Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview vs MiniMax M2.7
Updated October 21, 2026. 62 benchmarks have a result for both. Coding is ranked on the Vibe Coding Index; every other board is shown as published.
Decision reading
Pick MiniMax M2.7 for coding: it scores 28.4 on the Vibe Coding Index against 8.1 for Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview.
Pick Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview when a solved task costs $0.18 against $0.64, or when the context window is larger, 1.05M against 205K tokens.
- Shared results
- 62
- Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview only
- 15
- MiniMax M2.7 only
- 12
- Like-for-like categories
- 8 of 9
Shared results can support a head-to-head reading. Results only one model has describe coverage, not superiority.
Which one for your work
Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.
Coding
Vibe Coding Index, four public coding benchmarks
MiniMax M2.7
MiniMax M2.7 scores 28.4 against 8.1.
One benchmark behind each score
Intelligence
AA Intelligence Index
MiniMax M2.7
MiniMax M2.7 leads, 22.8 against 15.6.
Same board, both measured
Agentic work
AA Agentic Index
MiniMax M2.7
MiniMax M2.7 leads, 15.3 against 1.6.
Same board, both measured
Reasoning
GPQA Diamond
MiniMax M2.7
MiniMax M2.7 leads, 86.6% against 81.1%.
Same board, both measured
Math
AIME
MiniMax M2.7
MiniMax M2.7 leads, 91.0% against 83.3%.
Same board, both measured
Knowledge
MMLU Pro
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview leads, 86.2% against 80.4%.
Same board, both measured
Web design
Design Arena: websites
MiniMax M2.7
MiniMax M2.7 leads, 1243 against 1083.
Same board, both measured
Long documents
Listed context window
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview takes 1.05M tokens against 205K.
Listed by OpenRouter
Everyday cost
1K input + 500 output tokens
MiniMax M2.7
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview $0.0010, MiniMax M2.7 $0.0009 per turn.
List prices
Cost per solved task
One SWE-bench Verified task, solved
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview $0.18, MiniMax M2.7 $0.64.
Published attempt cost and pass rate
At a glance
- Coding index
- Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview 8.1 from 1 benchmark, MiniMax M2.7 28.4 from 1 benchmark.
- Widest category
- Web design, 17.0 points apart on average over 8 shared benchmarks.
- Widest single gap
- LMArena Text: Japanese: Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview 1413 against MiniMax M2.7 1260, 25.5 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
- Output price
- Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview $1.50 against MiniMax M2.7 $1.20 per million output tokens, 1.3x apart.
- Context window
- Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview takes 1.05M tokens, MiniMax M2.7 205K.
Benchmark by benchmark
First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.
| Category | Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview | Bars | MiniMax M2.7 | Ties |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Coding | 2 | 10 | 1 tie | |
| Intelligence | 0 | 1 | ||
| Agentic work | 1 | 4 | ||
| Reasoning | 0 | 4 | ||
| Math | 1 | 2 | ||
| Knowledge | 6 | 4 | ||
| Web design | 1 | 7 | ||
| General | 13 | 5 | ||
| All shared boards | 24 | 37 | 1 tie |
CodingLike-for-likeFour of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index210
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview | MiniMax M2.7 | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| LMArena WebDev | 1257 | 1399 | MiniMax M2.7 |
| AA Coding Index | 34.7 | 52.6 | MiniMax M2.7 |
| LiveCodeBench (Vals AI) | 80.1% | 79.9% | Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview |
| SWE-bench Verified (Vals AI) | 62.8% | 73.8% | MiniMax M2.7 |
| Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI) | 0.0% | 11.9% | MiniMax M2.7 |
| Code migration (Vals AI) | 4.6% | 8.7% | MiniMax M2.7 |
| ProgramBench (Vals AI) | 0.0% | 0.0% | Tie |
| Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals AI) | 34.1% | 48.7% | MiniMax M2.7 |
| SciCode | Not measured | 50.1% | Only MiniMax M2.7 measured |
| Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run) | Not measured | 39.4% | Only MiniMax M2.7 measured |
| Terminal-Bench | Not measured | 45.1% | Only MiniMax M2.7 measured |
| WeirdML | Not measured | 37.0% | Only MiniMax M2.7 measured |
| ALE-Bench | 797.7 | 599.3 | Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview |
| LMArena Text: coding | 1400 | 1454 | MiniMax M2.7 |
| LMArena Text: software and IT | 1413 | 1446 | MiniMax M2.7 |
| LMArena WebDev: React | 1245 | 1388 | MiniMax M2.7 |
| LMArena WebDev: HTML | 1276 | 1401 | MiniMax M2.7 |
| LMArena WebDev: from an image | 1336 | Not measured | Only Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 20 boards here | |||
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview | MiniMax M2.7 | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| AA Intelligence Index | 15.6 | 22.8 | MiniMax M2.7 |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | Not measured | 145.8 | Only MiniMax M2.7 measured |
