Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

Devstral 2 2512 vs GPT-5 Nano

GPT-5 Nano leads Devstral 2 2512 on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, 13.0 to 8.6, and GPT-5 Nano costs 5.0x less per output token ($0.40 vs $2.00 per million). Updated October 22, 2026; 3 benchmarks have a result for both.

Devstral 2 2512Mistral AI
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$2.00
1
GPT-5 NanoOpenAI
Coding
No data
Overall
35.6
Output $/M
$0.40
2
vs boards won of 3 shared

Devstral 2 2512 or GPT-5 Nano: which to pick

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Pick Devstral 2 2512 for work measured by LiveCodeBench (Vals AI) or AA Intelligence Index, where it leads.

Shared results
3
Devstral 2 2512 only
3
GPT-5 Nano only
84
Like-for-like categories
2 of 9

Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
Devstral 2 2512 not benchmarked, GPT-5 Nano not benchmarked.
Widest category
Coding, 18.7 points apart on average over 2 shared benchmarks.
Widest single gap
SWE-bench Verified: Devstral 2 2512 53.8% against GPT-5 Nano 34.8%, 19.0 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
Devstral 2 2512 $2.00 against GPT-5 Nano $0.40 per million output tokens, 5.0x apart.
Context window
Devstral 2 2512 takes 262K tokens, GPT-5 Nano 400K.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryDevstral 2 2512BarsGPT-5 NanoTies
Coding11
Intelligence01
All shared boards12
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index11
Coding benchmarks for Devstral 2 2512 and GPT-5 Nano
BenchmarkDevstral 2 2512GPT-5 NanoLeader
SWE-bench Verified53.8%34.8%Devstral 2 2512
AA Coding Index31.3Not measuredOnly Devstral 2 2512 measured
LiveCodeBench (Vals AI)51.8%70.2%GPT-5 Nano
SWE-bench Verified (Vals AI)62.8%Not measuredOnly Devstral 2 2512 measured
LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured78.9%Only GPT-5 Nano measured
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured17.4%Only GPT-5 Nano measured
Terminal-BenchNot measured21.8%Only GPT-5 Nano measured
WeirdMLNot measured38.1%Only GPT-5 Nano measured
LMArena Text: codingNot measured1351Only GPT-5 Nano measured
LMArena Text: software and ITNot measured1345Only GPT-5 Nano measured
Neither model has a result on the other 29 boards here
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
Intelligence benchmarks for Devstral 2 2512 and GPT-5 Nano
BenchmarkDevstral 2 2512GPT-5 NanoLeader
AA Intelligence Index8.613.0GPT-5 Nano
Epoch Capabilities IndexNot measured139.2Only GPT-5 Nano measured
Agentic workDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index3 boards, none shared
Agentic work benchmarks for Devstral 2 2512 and GPT-5 Nano
BenchmarkDevstral 2 2512GPT-5 NanoLeader
AA Agentic Index2.3Not measuredOnly Devstral 2 2512 measured
τ²-Bench TelecomNot measured36.5%Only GPT-5 Nano measured
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard (BFCL)Not measured51.4%Only GPT-5 Nano measured
Neither model has a result on the other 38 boards here
ReasoningDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index16 boards, none shared
Reasoning benchmarks for Devstral 2 2512 and GPT-5 Nano
BenchmarkDevstral 2 2512GPT-5 NanoLeader
GPQA DiamondNot measured63.4%Only GPT-5 Nano measured
MMMU Pro (Vals AI)Not measured70.9%Only GPT-5 Nano measured
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured67.6%Only GPT-5 Nano measured
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured9.5%Only GPT-5 Nano measured
GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run)Not measured69.4%Only GPT-5 Nano measured
ARC-AGINot measured20.7%Only GPT-5 Nano measured
ARC-AGI-2Not measured2.6%Only GPT-5 Nano measured
Chess puzzlesNot measured22.0%Only GPT-5 Nano measured
Mystery game puzzlesNot measured9.0%Only GPT-5 Nano measured
VPCTNot measured37.2%Only GPT-5 Nano measured
LMArena Text: hard promptsNot measured1328Only GPT-5 Nano measured
LMArena Text: expertNot measured1321Only GPT-5 Nano measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts in EnglishNot measured1338Only GPT-5 Nano measured
LMArena Vision: diagramsNot measured1141Only GPT-5 Nano measured
LMArena Vision: homeworkNot measured1157Only GPT-5 Nano measured
Kagi LLM BenchmarkNot measured62.2%Only GPT-5 Nano measured
Neither model has a result on the other 6 boards here
MathDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index12 boards, none shared
Math benchmarks for Devstral 2 2512 and GPT-5 Nano
BenchmarkDevstral 2 2512GPT-5 NanoLeader
AIMENot measured81.2%Only GPT-5 Nano measured
MATH 500 (Vals AI)Not measured93.8%Only GPT-5 Nano measured
