Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

Ember-1 vs Muse Spark 1.3

Muse Spark 1.3 leads Ember-1 on coding, 57.4 to 52.6 on the Vibe Coding Index, and Muse Spark 1.3 costs 3.5x less per output token ($4.25 vs $15.00 per million). Updated October 22, 2026; 10 benchmarks have a result for both.

Ember-1Fireworks
Coding
52.6
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$15.00
8
Muse Spark 1.3Meta
Coding
57.4
Overall
68.6
Output $/M
$4.25
2
vs boards won of 10 shared

Ember-1 or Muse Spark 1.3: which to pick

Pick Muse Spark 1.3 for coding: it scores 57.4 on the Vibe Coding Index against 52.6 for Ember-1.

Pick Ember-1 for work measured by Terminal-Bench 4 (Vals AI) or Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI), where it leads.

Shared results
10
Ember-1 only
4
Muse Spark 1.3 only
82
Like-for-like categories
2 of 9

Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
Ember-1 52.6 from 2 benchmarks, Muse Spark 1.3 57.4 from 4 benchmarks.
Widest category
Coding, 4.4 points apart on average over 5 shared benchmarks.
Widest single gap
Terminal-Bench 4 (Vals AI): Ember-1 20.7% against Muse Spark 1.3 10.6%, 13.5 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
Ember-1 $15.00 against Muse Spark 1.3 $4.25 per million output tokens, 3.5x apart.
Context window
Both take 1.05M tokens.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryEmber-1BarsMuse Spark 1.3Ties
Coding50
Agentic work32
All shared boards82
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index50
Coding benchmarks for Ember-1 and Muse Spark 1.3
BenchmarkEmber-1Muse Spark 1.3Leader
LiveBench codingNot measured90.2%Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
LMArena WebDevNot measured1659Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
AA Coding IndexNot measured75.8Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
Terminal-Bench 4 (Vals AI)20.7%10.6%Ember-1
Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI)83.9%82.9%Ember-1
Code migration (Vals AI)32.5%27.6%Ember-1
ProgramBench (Vals AI)Not measured0.5%Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
IOI (Vals AI)46.3%43.9%Ember-1
Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals AI)Not measured72.3%Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
CyberBench (Vals AI)69.5%69.4%Ember-1
SciCodeNot measured59.7%Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
FrontierSWENot measured25.8%Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
ALE-BenchNot measured1688.3Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
LMArena Text: codingNot measured1510Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
LMArena Text: software and ITNot measured1511Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
LMArena WebDev: ReactNot measured1672Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
LMArena WebDev: HTMLNot measured1653Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
LMArena WebDev: from an imageNot measured1640Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 21 boards here
IntelligenceDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index2 boards, none shared
Intelligence benchmarks for Ember-1 and Muse Spark 1.3
BenchmarkEmber-1Muse Spark 1.3Leader
AA Intelligence IndexNot measured48.1Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
Epoch Capabilities IndexNot measured157.2Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
Agentic workLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index32
Agentic work benchmarks for Ember-1 and Muse Spark 1.3
BenchmarkEmber-1Muse Spark 1.3Leader
AA Agentic IndexNot measured55.5Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
Design Arena: agents building web appsNot measured1297Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
Design Arena: agents building full-stack appsNot measured1295Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
Design Arena: agents building mobile appsNot measured1218Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
Design Arena: agents building Godot gamesNot measured1241Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
Design Arena: PowerPoint slidesNot measured1219Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
Design Arena: spreadsheetsNot measured1062Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
LiveBench researchNot measured68.6%Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
LiveBench browserNot measured80.0%Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
LiveBench long agenticNot measured40.4%Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
Finance Agent (Vals AI)51.8%58.9%Muse Spark 1.3
Tax Agent Bench (Vals AI)31.1%36.0%Muse Spark 1.3
Legal Research Bench (Vals AI)44.7%40.9%Ember-1
Excel Modeling Benchmark (Vals AI)63.4%62.7%Ember-1
BioMysteryBench (Vals AI)67.0%Not measuredOnly Ember-1 measured
Terminal-Bench-Science (Vals AI)5.7%4.3%Ember-1
Vals Science Index31.8%Not measuredOnly Ember-1 measured
APEX-AgentsNot measured58.6%Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 23 boards here
ReasoningDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index11 boards, none shared
Reasoning benchmarks for Ember-1 and Muse Spark 1.3
BenchmarkEmber-1Muse Spark 1.3Leader
LiveBench reasoningNot measured89.7%Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
MysteryMechanism (Vals AI)22.5%Not measuredOnly Ember-1 measured
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured94.1%Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured48.7%Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
Chess puzzlesNot measured37.0%Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
Mystery game puzzlesNot measured25.0%Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
LMArena Text: hard promptsNot measured1503Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
LMArena Text: expertNot measured1519Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts in EnglishNot measured1500Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
LMArena Vision: diagramsNot measured1330Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
LMArena Vision: homeworkNot measured1296Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 11 boards here
MathDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index6 boards, none shared
Math benchmarks for Ember-1 and Muse Spark 1.3
BenchmarkEmber-1Muse Spark 1.3Leader
OTIS Mock AIMENot measured99.2%Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
FrontierMath, tiers 1 to 3Not measured74.4%Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
FrontierMath, tier 4Not measured46.3%Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
ProofBenchNot measured58.0%Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
LMArena Text: mathNot measured1497Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
LMArena Text: mathematical workNot measured1491Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 7 boards here
KnowledgeDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index4 boards, none shared
Knowledge benchmarks for Ember-1 and Muse Spark 1.3
BenchmarkEmber-1Muse Spark 1.3Leader
LMArena Text: scienceNot measured1507Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcareNot measured1493Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
LMArena Text: legal and governmentNot measured1499Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
LMArena Text: business and financeNot measured1490Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 14 boards here
Web designDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index9 boards, none shared
Web design benchmarks for Ember-1 and Muse Spark 1.3
BenchmarkEmber-1Muse Spark 1.3Leader
Design Arena: websitesNot measured1356Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
Design Arena: UI componentsNot measured1349Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
Design Arena: game devNot measured1328Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
Design Arena: data vizNot measured1343Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
Design Arena: 3DNot measured1358Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
Design Arena: all code categoriesNot measured1352Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
Design Arena: SVGNot measured1301Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
Design Arena: ASCII artNot measured1278Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
LiveBench designNot measured74.8%Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
GeneralDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index28 boards, none shared
General benchmarks for Ember-1 and Muse Spark 1.3
BenchmarkEmber-1Muse Spark 1.3Leader
LiveBench data analysisNot measured79.6%Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
Public Benefits Bench (Vals AI)66.2%Not measuredOnly Ember-1 measured
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)Not measured83.0%Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
DTBenchNot measured96.5%Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
LMCANot measured53.9%Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
LMArena TextNot measured1490Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
LMArena Text: instruction followingNot measured1479Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
LMArena Text: creative writingNot measured1462Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
LMArena VisionNot measured1308Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
LMArena Text: EnglishNot measured1495Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
LMArena Text: non-EnglishNot measured1481Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
LMArena Text: ChineseNot measured1532Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
LMArena Text: GermanNot measured1513Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
LMArena Text: JapaneseNot measured1470Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
LMArena Text: KoreanNot measured1490Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
LMArena Text: FrenchNot measured1511Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
LMArena Text: SpanishNot measured1496Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
LMArena Text: RussianNot measured1491Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
LMArena Text: PolishNot measured1490Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
LMArena Text: multi-turnNot measured1487Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
LMArena Text: longer queriesNot measured1488Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
LMArena Text: writing and languageNot measured1470Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
LMArena Text: entertainment and mediaNot measured1457Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
LMArena Vision: EnglishNot measured1298Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
LMArena Vision: ChineseNot measured1384Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
LMArena Vision: reading textNot measured1319Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
LMArena Vision: humorNot measured1293Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
LMArena Vision: creative writingNot measured1296Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 18 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for Ember-1 and Muse Spark 1.3
BenchmarkEmber-1Muse Spark 1.3Leader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

