Ember-1 vs gpt-oss-120b
gpt-oss-120b costs 30.0x less per output token than Ember-1 ($0.50 vs $15.00 per million). Updated October 21, 2026; no benchmark has tested both models yet.
- Coding
- 52.6
- Overall
- No data
- Output $/M
- $15.00
- Coding
- No data
- Overall
- 50.0
- Output $/M
- $0.50
Ember-1 or gpt-oss-120b: which to pick
Only Ember-1 has a coding score, 52.6 on the Vibe Coding Index; gpt-oss-120b has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.
Pick gpt-oss-120b for output tokens 30.0x cheaper ($0.50 vs $15.00 per million).
No benchmark has tested both yet. Ember-1 has results on Terminal-Bench 4 (Vals AI), Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI) and Code migration (Vals AI); gpt-oss-120b on Aider polyglot, SWE-bench Verified and AA Coding Index. Compare them on price and context instead.
Which one for your work
Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.
Coding
Vibe Coding Index, six public coding benchmarks
No call
Only Ember-1 has a coding score, so no call is made.
One side not measured
Intelligence
AA Intelligence Index
No call
Only gpt-oss-120b has a AA Intelligence Index result, 11.6.
Directional only
Agentic work
AA Agentic Index
No call
Only gpt-oss-120b has a AA Agentic Index result, 3.7.
Directional only
Reasoning
GPQA Diamond
No call
Only gpt-oss-120b has a GPQA Diamond result, 78.5%.
Directional only
Math
AIME
No call
Only gpt-oss-120b has a AIME result, 92.6%.
Directional only
Knowledge
MMLU Pro
No call
Only gpt-oss-120b has a MMLU Pro result, 79.2%.
Directional only
Web design
Design Arena: websites
No call
Only gpt-oss-120b has a Design Arena: websites result, 968.
Directional only
Long documents
Listed context window
Ember-1
Ember-1 takes 1.05M tokens against 131K.
Listed by OpenRouter
Everyday cost
1K input + 500 output tokens
gpt-oss-120b
Ember-1 $0.011, gpt-oss-120b $0.0003 per turn.
List prices
Cost per solved task
One SWE-bench Verified task, solved
No call
Only gpt-oss-120b has the number, $0.51.
Directional only
At a glance
- Coding index
- Ember-1 52.6 from 2 benchmarks, gpt-oss-120b not benchmarked.
- Widest category
- None yet: no category has been tested on both models.
- Widest single gap
- None yet: no benchmark has tested both models.
- Output price
- Ember-1 $15.00 against gpt-oss-120b $0.50 per million output tokens, 30.0x apart.
- Context window
- Ember-1 takes 1.05M tokens, gpt-oss-120b 131K.
Benchmark by benchmark
Every board either model has a result on, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale. Only one model is measured on each, so no row names a leader.
CodingDirectional onlySix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index19 boards measured
| Benchmark | Ember-1 | gpt-oss-120b | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aider polyglot | Not measured | 41.8% | Only gpt-oss-120b measured |
| SWE-bench Verified | Not measured | 26.0% | Only gpt-oss-120b measured |
| AA Coding Index | Not measured | 30.4 | Only gpt-oss-120b measured |
| LiveCodeBench (Vals AI) | Not measured | 83.2% | Only gpt-oss-120b measured |
| SWE-bench Verified (Vals AI) | Not measured | 33.6% | Only gpt-oss-120b measured |
| Terminal-Bench 4 (Vals AI) | 20.7% | Not measured | Only Ember-1 measured |
| Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI) | 83.9% | Not measured | Only Ember-1 measured |
| Code migration (Vals AI) | 32.5% | Not measured | Only Ember-1 measured |
| IOI (Vals AI) | 46.3% | Not measured | Only Ember-1 measured |
| CyberBench (Vals AI) | 69.5% | Not measured | Only Ember-1 measured |
| LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run) | Not measured | 87.8% | Only gpt-oss-120b measured |
| SciCode | Not measured | 34.0% | Only gpt-oss-120b measured |
| Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run) | Not measured | 23.5% | Only gpt-oss-120b measured |
| Terminal-Bench | Not measured | 18.7% | Only gpt-oss-120b measured |
| WeirdML | Not measured | 48.2% | Only gpt-oss-120b measured |
| ALE-Bench | Not measured | 575.6 | Only gpt-oss-120b measured |
| LMArena Text: coding | Not measured | 1379 | Only gpt-oss-120b measured |
| LMArena Text: software and IT | Not measured | 1387 | Only gpt-oss-120b measured |
| SciCode | Not measured | 7.7% | Only gpt-oss-120b measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 20 boards here | |||
IntelligenceDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index2 boards measured
| Benchmark | Ember-1 | gpt-oss-120b | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| AA Intelligence Index | Not measured | 11.6 | Only gpt-oss-120b measured |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | Not measured | 139.8 | Only gpt-oss-120b measured |