Agentic workLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index14
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview | MiniMax M2.7 | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| AA Agentic Index | 1.6 | 15.3 | MiniMax M2.7 |
| Finance Agent (Vals AI) | 30.0% | 27.9% | Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview |
| Tax Agent Bench (Vals AI) | 3.1% | 6.9% | MiniMax M2.7 |
| Legal Research Bench (Vals AI) | 3.4% | 10.6% | MiniMax M2.7 |
| Excel Modeling Benchmark (Vals AI) | 8.6% | 28.4% | MiniMax M2.7 |
| τ²-Bench Telecom | Not measured | 84.8% | Only MiniMax M2.7 measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 33 boards here | |||
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index04
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview | MiniMax M2.7 | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 81.1% | 86.6% | MiniMax M2.7 |
| MMMU Pro (Vals AI) | 82.5% | Not measured | Only Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview measured |
| GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run) | Not measured | 87.4% | Only MiniMax M2.7 measured |
| Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run) | Not measured | 29.6% | Only MiniMax M2.7 measured |
| LMArena Text: hard prompts | 1407 | 1422 | MiniMax M2.7 |
| LMArena Text: expert | 1398 | 1443 | MiniMax M2.7 |
| LMArena Text: hard prompts in English | 1403 | 1441 | MiniMax M2.7 |
| LMArena Vision: diagrams | 1242 | Not measured | Only Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview measured |
| LMArena Vision: homework | 1271 | Not measured | Only Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 12 boards here | |||
MathLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index12
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview | MiniMax M2.7 | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| AIME | 83.3% | 91.0% | MiniMax M2.7 |
| ProofBench | Not measured | 3.0% | Only MiniMax M2.7 measured |
| LMArena Text: math | 1428 | 1421 | Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview |
| LMArena Text: mathematical work | 1417 | 1437 | MiniMax M2.7 |
| Neither model has a result on the other 9 boards here | |||
KnowledgeLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index64
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview | MiniMax M2.7 | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| MMLU Pro | 86.2% | 80.4% | Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview |
| LegalBench (Vals AI) | 83.8% | 84.0% | MiniMax M2.7 |
| CaseLaw (Vals AI) | 55.0% | 60.9% | MiniMax M2.7 |
| CorpFin (Vals AI) | 59.4% | 61.2% | MiniMax M2.7 |
| TaxEval (Vals AI) | 71.8% | 66.6% | Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview |
| MortgageTax (Vals AI) | 68.0% | Not measured | Only Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview measured |
| MedCode (Vals AI) | 47.6% | 34.4% | Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview |
| LMArena Text: science | 1425 | 1416 | Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview |
| LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare | 1428 | 1409 | Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview |
| LMArena Text: legal and government | 1418 | 1403 | Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview |
| LMArena Text: business and finance | 1389 | 1407 | MiniMax M2.7 |
| Neither model has a result on the other 6 boards here | |||
Web designLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index17
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview | MiniMax M2.7 | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| Design Arena: websites | 1083 | 1243 | MiniMax M2.7 |
| Design Arena: UI components | 1071 | 1210 | MiniMax M2.7 |
| Design Arena: game dev | 1029 | 1210 | MiniMax M2.7 |
| Design Arena: data viz | 1045 | 1233 | MiniMax M2.7 |
| Design Arena: 3D | 1048 | 1195 | MiniMax M2.7 |
| Design Arena: all code categories | 1072 | 1233 | MiniMax M2.7 |
| Design Arena: SVG | 1052 | 1136 | MiniMax M2.7 |
| Design Arena: ASCII art | 1166 | 1136 | Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview |
| Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here | |||
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index135
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview | MiniMax M2.7 | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| SAGE (Vals AI) | 49.5% | Not measured | Only Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview measured |
| MedScribe (Vals AI) | 63.9% | 79.9% | MiniMax M2.7 |
| Vals Multimodal Index | 41.4% | Not measured | Only Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview measured |
| IFBench | Not measured | 75.7% | Only MiniMax M2.7 measured |
| Long context reasoning (AA-LCR) | Not measured | 78.3% | Only MiniMax M2.7 measured |
| ExploitBench | Not measured | 13.3% | Only MiniMax M2.7 measured |
| LMArena Text | 1416 | 1405 | Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview |
