Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview vs Llama 3.2 3B Instruct

Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview leads Llama 3.2 3B Instruct on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, 15.6 to 5.7, and Llama 3.2 3B Instruct costs 4.5x less per output token ($0.3325 vs $1.50 per million). Updated October 21, 2026; 24 benchmarks have a result for both.

Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite PreviewGoogle
Coding
22.7
Overall
36.6
Output $/M
$1.50
24
Llama 3.2 3B InstructMeta Llama
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$0.3325
0
vs boards won of 24 shared

Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview or Llama 3.2 3B Instruct: which to pick

Only Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview has a coding score, 22.7 on the Vibe Coding Index; Llama 3.2 3B Instruct has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Pick Llama 3.2 3B Instruct for output tokens 4.5x cheaper ($0.3325 vs $1.50 per million).

Shared results
24
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview only
55
Llama 3.2 3B Instruct only
11
Like-for-like categories
6 of 9

Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview 22.7 from 3 benchmarks, Llama 3.2 3B Instruct not benchmarked.
Widest category
General, 55.3 points apart on average over 12 shared benchmarks.
Widest single gap
LMArena Text: Chinese: Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview 1460 against Llama 3.2 3B Instruct 1017, 73.8 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview $1.50 against Llama 3.2 3B Instruct $0.3325 per million output tokens, 4.5x apart.
Context window
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview takes 1.05M tokens, Llama 3.2 3B Instruct 131K.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryGemini 3.1 Flash Lite PreviewBarsLlama 3.2 3B InstructTies
Coding20
Intelligence10
Reasoning30
Math20
Knowledge40
General120
All shared boards240
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index20
Coding benchmarks for Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview and Llama 3.2 3B Instruct
BenchmarkGemini 3.1 Flash Lite PreviewLlama 3.2 3B InstructLeader
LMArena WebDev1257Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview measured
AA Coding Index34.7Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview measured
LiveCodeBench (Vals AI)80.1%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview measured
SWE-bench Verified (Vals AI)62.8%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview measured
Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI)0.0%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview measured
Code migration (Vals AI)4.6%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview measured
ProgramBench (Vals AI)0.0%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview measured
Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals AI)34.1%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview measured
LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured8.3%Only Llama 3.2 3B Instruct measured
ALE-Bench797.7Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview measured
LMArena Text: coding14001098Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview
LMArena Text: software and IT14131103Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview
LMArena WebDev: React1245Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview measured
LMArena WebDev: HTML1276Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview measured
LMArena WebDev: from an image1336Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview measured
SciCode4.6%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview measured
Neither model has a result on the other 23 boards here
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index10
Intelligence benchmarks for Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview and Llama 3.2 3B Instruct
BenchmarkGemini 3.1 Flash Lite PreviewLlama 3.2 3B InstructLeader
AA Intelligence Index15.65.7Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview
Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here
Agentic workDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index8 boards, none shared
Agentic work benchmarks for Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview and Llama 3.2 3B Instruct
BenchmarkGemini 3.1 Flash Lite PreviewLlama 3.2 3B InstructLeader
AA Agentic Index1.6Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview measured
Finance Agent (Vals AI)30.0%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview measured
Tax Agent Bench (Vals AI)3.1%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview measured
Legal Research Bench (Vals AI)3.4%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview measured
Excel Modeling Benchmark (Vals AI)8.6%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview measured
τ²-Bench TelecomNot measured21.1%Only Llama 3.2 3B Instruct measured
BALROGNot measured10.1%Only Llama 3.2 3B Instruct measured
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard (BFCL)Not measured21.9%Only Llama 3.2 3B Instruct measured
Neither model has a result on the other 33 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index30
Reasoning benchmarks for Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview and Llama 3.2 3B Instruct
BenchmarkGemini 3.1 Flash Lite PreviewLlama 3.2 3B InstructLeader
GPQA Diamond81.1%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview measured
MMMU Pro (Vals AI)82.5%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview measured
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured25.5%Only Llama 3.2 3B Instruct measured
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured5.3%Only Llama 3.2 3B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts14071095Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview
LMArena Text: expert13981090Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview
LMArena Text: hard prompts in English14031141Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview
LMArena Vision: diagrams1242Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview measured
LMArena Vision: homework1271Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview measured
Neither model has a result on the other 13 boards here
MathLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index20
Math benchmarks for Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview and Llama 3.2 3B Instruct
BenchmarkGemini 3.1 Flash Lite PreviewLlama 3.2 3B InstructLeader
AIME83.3%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview measured
AA Math IndexNot measured3.3Only Llama 3.2 3B Instruct measured
AIME 2025 (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured3.3%Only Llama 3.2 3B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: math14281126Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview
LMArena Text: mathematical work14171128Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview
Neither model has a result on the other 8 boards here
KnowledgeLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index40
Knowledge benchmarks for Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview and Llama 3.2 3B Instruct
BenchmarkGemini 3.1 Flash Lite PreviewLlama 3.2 3B InstructLeader
MMLU Pro86.2%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview measured
LegalBench (Vals AI)83.8%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview measured
CaseLaw (Vals AI)55.0%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview measured
CorpFin (Vals AI)59.4%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview measured
TaxEval (Vals AI)71.8%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview measured
MortgageTax (Vals AI)68.0%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview measured
MedCode (Vals AI)47.6%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview measured
MMLU Pro (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured34.7%Only Llama 3.2 3B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: science14251106Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare14281104Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview
LMArena Text: legal and government14181115Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview
LMArena Text: business and finance13891074Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview
FACTS Benchmark Suite51.4%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview measured
Neither model has a result on the other 5 boards here
Web designDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index8 boards, none shared
Web design benchmarks for Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview and Llama 3.2 3B Instruct
BenchmarkGemini 3.1 Flash Lite PreviewLlama 3.2 3B InstructLeader
Design Arena: websites1083Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview measured
Design Arena: UI components1072Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview measured
Design Arena: game dev1029Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview measured
Design Arena: data viz1045Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview measured
Design Arena: 3D1048Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview measured
Design Arena: all code categories1072Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview measured
Design Arena: SVG1052Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview measured
Design Arena: ASCII art1167Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview measured
Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index120
General benchmarks for Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview and Llama 3.2 3B Instruct
BenchmarkGemini 3.1 Flash Lite PreviewLlama 3.2 3B InstructLeader
SAGE (Vals AI)49.5%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview measured
MedScribe (Vals AI)63.9%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview measured
Vals Multimodal Index41.4%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview measured
IFBenchNot measured26.2%Only Llama 3.2 3B Instruct measured
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)Not measured4.3%Only Llama 3.2 3B Instruct measured
LMArena Text14161110Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview
LMArena Text: instruction following13771089Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview
LMArena Text: creative writing14011094Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview
LMArena Vision1240Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview measured
LMArena Text: English14141180Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview
LMArena Text: non-English14101019Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview
LMArena Text: Chinese14601017Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview
LMArena Text: German14301056Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview
LMArena Text: Japanese1413Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview measured
LMArena Text: Korean1392Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview measured
LMArena Text: French1424Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview measured
LMArena Text: Spanish1421Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview measured
LMArena Text: Russian1420949Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview
LMArena Text: Polish1443Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview measured
LMArena Text: multi-turn14171105Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview
LMArena Text: longer queries13941100Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview
LMArena Text: writing and language14081096Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview
LMArena Text: entertainment and media13861083Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview
LMArena Vision: English1232Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview measured
LMArena Vision: Chinese1278Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview measured
LMArena Vision: reading text1246Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview measured
LMArena Vision: humor1266Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview measured
LMArena Vision: captioning1259Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview measured
LMArena Vision: recognizing things1308Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview measured
LMArena Vision: creative writing1248Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview measured
Neither model has a result on the other 16 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview and Llama 3.2 3B Instruct
BenchmarkGemini 3.1 Flash Lite PreviewLlama 3.2 3B InstructLeader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview$0.0010Fits in one request
Llama 3.2 3B Instruct$0.0002Fits in one request

