Gemma 2 27B vs Muse Spark 1.3
Gemma 2 27B costs 6.5x less per output token than Muse Spark 1.3 ($0.65 vs $4.25 per million). Updated October 22, 2026; 32 benchmarks have a result for both.
Gemma 2 27B or Muse Spark 1.3: which to pick
Only Muse Spark 1.3 has a coding score, 57.4 on the Vibe Coding Index; Gemma 2 27B has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.
Pick Gemma 2 27B for output tokens 6.5x cheaper ($0.65 vs $4.25 per million).
- Shared results
- 32
- Gemma 2 27B only
- 4
- Muse Spark 1.3 only
- 60
- Like-for-like categories
- 6 of 9
Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.
Which one for your work
Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.
Coding
Vibe Coding Index, six public coding benchmarks
No call
Only Muse Spark 1.3 has a coding score, so no call is made.
One side not measured
Intelligence
AA Intelligence Index
No call
Only Muse Spark 1.3 has a AA Intelligence Index result, 48.1.
Directional only
Agentic work
AA Agentic Index
No call
Only Muse Spark 1.3 has a AA Agentic Index result, 55.5.
Directional only
Web design
Design Arena: websites
No call
Only Muse Spark 1.3 has a Design Arena: websites result, 1356.
Directional only
Long documents
Listed context window
Muse Spark 1.3
Muse Spark 1.3 takes 1.05M tokens against 8K.
Listed by OpenRouter
Everyday cost
1K input + 500 output tokens
Gemma 2 27B
Gemma 2 27B $0.0010, Muse Spark 1.3 $0.0034 per turn.
List prices
At a glance
- Coding index
- Gemma 2 27B not benchmarked, Muse Spark 1.3 57.4 from 4 benchmarks.
- Widest category
- Math, 63.4 points apart on average over 3 shared benchmarks.
- Widest single gap
- OTIS Mock AIME: Gemma 2 27B 1.4% against Muse Spark 1.3 99.2%, 97.8 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
- Output price
- Gemma 2 27B $0.65 against Muse Spark 1.3 $4.25 per million output tokens, 6.5x apart.
- Context window
- Gemma 2 27B takes 8K tokens, Muse Spark 1.3 1.05M.
Benchmark by benchmark
First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.
| Category | Gemma 2 27B | Bars | Muse Spark 1.3 | Ties |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Coding | 0 | 2 | ||
| Intelligence | 0 | 1 | ||
| Reasoning | 0 | 3 | ||
| Math | 0 | 3 | ||
| Knowledge | 0 | 4 | ||
| General | 0 | 19 | ||
| All shared boards | 0 | 32 |
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index02
| Benchmark | Gemma 2 27B | Muse Spark 1.3 | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| LiveBench coding | Not measured | 90.2% | Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured |
| LMArena WebDev | Not measured | 1659 | Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured |
| AA Coding Index | Not measured | 75.8 | Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured |
| Terminal-Bench 4 (Vals AI) | Not measured | 10.6% | Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured |
| Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI) | Not measured | 82.9% | Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured |
| Code migration (Vals AI) | Not measured | 27.6% | Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured |
| ProgramBench (Vals AI) | Not measured | 0.5% | Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured |
| IOI (Vals AI) | Not measured | 43.9% | Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured |
| Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals AI) | Not measured | 72.3% | Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured |
| CyberBench (Vals AI) | Not measured | 69.4% | Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured |
| SciCode | Not measured | 59.7% | Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured |
| FrontierSWE | Not measured | 25.8% | Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured |
| ALE-Bench | Not measured | 1688.3 | Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured |
| LMArena Text: coding | 1211 | 1510 | Muse Spark 1.3 |
| LMArena Text: software and IT | 1228 | 1511 | Muse Spark 1.3 |
| LMArena WebDev: React | Not measured | 1672 | Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured |
| LMArena WebDev: HTML | Not measured | 1653 | Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured |
| LMArena WebDev: from an image | Not measured | 1640 | Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 21 boards here | |||
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
| Benchmark | Gemma 2 27B | Muse Spark 1.3 | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| AA Intelligence Index | Not measured | 48.1 | Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 122.1 | 157.2 | Muse Spark 1.3 |
Agentic workDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index16 boards, none shared
| Benchmark | Gemma 2 27B | Muse Spark 1.3 | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| AA Agentic Index | Not measured | 55.5 | Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured |
