Ember-1 vs MiniMax M2.7
Ember-1 leads MiniMax M2.7 on coding, 52.6 to 36.2 on the Vibe Coding Index, and MiniMax M2.7 costs 12.5x less per output token ($1.20 vs $15.00 per million). Updated October 22, 2026; 6 benchmarks have a result for both.
Ember-1 or MiniMax M2.7: which to pick
Pick Ember-1 for coding: it scores 52.6 on the Vibe Coding Index against 36.2 for MiniMax M2.7, though on 2 benchmarks against 3.
Pick MiniMax M2.7 for output tokens 12.5x cheaper ($1.20 vs $15.00 per million).
- Shared results
- 6
- Ember-1 only
- 8
- MiniMax M2.7 only
- 68
- Like-for-like categories
- 2 of 9
Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.
Which one for your work
Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.
Coding
Vibe Coding Index, six public coding benchmarks
Ember-1
Ember-1 scores 52.6 against 36.2.
2 and 3 benchmarks behind the scores
Intelligence
AA Intelligence Index
No call
Only MiniMax M2.7 has a AA Intelligence Index result, 22.8.
Directional only
Agentic work
AA Agentic Index
No call
Only MiniMax M2.7 has a AA Agentic Index result, 15.3.
Directional only
Reasoning
GPQA Diamond
No call
Only MiniMax M2.7 has a GPQA Diamond result, 86.6%.
Directional only
Math
AIME
No call
Only MiniMax M2.7 has a AIME result, 91.0%.
Directional only
Knowledge
MMLU Pro
No call
Only MiniMax M2.7 has a MMLU Pro result, 80.4%.
Directional only
Web design
Design Arena: websites
No call
Only MiniMax M2.7 has a Design Arena: websites result, 1242.
Directional only
Long documents
Listed context window
Ember-1
Ember-1 takes 1.05M tokens against 205K.
Listed by OpenRouter
Everyday cost
1K input + 500 output tokens
MiniMax M2.7
Ember-1 $0.011, MiniMax M2.7 $0.0009 per turn.
List prices
Cost per solved task
One SWE-bench Verified task, solved
No call
Only MiniMax M2.7 has the number, $0.64.
Directional only
At a glance
- Coding index
- Ember-1 52.6 from 2 benchmarks, MiniMax M2.7 36.2 from 3 benchmarks.
- Widest category
- Coding, 47.9 points apart on average over 2 shared benchmarks.
- Widest single gap
- Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI): Ember-1 83.9% against MiniMax M2.7 11.9%, 71.9 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
- Output price
- Ember-1 $15.00 against MiniMax M2.7 $1.20 per million output tokens, 12.5x apart.
- Context window
- Ember-1 takes 1.05M tokens, MiniMax M2.7 205K.
Benchmark by benchmark
First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.
| Category | Ember-1 | Bars | MiniMax M2.7 | Ties |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Coding | 2 | 0 | ||
| Agentic work | 4 | 0 | ||
| All shared boards | 6 | 0 |
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index20
| Benchmark | Ember-1 | MiniMax M2.7 | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| LMArena WebDev | Not measured | 1399 | Only MiniMax M2.7 measured |
| AA Coding Index | Not measured | 52.6 | Only MiniMax M2.7 measured |
| LiveCodeBench (Vals AI) | Not measured | 79.9% | Only MiniMax M2.7 measured |
| SWE-bench Verified (Vals AI) | Not measured | 73.8% | Only MiniMax M2.7 measured |
| Terminal-Bench 4 (Vals AI) | 20.7% | Not measured | Only Ember-1 measured |
| Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI) | 83.9% | 11.9% | Ember-1 |
| Code migration (Vals AI) | 32.5% | 8.7% | Ember-1 |
| ProgramBench (Vals AI) | Not measured | 0.0% | Only MiniMax M2.7 measured |
| IOI (Vals AI) | 46.3% | Not measured | Only Ember-1 measured |
| Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals AI) | Not measured | 48.7% | Only MiniMax M2.7 measured |
| CyberBench (Vals AI) | 69.5% | Not measured | Only Ember-1 measured |
| SciCode | Not measured | 50.1% | Only MiniMax M2.7 measured |
| Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run) | Not measured | 39.4% | Only MiniMax M2.7 measured |
| Terminal-Bench | Not measured | 45.1% | Only MiniMax M2.7 measured |
| WeirdML | Not measured | 37.0% | Only MiniMax M2.7 measured |
| ALE-Bench | Not measured | 599.3 | Only MiniMax M2.7 measured |
| LMArena Text: coding | Not measured | 1454 | Only MiniMax M2.7 measured |
| LMArena Text: software and IT | Not measured | 1446 | Only MiniMax M2.7 measured |
| LMArena WebDev: React | Not measured | 1388 | Only MiniMax M2.7 measured |
