Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

Gemini 2.5 Flash vs MiMo-V2.5

MiMo-V2.5 leads Gemini 2.5 Flash on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, 21.8 to 15.5, and MiMo-V2.5 costs 7.4x less per output token ($0.336 vs $2.50 per million). Updated October 22, 2026; 54 benchmarks have a result for both.

Replace Gemini 2.5 Flash Replace MiMo-V2.5
Gemini 2.5 FlashGoogle
Coding
No data
Overall
34.3
Output $/M
$2.50
13
MiMo-V2.5Xiaomi
Coding
50.0
Overall
50.7
Output $/M
$0.336
41
vs boards won of 54 shared

Gemini 2.5 Flash or MiMo-V2.5: which to pick

Only MiMo-V2.5 has a coding score, 50.0 on the Vibe Coding Index; Gemini 2.5 Flash has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Pick Gemini 2.5 Flash for work measured by MedCode (Vals AI) or LMArena Text: legal and government, where it leads.

Model AGemini 2.5 FlashGoogleNot benchmarkedNo coding benchmark$0.466 per solved taskModel BMiMo-V2.5Xiaomi50.0/1003 independent benchmarks$0.01 per solved task
Shared results
54
Gemini 2.5 Flash only
19
MiMo-V2.5 only
26
Like-for-like categories
8 of 9

Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
Gemini 2.5 Flash not benchmarked, MiMo-V2.5 50.0 from 3 benchmarks.
Widest category
Agentic work, 59.1 points apart on average over 1 shared benchmark.
Widest single gap
τ²-Bench Telecom: Gemini 2.5 Flash 31.6% against MiMo-V2.5 90.6%, 59.1 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
Gemini 2.5 Flash $2.50 against MiMo-V2.5 $0.336 per million output tokens, 7.4x apart.
Context window
Gemini 2.5 Flash takes 1.05M tokens, MiMo-V2.5 1.05M.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryGemini 2.5 FlashBarsMiMo-V2.5Ties
Coding03
Intelligence01
Agentic work01
Reasoning07
Math02
Knowledge23
Web design07
General1117
All shared boards1341
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index03
Coding benchmarks for Gemini 2.5 Flash and MiMo-V2.5
BenchmarkGemini 2.5 FlashMiMo-V2.5Leader
SWE-bench Verified28.7%Not measuredOnly Gemini 2.5 Flash measured
LMArena WebDevNot measured1438Only MiMo-V2.5 measured
AA Coding IndexNot measured56.8Only MiMo-V2.5 measured
LiveCodeBench (Vals AI)Not measured81.5%Only MiMo-V2.5 measured
SWE-bench Verified (Vals AI)Not measured71.0%Only MiMo-V2.5 measured
Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI)Not measured42.2%Only MiMo-V2.5 measured
Code migration (Vals AI)Not measured14.2%Only MiMo-V2.5 measured
Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals AI)Not measured60.7%Only MiMo-V2.5 measured
LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run)69.5%Not measuredOnly Gemini 2.5 Flash measured
SciCodeNot measured43.9%Only MiMo-V2.5 measured
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)13.6%41.7%MiMo-V2.5
Terminal-Bench17.1%Not measuredOnly Gemini 2.5 Flash measured
ALE-BenchNot measured514.0Only MiMo-V2.5 measured
LMArena Text: coding14231469MiMo-V2.5
LMArena Text: software and IT14251463MiMo-V2.5
LMArena WebDev: ReactNot measured1425Only MiMo-V2.5 measured
LMArena WebDev: HTMLNot measured1429Only MiMo-V2.5 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 22 boards here
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
Intelligence benchmarks for Gemini 2.5 Flash and MiMo-V2.5
BenchmarkGemini 2.5 FlashMiMo-V2.5Leader
AA Intelligence Index15.521.8MiMo-V2.5
Epoch Capabilities Index142.9Not measuredOnly Gemini 2.5 Flash measured
Agentic workLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
Agentic work benchmarks for Gemini 2.5 Flash and MiMo-V2.5
BenchmarkGemini 2.5 FlashMiMo-V2.5Leader
AA Agentic IndexNot measured15.8Only MiMo-V2.5 measured
Finance Agent (Vals AI)Not measured36.7%Only MiMo-V2.5 measured
Tax Agent Bench (Vals AI)Not measured7.8%Only MiMo-V2.5 measured
Legal Research Bench (Vals AI)Not measured9.1%Only MiMo-V2.5 measured
Excel Modeling Benchmark (Vals AI)Not measured55.1%Only MiMo-V2.5 measured
τ²-Bench Telecom31.6%90.6%MiMo-V2.5
BALROG33.5%Not measuredOnly Gemini 2.5 Flash measured
Vending-Bench 2$549Not measuredOnly Gemini 2.5 Flash measured
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard (BFCL)56.2%Not measuredOnly Gemini 2.5 Flash measured
BrowseComp-Plus39.9%Not measuredOnly Gemini 2.5 Flash measured
Neither model has a result on the other 31 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index07
Reasoning benchmarks for Gemini 2.5 Flash and MiMo-V2.5
BenchmarkGemini 2.5 FlashMiMo-V2.5Leader
GPQA DiamondNot measured81.6%Only MiMo-V2.5 measured
MMMU Pro (Vals AI)Not measured80.0%Only MiMo-V2.5 measured
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)79.0%84.9%MiMo-V2.5
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)12.1%27.2%MiMo-V2.5
ARC-AGI33.3%Not measuredOnly Gemini 2.5 Flash measured
ARC-AGI-22.5%Not measuredOnly Gemini 2.5 Flash measured
SimpleBench41.2%Not measuredOnly Gemini 2.5 Flash measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts14221450MiMo-V2.5
LMArena Text: expert14261459MiMo-V2.5
LMArena Text: hard prompts in English14201461MiMo-V2.5
LMArena Vision: diagrams12451269MiMo-V2.5
LMArena Vision: homework12441262MiMo-V2.5
Kagi LLM Benchmark56.8%Not measuredOnly Gemini 2.5 Flash measured
Neither model has a result on the other 9 boards here
MathLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index02
Math benchmarks for Gemini 2.5 Flash and MiMo-V2.5
BenchmarkGemini 2.5 FlashMiMo-V2.5Leader
AA Math Index73.3Not measuredOnly Gemini 2.5 Flash measured
AIME 2025 (Artificial Analysis run)73.3%Not measuredOnly Gemini 2.5 Flash measured
ProofBenchNot measured16.0%Only MiMo-V2.5 measured
LMArena Text: math14111436MiMo-V2.5
LMArena Text: mathematical work14221451MiMo-V2.5
Neither model has a result on the other 8 boards here
KnowledgeLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index23
Knowledge benchmarks for Gemini 2.5 Flash and MiMo-V2.5
BenchmarkGemini 2.5 FlashMiMo-V2.5Leader
MMLU ProNot measured82.9%Only MiMo-V2.5 measured
LegalBench (Vals AI)Not measured78.9%Only MiMo-V2.5 measured
CorpFin (Vals AI)Not measured59.9%Only MiMo-V2.5 measured
TaxEval (Vals AI)Not measured71.8%Only MiMo-V2.5 measured
MortgageTax (Vals AI)Not measured59.3%Only MiMo-V2.5 measured
MedCode (Vals AI)40.4%31.9%Gemini 2.5 Flash
MMLU Pro (Artificial Analysis run)83.2%Not measuredOnly Gemini 2.5 Flash measured
LMArena Text: science14331440MiMo-V2.5
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare14281432MiMo-V2.5
LMArena Text: legal and government14301425Gemini 2.5 Flash
LMArena Text: business and finance14041432MiMo-V2.5
FACTS Benchmark Suite47.2%Not measuredOnly Gemini 2.5 Flash measured
Neither model has a result on the other 6 boards here
Web designLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index07
Web design benchmarks for Gemini 2.5 Flash and MiMo-V2.5
BenchmarkGemini 2.5 FlashMiMo-V2.5Leader
Design Arena: websites10741265MiMo-V2.5
Design Arena: UI components10021255MiMo-V2.5
Design Arena: game dev10041249MiMo-V2.5
Design Arena: data viz10601250MiMo-V2.5
Design Arena: 3D10201215MiMo-V2.5
Design Arena: all code categories10591260MiMo-V2.5
Design Arena: SVG10201179MiMo-V2.5
Design Arena: ASCII artNot measured1140Only MiMo-V2.5 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index1117
General benchmarks for Gemini 2.5 Flash and MiMo-V2.5
BenchmarkGemini 2.5 FlashMiMo-V2.5Leader
SAGE (Vals AI)44.8%43.3%Gemini 2.5 Flash
MedScribe (Vals AI)83.0%72.2%Gemini 2.5 Flash
Vals Multimodal IndexNot measured52.8%Only MiMo-V2.5 measured
IFBench50.3%67.1%MiMo-V2.5
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)65.3%73.0%MiMo-V2.5
DTBench76.5%Not measuredOnly Gemini 2.5 Flash measured
LMCA27.5%Not measuredOnly Gemini 2.5 Flash measured
LMArena Text14171428MiMo-V2.5
LMArena Text: instruction following14051435MiMo-V2.5
LMArena Text: creative writing14001393Gemini 2.5 Flash
LMArena Vision12351247MiMo-V2.5
LMArena Text: English14181447MiMo-V2.5
LMArena Text: non-English14091405Gemini 2.5 Flash
LMArena Text: Chinese14491469MiMo-V2.5
LMArena Text: German14171421MiMo-V2.5
LMArena Text: Japanese13961306Gemini 2.5 Flash
LMArena Text: Korean13851361Gemini 2.5 Flash
LMArena Text: French14321448MiMo-V2.5
LMArena Text: Spanish14221414Gemini 2.5 Flash
LMArena Text: Russian14151396Gemini 2.5 Flash
LMArena Text: Polish14131413Gemini 2.5 Flash
LMArena Text: multi-turn14081445MiMo-V2.5
LMArena Text: longer queries14191445MiMo-V2.5
LMArena Text: writing and language14051409MiMo-V2.5
LMArena Text: entertainment and media13931399MiMo-V2.5
LMArena Vision: English12391259MiMo-V2.5
LMArena Vision: Chinese12841326MiMo-V2.5
LMArena Vision: reading text12371256MiMo-V2.5
LMArena Vision: humor12251226MiMo-V2.5
LMArena Vision: captioning1277Not measuredOnly Gemini 2.5 Flash measured
LMArena Vision: recognizing things12521189Gemini 2.5 Flash
LMArena Vision: creative writing12411230Gemini 2.5 Flash
Neither model has a result on the other 14 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for Gemini 2.5 Flash and MiMo-V2.5
BenchmarkGemini 2.5 FlashMiMo-V2.5Leader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