| Design Arena: agents building web apps | Not measured | 1297 | Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured |
| Design Arena: agents building full-stack apps | Not measured | 1295 | Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured |
| Design Arena: agents building mobile apps | Not measured | 1218 | Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured |
| Design Arena: agents building Godot games | Not measured | 1241 | Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured |
| Design Arena: PowerPoint slides | Not measured | 1219 | Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured |
| Design Arena: spreadsheets | Not measured | 1062 | Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured |
| LiveBench research | Not measured | 68.6% | Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured |
| LiveBench browser | Not measured | 80.0% | Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured |
| LiveBench long agentic | Not measured | 40.4% | Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured |
| Finance Agent (Vals AI) | Not measured | 58.9% | Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured |
| Tax Agent Bench (Vals AI) | Not measured | 36.0% | Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured |
| Legal Research Bench (Vals AI) | Not measured | 40.9% | Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured |
| Excel Modeling Benchmark (Vals AI) | Not measured | 62.7% | Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured |
| Terminal-Bench-Science (Vals AI) | Not measured | 4.3% | Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured |
| APEX-Agents | Not measured | 58.6% | Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 25 boards here | |||
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index03
| Benchmark | Gemma 2 27B | Muse Spark 1.3 | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| LiveBench reasoning | Not measured | 89.7% | Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured |
| GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run) | Not measured | 94.1% | Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured |
| Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run) | Not measured | 48.7% | Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured |
| GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run) | 36.5% | Not measured | Only Gemma 2 27B measured |
| Chess puzzles | Not measured | 37.0% | Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured |
| Mystery game puzzles | Not measured | 25.0% | Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured |
| LMArena Text: hard prompts | 1198 | 1503 | Muse Spark 1.3 |
| LMArena Text: expert | 1171 | 1519 | Muse Spark 1.3 |
| LMArena Text: hard prompts in English | 1206 | 1500 | Muse Spark 1.3 |
| LMArena Vision: diagrams | Not measured | 1330 | Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured |
| LMArena Vision: homework | Not measured | 1296 | Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 11 boards here | |||
MathLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index03
| Benchmark | Gemma 2 27B | Muse Spark 1.3 | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME | 1.4% | 99.2% | Muse Spark 1.3 |
| FrontierMath, tiers 1 to 3 | Not measured | 74.4% | Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured |
| FrontierMath, tier 4 | Not measured | 46.3% | Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured |
| ProofBench | Not measured | 58.0% | Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured |
| MATH level 5 | 27.9% | Not measured | Only Gemma 2 27B measured |
| LMArena Text: math | 1212 | 1497 | Muse Spark 1.3 |
| LMArena Text: mathematical work | 1221 | 1491 | Muse Spark 1.3 |
| Neither model has a result on the other 6 boards here | |||
KnowledgeLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index04
| Benchmark | Gemma 2 27B | Muse Spark 1.3 | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| LegalBench (Vals AI) | 68.0% | Not measured | Only Gemma 2 27B measured |
| MMLU | 75.7% | Not measured | Only Gemma 2 27B measured |
| LMArena Text: science | 1228 | 1507 | Muse Spark 1.3 |
| LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare | 1198 | 1493 | Muse Spark 1.3 |
| LMArena Text: legal and government | 1241 | 1499 | Muse Spark 1.3 |
| LMArena Text: business and finance | 1208 | 1490 | Muse Spark 1.3 |
| Neither model has a result on the other 12 boards here | |||
Web designDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index9 boards, none shared
| Benchmark | Gemma 2 27B | Muse Spark 1.3 | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| Design Arena: websites | Not measured | 1356 | Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured |
| Design Arena: UI components | Not measured | 1349 | Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured |
