Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite vs GPT-5.4 Mini
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite costs 3.0x less per output token than GPT-5.4 Mini ($1.50 vs $4.50 per million). Updated October 22, 2026; 16 benchmarks have a result for both.
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite or GPT-5.4 Mini: which to pick
Only GPT-5.4 Mini has a coding score, 35.8 on the Vibe Coding Index; Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.
Pick Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite for output tokens 3.0x cheaper ($1.50 vs $4.50 per million) and a larger context window (1.05M against 400K tokens).
- Shared results
- 16
- Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite only
- 0
- GPT-5.4 Mini only
- 73
- Like-for-like categories
- 6 of 9
Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.
Which one for your work
Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.
Coding
Vibe Coding Index, six public coding benchmarks
No call
Only GPT-5.4 Mini has a coding score, so no call is made.
One side not measured
Intelligence
AA Intelligence Index
No call
Only GPT-5.4 Mini has a AA Intelligence Index result, 24.1.
Directional only
Agentic work
AA Agentic Index
No call
Only GPT-5.4 Mini has a AA Agentic Index result, 17.9.
Directional only
Reasoning
GPQA Diamond
No call
Only GPT-5.4 Mini has a GPQA Diamond result, 83.1%.
Directional only
Math
AIME
No call
Only GPT-5.4 Mini has a AIME result, 95.6%.
Directional only
Knowledge
MMLU Pro
No call
Only GPT-5.4 Mini has a MMLU Pro result, 84.5%.
Directional only
Long documents
Listed context window
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite takes 1.05M tokens against 400K.
Listed by OpenRouter
Everyday cost
1K input + 500 output tokens
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite $0.0010, GPT-5.4 Mini $0.0030 per turn.
List prices
Cost per solved task
One SWE-bench Verified task, solved
No call
Only GPT-5.4 Mini has the number, $0.70.
Directional only
At a glance
- Coding index
- Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite not benchmarked, GPT-5.4 Mini 35.8 from 5 benchmarks.
- Widest category
- Agentic work, 26.5 points apart on average over 2 shared benchmarks.
- Widest single gap
- τ²-Bench Telecom: Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite 31.3% against GPT-5.4 Mini 83.3%, 52.0 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
- Output price
- Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite $1.50 against GPT-5.4 Mini $4.50 per million output tokens, 3.0x apart.
- Context window
- Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite takes 1.05M tokens, GPT-5.4 Mini 400K.
Benchmark by benchmark
First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.
| Category | Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite | Bars | GPT-5.4 Mini | Ties |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Coding | 0 | 3 | ||
| Intelligence | 0 | 1 | ||
| Agentic work | 1 | 1 | ||
| Reasoning | 1 | 3 | ||
| Math | 0 | 2 | ||
| General | 1 | 3 | ||
| All shared boards | 3 | 13 |
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index03
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite | GPT-5.4 Mini | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| LMArena WebDev | Not measured | 1397 | Only GPT-5.4 Mini measured |
| AA Coding Index | Not measured | 56.1 | Only GPT-5.4 Mini measured |
| LiveCodeBench (Vals AI) | Not measured | 81.5% | Only GPT-5.4 Mini measured |
| SWE-bench Verified (Vals AI) | Not measured | 73.0% | Only GPT-5.4 Mini measured |
| Terminal-Bench 4 (Vals AI) | Not measured | 2.5% | Only GPT-5.4 Mini measured |
| Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI) | Not measured | 48.0% | Only GPT-5.4 Mini measured |
| Code migration (Vals AI) | Not measured | 12.9% | Only GPT-5.4 Mini measured |
| ProgramBench (Vals AI) | Not measured | 0.0% | Only GPT-5.4 Mini measured |
| Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals AI) | Not measured | 54.7% | Only GPT-5.4 Mini measured |
| SciCode | 43.4% | 52.1% | GPT-5.4 Mini |
| Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run) | 24.2% | 52.3% | GPT-5.4 Mini |
| FrontierCode | Not measured | 27.0% | Only GPT-5.4 Mini measured |
| WeirdML | 52.2% | 60.3% | GPT-5.4 Mini |
| ALE-Bench | Not measured | 1188.6 | Only GPT-5.4 Mini measured |
| LMArena Text: coding | Not measured | 1438 | Only GPT-5.4 Mini measured |
| LMArena Text: software and IT | Not measured | 1436 | Only GPT-5.4 Mini measured |
| LMArena WebDev: React | Not measured | 1386 | Only GPT-5.4 Mini measured |
| LMArena WebDev: HTML | Not measured | 1419 | Only GPT-5.4 Mini measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 21 boards here | |||
