Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

Gemma 2 27B vs Mistral Large 4

Gemma 2 27B costs 6.4x less per output token than Mistral Large 4 ($0.65 vs $4.18 per million). Updated October 22, 2026; 30 benchmarks have a result for both.

Gemma 2 27BGoogle
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$0.65
0
Mistral Large 4Mistral AI
Coding
56.4
Overall
54.6
Output $/M
$4.18
30
vs boards won of 30 shared

Gemma 2 27B or Mistral Large 4: which to pick

Only Mistral Large 4 has a coding score, 56.4 on the Vibe Coding Index; Gemma 2 27B has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Pick Gemma 2 27B for output tokens 6.4x cheaper ($0.65 vs $4.18 per million).

Shared results
30
Gemma 2 27B only
6
Mistral Large 4 only
51
Like-for-like categories
6 of 9

Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
Gemma 2 27B not benchmarked, Mistral Large 4 56.4 from 5 benchmarks.
Widest category
Math, 59.9 points apart on average over 3 shared benchmarks.
Widest single gap
OTIS Mock AIME: Gemma 2 27B 1.4% against Mistral Large 4 98.3%, 96.9 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
Gemma 2 27B $0.65 against Mistral Large 4 $4.18 per million output tokens, 6.4x apart.
Context window
Gemma 2 27B takes 8K tokens, Mistral Large 4 1.05M.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryGemma 2 27BBarsMistral Large 4Ties
Coding02
Intelligence01
Reasoning04
Math03
Knowledge04
General016
All shared boards030
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index02
Coding benchmarks for Gemma 2 27B and Mistral Large 4
BenchmarkGemma 2 27BMistral Large 4Leader
LiveBench codingNot measured60.0%Only Mistral Large 4 measured
LMArena WebDevNot measured1543Only Mistral Large 4 measured
Terminal-Bench 4 (Vals AI)Not measured27.8%Only Mistral Large 4 measured
Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI)Not measured78.4%Only Mistral Large 4 measured
Code migration (Vals AI)Not measured30.6%Only Mistral Large 4 measured
IOI (Vals AI)Not measured45.3%Only Mistral Large 4 measured
SWE-bench Multimodal (Vals AI)Not measured33.1%Only Mistral Large 4 measured
Vibe Code Bench 1-100 (Vals AI)Not measured14.3%Only Mistral Large 4 measured
SciCodeNot measured54.2%Only Mistral Large 4 measured
FrontierCodeNot measured39.4%Only Mistral Large 4 measured
ALE-BenchNot measured1213.2Only Mistral Large 4 measured
LMArena Text: coding12111478Mistral Large 4
LMArena Text: software and IT12281467Mistral Large 4
LMArena WebDev: ReactNot measured1559Only Mistral Large 4 measured
LMArena WebDev: HTMLNot measured1487Only Mistral Large 4 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 24 boards here
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
Intelligence benchmarks for Gemma 2 27B and Mistral Large 4
BenchmarkGemma 2 27BMistral Large 4Leader
AA Intelligence IndexNot measured38.4Only Mistral Large 4 measured
Epoch Capabilities Index122.1150.0Mistral Large 4
Agentic workDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index9 boards, none shared
Agentic work benchmarks for Gemma 2 27B and Mistral Large 4
BenchmarkGemma 2 27BMistral Large 4Leader
LiveBench researchNot measured28.1%Only Mistral Large 4 measured
LiveBench browserNot measured8.0%Only Mistral Large 4 measured
LiveBench long agenticNot measured11.8%Only Mistral Large 4 measured
Finance Agent (Vals AI)Not measured54.7%Only Mistral Large 4 measured
Tax Agent Bench (Vals AI)Not measured30.4%Only Mistral Large 4 measured
Legal Research Bench (Vals AI)Not measured31.7%Only Mistral Large 4 measured
Harvey's Legal Agent Benchmark (Vals AI)Not measured17.5%Only Mistral Large 4 measured
Excel Modeling Benchmark (Vals AI)Not measured56.2%Only Mistral Large 4 measured
BioMysteryBench (Vals AI)Not measured67.0%Only Mistral Large 4 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 32 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index04
Reasoning benchmarks for Gemma 2 27B and Mistral Large 4
BenchmarkGemma 2 27BMistral Large 4Leader
LiveBench reasoningNot measured83.9%Only Mistral Large 4 measured
MysteryMechanism (Vals AI)Not measured12.2%Only Mistral Large 4 measured
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured35.0%Only Mistral Large 4 measured
GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run)36.5%88.1%Mistral Large 4
Chess puzzlesNot measured33.0%Only Mistral Large 4 measured
Mystery game puzzlesNot measured17.0%Only Mistral Large 4 measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts11981444Mistral Large 4
LMArena Text: expert11711444Mistral Large 4
LMArena Text: hard prompts in English12061442Mistral Large 4
LMArena Vision: diagramsNot measured1288Only Mistral Large 4 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 12 boards here
MathLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index03
Math benchmarks for Gemma 2 27B and Mistral Large 4
BenchmarkGemma 2 27BMistral Large 4Leader
OTIS Mock AIME1.4%98.3%Mistral Large 4
FrontierMath, tiers 1 to 3Not measured58.6%Only Mistral Large 4 measured
FrontierMath, tier 4Not measured26.8%Only Mistral Large 4 measured
ProofBenchNot measured10.0%Only Mistral Large 4 measured
MATH level 527.9%Not measuredOnly Gemma 2 27B measured
LMArena Text: math12121469Mistral Large 4
LMArena Text: mathematical work12211462Mistral Large 4
Neither model has a result on the other 6 boards here
KnowledgeLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index04
Knowledge benchmarks for Gemma 2 27B and Mistral Large 4
BenchmarkGemma 2 27BMistral Large 4Leader
LegalBench (Vals AI)68.0%Not measuredOnly Gemma 2 27B measured
MedCode (Vals AI)Not measured40.7%Only Mistral Large 4 measured
SimpleQA VerifiedNot measured20.0%Only Mistral Large 4 measured
MMLU75.7%Not measuredOnly Gemma 2 27B measured
LMArena Text: science12281448Mistral Large 4
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare11981433Mistral Large 4
LMArena Text: legal and government12411425Mistral Large 4
LMArena Text: business and finance12081439Mistral Large 4
Neither model has a result on the other 10 boards here
Web designDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index9 boards, none shared
Web design benchmarks for Gemma 2 27B and Mistral Large 4
BenchmarkGemma 2 27BMistral Large 4Leader
Design Arena: websitesNot measured1258Only Mistral Large 4 measured
Design Arena: UI componentsNot measured1273Only Mistral Large 4 measured
Design Arena: game devNot measured1225Only Mistral Large 4 measured
Design Arena: data vizNot measured1275Only Mistral Large 4 measured
Design Arena: 3DNot measured1252Only Mistral Large 4 measured
Design Arena: all code categoriesNot measured1259Only Mistral Large 4 measured
Design Arena: SVGNot measured1232Only Mistral Large 4 measured
Design Arena: ASCII artNot measured1202Only Mistral Large 4 measured
LiveBench designNot measured65.6%Only Mistral Large 4 measured
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index016
General benchmarks for Gemma 2 27B and Mistral Large 4
BenchmarkGemma 2 27BMistral Large 4Leader
LiveBench data analysisNot measured76.5%Only Mistral Large 4 measured
MedScribe (Vals AI)Not measured80.4%Only Mistral Large 4 measured
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)Not measured81.3%Only Mistral Large 4 measured
DTBench48.0%88.2%Mistral Large 4
LMCA7.1%35.8%Mistral Large 4
Surface Evolver BenchNot measured28.1%Only Mistral Large 4 measured
Furniture assemblyNot measured20.8%Only Mistral Large 4 measured
LMArena Text12311431Mistral Large 4
LMArena Text: instruction following12061422Mistral Large 4
LMArena Text: creative writing12401363Mistral Large 4
LMArena VisionNot measured1272Only Mistral Large 4 measured
LMArena Text: English12421433Mistral Large 4
LMArena Text: non-English12171422Mistral Large 4
LMArena Text: Chinese12211492Mistral Large 4
LMArena Text: German1209Not measuredOnly Gemma 2 27B measured
LMArena Text: Japanese11751415Mistral Large 4
LMArena Text: Korean1174Not measuredOnly Gemma 2 27B measured
LMArena Text: French12481492Mistral Large 4
LMArena Text: Spanish12281455Mistral Large 4
LMArena Text: Russian12341417Mistral Large 4
LMArena Text: Polish1277Not measuredOnly Gemma 2 27B measured
LMArena Text: multi-turn12241435Mistral Large 4
LMArena Text: longer queries12301428Mistral Large 4
LMArena Text: writing and language12491386Mistral Large 4
LMArena Text: entertainment and media12121378Mistral Large 4
LMArena Vision: EnglishNot measured1283Only Mistral Large 4 measured
LMArena Vision: reading textNot measured1284Only Mistral Large 4 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 19 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for Gemma 2 27B and Mistral Large 4
BenchmarkGemma 2 27BMistral Large 4Leader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

