.0%54.2%Mistral Large 4
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)25.0%Not measuredOnly Gemma 4 26B A4B measured
FrontierCodeNot measured39.4%Only Mistral Large 4 measured
WeirdML35.2%Not measuredOnly Gemma 4 26B A4B measured
ALE-Bench927.21213.2Mistral Large 4
LMArena Text: coding14461478Mistral Large 4
LMArena Text: software and IT14541467Mistral Large 4
LMArena WebDev: React13511559Mistral Large 4
LMArena WebDev: HTML13621487Mistral Large 4
Neither model has a result on the other 21 boards here
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index02
Intelligence benchmarks for Gemma 4 26B A4B and Mistral Large 4
BenchmarkGemma 4 26B A4BMistral Large 4Leader
AA Intelligence Index16.738.4Mistral Large 4
Epoch Capabilities Index141.9150.0Mistral Large 4
Agentic workDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index11 boards, none shared
Agentic work benchmarks for Gemma 4 26B A4B and Mistral Large 4
BenchmarkGemma 4 26B A4BMistral Large 4Leader
AA Agentic Index2.9Not measuredOnly Gemma 4 26B A4B measured
LiveBench researchNot measured28.1%Only Mistral Large 4 measured
LiveBench browserNot measured8.0%Only Mistral Large 4 measured
LiveBench long agenticNot measured11.8%Only Mistral Large 4 measured
Finance Agent (Vals AI)Not measured54.7%Only Mistral Large 4 measured
Tax Agent Bench (Vals AI)Not measured30.4%Only Mistral Large 4 measured
Legal Research Bench (Vals AI)Not measured31.7%Only Mistral Large 4 measured
Harvey's Legal Agent Benchmark (Vals AI)Not measured17.5%Only Mistral Large 4 measured
Excel Modeling Benchmark (Vals AI)Not measured56.2%Only Mistral Large 4 measured
BioMysteryBench (Vals AI)Not measured67.0%Only Mistral Large 4 measured
τ²-Bench Telecom43.6%Not measuredOnly Gemma 4 26B A4B measured
Neither model has a result on the other 30 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index24
Reasoning benchmarks for Gemma 4 26B A4B and Mistral Large 4
BenchmarkGemma 4 26B A4BMistral Large 4Leader
LiveBench reasoningNot measured83.9%Only Mistral Large 4 measured
MysteryMechanism (Vals AI)Not measured12.2%Only Mistral Large 4 measured
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)79.2%Not measuredOnly Gemma 4 26B A4B measured
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)19.3%35.0%Mistral Large 4
GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run)73.2%88.1%Mistral Large 4
Chess puzzlesNot measured33.0%Only Mistral Large 4 measured
Mystery game puzzlesNot measured17.0%Only Mistral Large 4 measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts14381444Mistral Large 4
LMArena Text: expert14471444Gemma 4 26B A4B
LMArena Text: hard prompts in English14481442Gemma 4 26B A4B
LMArena Vision: diagrams12641288Mistral Large 4
LMArena Vision: homework1293Not measuredOnly Gemma 4 26B A4B measured
Neither model has a result on the other 10 boards here
MathLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index21
Math benchmarks for Gemma 4 26B A4B and Mistral Large 4
BenchmarkGemma 4 26B A4BMistral Large 4Leader
OTIS Mock AIME82.2%98.3%Mistral Large 4
FrontierMath, tiers 1 to 3Not measured58.6%Only Mistral Large 4 measured
FrontierMath, tier 4Not measured26.8%Only Mistral Large 4 measured
ProofBenchNot measured10.0%Only Mistral Large 4 measured
LMArena Text: math14701469Gemma 4 26B A4B
LMArena Text: mathematical work14751462Gemma 4 26B A4B
Neither model has a result on the other 7 boards here
KnowledgeLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index13
Knowledge benchmarks for Gemma 4 26B A4B and Mistral Large 4
BenchmarkGemma 4 26B A4BMistral Large 4Leader
MedCode (Vals AI)Not measured40.7%Only Mistral Large 4 measured
SimpleQA VerifiedNot measured20.0%Only Mistral Large 4 measured
LMArena Text: science14461448Mistral Large 4
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare14281433Mistral Large 4
LMArena Text: legal and government14571425Gemma 4 26B A4B
LMArena Text: business and finance14291439Mistral Large 4
FACTS Benchmark Suite42.7%Not measuredOnly Gemma 4 26B A4B measured
Neither model has a result on the other 11 boards here
Web designDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index9 boards, none shared
Web design benchmarks for Gemma 4 26B A4B and Mistral Large 4
BenchmarkGemma 4 26B A4BMistral Large 4Leader
Design Arena: websitesNot measured1257Only Mistral Large 4 measured
Design Arena: UI componentsNot measured1272Only Mistral Large 4 measured
Design Arena: game devNot measured1225Only Mistral Large 4 measured
Design Arena: data vizNot measured1275Only Mistral Large 4 measured
Design Arena: 3DNot measured1252Only Mistral Large 4 measured
Design Arena: all code categoriesNot measured1259Only Mistral Large 4 measured
Design Arena: SVGNot measured1232Only Mistral Large 4 measured
Design Arena: ASCII artNot measured1202Only Mistral Large 4 measured
LiveBench designNot measured65.6%Only Mistral Large 4 measured
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index811
General benchmarks for Gemma 4 26B A4B and Mistral Large 4
BenchmarkGemma 4 26B A4BMistral Large 4Leader
LiveBench data analysisNot measured76.5%Only Mistral Large 4 measured
MedScribe (Vals AI)Not measured80.4%Only Mistral Large 4 measured
IFBench72.4%Not measuredOnly Gemma 4 26B A4B measured
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)65.7%81.3%Mistral Large 4
DTBench74.9%88.2%Mistral Large 4
LMCA29.7%35.8%Mistral Large 4
Surface Evolver BenchNot measured28.1%Only Mistral Large 4 measured
Furniture assemblyNot measured20.8%Only Mistral Large 4 measured
LMArena Text14341431Gemma 4 26B A4B
LMArena Text: instruction following14201422Mistral Large 4
LMArena Text: creative writing14001363Gemma 4 26B A4B
LMArena Vision12601272Mistral Large 4
LMArena Text: English14441433Gemma 4 26B A4B
LMArena Text: non-English14211422Mistral Large 4
LMArena Text: Chinese14951492Gemma 4 26B A4B
LMArena Text: JapaneseNot measured1415Only Mistral Large 4 measured
LMArena Text: French14601492Mistral Large 4
LMArena Text: Spanish14151455Mistral Large 4
LMArena Text: Russian14341417Gemma 4 26B A4B
LMArena Text: multi-turn14411435Gemma 4 26B A4B
LMArena Text: longer queries14271428Mistral Large 4
LMArena Text: writing and language14051386Gemma 4 26B A4B
LMArena Text: entertainment and media14031378Gemma 4 26B A4B
LMArena Vision: English12561283Mistral Large 4
LMArena Vision: Chinese1312Not measuredOnly Gemma 4 26B A4B measured
LMArena Vision: reading text12681284Mistral Large 4
LMArena Vision: humor1272Not measuredOnly Gemma 4 26B A4B measured
LMArena Vision: captioning1297Not measuredOnly Gemma 4 26B A4B measured
LMArena Vision: recognizing things1191Not measuredOnly Gemma 4 26B A4B measured
LMArena Vision: creative writing1256Not measuredOnly Gemma 4 26B A4B measured
Neither model has a result on the other 16 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for Gemma 4 26B A4B and Mistral Large 4
BenchmarkGemma 4 26B A4BMistral Large 4Leader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

