Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview vs Mercury 2.5

Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview leads Mercury 2.5 on coding, 22.7 to 1.6 on the Vibe Coding Index, and Mercury 2.5 costs 10.0x less per output token ($0.15 vs $1.50 per million). Updated October 22, 2026; 12 benchmarks have a result for both.

Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite PreviewGoogle
Coding
22.7
Overall
36.6
Output $/M
$1.50
8
Mercury 2.5Inception
Coding
1.6
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$0.15
4
vs boards won of 12 shared

Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview or Mercury 2.5: which to pick

Pick Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview for coding: it scores 22.7 on the Vibe Coding Index against 1.6 for Mercury 2.5.

Pick Mercury 2.5 for output tokens 10.0x cheaper ($0.15 vs $1.50 per million) and work measured by Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI) or Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals AI), where it leads.

Shared results
12
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview only
67
Mercury 2.5 only
10
Like-for-like categories
5 of 9

Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview 22.7 from 3 benchmarks, Mercury 2.5 1.6 from 2 benchmarks.
Widest category
General, 8.8 points apart on average over 1 shared benchmark.
Widest single gap
ALE-Bench: Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview 797.7 against Mercury 2.5 301.6, 16.5 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview $1.50 against Mercury 2.5 $0.15 per million output tokens, 10.0x apart.
Context window
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview takes 1.05M tokens, Mercury 2.5 260K.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryGemini 3.1 Flash Lite PreviewBarsMercury 2.5Ties
Coding22
Intelligence10
Agentic work22
Knowledge20
General10
All shared boards84
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index22
Coding benchmarks for Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview and Mercury 2.5
BenchmarkGemini 3.1 Flash Lite PreviewMercury 2.5Leader
LMArena WebDev1257Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview measured
AA Coding Index34.7Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview measured
LiveCodeBench (Vals AI)80.1%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview measured
SWE-bench Verified (Vals AI)62.8%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview measured
Terminal-Bench 4 (Vals AI)Not measured0.0%Only Mercury 2.5 measured
Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI)0.0%3.7%Mercury 2.5
Code migration (Vals AI)4.6%4.5%Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview
ProgramBench (Vals AI)0.0%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview measured
IOI (Vals AI)Not measured2.4%Only Mercury 2.5 measured
Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals AI)34.1%34.5%Mercury 2.5
SkillsBench (Vals AI)Not measured18.1%Only Mercury 2.5 measured
CyberBench (Vals AI)Not measured45.5%Only Mercury 2.5 measured
SciCodeNot measured38.5%Only Mercury 2.5 measured
ALE-Bench797.7301.6Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview
LMArena Text: coding1400Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview measured
LMArena Text: software and IT1413Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview measured
LMArena WebDev: React1245Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview measured
LMArena WebDev: HTML1276Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview measured
LMArena WebDev: from an image1336Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview measured
SciCode4.6%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview measured
Neither model has a result on the other 19 boards here
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index10
Intelligence benchmarks for Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview and Mercury 2.5
BenchmarkGemini 3.1 Flash Lite PreviewMercury 2.5Leader
AA Intelligence Index15.612.3Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview
Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here
Agentic workLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index22
Agentic work benchmarks for Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview and Mercury 2.5
BenchmarkGemini 3.1 Flash Lite PreviewMercury 2.5Leader
AA Agentic Index1.6Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview measured
Finance Agent (Vals AI)30.0%18.9%Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview
Tax Agent Bench (Vals AI)3.1%2.5%Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview
Legal Research Bench (Vals AI)3.4%4.3%Mercury 2.5
Excel Modeling Benchmark (Vals AI)8.6%8.8%Mercury 2.5
Terminal-Bench-Science (Vals AI)Not measured0.0%Only Mercury 2.5 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 35 boards here
ReasoningDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index8 boards, none shared
Reasoning benchmarks for Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview and Mercury 2.5
BenchmarkGemini 3.1 Flash Lite PreviewMercury 2.5Leader
GPQA Diamond81.1%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview measured
MMMU Pro (Vals AI)82.5%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview measured
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured11.8%Only Mercury 2.5 measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts1407Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview measured
LMArena Text: expert1398Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts in English1403Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview measured
LMArena Vision: diagrams1242Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview measured
LMArena Vision: homework1271Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview measured
Neither model has a result on the other 14 boards here
MathDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index4 boards, none shared
Math benchmarks for Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview and Mercury 2.5
BenchmarkGemini 3.1 Flash Lite PreviewMercury 2.5Leader
AIME83.3%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview measured
ProofBenchNot measured3.0%Only Mercury 2.5 measured
LMArena Text: math1428Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview measured
LMArena Text: mathematical work1417Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview measured
Neither model has a result on the other 9 boards here
KnowledgeLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index20
Knowledge benchmarks for Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview and Mercury 2.5
BenchmarkGemini 3.1 Flash Lite PreviewMercury 2.5Leader
MMLU Pro86.2%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview measured
LegalBench (Vals AI)83.8%83.1%Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview
CaseLaw (Vals AI)55.0%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview measured
CorpFin (Vals AI)59.4%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview measured
TaxEval (Vals AI)71.8%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview measured
MortgageTax (Vals AI)68.0%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview measured
MedCode (Vals AI)47.6%31.3%Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview
LMArena Text: science1425Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview measured
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare1428Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview measured
LMArena Text: legal and government1418Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview measured
LMArena Text: business and finance1389Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview measured
FACTS Benchmark Suite51.4%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview measured
Neither model has a result on the other 6 boards here
Web designDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index8 boards, none shared
Web design benchmarks for Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview and Mercury 2.5
BenchmarkGemini 3.1 Flash Lite PreviewMercury 2.5Leader
Design Arena: websites1082Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview measured
Design Arena: UI components1069Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview measured
Design Arena: game dev1029Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview measured
Design Arena: data viz1045Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview measured
Design Arena: 3D1047Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview measured
Design Arena: all code categories1072Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview measured
Design Arena: SVG1052Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview measured
Design Arena: ASCII art1167Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview measured
Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index10
General benchmarks for Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview and Mercury 2.5
BenchmarkGemini 3.1 Flash Lite PreviewMercury 2.5Leader
Public Benefits Bench (Vals AI)Not measured45.3%Only Mercury 2.5 measured
SAGE (Vals AI)49.5%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview measured
MedScribe (Vals AI)63.9%55.1%Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview
Vals Multimodal Index41.4%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview measured
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)Not measured71.7%Only Mercury 2.5 measured
LMArena Text1416Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview measured
LMArena Text: instruction following1377Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview measured
LMArena Text: creative writing1401Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview measured
LMArena Vision1240Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview measured
LMArena Text: English1414Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview measured
LMArena Text: non-English1410Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview measured
LMArena Text: Chinese1460Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview measured
LMArena Text: German1430Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview measured
LMArena Text: Japanese1413Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview measured
LMArena Text: Korean1392Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview measured
LMArena Text: French1424Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview measured
LMArena Text: Spanish1421Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview measured
LMArena Text: Russian1420Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview measured
LMArena Text: Polish1443Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview measured
LMArena Text: multi-turn1417Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview measured
LMArena Text: longer queries1394Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview measured
LMArena Text: writing and language1408Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview measured
LMArena Text: entertainment and media1386Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview measured
LMArena Vision: English1232Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview measured
LMArena Vision: Chinese1278Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview measured
LMArena Vision: reading text1246Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview measured
LMArena Vision: humor1266Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview measured
LMArena Vision: captioning1259Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview measured
LMArena Vision: recognizing things1308Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview measured
LMArena Vision: creative writing1248Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview measured
Neither model has a result on the other 16 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview and Mercury 2.5
BenchmarkGemini 3.1 Flash Lite PreviewMercury 2.5Leader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview$0.0010Fits in one request
Mercury 2.5$0.0001Fits in one request

