LLMBenchmark.ai

Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05 vs GPT-5.4

Updated October 21, 2026. 7 benchmarks have a result for both. Coding is ranked on the Vibe Coding Index; every other board is shown as published.

Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05Google
Coding
83.1
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$10.00
1
GPT-5.4OpenAI
Coding
37.7
Overall
39.0
Output $/M
$15.00
6
vs boards won of 7 shared

Decision reading

Pick Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05 for coding: it scores 83.1 on the Vibe Coding Index against 37.7 for GPT-5.4.

Pick GPT-5.4 when the context window is larger, 1.05M against 1.05M tokens, or when what matters is LiveCodeBench (Vals AI) or GSO-Bench, where it leads.

Shared results
7
Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05 only
7
GPT-5.4 only
102
Like-for-like categories
3 of 9

Shared results can support a head-to-head reading. Results only one model has describe coverage, not superiority.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05 83.1 from 1 benchmark, GPT-5.4 37.7 from 1 benchmark.
Widest category
Coding, 16.2 points apart on average over 2 shared benchmarks.
Widest single gap
GSO-Bench: Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05 3.9% against GPT-5.4 31.4%, 27.5 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05 $10.00 against GPT-5.4 $15.00 per million output tokens, 1.5x apart.
Context window
Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05 takes 1.05M tokens, GPT-5.4 1.05M.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryGemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05BarsGPT-5.4Ties
Coding02
Agentic work11
Reasoning03
All shared boards16
CodingLike-for-likeFour of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index02
Coding benchmarks for Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05 and GPT-5.4
BenchmarkGemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05GPT-5.4Leader
Aider polyglot83.1%Not measuredOnly Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05 measured
LMArena WebDevNot measured1464Only GPT-5.4 measured
AA Coding IndexNot measured71.1Only GPT-5.4 measured
LiveCodeBench (Vals AI)79.2%84.1%GPT-5.4
SWE-bench Verified (Vals AI)Not measured78.2%Only GPT-5.4 measured
Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI)Not measured67.4%Only GPT-5.4 measured
Code migration (Vals AI)Not measured35.0%Only GPT-5.4 measured
ProgramBench (Vals AI)Not measured0.5%Only GPT-5.4 measured
SkillsBench (Vals AI)Not measured51.7%Only GPT-5.4 measured
LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run)77.8%Not measuredOnly Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05 measured
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured57.6%Only GPT-5.4 measured
Terminal-BenchNot measured81.8%Only GPT-5.4 measured
GSO-Bench3.9%31.4%GPT-5.4
WeirdMLNot measured77.7%Only GPT-5.4 measured
MirrorCodeNot measured15.6%Only GPT-5.4 measured
ALE-BenchNot measured1607.0Only GPT-5.4 measured
LMArena Text: codingNot measured1496Only GPT-5.4 measured
LMArena Text: software and ITNot measured1491Only GPT-5.4 measured
LMArena WebDev: ReactNot measured1454Only GPT-5.4 measured
LMArena WebDev: HTMLNot measured1478Only GPT-5.4 measured
LMArena WebDev: from an imageNot measured1436Only GPT-5.4 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 17 boards here
IntelligenceDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index2 boards, none shared
Intelligence benchmarks for Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05 and GPT-5.4
BenchmarkGemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05GPT-5.4Leader
AA Intelligence IndexNot measured39.0Only GPT-5.4 measured
Epoch Capabilities IndexNot measured157.3Only GPT-5.4 measured
Agentic workLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index11
Agentic work benchmarks for Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05 and GPT-5.4
BenchmarkGemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05GPT-5.4Leader
Design Arena: agents building web appsNot measured1059Only GPT-5.4 measured
Design Arena: agents building full-stack appsNot measured1017Only GPT-5.4 measured
Design Arena: agents building mobile appsNot measured1087Only GPT-5.4 measured
Design Arena: agents building Android appsNot measured1037Only GPT-5.4 measured
Design Arena: agents building Godot gamesNot measured1135Only GPT-5.4 measured
τ²-Bench TelecomNot measured87.1%Only GPT-5.4 measured
APEX-AgentsNot measured52.4%Only GPT-5.4 measured
METR time horizons55.4%74.3%GPT-5.4
Remote Labor Index0.8%Not measuredOnly Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05 measured
DeepResearch Bench42.8%35.1%Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05
PostTrainBenchNot measured19.0%Only GPT-5.4 measured
Vending-Bench 2Not measured$6,144Only GPT-5.4 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 27 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index03
Reasoning benchmarks for Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05 and GPT-5.4
BenchmarkGemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05GPT-5.4Leader
GPQA DiamondNot measured91.7%Only GPT-5.4 measured
MMMU Pro (Vals AI)Not measured87.5%Only GPT-5.4 measured
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)83.6%92.0%GPT-5.4
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)19.9%43.7%GPT-5.4
GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run)84.8%93.3%GPT-5.4
ARC-AGINot measured93.7%Only GPT-5.4 measured
ARC-AGI-2Not measured74.0%Only GPT-5.4 measured
SimpleBench62.4%Not measuredOnly Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05 measured
Chess puzzlesNot measured48.0%Only GPT-5.4 measured
Mystery game puzzlesNot measured37.0%Only GPT-5.4 measured
EBR-benchNot measured25.4%Only GPT-5.4 measured
VPCT46.4%Not measuredOnly Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05 measured
