Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

Gemma 3 27B vs Muse Spark Open

Gemma 3 27B costs 14.2x less per output token than Muse Spark Open ($0.30 vs $4.25 per million). Updated October 22, 2026; 5 benchmarks have a result for both.

Gemma 3 27BGoogle
Coding
No data
Overall
31.4
Output $/M
$0.30
0
Muse Spark OpenMeta
Coding
47.4
Overall
44.9
Output $/M
$4.25
5
vs boards won of 5 shared

Gemma 3 27B or Muse Spark Open: which to pick

Only Muse Spark Open has a coding score, 47.4 on the Vibe Coding Index; Gemma 3 27B has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Pick Gemma 3 27B for output tokens 14.2x cheaper ($0.30 vs $4.25 per million).

Shared results
5
Gemma 3 27B only
61
Muse Spark Open only
23
Like-for-like categories
4 of 9

Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
Gemma 3 27B not benchmarked, Muse Spark Open 47.4 from 4 benchmarks.
Widest category
General, 71.0 points apart on average over 1 shared benchmark.
Widest single gap
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR): Gemma 3 27B 7.3% against Muse Spark Open 78.3%, 71.0 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
Gemma 3 27B $0.30 against Muse Spark Open $4.25 per million output tokens, 14.2x apart.
Context window
Gemma 3 27B takes 131K tokens, Muse Spark Open 1.05M.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryGemma 3 27BBarsMuse Spark OpenTies
Coding01
Intelligence01
Reasoning02
General01
All shared boards05
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index01
Coding benchmarks for Gemma 3 27B and Muse Spark Open
BenchmarkGemma 3 27BMuse Spark OpenLeader
Aider polyglot4.9%Not measuredOnly Gemma 3 27B measured
LiveBench codingNot measured73.6%Only Muse Spark Open measured
LMArena WebDevNot measured1528Only Muse Spark Open measured
AA Coding Index10.1Not measuredOnly Gemma 3 27B measured
Terminal-Bench 4 (Vals AI)Not measured6.6%Only Muse Spark Open measured
Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI)Not measured76.2%Only Muse Spark Open measured
Code migration (Vals AI)Not measured21.2%Only Muse Spark Open measured
LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run)13.7%Not measuredOnly Gemma 3 27B measured
SciCode23.3%58.4%Muse Spark Open
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)3.8%Not measuredOnly Gemma 3 27B measured
ALE-BenchNot measured1590.1Only Muse Spark Open measured
LMArena Text: coding1322Not measuredOnly Gemma 3 27B measured
LMArena Text: software and IT1354Not measuredOnly Gemma 3 27B measured
LMArena WebDev: ReactNot measured1529Only Muse Spark Open measured
LMArena WebDev: HTMLNot measured1495Only Muse Spark Open measured
SciCode0.0%Not measuredOnly Gemma 3 27B measured
Neither model has a result on the other 23 boards here
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
Intelligence benchmarks for Gemma 3 27B and Muse Spark Open
BenchmarkGemma 3 27BMuse Spark OpenLeader
AA Intelligence Index4.9Not measuredOnly Gemma 3 27B measured
Epoch Capabilities Index130.0155.1Muse Spark Open
Agentic workDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index12 boards, none shared
Agentic work benchmarks for Gemma 3 27B and Muse Spark Open
BenchmarkGemma 3 27BMuse Spark OpenLeader
AA Agentic Index0.1Not measuredOnly Gemma 3 27B measured
LiveBench researchNot measured80.3%Only Muse Spark Open measured
LiveBench browserNot measured36.0%Only Muse Spark Open measured
LiveBench long agenticNot measured18.9%Only Muse Spark Open measured
Finance Agent (Vals AI)Not measured61.3%Only Muse Spark Open measured
Tax Agent Bench (Vals AI)Not measured26.3%Only Muse Spark Open measured
Legal Research Bench (Vals AI)Not measured38.5%Only Muse Spark Open measured
Harvey's Legal Agent Benchmark (Vals AI)Not measured25.0%Only Muse Spark Open measured
Excel Modeling Benchmark (Vals AI)Not measured53.7%Only Muse Spark Open measured
τ²-Bench Telecom10.5%Not measuredOnly Gemma 3 27B measured
APEX-AgentsNot measured33.4%Only Muse Spark Open measured
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard (BFCL)29.5%Not measuredOnly Gemma 3 27B measured
Neither model has a result on the other 29 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index02
Reasoning benchmarks for Gemma 3 27B and Muse Spark Open
BenchmarkGemma 3 27BMuse Spark OpenLeader
LiveBench reasoningNot measured73.7%Only Muse Spark Open measured
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)42.8%89.0%Muse Spark Open
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)4.4%43.9%Muse Spark Open
GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run)47.7%Not measuredOnly Gemma 3 27B measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts1340Not measuredOnly Gemma 3 27B measured