MGSM (Vals AI)Not measured89.3%Only GPT-5 Nano measured
AA Math IndexNot measured83.7Only GPT-5 Nano measured
AIME 2025 (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured83.7%Only GPT-5 Nano measured
OTIS Mock AIMENot measured81.1%Only GPT-5 Nano measured
FrontierMath, tiers 1 to 3Not measured20.0%Only GPT-5 Nano measured
FrontierMath, tier 4Not measured2.4%Only GPT-5 Nano measured
ProofBenchNot measured12.0%Only GPT-5 Nano measured
MATH level 5Not measured95.2%Only GPT-5 Nano measured
LMArena Text: mathNot measured1317Only GPT-5 Nano measured
LMArena Text: mathematical workNot measured1326Only GPT-5 Nano measured
Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here
KnowledgeDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index13 boards, none shared
Knowledge benchmarks for Devstral 2 2512 and GPT-5 Nano
BenchmarkDevstral 2 2512GPT-5 NanoLeader
MMLU ProNot measured76.1%Only GPT-5 Nano measured
LegalBench (Vals AI)Not measured50.1%Only GPT-5 Nano measured
CaseLaw (Vals AI)Not measured52.6%Only GPT-5 Nano measured
TaxEval (Vals AI)Not measured67.4%Only GPT-5 Nano measured
MortgageTax (Vals AI)Not measured53.6%Only GPT-5 Nano measured
MedQA (Vals AI)Not measured93.3%Only GPT-5 Nano measured
MedCode (Vals AI)Not measured30.4%Only GPT-5 Nano measured
MMLU Pro (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured78.0%Only GPT-5 Nano measured
SimpleQA VerifiedNot measured11.7%Only GPT-5 Nano measured
LMArena Text: scienceNot measured1318Only GPT-5 Nano measured
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcareNot measured1335Only GPT-5 Nano measured
LMArena Text: legal and governmentNot measured1298Only GPT-5 Nano measured
LMArena Text: business and financeNot measured1311Only GPT-5 Nano measured
Neither model has a result on the other 5 boards here
Web designDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index6 boards, none shared
Web design benchmarks for Devstral 2 2512 and GPT-5 Nano
BenchmarkDevstral 2 2512GPT-5 NanoLeader
Design Arena: websitesNot measured1101Only GPT-5 Nano measured
Design Arena: UI componentsNot measured1064Only GPT-5 Nano measured
Design Arena: game devNot measured1044Only GPT-5 Nano measured
Design Arena: data vizNot measured1056Only GPT-5 Nano measured
Design Arena: 3DNot measured965Only GPT-5 Nano measured
Design Arena: all code categoriesNot measured1084Only GPT-5 Nano measured
Neither model has a result on the other 3 boards here
GeneralDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index28 boards, none shared
General benchmarks for Devstral 2 2512 and GPT-5 Nano
BenchmarkDevstral 2 2512GPT-5 NanoLeader
SAGE (Vals AI)Not measured30.4%Only GPT-5 Nano measured
MedScribe (Vals AI)Not measured72.9%Only GPT-5 Nano measured
IFBenchNot measured67.6%Only GPT-5 Nano measured
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)Not measured45.0%Only GPT-5 Nano measured
DTBenchNot measured62.7%Only GPT-5 Nano measured
LMCANot measured7.9%Only GPT-5 Nano measured
Fiction.LiveBenchNot measured44.4%Only GPT-5 Nano measured
LMArena TextNot measured1320Only GPT-5 Nano measured
LMArena Text: instruction followingNot measured1306Only GPT-5 Nano measured
LMArena Text: creative writingNot measured1249Only GPT-5 Nano measured
LMArena VisionNot measured1159Only GPT-5 Nano measured
LMArena Text: EnglishNot measured1321Only GPT-5 Nano measured
LMArena Text: non-EnglishNot measured1313Only GPT-5 Nano measured
LMArena Text: ChineseNot measured1356Only GPT-5 Nano measured
LMArena Text: GermanNot measured1327Only GPT-5 Nano measured
LMArena Text: JapaneseNot measured1227Only GPT-5 Nano measured
LMArena Text: KoreanNot measured1269Only GPT-5 Nano measured
LMArena Text: SpanishNot measured1360Only GPT-5 Nano measured
LMArena Text: RussianNot measured1296Only GPT-5 Nano measured
LMArena Text: PolishNot measured1314Only GPT-5 Nano measured
LMArena Text: multi-turnNot measured1311Only GPT-5 Nano measured
LMArena Text: longer queriesNot measured1312Only GPT-5 Nano measured
LMArena Text: writing and languageNot measured1283Only GPT-5 Nano measured
LMArena Text: entertainment and mediaNot measured1268Only GPT-5 Nano measured
LMArena Vision: EnglishNot measured1170Only GPT-5 Nano measured
LMArena Vision: ChineseNot measured1176Only GPT-5 Nano measured
LMArena Vision: reading textNot measured1152Only GPT-5 Nano measured
LMArena Vision: humorNot measured1110Only GPT-5 Nano measured
Neither model has a result on the other 18 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for Devstral 2 2512 and GPT-5 Nano
BenchmarkDevstral 2 2512GPT-5 NanoLeader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