Gemini 2.5 Flash$0.0015Fits in one request
MiMo-V2.5$0.0003Fits in one request

MiMo-V2.5 costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

Gemini 2.5 Flash$0.022Fits in one request
MiMo-V2.5$0.0094Fits in one request

MiMo-V2.5 costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

Gemini 2.5 Flash$0.085Fits in one request
MiMo-V2.5$0.037Fits in one request

MiMo-V2.5 costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of Gemini 2.5 Flash and MiMo-V2.5
SpecificationGoogle Gemini 2.5 FlashXiaomi MiMo-V2.5
MakerGoogleXiaomi
WeightsNo public weights listedOpen weights
ReleasedJune 17, 2025April 22, 2026
Context window1.05M1.05M
Input $/Mtok$0.30$0.168
Output $/Mtok$2.50$0.336
Coding indexNot benchmarked50.0
Independent measurements behind it03
Cost per solved task$0.466$0.01
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is Gemini 2.5 Flash better than MiMo-V2.5 for coding?

Only MiMo-V2.5 has a coding score, 50.0 on the Vibe Coding Index; Gemini 2.5 Flash has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Pick Gemini 2.5 Flash for work measured by MedCode (Vals AI) or LMArena Text: legal and government, where it leads.

Which is cheaper, Gemini 2.5 Flash or MiMo-V2.5?

Gemini 2.5 Flash costs $0.30 per million input tokens and $2.50 per million output tokens; MiMo-V2.5 costs $0.168 and $0.336. Per solved SWE-bench Verified task, Gemini 2.5 Flash costs $0.466 and MiMo-V2.5 $0.01.

Which has the bigger context window, Gemini 2.5 Flash or MiMo-V2.5?

MiMo-V2.5, with 1.05M tokens against 1.05M.

How many benchmarks is the Gemini 2.5 Flash vs MiMo-V2.5 comparison based on?

54 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 22, 2026. Gemini 2.5 Flash's coding index rests on 0 independent benchmarks and MiMo-V2.5's on 3. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next