LMArena Text: expert1304Not measuredOnly Gemma 3 27B measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts in English1353Not measuredOnly Gemma 3 27B measured
LMArena Vision: diagrams1156Not measuredOnly Gemma 3 27B measured
LMArena Vision: homework1160Not measuredOnly Gemma 3 27B measured
Kagi LLM Benchmark35.1%Not measuredOnly Gemma 3 27B measured
Neither model has a result on the other 12 boards here
MathDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index6 boards, none shared
Math benchmarks for Gemma 3 27B and Muse Spark Open
BenchmarkGemma 3 27BMuse Spark OpenLeader
AA Math Index20.7Not measuredOnly Gemma 3 27B measured
AIME 2025 (Artificial Analysis run)20.7%Not measuredOnly Gemma 3 27B measured
OTIS Mock AIME22.5%Not measuredOnly Gemma 3 27B measured
MATH level 574.0%Not measuredOnly Gemma 3 27B measured
LMArena Text: math1312Not measuredOnly Gemma 3 27B measured
LMArena Text: mathematical work1327Not measuredOnly Gemma 3 27B measured
Neither model has a result on the other 7 boards here
KnowledgeDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index7 boards, none shared
Knowledge benchmarks for Gemma 3 27B and Muse Spark Open
BenchmarkGemma 3 27BMuse Spark OpenLeader
MMLU Pro (Artificial Analysis run)66.9%Not measuredOnly Gemma 3 27B measured
GeoBench52.0%Not measuredOnly Gemma 3 27B measured
LMArena Text: science1383Not measuredOnly Gemma 3 27B measured
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare1391Not measuredOnly Gemma 3 27B measured
LMArena Text: legal and government1375Not measuredOnly Gemma 3 27B measured
LMArena Text: business and finance1360Not measuredOnly Gemma 3 27B measured
FACTS Benchmark Suite29.1%Not measuredOnly Gemma 3 27B measured
Neither model has a result on the other 11 boards here
Web designDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index3 boards, none shared
Web design benchmarks for Gemma 3 27B and Muse Spark Open
BenchmarkGemma 3 27BMuse Spark OpenLeader
Design Arena: websitesNot measured1310Only Muse Spark Open measured
Design Arena: game devNot measured1282Only Muse Spark Open measured
LiveBench designNot measured60.3%Only Muse Spark Open measured
Neither model has a result on the other 6 boards here
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
General benchmarks for Gemma 3 27B and Muse Spark Open
BenchmarkGemma 3 27BMuse Spark OpenLeader
Vals IndexNot measured48.6%Only Muse Spark Open measured
LiveBench data analysisNot measured60.2%Only Muse Spark Open measured
IFBench31.8%Not measuredOnly Gemma 3 27B measured
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)7.3%78.3%Muse Spark Open
DTBench52.5%Not measuredOnly Gemma 3 27B measured
LMCA12.3%Not measuredOnly Gemma 3 27B measured
Fiction.LiveBench33.3%Not measuredOnly Gemma 3 27B measured
Creative writing (Lech Mazur)79.9%Not measuredOnly Gemma 3 27B measured
LMArena Text1358Not measuredOnly Gemma 3 27B measured
LMArena Text: instruction following1321Not measuredOnly Gemma 3 27B measured
LMArena Text: creative writing1345Not measuredOnly Gemma 3 27B measured
LMArena Vision1165Not measuredOnly Gemma 3 27B measured
LMArena Text: English1377Not measuredOnly Gemma 3 27B measured
LMArena Text: non-English1334Not measuredOnly Gemma 3 27B measured
LMArena Text: Chinese1346Not measuredOnly Gemma 3 27B measured
LMArena Text: German1362Not measuredOnly Gemma 3 27B measured
LMArena Text: Japanese1287Not measuredOnly Gemma 3 27B measured
LMArena Text: Korean1308Not measuredOnly Gemma 3 27B measured
LMArena Text: French1368Not measuredOnly Gemma 3 27B measured
LMArena Text: Spanish1349Not measuredOnly Gemma 3 27B measured
LMArena Text: Russian1349Not measuredOnly Gemma 3 27B measured
LMArena Text: Polish1345Not measuredOnly Gemma 3 27B measured
LMArena Text: multi-turn1345Not measuredOnly Gemma 3 27B measured
LMArena Text: longer queries1333Not measuredOnly Gemma 3 27B measured
LMArena Text: writing and language1347Not measuredOnly Gemma 3 27B measured
LMArena Text: entertainment and media1320Not measuredOnly Gemma 3 27B measured
LMArena Vision: English1188Not measuredOnly Gemma 3 27B measured
LMArena Vision: Chinese1164Not measuredOnly Gemma 3 27B measured
LMArena Vision: reading text1156Not measuredOnly Gemma 3 27B measured
LMArena Vision: humor1166Not measuredOnly Gemma 3 27B measured
LMArena Vision: captioning1151Not measuredOnly Gemma 3 27B measured
LMArena Vision: recognizing things1196Not measuredOnly Gemma 3 27B measured
LMArena Vision: creative writing1177Not measuredOnly Gemma 3 27B measured
Neither model has a result on the other 13 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for Gemma 3 27B and Muse Spark Open
BenchmarkGemma 3 27BMuse Spark OpenLeader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

