Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

Ember-1 vs Mistral Large

Updated October 21, 2026. No benchmark has tested both models yet. Coding is ranked on the Vibe Coding Index; every other board is shown as published.

Ember-1Fireworks
Coding
52.6
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$15.00
Mistral LargeMistral AI
Coding
No data
Overall
5.8
Output $/M
$6.00
vs $15.00 vs $6.00 per 1M output tokens. Mistral Large is 2.5x cheaper.

Decision reading

Only Ember-1 has a coding score, 52.6 on the Vibe Coding Index; Mistral Large has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Mistral Large has the edge where output tokens cost 2.5x less.

No benchmark has tested both yet. Ember-1 has results on Terminal-Bench 4 (Vals AI), Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI) and Code migration (Vals AI); Mistral Large on LiveCodeBench (Vals AI), LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run) and LMArena Text: coding. Compare them on price and context instead.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
Ember-1 52.6 from 2 benchmarks, Mistral Large not benchmarked.
Widest category
None yet: no category has been tested on both models.
Widest single gap
None yet: no benchmark has tested both models.
Output price
Ember-1 $15.00 against Mistral Large $6.00 per million output tokens, 2.5x apart.
Context window
Ember-1 takes 1.05M tokens, Mistral Large 128K.

Benchmark by benchmark

Every board either model has a result on, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale. Only one model is measured on each, so no row names a leader.

CodingDirectional onlySix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index9 boards measured
Coding benchmarks for Ember-1 and Mistral Large
BenchmarkEmber-1Mistral LargeLeader
LiveCodeBench (Vals AI)Not measured37.1%Only Mistral Large measured
Terminal-Bench 4 (Vals AI)20.7%Not measuredOnly Ember-1 measured
Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI)83.9%Not measuredOnly Ember-1 measured
Code migration (Vals AI)32.5%Not measuredOnly Ember-1 measured
IOI (Vals AI)46.3%Not measuredOnly Ember-1 measured
CyberBench (Vals AI)69.5%Not measuredOnly Ember-1 measured
LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured17.8%Only Mistral Large measured
LMArena Text: codingNot measured1275Only Mistral Large measured
LMArena Text: software and ITNot measured1274Only Mistral Large measured
Neither model has a result on the other 29 boards here
IntelligenceDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index2 boards measured
Intelligence benchmarks for Ember-1 and Mistral Large
BenchmarkEmber-1Mistral LargeLeader
AA Intelligence IndexNot measured5.8Only Mistral Large measured
Epoch Capabilities IndexNot measured122.1Only Mistral Large measured
Agentic workDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index7 boards measured
Agentic work benchmarks for Ember-1 and Mistral Large
BenchmarkEmber-1Mistral LargeLeader
Finance Agent (Vals AI)51.8%Not measuredOnly Ember-1 measured
Tax Agent Bench (Vals AI)31.1%Not measuredOnly Ember-1 measured
Legal Research Bench (Vals AI)44.7%Not measuredOnly Ember-1 measured
Excel Modeling Benchmark (Vals AI)63.4%Not measuredOnly Ember-1 measured
BioMysteryBench (Vals AI)67.0%Not measuredOnly Ember-1 measured
Terminal-Bench-Science (Vals AI)5.7%Not measuredOnly Ember-1 measured
Vals Science Index31.8%Not measuredOnly Ember-1 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 32 boards here
ReasoningDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index7 boards measured
Reasoning benchmarks for Ember-1 and Mistral Large
BenchmarkEmber-1Mistral LargeLeader
GPQA DiamondNot measured47.7%Only Mistral Large measured
MysteryMechanism (Vals AI)22.5%Not measuredOnly Ember-1 measured
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured35.1%Only Mistral Large measured
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured3.5%Only Mistral Large measured
LMArena Text: hard promptsNot measured1257Only Mistral Large measured
LMArena Text: expertNot measured1208Only Mistral Large measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts in EnglishNot measured1268Only Mistral Large measured
Neither model has a result on the other 14 boards here
MathDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index5 boards measured
Math benchmarks for Ember-1 and Mistral Large
BenchmarkEmber-1Mistral LargeLeader
AIMENot measured9.2%Only Mistral Large measured
MATH 500 (Vals AI)Not measured74.4%Only Mistral Large measured
MGSM (Vals AI)Not measured87.2%Only Mistral Large measured
LMArena Text: mathNot measured1261Only Mistral Large measured
LMArena Text: mathematical workNot measured1257Only Mistral Large measured
Neither model has a result on the other 8 boards here
KnowledgeDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index9 boards measured
Knowledge benchmarks for Ember-1 and Mistral Large
BenchmarkEmber-1Mistral LargeLeader
MMLU ProNot measured69.7%Only Mistral Large measured
TaxEval (Vals AI)Not measured63.8%Only Mistral Large measured
MedQA (Vals AI)Not measured76.2%Only Mistral Large measured
MMLU Pro (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured51.5%Only Mistral Large measured
MMLUNot measured68.8%Only Mistral Large measured
LMArena Text: scienceNot measured1260Only Mistral Large measured
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcareNot measured1255Only Mistral Large measured
LMArena Text: legal and governmentNot measured1275Only Mistral Large measured
LMArena Text: business and financeNot measured1238Only Mistral Large measured
Neither model has a result on the other 8 boards here
GeneralDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index19 boards measured
General benchmarks for Ember-1 and Mistral Large
BenchmarkEmber-1Mistral LargeLeader
Public Benefits Bench (Vals AI)66.2%Not measuredOnly Ember-1 measured
DTBenchNot measured60.8%Only Mistral Large measured
LMArena TextNot measured1265Only Mistral Large measured
LMArena Text: instruction followingNot measured1249Only Mistral Large measured
LMArena Text: creative writingNot measured1242Only Mistral Large measured
LMArena Text: EnglishNot measured1284Only Mistral Large measured
LMArena Text: non-EnglishNot measured1235Only Mistral Large measured
LMArena Text: ChineseNot measured1239Only Mistral Large measured
LMArena Text: GermanNot measured1242Only Mistral Large measured
LMArena Text: JapaneseNot measured1170Only Mistral Large measured
LMArena Text: KoreanNot measured1202Only Mistral Large measured
LMArena Text: FrenchNot measured1325Only Mistral Large measured
LMArena Text: SpanishNot measured1268Only Mistral Large measured
LMArena Text: RussianNot measured1252Only Mistral Large measured
LMArena Text: PolishNot measured1157Only Mistral Large measured
LMArena Text: multi-turnNot measured1260Only Mistral Large measured
LMArena Text: longer queriesNot measured1261Only Mistral Large measured
LMArena Text: writing and languageNot measured1261Only Mistral Large measured
LMArena Text: entertainment and mediaNot measured1230Only Mistral Large measured
Neither model has a result on the other 27 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