Mercury 2.5 costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview$0.017Fits in one request
Mercury 2.5$0.0024Fits in one request

Mercury 2.5 costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview$0.065Fits in one request
Mercury 2.5$0.0095Fits in one request

Mercury 2.5 costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview and Mercury 2.5
SpecificationGoogle Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite PreviewInception Mercury 2.5
MakerGoogleInception
WeightsNo public weights listedNo public weights listed
ReleasedMarch 3, 2026September 8, 2026
Context window1.05M260K
Input $/Mtok$0.25$0.04
Output $/Mtok$1.50$0.15
Coding index22.71.6
Independent measurements behind it32
Cost per solved task$0.18Not computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview better than Mercury 2.5 for coding?

Pick Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview for coding: it scores 22.7 on the Vibe Coding Index against 1.6 for Mercury 2.5. Pick Mercury 2.5 for output tokens 10.0x cheaper ($0.15 vs $1.50 per million) and work measured by Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI) or Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals AI), where it leads.

Which is cheaper, Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview or Mercury 2.5?

Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview costs $0.25 per million input tokens and $1.50 per million output tokens; Mercury 2.5 costs $0.04 and $0.15. Cost per solved task is known for Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview only.

Which has the bigger context window, Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview or Mercury 2.5?

Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview, with 1.05M tokens against 260K.

How many benchmarks is the Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview vs Mercury 2.5 comparison based on?

12 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 22, 2026. Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview's coding index rests on 3 independent benchmarks and Mercury 2.5's on 2. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next

Embed this comparison on your site

Free under CC BY 4.0, while the source link stays visible. Preview the frame · Terms and other embeds

<iframe src="https://llmbenchmark.ai/embed/compare/gemini-3-1-flash-lite-preview-vs-inception-mercury-2-5" title="Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview vs Mercury 2.5, LLMBenchmark.ai" width="100%" height="360" style="border:0;max-width:100%" loading="lazy"></iframe>
<p style="font:13px/1.4 sans-serif;margin:6px 0 0">Source: <a href="https://llmbenchmark.ai/compare/gemini-3-1-flash-lite-preview-vs-inception-mercury-2-5">LLMBenchmark.ai, Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview vs Mercury 2.5</a></p>