Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

Gemma 4 26B A4B vs Muse Spark Open

Gemma 4 26B A4B costs 7.1x less per output token than Muse Spark Open ($0.60 vs $4.25 per million). Updated October 22, 2026; 9 benchmarks have a result for both.

Gemma 4 26B A4BGoogle
Coding
No data
Overall
54.7
Output $/M
$0.60
0
Muse Spark OpenMeta
Coding
47.4
Overall
44.9
Output $/M
$4.25
9
vs boards won of 9 shared

Gemma 4 26B A4B or Muse Spark Open: which to pick

Only Muse Spark Open has a coding score, 47.4 on the Vibe Coding Index; Gemma 4 26B A4B has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Pick Gemma 4 26B A4B for output tokens 7.1x cheaper ($0.60 vs $4.25 per million).

Shared results
9
Gemma 4 26B A4B only
46
Muse Spark Open only
19
Like-for-like categories
4 of 9

Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
Gemma 4 26B A4B not benchmarked, Muse Spark Open 47.4 from 4 benchmarks.
Widest category
Coding, 23.3 points apart on average over 5 shared benchmarks.
Widest single gap
LMArena WebDev: React: Gemma 4 26B A4B 1351 against Muse Spark Open 1529, 29.7 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
Gemma 4 26B A4B $0.60 against Muse Spark Open $4.25 per million output tokens, 7.1x apart.
Context window
Gemma 4 26B A4B takes 262K tokens, Muse Spark Open 1.05M.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryGemma 4 26B A4BBarsMuse Spark OpenTies
Coding05
Intelligence01
Reasoning02
General01
All shared boards09
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index05
Coding benchmarks for Gemma 4 26B A4B and Muse Spark Open
BenchmarkGemma 4 26B A4BMuse Spark OpenLeader
LiveBench codingNot measured73.6%Only Muse Spark Open measured
LMArena WebDev13601528Muse Spark Open
AA Coding Index39.3Not measuredOnly Gemma 4 26B A4B measured
Terminal-Bench 4 (Vals AI)Not measured6.6%Only Muse Spark Open measured
Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI)Not measured76.2%Only Muse Spark Open measured
Code migration (Vals AI)Not measured21.2%Only Muse Spark Open measured
SciCode40.0%58.4%Muse Spark Open
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)25.0%Not measuredOnly Gemma 4 26B A4B measured
WeirdML35.2%Not measuredOnly Gemma 4 26B A4B measured
ALE-Bench927.21590.1Muse Spark Open
LMArena Text: coding1446Not measuredOnly Gemma 4 26B A4B measured
LMArena Text: software and IT1454Not measuredOnly Gemma 4 26B A4B measured
LMArena WebDev: React13511529Muse Spark Open
LMArena WebDev: HTML13621495Muse Spark Open
Neither model has a result on the other 25 boards here
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
Intelligence benchmarks for Gemma 4 26B A4B and Muse Spark Open
BenchmarkGemma 4 26B A4BMuse Spark OpenLeader
AA Intelligence Index16.7Not measuredOnly Gemma 4 26B A4B measured
Epoch Capabilities Index141.9155.1Muse Spark Open
Agentic workDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index11 boards, none shared
Agentic work benchmarks for Gemma 4 26B A4B and Muse Spark Open
BenchmarkGemma 4 26B A4BMuse Spark OpenLeader
AA Agentic Index2.9Not measuredOnly Gemma 4 26B A4B measured
LiveBench researchNot measured80.3%Only Muse Spark Open measured
LiveBench browserNot measured36.0%Only Muse Spark Open measured
LiveBench long agenticNot measured18.9%Only Muse Spark Open measured
Finance Agent (Vals AI)Not measured61.3%Only Muse Spark Open measured
Tax Agent Bench (Vals AI)Not measured26.3%Only Muse Spark Open measured
Legal Research Bench (Vals AI)Not measured38.5%Only Muse Spark Open measured
Harvey's Legal Agent Benchmark (Vals AI)Not measured25.0%Only Muse Spark Open measured
Excel Modeling Benchmark (Vals AI)Not measured53.7%Only Muse Spark Open measured
τ²-Bench Telecom43.6%Not measuredOnly Gemma 4 26B A4B measured
APEX-AgentsNot measured33.4%Only Muse Spark Open measured
Neither model has a result on the other 30 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index02
Reasoning benchmarks for Gemma 4 26B A4B and Muse Spark Open
BenchmarkGemma 4 26B A4BMuse Spark OpenLeader
LiveBench reasoningNot measured73.7%Only Muse Spark Open measured
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)79.2%89.0%Muse Spark Open
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)19.3%43.9%Muse Spark Open
GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run)73.2%Not measuredOnly Gemma 4 26B A4B measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts1438Not measuredOnly Gemma 4 26B A4B measured
LMArena Text: expert1447Not measuredOnly Gemma 4 26B A4B measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts in English1448Not measuredOnly Gemma 4 26B A4B measured
LMArena Vision: diagrams1264Not measuredOnly Gemma 4 26B A4B measured
LMArena Vision: homework1293Not measuredOnly Gemma 4 26B A4B measured
Neither model has a result on the other 13 boards here
MathDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index3 boards, none shared
Math benchmarks for Gemma 4 26B A4B and Muse Spark Open
BenchmarkGemma 4 26B A4BMuse Spark OpenLeader
OTIS Mock AIME82.2%Not measuredOnly Gemma 4 26B A4B measured
LMArena Text: math1470Not measuredOnly Gemma 4 26B A4B measured
LMArena Text: mathematical work1475Not measuredOnly Gemma 4 26B A4B measured
Neither model has a result on the other 10 boards here
KnowledgeDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index5 boards, none shared
Knowledge benchmarks for Gemma 4 26B A4B and Muse Spark Open
BenchmarkGemma 4 26B A4BMuse Spark OpenLeader
LMArena Text: science1446Not measuredOnly Gemma 4 26B A4B measured
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare1428Not measuredOnly Gemma 4 26B A4B measured
LMArena Text: legal and government1457Not measuredOnly Gemma 4 26B A4B measured
LMArena Text: business and finance1429Not measuredOnly Gemma 4 26B A4B measured
FACTS Benchmark Suite42.7%Not measuredOnly Gemma 4 26B A4B measured
Neither model has a result on the other 13 boards here
Web designDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index3 boards, none shared
Web design benchmarks for Gemma 4 26B A4B and Muse Spark Open
BenchmarkGemma 4 26B A4BMuse Spark OpenLeader
Design Arena: websitesNot measured1310Only Muse Spark Open measured
Design Arena: game devNot measured1282Only Muse Spark Open measured
LiveBench designNot measured60.3%Only Muse Spark Open measured
Neither model has a result on the other 6 boards here
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
General benchmarks for Gemma 4 26B A4B and Muse Spark Open
BenchmarkGemma 4 26B A4BMuse Spark OpenLeader
Vals IndexNot measured48.6%Only Muse Spark Open measured
LiveBench data analysisNot measured60.2%Only Muse Spark Open measured
IFBench72.4%Not measuredOnly Gemma 4 26B A4B measured
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)65.7%78.3%Muse Spark Open
DTBench74.9%Not measuredOnly Gemma 4 26B A4B measured
LMCA29.7%Not measuredOnly Gemma 4 26B A4B measured
LMArena Text1434Not measuredOnly Gemma 4 26B A4B measured
LMArena Text: instruction following1420Not measuredOnly Gemma 4 26B A4B measured
LMArena Text: creative writing1400Not measuredOnly Gemma 4 26B A4B measured
LMArena Vision1260Not measuredOnly Gemma 4 26B A4B measured
LMArena Text: English1444Not measuredOnly Gemma 4 26B A4B measured
LMArena Text: non-English1421Not measuredOnly Gemma 4 26B A4B measured
LMArena Text: Chinese1495Not measuredOnly Gemma 4 26B A4B measured
LMArena Text: French1460Not measuredOnly Gemma 4 26B A4B measured
LMArena Text: Spanish1415Not measuredOnly Gemma 4 26B A4B measured
LMArena Text: Russian1434Not measuredOnly Gemma 4 26B A4B measured
LMArena Text: multi-turn1441Not measuredOnly Gemma 4 26B A4B measured
LMArena Text: longer queries1427Not measuredOnly Gemma 4 26B A4B measured
LMArena Text: writing and language1405Not measuredOnly Gemma 4 26B A4B measured
LMArena Text: entertainment and media1403Not measuredOnly Gemma 4 26B A4B measured
LMArena Vision: English1256Not measuredOnly Gemma 4 26B A4B measured
LMArena Vision: Chinese1312Not measuredOnly Gemma 4 26B A4B measured
LMArena Vision: reading text1268Not measuredOnly Gemma 4 26B A4B measured
LMArena Vision: humor1272Not measuredOnly Gemma 4 26B A4B measured
LMArena Vision: captioning1297Not measuredOnly Gemma 4 26B A4B measured
LMArena Vision: recognizing things1191Not measuredOnly Gemma 4 26B A4B measured
LMArena Vision: creative writing1256Not measuredOnly Gemma 4 26B A4B measured
Neither model has a result on the other 19 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for Gemma 4 26B A4B and Muse Spark Open
BenchmarkGemma 4 26B A4BMuse Spark OpenLeader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