| Design Arena: game dev | Not measured | 1328 | Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured |
| Design Arena: data viz | Not measured | 1343 | Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured |
| Design Arena: 3D | Not measured | 1358 | Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured |
| Design Arena: all code categories | Not measured | 1352 | Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured |
| Design Arena: SVG | Not measured | 1301 | Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured |
| Design Arena: ASCII art | Not measured | 1278 | Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured |
| LiveBench design | Not measured | 74.8% | Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured |
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index019
| Benchmark | Gemma 2 27B | Muse Spark 1.3 | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| LiveBench data analysis | Not measured | 79.6% | Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured |
| Long context reasoning (AA-LCR) | Not measured | 83.0% | Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured |
| DTBench | 48.0% | 96.5% | Muse Spark 1.3 |
| LMCA | 7.1% | 53.9% | Muse Spark 1.3 |
| LMArena Text | 1231 | 1490 | Muse Spark 1.3 |
| LMArena Text: instruction following | 1206 | 1479 | Muse Spark 1.3 |
| LMArena Text: creative writing | 1240 | 1462 | Muse Spark 1.3 |
| LMArena Vision | Not measured | 1308 | Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured |
| LMArena Text: English | 1242 | 1495 | Muse Spark 1.3 |
| LMArena Text: non-English | 1217 | 1481 | Muse Spark 1.3 |
| LMArena Text: Chinese | 1221 | 1532 | Muse Spark 1.3 |
| LMArena Text: German | 1209 | 1513 | Muse Spark 1.3 |
| LMArena Text: Japanese | 1175 | 1470 | Muse Spark 1.3 |
| LMArena Text: Korean | 1174 | 1490 | Muse Spark 1.3 |
| LMArena Text: French | 1248 | 1511 | Muse Spark 1.3 |
| LMArena Text: Spanish | 1228 | 1496 | Muse Spark 1.3 |
| LMArena Text: Russian | 1234 | 1491 | Muse Spark 1.3 |
| LMArena Text: Polish | 1277 | 1490 | Muse Spark 1.3 |
| LMArena Text: multi-turn | 1224 | 1487 | Muse Spark 1.3 |
| LMArena Text: longer queries | 1230 | 1488 | Muse Spark 1.3 |
| LMArena Text: writing and language | 1249 | 1470 | Muse Spark 1.3 |
| LMArena Text: entertainment and media | 1212 | 1457 | Muse Spark 1.3 |
| LMArena Vision: English | Not measured | 1298 | Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured |
| LMArena Vision: Chinese | Not measured | 1384 | Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured |
| LMArena Vision: reading text | Not measured | 1319 | Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured |
| LMArena Vision: humor | Not measured | 1293 | Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured |
| LMArena Vision: creative writing | Not measured | 1296 | Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 19 boards here | |||
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
| Benchmark | Gemma 2 27B | Muse Spark 1.3 | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| Neither model has a result on 5 boards here | |||
What each workload costs
Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.
Chat turn
1K input + 500 output tokens
Gemma 2 27B costs less
Repository review
50K input + 3K output tokens
Gemma 2 27B costs less
Agent loop
200K input + 10K output tokens
Gemma 2 27B costs less
Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.
Specification differences
The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.
| Specification | Google Gemma 2 27B | Meta Muse Spark 1.3 |
|---|---|---|
| Maker | Meta | |
| Weights | Open weights | No public weights listed |
| Released | July 13, 2024 | September 2, 2026 |
| Context window | 8K | 1.05M |
| Input $/Mtok | $0.65 | $1.25 |
| Output $/Mtok | $0.65 | $4.25 |
| Coding index | Not benchmarked | 57.4 |
| Independent measurements behind it | 0 | 4 |
| Cost per solved task | Not computable | Not computable |
| Source | OpenRouter listing | OpenRouter listing |
Questions
Is Gemma 2 27B better than Muse Spark 1.3 for coding?
Only Muse Spark 1.3 has a coding score, 57.4 on the Vibe Coding Index; Gemma 2 27B has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Pick Gemma 2 27B for output tokens 6.5x cheaper ($0.65 vs $4.25 per million).
Which is cheaper, Gemma 2 27B or Muse Spark 1.3?
Gemma 2 27B costs $0.65 per million input tokens and $0.65 per million output tokens; Muse Spark 1.3 costs $1.25 and $4.25. Cost per solved task is known for neither of them.
Which has the bigger context window, Gemma 2 27B or Muse Spark 1.3?
Muse Spark 1.3, with 1.05M tokens against 8K.
How many benchmarks is the Gemma 2 27B vs Muse Spark 1.3 comparison based on?
32 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 22, 2026. Gemma 2 27B's coding index rests on 0 independent benchmarks and Muse Spark 1.3's on 4. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.