| LMArena Text: instruction following | 1377 | 1405 | MiniMax M2.7 |
| LMArena Text: creative writing | 1401 | 1354 | Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview |
| LMArena Vision | 1240 | Not measured | Only Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview measured |
| LMArena Text: English | 1414 | 1426 | MiniMax M2.7 |
| LMArena Text: non-English | 1410 | 1382 | Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview |
| LMArena Text: Chinese | 1460 | 1442 | Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview |
| LMArena Text: German | 1430 | 1398 | Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview |
| LMArena Text: Japanese | 1413 | 1260 | Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview |
| LMArena Text: Korean | 1392 | 1314 | Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview |
| LMArena Text: French | 1424 | 1424 | MiniMax M2.7 |
| LMArena Text: Spanish | 1421 | 1402 | Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview |
| LMArena Text: Russian | 1420 | 1383 | Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview |
| LMArena Text: Polish | 1443 | 1387 | Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview |
| LMArena Text: multi-turn | 1417 | 1412 | Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview |
| LMArena Text: longer queries | 1394 | 1418 | MiniMax M2.7 |
| LMArena Text: writing and language | 1408 | 1376 | Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview |
| LMArena Text: entertainment and media | 1386 | 1360 | Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview |
| LMArena Vision: English | 1232 | Not measured | Only Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview measured |
| LMArena Vision: Chinese | 1278 | Not measured | Only Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview measured |
| LMArena Vision: reading text | 1246 | Not measured | Only Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview measured |
| LMArena Vision: humor | 1266 | Not measured | Only Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview measured |
| LMArena Vision: captioning | 1259 | Not measured | Only Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview measured |
| LMArena Vision: recognizing things | 1308 | Not measured | Only Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview measured |
| LMArena Vision: creative writing | 1248 | Not measured | Only Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 15 boards here | |||
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview | MiniMax M2.7 | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| Neither model has a result on 5 boards here | |||
What each workload costs
Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.
Chat turn
1K input + 500 output tokens
MiniMax M2.7 costs less
Repository review
50K input + 3K output tokens
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview costs less
Agent loop
200K input + 10K output tokens
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview costs less
Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.
Specification differences
The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.
| Specification | Google Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview | MiniMax M2.7 |
|---|---|---|
| Maker | MiniMax | |
| Weights | No public weights listed | Open weights |
| Released | March 3, 2026 | March 18, 2026 |
| Context window | 1.05M | 205K |
| Input $/Mtok | $0.25 | $0.30 |
| Output $/Mtok | $1.50 | $1.20 |
| Coding index | 8.1 | 28.4 |
| Independent measurements behind it | 1 | 1 |
| Cost per solved task | $0.18 | $0.64 |
| Source | OpenRouter listing | OpenRouter listing |
Questions
Is Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview better than MiniMax M2.7 for coding?
Pick MiniMax M2.7 for coding: it scores 28.4 on the Vibe Coding Index against 8.1 for Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview. Pick Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview when a solved task costs $0.18 against $0.64, or when the context window is larger, 1.05M against 205K tokens.
Which is cheaper, Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview or MiniMax M2.7?
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview costs $0.25 per million input tokens and $1.50 per million output tokens; MiniMax M2.7 costs $0.30 and $1.20. Per solved SWE-bench Verified task, Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview costs $0.18 and MiniMax M2.7 $0.64.
Which has the bigger context window, Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview or MiniMax M2.7?
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview, with 1.05M tokens against 205K.
How many benchmarks is the Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview vs MiniMax M2.7 comparison based on?
62 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 21, 2026. Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview's coding index rests on 1 independent benchmark and MiniMax M2.7's on 1. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.