Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview vs Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507

Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview leads Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, 15.6 to 12.7, and Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview costs 2.3x less per output token ($1.50 vs $3.50 per million). Updated October 22, 2026; 36 benchmarks have a result for both.

Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite PreviewGoogle
Coding
22.7
Overall
36.6
Output $/M
$1.50
23
Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507Qwen
Coding
No data
Overall
52.9
Output $/M
$3.50
13
vs boards won of 36 shared

Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview or Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507: which to pick

Only Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview has a coding score, 22.7 on the Vibe Coding Index; Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Pick Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 for work measured by LMArena Text: coding or LMArena Text: software and IT, where it leads.

Shared results
36
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview only
44
Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 only
10
Like-for-like categories
8 of 9

Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview 22.7 from 3 benchmarks, Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 not benchmarked.
Widest category
Web design, 8.6 points apart on average over 6 shared benchmarks.
Widest single gap
Design Arena: UI components: Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview 1069 against Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 942, 15.9 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview $1.50 against Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 $3.50 per million output tokens, 2.3x apart.
Context window
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview takes 1.05M tokens, Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 128K.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryGemini 3.1 Flash Lite PreviewBarsQwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507Ties
Coding12
Intelligence10
Agentic work10
Reasoning03
Math11
Knowledge13
Web design60
General124
All shared boards2313
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index12
Coding benchmarks for Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview and Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507
BenchmarkGemini 3.1 Flash Lite PreviewQwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507Leader
LMArena WebDev1257Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview measured
AA Coding Index34.722.1Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview
LiveCodeBench (Vals AI)80.1%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview measured
SWE-bench Verified (Vals AI)62.8%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview measured
Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI)0.0%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview measured
Code migration (Vals AI)4.6%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview measured
ProgramBench (Vals AI)0.0%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview measured
Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals AI)34.1%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview measured
WeirdMLNot measured41.0%Only Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 measured
ALE-Bench797.7Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview measured
LMArena Text: coding14001424Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507
LMArena Text: software and IT14131431Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507
LMArena WebDev: React1245Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview measured
LMArena WebDev: HTML1276Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview measured
LMArena WebDev: from an image1336Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview measured
SciCode4.6%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview measured
Neither model has a result on the other 27 boards here
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index10
Intelligence benchmarks for Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview and Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507
BenchmarkGemini 3.1 Flash Lite PreviewQwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507Leader
AA Intelligence Index15.612.7Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview
Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here
Agentic workLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index10
Agentic work benchmarks for Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview and Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507
BenchmarkGemini 3.1 Flash Lite PreviewQwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507Leader
AA Agentic Index1.61.3Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview
Finance Agent (Vals AI)30.0%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview measured
Tax Agent Bench (Vals AI)3.1%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview measured
Legal Research Bench (Vals AI)3.4%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview measured
Excel Modeling Benchmark (Vals AI)8.6%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview measured
Vending-Bench 2Not measured-$11Only Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 36 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index03
Reasoning benchmarks for Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview and Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507
BenchmarkGemini 3.1 Flash Lite PreviewQwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507Leader
GPQA Diamond81.1%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview measured
MMMU Pro (Vals AI)82.5%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview measured
GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run)Not measured80.1%Only Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 measured
Mystery game puzzlesNot measured9.0%Only Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts14071416Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507
LMArena Text: expert13981463Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507
LMArena Text: hard prompts in English14031432Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507
LMArena Vision: diagrams1242Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview measured
LMArena Vision: homework1271Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview measured
Neither model has a result on the other 14 boards here
MathLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index11
Math benchmarks for Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview and Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507
BenchmarkGemini 3.1 Flash Lite PreviewQwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507Leader
AIME83.3%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview measured
OTIS Mock AIMENot measured86.7%Only Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 measured
LMArena Text: math14281412Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview
LMArena Text: mathematical work14171435Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507
Neither model has a result on the other 10 boards here
KnowledgeLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index13
Knowledge benchmarks for Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview and Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507
BenchmarkGemini 3.1 Flash Lite PreviewQwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507Leader
MMLU Pro86.2%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview measured
LegalBench (Vals AI)83.8%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview measured
CaseLaw (Vals AI)55.0%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview measured
CorpFin (Vals AI)59.4%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview measured