Llama 3.2 3B Instruct costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview$0.017Fits in one request
Llama 3.2 3B Instruct$0.0035Fits in one request

Llama 3.2 3B Instruct costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview$0.065Fits in one request
Llama 3.2 3B Instruct$0.013Exceeds the context window

Llama 3.2 3B Instruct costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview and Llama 3.2 3B Instruct
SpecificationGoogle Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite PreviewMeta Llama 3.2 3B Instruct
MakerGoogleMeta Llama
WeightsNo public weights listedOpen weights
ReleasedMarch 3, 2026September 25, 2024
Context window1.05M131K
Input $/Mtok$0.25$0.0505
Output $/Mtok$1.50$0.3325
Coding index22.7Not benchmarked
Independent measurements behind it30
Cost per solved task$0.18Not computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview better than Llama 3.2 3B Instruct for coding?

Only Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview has a coding score, 22.7 on the Vibe Coding Index; Llama 3.2 3B Instruct has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Pick Llama 3.2 3B Instruct for output tokens 4.5x cheaper ($0.3325 vs $1.50 per million).

Which is cheaper, Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview or Llama 3.2 3B Instruct?

Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview costs $0.25 per million input tokens and $1.50 per million output tokens; Llama 3.2 3B Instruct costs $0.0505 and $0.3325. Cost per solved task is known for Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview only.

Which has the bigger context window, Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview or Llama 3.2 3B Instruct?

Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview, with 1.05M tokens against 131K.

How many benchmarks is the Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview vs Llama 3.2 3B Instruct comparison based on?

24 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 21, 2026. Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview's coding index rests on 3 independent benchmarks and Llama 3.2 3B Instruct's on 0. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next