Gemma 4 26B A4B$0.0004Fits in one request
Muse Spark Open$0.0034Fits in one request

Gemma 4 26B A4B costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

Gemma 4 26B A4B$0.0093Fits in one request
Muse Spark Open$0.075Fits in one request

Gemma 4 26B A4B costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

Gemma 4 26B A4B$0.036Fits in one request
Muse Spark Open$0.292Fits in one request

Gemma 4 26B A4B costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of Gemma 4 26B A4B and Muse Spark Open
SpecificationGoogle Gemma 4 26B A4BMeta Muse Spark Open
MakerGoogleMeta
WeightsOpen weightsOpen weights
ReleasedApril 3, 2026October 15, 2026
Context window262K1.05M
Input $/Mtok$0.15$1.25
Output $/Mtok$0.60$4.25
Coding indexNot benchmarked47.4
Independent measurements behind it14
Cost per solved taskNot computableNot computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is Gemma 4 26B A4B better than Muse Spark Open for coding?

Only Muse Spark Open has a coding score, 47.4 on the Vibe Coding Index; Gemma 4 26B A4B has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Pick Gemma 4 26B A4B for output tokens 7.1x cheaper ($0.60 vs $4.25 per million).

Which is cheaper, Gemma 4 26B A4B or Muse Spark Open?

Gemma 4 26B A4B costs $0.15 per million input tokens and $0.60 per million output tokens; Muse Spark Open costs $1.25 and $4.25. Cost per solved task is known for neither of them.

Which has the bigger context window, Gemma 4 26B A4B or Muse Spark Open?

Muse Spark Open, with 1.05M tokens against 262K.

How many benchmarks is the Gemma 4 26B A4B vs Muse Spark Open comparison based on?

9 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 22, 2026. Gemma 4 26B A4B's coding index rests on 1 independent benchmark and Muse Spark Open's on 4. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next