Gemma 4 26B A4B$0.0004Fits in one request
Mistral Large 4$0.0034Fits in one request

Gemma 4 26B A4B costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

Gemma 4 26B A4B$0.0093Fits in one request
Mistral Large 4$0.081Fits in one request

Gemma 4 26B A4B costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

Gemma 4 26B A4B$0.036Fits in one request
Mistral Large 4$0.314Fits in one request

Gemma 4 26B A4B costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of Gemma 4 26B A4B and Mistral Large 4
SpecificationGoogle Gemma 4 26B A4BMistral Large 4
MakerGoogleMistral AI
WeightsOpen weightsNo public weights listed
ReleasedApril 3, 2026October 6, 2026
Context window262K1.05M
Input $/Mtok$0.15$1.36
Output $/Mtok$0.60$4.18
Coding indexNot benchmarked56.4
Independent measurements behind it15
Cost per solved taskNot computableNot computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is Gemma 4 26B A4B better than Mistral Large 4 for coding?

Only Mistral Large 4 has a coding score, 56.4 on the Vibe Coding Index; Gemma 4 26B A4B has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Pick Gemma 4 26B A4B for output tokens 7.0x cheaper ($0.60 vs $4.18 per million) and work measured by LMArena Text: expert or LMArena Text: hard prompts in English, where it leads.

Which is cheaper, Gemma 4 26B A4B or Mistral Large 4?

Gemma 4 26B A4B costs $0.15 per million input tokens and $0.60 per million output tokens; Mistral Large 4 costs $1.36 and $4.18. Cost per solved task is known for neither of them.

Which has the bigger context window, Gemma 4 26B A4B or Mistral Large 4?

Mistral Large 4, with 1.05M tokens against 262K.

How many benchmarks is the Gemma 4 26B A4B vs Mistral Large 4 comparison based on?

41 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 22, 2026. Gemma 4 26B A4B's coding index rests on 1 independent benchmark and Mistral Large 4's on 5. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next