Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

Gemini 2.5 Pro vs Step 5 Preview

Step 5 Preview leads Gemini 2.5 Pro on coding, 61.1 to 19.1 on the Vibe Coding Index, and Step 5 Preview costs 3.7x less per output token ($2.70 vs $10.00 per million). Updated October 21, 2026; 38 benchmarks have a result for both.

Gemini 2.5 ProGoogle
Coding
19.1
Overall
41.8
Output $/M
$10.00
18
Step 5 PreviewStepFun
Coding
61.1
Overall
60.5
Output $/M
$2.70
20
vs boards won of 38 shared

Gemini 2.5 Pro or Step 5 Preview: which to pick

Pick Step 5 Preview for coding: it scores 61.1 on the Vibe Coding Index against 19.1 for Gemini 2.5 Pro.

Pick Gemini 2.5 Pro for work measured by LMArena Vision: homework or LMArena Text: science, where it leads.

Shared results
38
Gemini 2.5 Pro only
52
Step 5 Preview only
23
Like-for-like categories
6 of 9

Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
Gemini 2.5 Pro 19.1 from 3 benchmarks, Step 5 Preview 61.1 from 4 benchmarks.
Widest category
Coding, 33.8 points apart on average over 7 shared benchmarks.
Widest single gap
Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI): Gemini 2.5 Pro 0.4% against Step 5 Preview 70.4%, 70.0 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
Gemini 2.5 Pro $10.00 against Step 5 Preview $2.70 per million output tokens, 3.7x apart.
Context window
Both take 1.05M tokens.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryGemini 2.5 ProBarsStep 5 PreviewTies
Coding07
Intelligence01
Reasoning15
Math02
Knowledge40
General135
All shared boards1820
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index07
Coding benchmarks for Gemini 2.5 Pro and Step 5 Preview
BenchmarkGemini 2.5 ProStep 5 PreviewLeader
SWE-bench Verified53.6%Not measuredOnly Gemini 2.5 Pro measured
LiveBench codingNot measured85.6%Only Step 5 Preview measured
LMArena WebDev12261567Step 5 Preview
AA Coding Index33.3Not measuredOnly Gemini 2.5 Pro measured
SWE-bench Verified (Vals AI)54.4%Not measuredOnly Gemini 2.5 Pro measured
Terminal-Bench 4 (Vals AI)Not measured31.8%Only Step 5 Preview measured
Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI)0.4%70.4%Step 5 Preview
Code migration (Vals AI)Not measured39.0%Only Step 5 Preview measured
IOI (Vals AI)Not measured38.1%Only Step 5 Preview measured
SWE-bench Multimodal (Vals AI)Not measured40.8%Only Step 5 Preview measured
LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run)80.1%Not measuredOnly Gemini 2.5 Pro measured
SciCode46.3%58.9%Step 5 Preview
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)26.5%Not measuredOnly Gemini 2.5 Pro measured
Terminal-Bench32.6%Not measuredOnly Gemini 2.5 Pro measured
GSO-Bench3.9%Not measuredOnly Gemini 2.5 Pro measured
WeirdML54.0%Not measuredOnly Gemini 2.5 Pro measured
LMArena Text: coding14521485Step 5 Preview
LMArena Text: software and IT14591473Step 5 Preview
LMArena WebDev: ReactNot measured1583Only Step 5 Preview measured
LMArena WebDev: HTML12351556Step 5 Preview
LMArena WebDev: from an image12851550Step 5 Preview
Neither model has a result on the other 18 boards here
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
Intelligence benchmarks for Gemini 2.5 Pro and Step 5 Preview
BenchmarkGemini 2.5 ProStep 5 PreviewLeader
AA Intelligence Index16.143.7Step 5 Preview
Epoch Capabilities Index145.1Not measuredOnly Gemini 2.5 Pro measured
Agentic workDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index17 boards, none shared
Agentic work benchmarks for Gemini 2.5 Pro and Step 5 Preview
BenchmarkGemini 2.5 ProStep 5 PreviewLeader
AA Agentic Index1.6Not measuredOnly Gemini 2.5 Pro measured
LiveBench researchNot measured72.8%Only Step 5 Preview measured
LiveBench browserNot measured24.0%Only Step 5 Preview measured
LiveBench long agenticNot measured27.5%Only Step 5 Preview measured
SREBench (Vals AI)Not measured0.4%Only Step 5 Preview measured
Finance Agent (Vals AI)Not measured50.7%Only Step 5 Preview measured
Tax Agent Bench (Vals AI)Not measured27.3%Only Step 5 Preview measured
Legal Research Bench (Vals AI)Not measured40.4%Only Step 5 Preview measured
Excel Modeling Benchmark (Vals AI)Not measured57.1%Only Step 5 Preview measured
BioMysteryBench (Vals AI)Not measured67.4%Only Step 5 Preview measured
Terminal-Bench-Science (Vals AI)Not measured2.9%Only Step 5 Preview measured
Vals Science IndexNot measured29.6%Only Step 5 Preview measured
τ²-Bench Telecom54.1%Not measuredOnly Gemini 2.5 Pro measured
GDPval23.3%Not measuredOnly Gemini 2.5 Pro measured
DeepResearch Bench41.5%Not measuredOnly Gemini 2.5 Pro measured
Vending-Bench 2$574Not measuredOnly Gemini 2.5 Pro measured
BrowseComp-Plus29.5%Not measuredOnly Gemini 2.5 Pro measured
Neither model has a result on the other 24 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index15
Reasoning benchmarks for Gemini 2.5 Pro and Step 5 Preview
BenchmarkGemini 2.5 ProStep 5 PreviewLeader
LiveBench reasoningNot measured83.8%Only Step 5 Preview measured
MysteryMechanism (Vals AI)Not measured18.5%Only Step 5 Preview measured
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)84.4%Not measuredOnly Gemini 2.5 Pro measured
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)22.5%46.5%Step 5 Preview
GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run)85.3%Not measuredOnly Gemini 2.5 Pro measured
ARC-AGI41.0%Not measuredOnly Gemini 2.5 Pro measured
ARC-AGI-24.9%Not measuredOnly Gemini 2.5 Pro measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts14551461Step 5 Preview
LMArena Text: expert14521485Step 5 Preview
LMArena Text: hard prompts in English14531454Step 5 Preview
LMArena Vision: diagrams12741308Step 5 Preview
LMArena Vision: homework12811265Gemini 2.5 Pro
Kagi LLM Benchmark70.3%Not measuredOnly Gemini 2.5 Pro measured
Neither model has a result on the other 9 boards here
MathLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index02
Math benchmarks for Gemini 2.5 Pro and Step 5 Preview
BenchmarkGemini 2.5 ProStep 5 PreviewLeader
AA Math Index87.7Not measuredOnly Gemini 2.5 Pro measured
AIME 2025 (Artificial Analysis run)87.7%Not measuredOnly Gemini 2.5 Pro measured
OTIS Mock AIME84.7%Not measuredOnly Gemini 2.5 Pro measured
FrontierMath, tiers 1 to 324.6%Not measuredOnly Gemini 2.5 Pro measured
FrontierMath, tier 40.0%Not measuredOnly Gemini 2.5 Pro measured
ProofBenchNot measured42.0%Only Step 5 Preview measured
LMArena Text: math14501458Step 5 Preview
LMArena Text: mathematical work14541460Step 5 Preview
Neither model has a result on the other 5 boards here
KnowledgeLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index40
Knowledge benchmarks for Gemini 2.5 Pro and Step 5 Preview
BenchmarkGemini 2.5 ProStep 5 PreviewLeader
CaseLaw (Vals AI)63.9%Not measuredOnly Gemini 2.5 Pro measured
CorpFin (Vals AI)60.8%Not measuredOnly Gemini 2.5 Pro measured
MortgageTax (Vals AI)68.9%Not measuredOnly Gemini 2.5 Pro measured
MedCode (Vals AI)50.6%Not measuredOnly Gemini 2.5 Pro measured
MMLU Pro (Artificial Analysis run)86.2%Not measuredOnly Gemini 2.5 Pro measured
LMArena Text: science14801454Gemini 2.5 Pro
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare14761439Gemini 2.5 Pro
LMArena Text: legal and government14801437Gemini 2.5 Pro
LMArena Text: business and finance14391435Gemini 2.5 Pro
FACTS Benchmark Suite61.5%Not measuredOnly Gemini 2.5 Pro measured
Neither model has a result on the other 8 boards here
Web designDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index7 boards, none shared
Web design benchmarks for Gemini 2.5 Pro and Step 5 Preview
BenchmarkGemini 2.5 ProStep 5 PreviewLeader
Design Arena: websites1167Not measuredOnly Gemini 2.5 Pro measured
Design Arena: UI components1140Not measuredOnly Gemini 2.5 Pro measured
Design Arena: game dev1111Not measuredOnly Gemini 2.5 Pro measured
Design Arena: data viz1221Not measuredOnly Gemini 2.5 Pro measured
Design Arena: 3D1081Not measuredOnly Gemini 2.5 Pro measured
Design Arena: all code categories1152Not measuredOnly Gemini 2.5 Pro measured
LiveBench designNot measured76.9%Only Step 5 Preview measured
Neither model has a result on the other 2 boards here
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index135
General benchmarks for Gemini 2.5 Pro and Step 5 Preview
BenchmarkGemini 2.5 ProStep 5 PreviewLeader
LiveBench data analysisNot measured63.5%Only Step 5 Preview measured
Public Benefits Bench (Vals AI)Not measured58.1%Only Step 5 Preview measured
SAGE (Vals AI)41.9%Not measuredOnly Gemini 2.5 Pro measured
MedScribe (Vals AI)73.5%Not measuredOnly Gemini 2.5 Pro measured
IFBench48.7%Not measuredOnly Gemini 2.5 Pro measured
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)69.0%88.3%Step 5 Preview
DTBench82.4%Not measuredOnly Gemini 2.5 Pro measured
LMCA34.8%Not measuredOnly Gemini 2.5 Pro measured
Creative writing (Lech Mazur)83.8%Not measuredOnly Gemini 2.5 Pro measured
LMArena Text14581440Gemini 2.5 Pro
LMArena Text: instruction following14371438Step 5 Preview
LMArena Text: creative writing14541409Gemini 2.5 Pro
LMArena Vision12631265Step 5 Preview
LMArena Text: English14581447Gemini 2.5 Pro
LMArena Text: non-English14521428Gemini 2.5 Pro
LMArena Text: Chinese15071500Gemini 2.5 Pro
LMArena Text: German1487Not measuredOnly Gemini 2.5 Pro measured
LMArena Text: Japanese14611383Gemini 2.5 Pro
LMArena Text: Korean1434Not measuredOnly Gemini 2.5 Pro measured
LMArena Text: French14731438Gemini 2.5 Pro
LMArena Text: Spanish14741441Gemini 2.5 Pro
LMArena Text: Russian14611433Gemini 2.5 Pro
LMArena Text: Polish1479Not measuredOnly Gemini 2.5 Pro measured
LMArena Text: multi-turn14531437Gemini 2.5 Pro
LMArena Text: longer queries14491449Gemini 2.5 Pro
LMArena Text: writing and language14541425Gemini 2.5 Pro
LMArena Text: entertainment and media14411412Gemini 2.5 Pro
LMArena Vision: English12611290Step 5 Preview
LMArena Vision: Chinese1300Not measuredOnly Gemini 2.5 Pro measured
LMArena Vision: reading text12701282Step 5 Preview
LMArena Vision: humor1262Not measuredOnly Gemini 2.5 Pro measured
LMArena Vision: captioning1304Not measuredOnly Gemini 2.5 Pro measured
LMArena Vision: recognizing things1283Not measuredOnly Gemini 2.5 Pro measured
LMArena Vision: creative writing1265Not measuredOnly Gemini 2.5 Pro measured
LMArena Document1421Not measuredOnly Gemini 2.5 Pro measured
Neither model has a result on the other 11 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for Gemini 2.5 Pro and Step 5 Preview
BenchmarkGemini 2.5 ProStep 5 PreviewLeader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