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite | GPT-5.4 Mini | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| AA Intelligence Index | Not measured | 24.1 | Only GPT-5.4 Mini measured |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 144.3 | 148.7 | GPT-5.4 Mini |
Agentic workLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index11
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite | GPT-5.4 Mini | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| AA Agentic Index | Not measured | 17.9 | Only GPT-5.4 Mini measured |
| Finance Agent (Vals AI) | Not measured | 45.4% | Only GPT-5.4 Mini measured |
| Tax Agent Bench (Vals AI) | Not measured | 8.8% | Only GPT-5.4 Mini measured |
| Legal Research Bench (Vals AI) | Not measured | 12.5% | Only GPT-5.4 Mini measured |
| Excel Modeling Benchmark (Vals AI) | Not measured | 45.4% | Only GPT-5.4 Mini measured |
| τ²-Bench Telecom | 31.3% | 83.3% | GPT-5.4 Mini |
| DeepResearch Bench | 37.3% | 36.3% | Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite |
| Neither model has a result on the other 34 boards here | |||
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index13
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite | GPT-5.4 Mini | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | Not measured | 83.1% | Only GPT-5.4 Mini measured |
| MMMU Pro (Vals AI) | Not measured | 79.3% | Only GPT-5.4 Mini measured |
| GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run) | 82.2% | 87.5% | GPT-5.4 Mini |
| Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run) | 17.2% | 28.1% | GPT-5.4 Mini |
| GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run) | 81.8% | 86.9% | GPT-5.4 Mini |
| ARC-AGI | Not measured | 63.7% | Only GPT-5.4 Mini measured |
| ARC-AGI-2 | Not measured | 18.9% | Only GPT-5.4 Mini measured |
| Chess puzzles | Not measured | 23.0% | Only GPT-5.4 Mini measured |
| Mystery game puzzles | Not measured | 11.0% | Only GPT-5.4 Mini measured |
| LMArena Text: hard prompts | Not measured | 1424 | Only GPT-5.4 Mini measured |
| LMArena Text: expert | Not measured | 1435 | Only GPT-5.4 Mini measured |
| LMArena Text: hard prompts in English | Not measured | 1420 | Only GPT-5.4 Mini measured |
| LMArena Vision: diagrams | Not measured | 1266 | Only GPT-5.4 Mini measured |
| LMArena Vision: homework | Not measured | 1285 | Only GPT-5.4 Mini measured |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 67.2% | 37.9% | Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite |
| Neither model has a result on the other 7 boards here | |||
MathLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index02
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite | GPT-5.4 Mini | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| AIME | Not measured | 95.6% | Only GPT-5.4 Mini measured |
| OTIS Mock AIME | 80.0% | 88.9% | GPT-5.4 Mini |
| FrontierMath, tiers 1 to 3 | 27.7% | 51.2% | GPT-5.4 Mini |
| FrontierMath, tier 4 | Not measured | 9.8% | Only GPT-5.4 Mini measured |
| ProofBench | Not measured | 21.0% | Only GPT-5.4 Mini measured |
| LMArena Text: math | Not measured | 1418 | Only GPT-5.4 Mini measured |
| LMArena Text: mathematical work | Not measured | 1429 | Only GPT-5.4 Mini measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 6 boards here | |||
KnowledgeDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index10 boards, none shared
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite | GPT-5.4 Mini | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| MMLU Pro | Not measured | 84.5% | Only GPT-5.4 Mini measured |
| CaseLaw (Vals AI) | Not measured | 51.7% | Only GPT-5.4 Mini measured |
| CorpFin (Vals AI) | Not measured | 60.9% | Only GPT-5.4 Mini measured |
| TaxEval (Vals AI) | Not measured | 71.2% | Only GPT-5.4 Mini measured |
| MortgageTax (Vals AI) | Not measured | 63.5% | Only GPT-5.4 Mini measured |
| SimpleQA Verified | Not measured | 29.4% | Only GPT-5.4 Mini measured |
| LMArena Text: science | Not measured | 1417 | Only GPT-5.4 Mini measured |
| LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare | Not measured | 1395 | Only GPT-5.4 Mini measured |
| LMArena Text: legal and government | Not measured | 1414 | Only GPT-5.4 Mini measured |
| LMArena Text: business and finance | Not measured | 1418 | Only GPT-5.4 Mini measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 8 boards here | |||
Web designNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite | GPT-5.4 Mini | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| Neither model has a result on 9 boards here | |||
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index13
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite | GPT-5.4 Mini | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| SAGE (Vals AI) | Not measured | 50.8% | Only GPT-5.4 Mini measured |
| Vals Multimodal Index | Not measured | 54.2% | Only GPT-5.4 Mini measured |