TaxEval (Vals AI)71.8%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview measured
MortgageTax (Vals AI)68.0%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview measured
MedCode (Vals AI)47.6%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview measured
SimpleQA VerifiedNot measured40.4%Only Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 measured
LMArena Text: science14251433Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare14281456Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507
LMArena Text: legal and government14181415Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview
LMArena Text: business and finance13891413Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507
FACTS Benchmark Suite51.4%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview measured
Neither model has a result on the other 7 boards here
Web designLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index60
Web design benchmarks for Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview and Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507
BenchmarkGemini 3.1 Flash Lite PreviewQwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507Leader
Design Arena: websites10821052Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview
Design Arena: UI components1069942Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview
Design Arena: game dev1029956Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview
Design Arena: data viz1045950Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview
Design Arena: 3D1047997Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview
Design Arena: all code categories10711032Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview
Design Arena: SVG1052Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview measured
Design Arena: ASCII art1167Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview measured
Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index124
General benchmarks for Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview and Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507
BenchmarkGemini 3.1 Flash Lite PreviewQwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507Leader
SAGE (Vals AI)49.5%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview measured
MedScribe (Vals AI)63.9%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview measured
Vals Multimodal Index41.4%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview measured
DTBenchNot measured80.3%Only Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 measured
LMCANot measured29.3%Only Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 measured
Fiction.LiveBenchNot measured75.0%Only Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 measured
Creative writing (Lech Mazur)Not measured82.4%Only Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 measured
LMArena Text14161415Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview
LMArena Text: instruction following13771386Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507
LMArena Text: creative writing14011384Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview
LMArena Vision1240Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview measured
LMArena Text: English14141429Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507
LMArena Text: non-English14101397Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview
LMArena Text: Chinese14601481Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507
LMArena Text: German14301408Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview
LMArena Text: Japanese14131386Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview
LMArena Text: Korean13921375Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview
LMArena Text: French1424Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview measured
LMArena Text: Spanish14211389Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview
LMArena Text: Russian14201401Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview
LMArena Text: Polish14431390Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview
LMArena Text: multi-turn14171406Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview
LMArena Text: longer queries13941400Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507
LMArena Text: writing and language14081388Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview
LMArena Text: entertainment and media13861370Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview
LMArena Vision: English1232Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview measured
LMArena Vision: Chinese1278Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview measured
LMArena Vision: reading text1246Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview measured
LMArena Vision: humor1266Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview measured
LMArena Vision: captioning1259Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview measured
LMArena Vision: recognizing things1308Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview measured
LMArena Vision: creative writing1248Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview measured
MultiChallenge60.6%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview measured
Neither model has a result on the other 15 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview and Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507
BenchmarkGemini 3.1 Flash Lite PreviewQwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507Leader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview$0.0010Fits in one request
Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507$0.0022Fits in one request

Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview$0.017Fits in one request
Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507$0.033Fits in one request

Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview$0.065Fits in one request
Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507$0.125Exceeds the context window

Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview and Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507
SpecificationGoogle Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite PreviewQwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507
MakerGoogleQwen
WeightsNo public weights listedOpen weights
ReleasedMarch 3, 2026July 25, 2025
Context window1.05M128K
Input $/Mtok$0.25$0.45
Output $/Mtok$1.50$3.50
Coding index22.7Not benchmarked
Independent measurements behind it30
Cost per solved task$0.18Not computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview better than Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 for coding?

Only Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview has a coding score, 22.7 on the Vibe Coding Index; Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Pick Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 for work measured by LMArena Text: coding or LMArena Text: software and IT, where it leads.

Which is cheaper, Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview or Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507?

Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview costs $0.25 per million input tokens and $1.50 per million output tokens; Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 costs $0.45 and $3.50. Cost per solved task is known for Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview only.

Which has the bigger context window, Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview or Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507?

Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview, with 1.05M tokens against 128K.

How many benchmarks is the Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview vs Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 comparison based on?

36 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 22, 2026. Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview's coding index rests on 3 independent benchmarks and Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507's on 0. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next