Gemini 2.5 Pro$0.0063Fits in one request
Step 5 Preview$0.0024Fits in one request

Step 5 Preview costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

Gemini 2.5 Pro$0.092Fits in one request
Step 5 Preview$0.058Fits in one request

Step 5 Preview costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

Gemini 2.5 Pro$0.350Fits in one request
Step 5 Preview$0.227Fits in one request

Step 5 Preview costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of Gemini 2.5 Pro and Step 5 Preview
SpecificationGoogle Gemini 2.5 ProStepFun Step 5 Preview
MakerGoogleStepFun
WeightsNo public weights listedOpen weights
ReleasedJune 17, 2025October 8, 2026
Context window1.05M1.05M
Input $/Mtok$1.25$1.00
Output $/Mtok$10.00$2.70
Coding index19.161.1
Independent measurements behind it34
Cost per solved task$0.64Not computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is Gemini 2.5 Pro better than Step 5 Preview for coding?

Pick Step 5 Preview for coding: it scores 61.1 on the Vibe Coding Index against 19.1 for Gemini 2.5 Pro. Pick Gemini 2.5 Pro for work measured by LMArena Vision: homework or LMArena Text: science, where it leads.

Which is cheaper, Gemini 2.5 Pro or Step 5 Preview?

Gemini 2.5 Pro costs $1.25 per million input tokens and $10.00 per million output tokens; Step 5 Preview costs $1.00 and $2.70. Cost per solved task is known for Gemini 2.5 Pro only.

Which has the bigger context window, Gemini 2.5 Pro or Step 5 Preview?

Neither: both take 1.05M tokens.

How many benchmarks is the Gemini 2.5 Pro vs Step 5 Preview comparison based on?

38 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 21, 2026. Gemini 2.5 Pro's coding index rests on 3 independent benchmarks and Step 5 Preview's on 4. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next

Embed this comparison on your site

Free under CC BY 4.0, while the source link stays visible. Preview the frame · Terms and other embeds

<iframe src="https://llmbenchmark.ai/embed/compare/gemini-2-5-pro-vs-stepfun-step-5-preview" title="Gemini 2.5 Pro vs Step 5 Preview, LLMBenchmark.ai" width="100%" height="360" style="border:0;max-width:100%" loading="lazy"></iframe>
<p style="font:13px/1.4 sans-serif;margin:6px 0 0">Source: <a href="https://llmbenchmark.ai/compare/gemini-2-5-pro-vs-stepfun-step-5-preview">LLMBenchmark.ai, Gemini 2.5 Pro vs Step 5 Preview</a></p>