Ember-1$0.011Fits in one request
Muse Spark 1.3$0.0034Fits in one request

Muse Spark 1.3 costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

Ember-1$0.195Fits in one request
Muse Spark 1.3$0.075Fits in one request

Muse Spark 1.3 costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

Ember-1$0.750Fits in one request
Muse Spark 1.3$0.292Fits in one request

Muse Spark 1.3 costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of Ember-1 and Muse Spark 1.3
SpecificationFireworks Ember-1Meta Muse Spark 1.3
MakerFireworksMeta
WeightsNo public weights listedNo public weights listed
ReleasedSeptember 24, 2026September 2, 2026
Context window1.05M1.05M
Input $/Mtok$3.00$1.25
Output $/Mtok$15.00$4.25
Coding index52.657.4
Independent measurements behind it24
Cost per solved taskNot computableNot computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is Ember-1 better than Muse Spark 1.3 for coding?

Pick Muse Spark 1.3 for coding: it scores 57.4 on the Vibe Coding Index against 52.6 for Ember-1. Pick Ember-1 for work measured by Terminal-Bench 4 (Vals AI) or Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI), where it leads.

Which is cheaper, Ember-1 or Muse Spark 1.3?

Ember-1 costs $3.00 per million input tokens and $15.00 per million output tokens; Muse Spark 1.3 costs $1.25 and $4.25. Cost per solved task is known for neither of them.

Which has the bigger context window, Ember-1 or Muse Spark 1.3?

Neither: both take 1.05M tokens.

How many benchmarks is the Ember-1 vs Muse Spark 1.3 comparison based on?

10 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 22, 2026. Ember-1's coding index rests on 2 independent benchmarks and Muse Spark 1.3's on 4. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next

Embed this comparison on your site

Free under CC BY 4.0, while the source link stays visible. Preview the frame · Terms and other embeds

<iframe src="https://llmbenchmark.ai/embed/compare/fireworks-ember-1-vs-meta-muse-spark-1-3" title="Ember-1 vs Muse Spark 1.3, LLMBenchmark.ai" width="100%" height="360" style="border:0;max-width:100%" loading="lazy"></iframe>
<p style="font:13px/1.4 sans-serif;margin:6px 0 0">Source: <a href="https://llmbenchmark.ai/compare/fireworks-ember-1-vs-meta-muse-spark-1-3">LLMBenchmark.ai, Ember-1 vs Muse Spark 1.3</a></p>