| IFBench | 77.2% | 73.3% | Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite |
| Long context reasoning (AA-LCR) | 74.3% | 77.0% | GPT-5.4 Mini |
| DTBench | 76.8% | 80.0% | GPT-5.4 Mini |
| LMCA | 35.0% | 40.8% | GPT-5.4 Mini |
| LMArena Text | Not measured | 1412 | Only GPT-5.4 Mini measured |
| LMArena Text: instruction following | Not measured | 1405 | Only GPT-5.4 Mini measured |
| LMArena Text: creative writing | Not measured | 1370 | Only GPT-5.4 Mini measured |
| LMArena Vision | Not measured | 1245 | Only GPT-5.4 Mini measured |
| LMArena Text: English | Not measured | 1412 | Only GPT-5.4 Mini measured |
| LMArena Text: non-English | Not measured | 1405 | Only GPT-5.4 Mini measured |
| LMArena Text: Chinese | Not measured | 1446 | Only GPT-5.4 Mini measured |
| LMArena Text: German | Not measured | 1408 | Only GPT-5.4 Mini measured |
| LMArena Text: Japanese | Not measured | 1375 | Only GPT-5.4 Mini measured |
| LMArena Text: Korean | Not measured | 1370 | Only GPT-5.4 Mini measured |
| LMArena Text: French | Not measured | 1441 | Only GPT-5.4 Mini measured |
| LMArena Text: Spanish | Not measured | 1405 | Only GPT-5.4 Mini measured |
| LMArena Text: Russian | Not measured | 1417 | Only GPT-5.4 Mini measured |
| LMArena Text: Polish | Not measured | 1415 | Only GPT-5.4 Mini measured |
| LMArena Text: multi-turn | Not measured | 1429 | Only GPT-5.4 Mini measured |
| LMArena Text: longer queries | Not measured | 1408 | Only GPT-5.4 Mini measured |
| LMArena Text: writing and language | Not measured | 1393 | Only GPT-5.4 Mini measured |
| LMArena Text: entertainment and media | Not measured | 1373 | Only GPT-5.4 Mini measured |
| LMArena Vision: English | Not measured | 1244 | Only GPT-5.4 Mini measured |
| LMArena Vision: Chinese | Not measured | 1286 | Only GPT-5.4 Mini measured |
| LMArena Vision: reading text | Not measured | 1253 | Only GPT-5.4 Mini measured |
| LMArena Vision: humor | Not measured | 1235 | Only GPT-5.4 Mini measured |
| LMArena Vision: recognizing things | Not measured | 1218 | Only GPT-5.4 Mini measured |
| LMArena Vision: creative writing | Not measured | 1222 | Only GPT-5.4 Mini measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 16 boards here | |||
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite | GPT-5.4 Mini | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| Neither model has a result on 5 boards here | |||
What each workload costs
Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.
Chat turn
1K input + 500 output tokens
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite costs less
Repository review
50K input + 3K output tokens
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite costs less
Agent loop
200K input + 10K output tokens
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite costs less
Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.
Specification differences
The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.
| Specification | Google Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite | OpenAI GPT-5.4 Mini |
|---|---|---|
| Maker | OpenAI | |
| Weights | No public weights listed | No public weights listed |
| Released | May 7, 2026 | March 17, 2026 |
| Context window | 1.05M | 400K |
| Input $/Mtok | $0.25 | $0.75 |
| Output $/Mtok | $1.50 | $4.50 |
| Coding index | Not benchmarked | 35.8 |
| Independent measurements behind it | 0 | 5 |
| Cost per solved task | Not computable | $0.70 |
| Source | OpenRouter listing | OpenRouter listing |
Questions
Is Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite better than GPT-5.4 Mini for coding?
Only GPT-5.4 Mini has a coding score, 35.8 on the Vibe Coding Index; Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Pick Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite for output tokens 3.0x cheaper ($1.50 vs $4.50 per million) and a larger context window (1.05M against 400K tokens).
Which is cheaper, Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite or GPT-5.4 Mini?
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite costs $0.25 per million input tokens and $1.50 per million output tokens; GPT-5.4 Mini costs $0.75 and $4.50. Cost per solved task is known for GPT-5.4 Mini only.
Which has the bigger context window, Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite or GPT-5.4 Mini?
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite, with 1.05M tokens against 400K.
How many benchmarks is the Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite vs GPT-5.4 Mini comparison based on?
16 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 22, 2026. Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite's coding index rests on 0 independent benchmarks and GPT-5.4 Mini's on 5. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.