Agentic workDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index13 boards measured
| Benchmark | Ember-1 | gpt-oss-120b | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| AA Agentic Index | Not measured | 3.7 | Only gpt-oss-120b measured |
| Finance Agent (Vals AI) | 51.8% | Not measured | Only Ember-1 measured |
| Tax Agent Bench (Vals AI) | 31.1% | Not measured | Only Ember-1 measured |
| Legal Research Bench (Vals AI) | 44.7% | Not measured | Only Ember-1 measured |
| Excel Modeling Benchmark (Vals AI) | 63.4% | Not measured | Only Ember-1 measured |
| BioMysteryBench (Vals AI) | 67.0% | Not measured | Only Ember-1 measured |
| Terminal-Bench-Science (Vals AI) | 5.7% | Not measured | Only Ember-1 measured |
| Vals Science Index | 31.8% | Not measured | Only Ember-1 measured |
| τ²-Bench Telecom | Not measured | 65.8% | Only gpt-oss-120b measured |
| APEX-Agents | Not measured | 4.4% | Only gpt-oss-120b measured |
| METR time horizons | Not measured | 56.6% | Only gpt-oss-120b measured |
| Vending-Bench 2 | Not measured | -$22 | Only gpt-oss-120b measured |
| BrowseComp-Plus | Not measured | 67.0% | Only gpt-oss-120b measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 28 boards here | |||
ReasoningDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index11 boards measured
| Benchmark | Ember-1 | gpt-oss-120b | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | Not measured | 78.5% | Only gpt-oss-120b measured |
| MysteryMechanism (Vals AI) | 22.5% | Not measured | Only Ember-1 measured |
| GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run) | Not measured | 78.2% | Only gpt-oss-120b measured |
| Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run) | Not measured | 19.6% | Only gpt-oss-120b measured |
| GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run) | Not measured | 75.8% | Only gpt-oss-120b measured |
| SimpleBench | Not measured | 22.1% | Only gpt-oss-120b measured |
| Mystery game puzzles | Not measured | 2.0% | Only gpt-oss-120b measured |
| LMArena Text: hard prompts | Not measured | 1364 | Only gpt-oss-120b measured |
| LMArena Text: expert | Not measured | 1356 | Only gpt-oss-120b measured |
| LMArena Text: hard prompts in English | Not measured | 1368 | Only gpt-oss-120b measured |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | Not measured | 58.6% | Only gpt-oss-120b measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 11 boards here | |||
MathDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index8 boards measured
| Benchmark | Ember-1 | gpt-oss-120b | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| AIME | Not measured | 92.6% | Only gpt-oss-120b measured |
| MATH 500 (Vals AI) | Not measured | 94.8% | Only gpt-oss-120b measured |
| MGSM (Vals AI) | Not measured | 92.0% | Only gpt-oss-120b measured |
| AA Math Index | Not measured | 93.4 | Only gpt-oss-120b measured |
| AIME 2025 (Artificial Analysis run) | Not measured | 93.4% | Only gpt-oss-120b measured |
| OTIS Mock AIME | Not measured | 88.9% | Only gpt-oss-120b measured |
| LMArena Text: math | Not measured | 1389 | Only gpt-oss-120b measured |
| LMArena Text: mathematical work | Not measured | 1386 | Only gpt-oss-120b measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 5 boards here | |||
KnowledgeDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index11 boards measured
| Benchmark | Ember-1 | gpt-oss-120b | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| MMLU Pro | Not measured | 79.2% | Only gpt-oss-120b measured |
| LegalBench (Vals AI) | Not measured | 75.9% | Only gpt-oss-120b measured |
| CaseLaw (Vals AI) | Not measured | 48.8% | Only gpt-oss-120b measured |
| CorpFin (Vals AI) | Not measured | 58.2% | Only gpt-oss-120b measured |
| TaxEval (Vals AI) | Not measured | 71.6% | Only gpt-oss-120b measured |
| MedQA (Vals AI) | Not measured | 91.4% | Only gpt-oss-120b measured |
| MMLU Pro (Artificial Analysis run) | Not measured | 80.8% | Only gpt-oss-120b measured |
| LMArena Text: science | Not measured | 1382 | Only gpt-oss-120b measured |
| LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare | Not measured | 1388 | Only gpt-oss-120b measured |
| LMArena Text: legal and government | Not measured | 1355 | Only gpt-oss-120b measured |
| LMArena Text: business and finance | Not measured | 1359 | Only gpt-oss-120b measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 7 boards here | |||
Web designDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index6 boards measured