| LMArena WebDev: HTML | Not measured | 1401 | Only MiniMax M2.7 measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 23 boards here | |||
IntelligenceDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index2 boards, none shared
| Benchmark | Ember-1 | MiniMax M2.7 | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| AA Intelligence Index | Not measured | 22.8 | Only MiniMax M2.7 measured |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | Not measured | 145.8 | Only MiniMax M2.7 measured |
Agentic workLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index40
| Benchmark | Ember-1 | MiniMax M2.7 | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| AA Agentic Index | Not measured | 15.3 | Only MiniMax M2.7 measured |
| Finance Agent (Vals AI) | 51.8% | 27.9% | Ember-1 |
| Tax Agent Bench (Vals AI) | 31.1% | 6.9% | Ember-1 |
| Legal Research Bench (Vals AI) | 44.7% | 10.6% | Ember-1 |
| Excel Modeling Benchmark (Vals AI) | 63.4% | 28.4% | Ember-1 |
| BioMysteryBench (Vals AI) | 67.0% | Not measured | Only Ember-1 measured |
| Terminal-Bench-Science (Vals AI) | 5.7% | Not measured | Only Ember-1 measured |
| Vals Science Index | 31.8% | Not measured | Only Ember-1 measured |
| τ²-Bench Telecom | Not measured | 84.8% | Only MiniMax M2.7 measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 33 boards here | |||
ReasoningDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index7 boards, none shared
| Benchmark | Ember-1 | MiniMax M2.7 | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | Not measured | 86.6% | Only MiniMax M2.7 measured |
| MysteryMechanism (Vals AI) | 22.5% | Not measured | Only Ember-1 measured |
| GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run) | Not measured | 87.4% | Only MiniMax M2.7 measured |
| Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run) | Not measured | 29.6% | Only MiniMax M2.7 measured |
| LMArena Text: hard prompts | Not measured | 1422 | Only MiniMax M2.7 measured |
| LMArena Text: expert | Not measured | 1443 | Only MiniMax M2.7 measured |
| LMArena Text: hard prompts in English | Not measured | 1441 | Only MiniMax M2.7 measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 16 boards here | |||
MathDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index4 boards, none shared
| Benchmark | Ember-1 | MiniMax M2.7 | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| AIME | Not measured | 91.0% | Only MiniMax M2.7 measured |
| ProofBench | Not measured | 3.0% | Only MiniMax M2.7 measured |
| LMArena Text: math | Not measured | 1421 | Only MiniMax M2.7 measured |
| LMArena Text: mathematical work | Not measured | 1437 | Only MiniMax M2.7 measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 10 boards here | |||
KnowledgeDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index10 boards, none shared
| Benchmark | Ember-1 | MiniMax M2.7 | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| MMLU Pro | Not measured | 80.4% | Only MiniMax M2.7 measured |
| LegalBench (Vals AI) | Not measured | 84.0% | Only MiniMax M2.7 measured |
| CaseLaw (Vals AI) | Not measured | 60.9% | Only MiniMax M2.7 measured |
| CorpFin (Vals AI) | Not measured | 61.2% | Only MiniMax M2.7 measured |
| TaxEval (Vals AI) | Not measured | 66.6% | Only MiniMax M2.7 measured |
| MedCode (Vals AI) | Not measured | 34.4% | Only MiniMax M2.7 measured |
| LMArena Text: science | Not measured | 1416 | Only MiniMax M2.7 measured |
| LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare | Not measured | 1409 | Only MiniMax M2.7 measured |
| LMArena Text: legal and government | Not measured | 1403 | Only MiniMax M2.7 measured |
| LMArena Text: business and finance | Not measured | 1407 | Only MiniMax M2.7 measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 10 boards here | |||
Web designDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index8 boards, none shared
| Benchmark | Ember-1 | MiniMax M2.7 | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| Design Arena: websites | Not measured | 1242 | Only MiniMax M2.7 measured |
| Design Arena: UI components | Not measured | 1207 | Only MiniMax M2.7 measured |
| Design Arena: game dev | Not measured | 1209 | Only MiniMax M2.7 measured |
| Design Arena: data viz | Not measured | 1233 | Only MiniMax M2.7 measured |