Gemma 2 27B$0.0010Fits in one request
Mistral Large 4$0.0034Fits in one request

Gemma 2 27B costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

Gemma 2 27B$0.034Exceeds the context window
Mistral Large 4$0.081Fits in one request

Gemma 2 27B costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

Gemma 2 27B$0.137Exceeds the context window
Mistral Large 4$0.314Fits in one request

Gemma 2 27B costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of Gemma 2 27B and Mistral Large 4
SpecificationGoogle Gemma 2 27BMistral Large 4
MakerGoogleMistral AI
WeightsOpen weightsNo public weights listed
ReleasedJuly 13, 2024October 6, 2026
Context window8K1.05M
Input $/Mtok$0.65$1.36
Output $/Mtok$0.65$4.18
Coding indexNot benchmarked56.4
Independent measurements behind it05
Cost per solved taskNot computableNot computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is Gemma 2 27B better than Mistral Large 4 for coding?

Only Mistral Large 4 has a coding score, 56.4 on the Vibe Coding Index; Gemma 2 27B has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Pick Gemma 2 27B for output tokens 6.4x cheaper ($0.65 vs $4.18 per million).

Which is cheaper, Gemma 2 27B or Mistral Large 4?

Gemma 2 27B costs $0.65 per million input tokens and $0.65 per million output tokens; Mistral Large 4 costs $1.36 and $4.18. Cost per solved task is known for neither of them.

Which has the bigger context window, Gemma 2 27B or Mistral Large 4?

Mistral Large 4, with 1.05M tokens against 8K.

How many benchmarks is the Gemma 2 27B vs Mistral Large 4 comparison based on?

30 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 22, 2026. Gemma 2 27B's coding index rests on 0 independent benchmarks and Mistral Large 4's on 5. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next