| Benchmark | Ember-1 | gpt-oss-120b | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| Design Arena: websites | Not measured | 968 | Only gpt-oss-120b measured |
| Design Arena: UI components | Not measured | 927 | Only gpt-oss-120b measured |
| Design Arena: game dev | Not measured | 992 | Only gpt-oss-120b measured |
| Design Arena: data viz | Not measured | 987 | Only gpt-oss-120b measured |
| Design Arena: 3D | Not measured | 901 | Only gpt-oss-120b measured |
| Design Arena: all code categories | Not measured | 963 | Only gpt-oss-120b measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 3 boards here | |||
GeneralDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index25 boards measured
| Benchmark | Ember-1 | gpt-oss-120b | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| Public Benefits Bench (Vals AI) | 66.2% | Not measured | Only Ember-1 measured |
| IFBench | Not measured | 69.0% | Only gpt-oss-120b measured |
| Long context reasoning (AA-LCR) | Not measured | 52.0% | Only gpt-oss-120b measured |
| DTBench | Not measured | 76.3% | Only gpt-oss-120b measured |
| LMCA | Not measured | 22.1% | Only gpt-oss-120b measured |
| Fiction.LiveBench | Not measured | 44.4% | Only gpt-oss-120b measured |
| Creative writing (Lech Mazur) | Not measured | 77.1% | Only gpt-oss-120b measured |
| Surface Evolver Bench | Not measured | 25.0% | Only gpt-oss-120b measured |
| LMArena Text | Not measured | 1366 | Only gpt-oss-120b measured |
| LMArena Text: instruction following | Not measured | 1318 | Only gpt-oss-120b measured |
| LMArena Text: creative writing | Not measured | 1274 | Only gpt-oss-120b measured |
| LMArena Text: English | Not measured | 1375 | Only gpt-oss-120b measured |
| LMArena Text: non-English | Not measured | 1351 | Only gpt-oss-120b measured |
| LMArena Text: Chinese | Not measured | 1385 | Only gpt-oss-120b measured |
| LMArena Text: German | Not measured | 1353 | Only gpt-oss-120b measured |
| LMArena Text: Japanese | Not measured | 1331 | Only gpt-oss-120b measured |
| LMArena Text: Korean | Not measured | 1282 | Only gpt-oss-120b measured |
| LMArena Text: French | Not measured | 1370 | Only gpt-oss-120b measured |
| LMArena Text: Spanish | Not measured | 1389 | Only gpt-oss-120b measured |
| LMArena Text: Russian | Not measured | 1343 | Only gpt-oss-120b measured |
| LMArena Text: Polish | Not measured | 1353 | Only gpt-oss-120b measured |
| LMArena Text: multi-turn | Not measured | 1340 | Only gpt-oss-120b measured |
| LMArena Text: longer queries | Not measured | 1319 | Only gpt-oss-120b measured |
| LMArena Text: writing and language | Not measured | 1306 | Only gpt-oss-120b measured |
| LMArena Text: entertainment and media | Not measured | 1292 | Only gpt-oss-120b measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 21 boards here | |||
What each workload costs
Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.
Chat turn
1K input + 500 output tokens
gpt-oss-120b costs less
Repository review
50K input + 3K output tokens
gpt-oss-120b costs less
Agent loop
200K input + 10K output tokens
gpt-oss-120b costs less
Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.
Specification differences
The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.
| Specification | Fireworks Ember-1 | OpenAI gpt-oss-120b |
|---|---|---|
| Maker | Fireworks | OpenAI |
| Weights | No public weights listed | Open weights |
| Released | September 24, 2026 | August 5, 2025 |
| Context window | 1.05M | 131K |
| Input $/Mtok | $3.00 | $0.10 |
| Output $/Mtok | $15.00 | $0.50 |
| Coding index | 52.6 | Not benchmarked |
| Independent measurements behind it | 2 | 1 |
| Cost per solved task | Not computable | $0.51 |
| Source | OpenRouter listing | OpenRouter listing |
Questions
Is Ember-1 better than gpt-oss-120b for coding?
Only Ember-1 has a coding score, 52.6 on the Vibe Coding Index; gpt-oss-120b has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Pick gpt-oss-120b for output tokens 30.0x cheaper ($0.50 vs $15.00 per million).
Which is cheaper, Ember-1 or gpt-oss-120b?
Ember-1 costs $3.00 per million input tokens and $15.00 per million output tokens; gpt-oss-120b costs $0.10 and $0.50. Cost per solved task is known for gpt-oss-120b only.
Which has the bigger context window, Ember-1 or gpt-oss-120b?
Ember-1, with 1.05M tokens against 131K.
Has any benchmark tested both Ember-1 and gpt-oss-120b?
No benchmark has tested both yet. Ember-1 has results on Terminal-Bench 4 (Vals AI), Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI) and Code migration (Vals AI); gpt-oss-120b on Aider polyglot, SWE-bench Verified and AA Coding Index. Compare them on price and context instead. Data as of October 21, 2026.