LMArena Text: hard promptsNot measured1485Only GPT-5.4 measured
LMArena Text: expertNot measured1507Only GPT-5.4 measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts in EnglishNot measured1479Only GPT-5.4 measured
LMArena Vision: diagramsNot measured1327Only GPT-5.4 measured
LMArena Vision: homeworkNot measured1336Only GPT-5.4 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 4 boards here
MathDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index7 boards, none shared
Math benchmarks for Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05 and GPT-5.4
BenchmarkGemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05GPT-5.4Leader
AIMENot measured96.7%Only GPT-5.4 measured
OTIS Mock AIMENot measured97.8%Only GPT-5.4 measured
FrontierMath, tiers 1 to 3Not measured78.6%Only GPT-5.4 measured
FrontierMath, tier 4Not measured49.0%Only GPT-5.4 measured
ProofBenchNot measured56.0%Only GPT-5.4 measured
LMArena Text: mathNot measured1488Only GPT-5.4 measured
LMArena Text: mathematical workNot measured1497Only GPT-5.4 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 6 boards here
KnowledgeDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index14 boards, none shared
Knowledge benchmarks for Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05 and GPT-5.4
BenchmarkGemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05GPT-5.4Leader
MMLU ProNot measured87.5%Only GPT-5.4 measured
LegalBench (Vals AI)Not measured86.0%Only GPT-5.4 measured
CaseLaw (Vals AI)Not measured63.8%Only GPT-5.4 measured
CorpFin (Vals AI)Not measured65.3%Only GPT-5.4 measured
TaxEval (Vals AI)Not measured74.0%Only GPT-5.4 measured
MortgageTax (Vals AI)Not measured68.3%Only GPT-5.4 measured
MedQA (Vals AI)Not measured96.1%Only GPT-5.4 measured
MedCode (Vals AI)Not measured41.3%Only GPT-5.4 measured
MMLU Pro (Artificial Analysis run)85.8%Not measuredOnly Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05 measured
SimpleQA VerifiedNot measured45.1%Only GPT-5.4 measured
LMArena Text: scienceNot measured1479Only GPT-5.4 measured
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcareNot measured1458Only GPT-5.4 measured
LMArena Text: legal and governmentNot measured1486Only GPT-5.4 measured
LMArena Text: business and financeNot measured1474Only GPT-5.4 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 3 boards here
Web designDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index8 boards, none shared
Web design benchmarks for Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05 and GPT-5.4
BenchmarkGemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05GPT-5.4Leader
Design Arena: websitesNot measured1199Only GPT-5.4 measured
Design Arena: UI componentsNot measured1215Only GPT-5.4 measured
Design Arena: game devNot measured1195Only GPT-5.4 measured
Design Arena: data vizNot measured1196Only GPT-5.4 measured
Design Arena: 3DNot measured1065Only GPT-5.4 measured
Design Arena: all code categoriesNot measured1180Only GPT-5.4 measured
Design Arena: SVGNot measured1141Only GPT-5.4 measured
Design Arena: ASCII artNot measured1188Only GPT-5.4 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here
GeneralDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index35 boards, none shared
General benchmarks for Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05 and GPT-5.4
BenchmarkGemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05GPT-5.4Leader
SAGE (Vals AI)Not measured43.3%Only GPT-5.4 measured
MedScribe (Vals AI)Not measured77.5%Only GPT-5.4 measured
IFBenchNot measured73.9%Only GPT-5.4 measured
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)Not measured82.0%Only GPT-5.4 measured
DTBenchNot measured94.4%Only GPT-5.4 measured
LMCANot measured52.0%Only GPT-5.4 measured
Fiction.LiveBench91.7%Not measuredOnly Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05 measured
CL-benchNot measured27.9%Only GPT-5.4 measured
Furniture assemblyNot measured37.5%Only GPT-5.4 measured
CL-bench LifeNot measured21.7%Only GPT-5.4 measured
LMArena TextNot measured1469Only GPT-5.4 measured
LMArena Text: instruction followingNot measured1469Only GPT-5.4 measured
LMArena Text: creative writingNot measured1439Only GPT-5.4 measured
LMArena VisionNot measured1303Only GPT-5.4 measured
LMArena Text: EnglishNot measured1467Only GPT-5.4 measured
LMArena Text: non-EnglishNot measured1465Only GPT-5.4 measured
LMArena Text: ChineseNot measured1520Only GPT-5.4 measured
LMArena Text: GermanNot measured1472Only GPT-5.4 measured
LMArena Text: JapaneseNot measured1485Only GPT-5.4 measured
LMArena Text: KoreanNot measured1449Only GPT-5.4 measured
LMArena Text: FrenchNot measured1493Only GPT-5.4 measured
LMArena Text: SpanishNot measured1452Only GPT-5.4 measured
LMArena Text: RussianNot measured1480Only GPT-5.4 measured
LMArena Text: PolishNot measured1472Only GPT-5.4 measured
LMArena Text: multi-turnNot measured1482Only GPT-5.4 measured
LMArena Text: longer queriesNot measured1473Only GPT-5.4 measured
LMArena Text: writing and languageNot measured1458Only GPT-5.4 measured
LMArena Text: entertainment and mediaNot measured1438Only GPT-5.4 measured
LMArena Vision: EnglishNot measured1301Only GPT-5.4 measured
LMArena Vision: ChineseNot measured1354Only GPT-5.4 measured
LMArena Vision: reading textNot measured1312Only GPT-5.4 measured
LMArena Vision: humorNot measured1284Only GPT-5.4 measured
LMArena Vision: recognizing thingsNot measured1251Only GPT-5.4 measured
LMArena Vision: creative writingNot measured1283Only GPT-5.4 measured
LMArena DocumentNot measured1471Only GPT-5.4 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 11 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05 and GPT-5.4
BenchmarkGemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05GPT-5.4Leader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05$0.0063Fits in one request
GPT-5.4$0.010Fits in one request

Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05 costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05$0.092Fits in one request
GPT-5.4$0.170Fits in one request

Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05 costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05$0.350Fits in one request
GPT-5.4$0.650Fits in one request

Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05 costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05 and GPT-5.4
SpecificationGoogle Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05OpenAI GPT-5.4
MakerGoogleOpenAI
WeightsNo public weights listedNo public weights listed
ReleasedJune 5, 2025March 5, 2026
Context window1.05M1.05M
Input $/Mtok$1.25$2.50
Output $/Mtok$10.00$15.00
Coding index83.137.7
Independent measurements behind it11
Cost per solved taskNot computable$1.02
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05 better than GPT-5.4 for coding?

Pick Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05 for coding: it scores 83.1 on the Vibe Coding Index against 37.7 for GPT-5.4. Pick GPT-5.4 when the context window is larger, 1.05M against 1.05M tokens, or when what matters is LiveCodeBench (Vals AI) or GSO-Bench, where it leads.

Which is cheaper, Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05 or GPT-5.4?

Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05 costs $1.25 per million input tokens and $10.00 per million output tokens; GPT-5.4 costs $2.50 and $15.00. Cost per solved task is known for GPT-5.4 only.

Which has the bigger context window, Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05 or GPT-5.4?

GPT-5.4, with 1.05M tokens against 1.05M.

How many benchmarks is the Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05 vs GPT-5.4 comparison based on?

7 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 21, 2026. Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05's coding index rests on 1 independent benchmark and GPT-5.4's on 1. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next