Devstral 2 2512$0.0014Fits in one request
GPT-5 Nano$0.0003Fits in one request

GPT-5 Nano costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

Devstral 2 2512$0.026Fits in one request
GPT-5 Nano$0.0037Fits in one request

GPT-5 Nano costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

Devstral 2 2512$0.100Fits in one request
GPT-5 Nano$0.014Fits in one request

GPT-5 Nano costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of Devstral 2 2512 and GPT-5 Nano
SpecificationMistral Devstral 2 2512OpenAI GPT-5 Nano
MakerMistral AIOpenAI
WeightsOpen weightsNo public weights listed
ReleasedDecember 9, 2025August 7, 2025
Context window262K400K
Input $/Mtok$0.40$0.05
Output $/Mtok$2.00$0.40
Coding indexNot benchmarkedNot benchmarked
Independent measurements behind it10
Cost per solved task$1.19$0.109
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is Devstral 2 2512 better than GPT-5 Nano for coding?

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Pick Devstral 2 2512 for work measured by LiveCodeBench (Vals AI) or AA Intelligence Index, where it leads.

Which is cheaper, Devstral 2 2512 or GPT-5 Nano?

Devstral 2 2512 costs $0.40 per million input tokens and $2.00 per million output tokens; GPT-5 Nano costs $0.05 and $0.40. Per solved SWE-bench Verified task, Devstral 2 2512 costs $1.19 and GPT-5 Nano $0.109.

Which has the bigger context window, Devstral 2 2512 or GPT-5 Nano?

GPT-5 Nano, with 400K tokens against 262K.

How many benchmarks is the Devstral 2 2512 vs GPT-5 Nano comparison based on?

3 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 22, 2026. Devstral 2 2512's coding index rests on 1 independent benchmark and GPT-5 Nano's on 0. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next