Gemma 3 27B$0.0002Fits in one request
Muse Spark Open$0.0034Fits in one request

Gemma 3 27B costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

Gemma 3 27B$0.0049Fits in one request
Muse Spark Open$0.075Fits in one request

Gemma 3 27B costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

Gemma 3 27B$0.019Exceeds the context window
Muse Spark Open$0.292Fits in one request

Gemma 3 27B costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of Gemma 3 27B and Muse Spark Open
SpecificationGoogle Gemma 3 27BMeta Muse Spark Open
MakerGoogleMeta
WeightsOpen weightsOpen weights
ReleasedMarch 12, 2025October 15, 2026
Context window131K1.05M
Input $/Mtok$0.08$1.25
Output $/Mtok$0.30$4.25
Coding indexNot benchmarked47.4
Independent measurements behind it04
Cost per solved taskNot computableNot computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is Gemma 3 27B better than Muse Spark Open for coding?

Only Muse Spark Open has a coding score, 47.4 on the Vibe Coding Index; Gemma 3 27B has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Pick Gemma 3 27B for output tokens 14.2x cheaper ($0.30 vs $4.25 per million).

Which is cheaper, Gemma 3 27B or Muse Spark Open?

Gemma 3 27B costs $0.08 per million input tokens and $0.30 per million output tokens; Muse Spark Open costs $1.25 and $4.25. Cost per solved task is known for neither of them.

Which has the bigger context window, Gemma 3 27B or Muse Spark Open?

Muse Spark Open, with 1.05M tokens against 131K.

How many benchmarks is the Gemma 3 27B vs Muse Spark Open comparison based on?

5 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 22, 2026. Gemma 3 27B's coding index rests on 0 independent benchmarks and Muse Spark Open's on 4. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next