Ember-1$0.011Fits in one request
Mistral Large$0.0050Fits in one request

Mistral Large costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

Ember-1$0.195Fits in one request
Mistral Large$0.118Fits in one request

Mistral Large costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

Ember-1$0.750Fits in one request
Mistral Large$0.460Exceeds the context window

Mistral Large costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of Ember-1 and Mistral Large
SpecificationFireworks Ember-1Mistral Large
MakerFireworksMistral AI
WeightsNo public weights listedNo public weights listed
ReleasedSeptember 24, 2026February 26, 2024
Context window1.05M128K
Input $/Mtok$3.00$2.00
Output $/Mtok$15.00$6.00
Coding index52.6Not benchmarked
Independent measurements behind it20
Cost per solved taskNot computableNot computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is Ember-1 better than Mistral Large for coding?

Only Ember-1 has a coding score, 52.6 on the Vibe Coding Index; Mistral Large has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Mistral Large has the edge where output tokens cost 2.5x less.

Which is cheaper, Ember-1 or Mistral Large?

Ember-1 costs $3.00 per million input tokens and $15.00 per million output tokens; Mistral Large costs $2.00 and $6.00. Cost per solved task is known for neither of them.

Which has the bigger context window, Ember-1 or Mistral Large?

Ember-1, with 1.05M tokens against 128K.

Has any benchmark tested both Ember-1 and Mistral Large?

No benchmark has tested both yet. Ember-1 has results on Terminal-Bench 4 (Vals AI), Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI) and Code migration (Vals AI); Mistral Large on LiveCodeBench (Vals AI), LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run) and LMArena Text: coding. Compare them on price and context instead. Data as of October 21, 2026.

Compare next