| Design Arena: 3D | Not measured | 1194 | Only MiniMax M2.7 measured |
| Design Arena: all code categories | Not measured | 1233 | Only MiniMax M2.7 measured |
| Design Arena: SVG | Not measured | 1137 | Only MiniMax M2.7 measured |
| Design Arena: ASCII art | Not measured | 1136 | Only MiniMax M2.7 measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here | |||
GeneralDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index22 boards, none shared
| Benchmark | Ember-1 | MiniMax M2.7 | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| Public Benefits Bench (Vals AI) | 66.2% | Not measured | Only Ember-1 measured |
| MedScribe (Vals AI) | Not measured | 79.9% | Only MiniMax M2.7 measured |
| IFBench | Not measured | 75.7% | Only MiniMax M2.7 measured |
| Long context reasoning (AA-LCR) | Not measured | 78.3% | Only MiniMax M2.7 measured |
| ExploitBench | Not measured | 13.3% | Only MiniMax M2.7 measured |
| LMArena Text | Not measured | 1405 | Only MiniMax M2.7 measured |
| LMArena Text: instruction following | Not measured | 1405 | Only MiniMax M2.7 measured |
| LMArena Text: creative writing | Not measured | 1354 | Only MiniMax M2.7 measured |
| LMArena Text: English | Not measured | 1426 | Only MiniMax M2.7 measured |
| LMArena Text: non-English | Not measured | 1382 | Only MiniMax M2.7 measured |
| LMArena Text: Chinese | Not measured | 1442 | Only MiniMax M2.7 measured |
| LMArena Text: German | Not measured | 1398 | Only MiniMax M2.7 measured |
| LMArena Text: Japanese | Not measured | 1260 | Only MiniMax M2.7 measured |
| LMArena Text: Korean | Not measured | 1314 | Only MiniMax M2.7 measured |
| LMArena Text: French | Not measured | 1424 | Only MiniMax M2.7 measured |
| LMArena Text: Spanish | Not measured | 1402 | Only MiniMax M2.7 measured |
| LMArena Text: Russian | Not measured | 1383 | Only MiniMax M2.7 measured |
| LMArena Text: Polish | Not measured | 1387 | Only MiniMax M2.7 measured |
| LMArena Text: multi-turn | Not measured | 1412 | Only MiniMax M2.7 measured |
| LMArena Text: longer queries | Not measured | 1418 | Only MiniMax M2.7 measured |
| LMArena Text: writing and language | Not measured | 1376 | Only MiniMax M2.7 measured |
| LMArena Text: entertainment and media | Not measured | 1360 | Only MiniMax M2.7 measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 26 boards here | |||
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
| Benchmark | Ember-1 | MiniMax M2.7 | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| Neither model has a result on 5 boards here | |||
What each workload costs
Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.
Chat turn
1K input + 500 output tokens
MiniMax M2.7 costs less
Repository review
50K input + 3K output tokens
MiniMax M2.7 costs less
Agent loop
200K input + 10K output tokens
MiniMax M2.7 costs less
Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.
Specification differences
The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.
| Specification | Fireworks Ember-1 | MiniMax M2.7 |
|---|---|---|
| Maker | Fireworks | MiniMax |
| Weights | No public weights listed | Open weights |
| Released | September 24, 2026 | March 18, 2026 |
| Context window | 1.05M | 205K |
| Input $/Mtok | $3.00 | $0.30 |
| Output $/Mtok | $15.00 | $1.20 |
| Coding index | 52.6 | 36.2 |
| Independent measurements behind it | 2 | 3 |
| Cost per solved task | Not computable | $0.64 |
| Source | OpenRouter listing | OpenRouter listing |
Questions
Is Ember-1 better than MiniMax M2.7 for coding?
Pick Ember-1 for coding: it scores 52.6 on the Vibe Coding Index against 36.2 for MiniMax M2.7, though on 2 benchmarks against 3. Pick MiniMax M2.7 for output tokens 12.5x cheaper ($1.20 vs $15.00 per million).
Which is cheaper, Ember-1 or MiniMax M2.7?
Ember-1 costs $3.00 per million input tokens and $15.00 per million output tokens; MiniMax M2.7 costs $0.30 and $1.20. Cost per solved task is known for MiniMax M2.7 only.
Which has the bigger context window, Ember-1 or MiniMax M2.7?
Ember-1, with 1.05M tokens against 205K.
How many benchmarks is the Ember-1 vs MiniMax M2.7 comparison based on?
6 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 22, 2026. Ember-1's coding index rests on 2 independent benchmarks and MiniMax M2.7's on 3. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.