Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Qwen3.5-9B

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash leads Qwen3.5-9B on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, 24.7 to 13.3, and Qwen3.5-9B costs 5.2x less per output token ($0.15 vs $0.78 per million). Updated October 21, 2026; 9 benchmarks have a result for both.

DeepSeek V4.1 FlashDeepSeek
Coding
62.5
Overall
62.4
Output $/M
$0.78
9
Qwen3.5-9BQwen
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$0.15
0
vs boards won of 9 shared

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash or Qwen3.5-9B: which to pick

Only DeepSeek V4.1 Flash has a coding score, 62.5 on the Vibe Coding Index; Qwen3.5-9B has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Pick Qwen3.5-9B for output tokens 5.2x cheaper ($0.15 vs $0.78 per million).

Shared results
9
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash only
92
Qwen3.5-9B only
6
Like-for-like categories
5 of 9

Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 62.5 from 5 benchmarks, Qwen3.5-9B not benchmarked.
Widest category
Math, 36.7 points apart on average over 1 shared benchmark.
Widest single gap
OTIS Mock AIME: DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 98.3% against Qwen3.5-9B 61.7%, 36.7 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash $0.78 against Qwen3.5-9B $0.15 per million output tokens, 5.2x apart.
Context window
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash takes 1.05M tokens, Qwen3.5-9B 262K.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryDeepSeek V4.1 FlashBarsQwen3.5-9BTies
Coding10
Intelligence20
Reasoning20
Math10
General30
All shared boards90
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index10
Coding benchmarks for DeepSeek V4.1 Flash and Qwen3.5-9B
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4.1 FlashQwen3.5-9BLeader
LiveBench coding90.2%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured
LMArena WebDev1618Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured
AA Coding IndexNot measured23.5Only Qwen3.5-9B measured
Terminal-Bench 4 (Vals AI)19.7%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured
Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI)84.7%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured
Code migration (Vals AI)45.6%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured
ProgramBench (Vals AI)0.5%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured
IOI (Vals AI)40.3%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured
Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals AI)74.5%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured
SWE-bench Multimodal (Vals AI)46.5%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured
Vibe Code Bench 1-100 (Vals AI)16.4%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured
SkillsBench (Vals AI)69.8%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured
CyberBench (Vals AI)73.7%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured
SciCode51.9%29.5%DeepSeek V4.1 Flash
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured24.2%Only Qwen3.5-9B measured
Terminal-BenchNot measured9.2%Only Qwen3.5-9B measured
FrontierCode43.9%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured
ALE-Bench1092.3Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured
LMArena Text: coding1502Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured
LMArena Text: software and IT1496Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured
LMArena WebDev: React1628Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured
LMArena WebDev: HTML1612Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured
LMArena WebDev: from an image1606Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured
Neither model has a result on the other 16 boards here
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index20
Intelligence benchmarks for DeepSeek V4.1 Flash and Qwen3.5-9B
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4.1 FlashQwen3.5-9BLeader
AA Intelligence Index24.713.3DeepSeek V4.1 Flash
Epoch Capabilities Index155.9139.3DeepSeek V4.1 Flash
Agentic workDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index13 boards, none shared
Agentic work benchmarks for DeepSeek V4.1 Flash and Qwen3.5-9B
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4.1 FlashQwen3.5-9BLeader
LiveBench research86.8%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured
LiveBench browser84.0%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured
LiveBench long agentic40.1%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured
SREBench (Vals AI)0.8%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured
Finance Agent (Vals AI)53.5%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured
Tax Agent Bench (Vals AI)26.6%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured
Legal Research Bench (Vals AI)41.4%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured
Excel Modeling Benchmark (Vals AI)57.2%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured
BioMysteryBench (Vals AI)67.8%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured
Terminal-Bench-Science (Vals AI)0.0%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured
Vals Science Index29.6%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured
τ²-Bench TelecomNot measured86.8%Only Qwen3.5-9B measured
APEX-Agents39.5%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured
Neither model has a result on the other 28 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index20
Reasoning benchmarks for DeepSeek V4.1 Flash and Qwen3.5-9B
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4.1 FlashQwen3.5-9BLeader
LiveBench reasoning86.7%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured
MysteryMechanism (Vals AI)21.2%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured80.6%Only Qwen3.5-9B measured
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)39.2%14.9%DeepSeek V4.1 Flash
GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run)89.8%79.0%DeepSeek V4.1 Flash
ARC-AGI94.5%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured
ARC-AGI-272.9%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured
Chess puzzles48.0%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured
Mystery game puzzles43.0%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts1483Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured
LMArena Text: expert1501Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts in English1488Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured
LMArena Vision: diagrams1297Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured
LMArena Vision: homework1307Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured
Neither model has a result on the other 8 boards here
MathLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index10
Math benchmarks for DeepSeek V4.1 Flash and Qwen3.5-9B
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4.1 FlashQwen3.5-9BLeader
OTIS Mock AIME98.3%61.7%DeepSeek V4.1 Flash
FrontierMath, tiers 1 to 367.4%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured
FrontierMath, tier 426.8%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured
ProofBench54.0%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured
LMArena Text: math1478Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured
LMArena Text: mathematical work1485Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured
Neither model has a result on the other 7 boards here
KnowledgeDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index7 boards, none shared
Knowledge benchmarks for DeepSeek V4.1 Flash and Qwen3.5-9B
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4.1 FlashQwen3.5-9BLeader
LegalBench (Vals AI)83.3%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured
MedCode (Vals AI)41.2%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured
SimpleQA Verified42.9%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured
LMArena Text: science1469Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare1484Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured
LMArena Text: legal and government1443Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured
LMArena Text: business and finance1461Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured
Neither model has a result on the other 11 boards here
Web designDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index9 boards, none shared
Web design benchmarks for DeepSeek V4.1 Flash and Qwen3.5-9B
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4.1 FlashQwen3.5-9BLeader
Design Arena: websites1309Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured
Design Arena: UI components1315Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured
Design Arena: game dev1330Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured
Design Arena: data viz1290Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured
Design Arena: 3D1356Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured
Design Arena: all code categories1320Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured
Design Arena: SVG1244Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured
Design Arena: ASCII art1265Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured
LiveBench design79.2%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index30
General benchmarks for DeepSeek V4.1 Flash and Qwen3.5-9B
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4.1 FlashQwen3.5-9BLeader
LiveBench data analysis79.3%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured
Public Benefits Bench (Vals AI)64.3%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured
SAGE (Vals AI)47.9%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured
MedScribe (Vals AI)85.5%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured
IFBenchNot measured66.7%Only Qwen3.5-9B measured
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)84.0%70.0%DeepSeek V4.1 Flash
DTBench89.9%71.2%DeepSeek V4.1 Flash
LMCA47.0%24.5%DeepSeek V4.1 Flash
Surface Evolver Bench46.3%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured
Furniture assembly34.2%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured
LMArena Text1464Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured
LMArena Text: instruction following1473Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured
LMArena Text: creative writing1437Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured
LMArena Vision1278Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured
LMArena Text: English1473Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured
LMArena Text: non-English1449Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured
LMArena Text: Chinese1501Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured
LMArena Text: German1470Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured
LMArena Text: Japanese1432Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured
LMArena Text: Korean1436Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured
LMArena Text: French1465Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured
LMArena Text: Spanish1459Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured
LMArena Text: Russian1467Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured
LMArena Text: Polish1457Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured
LMArena Text: multi-turn1461Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured
LMArena Text: longer queries1473Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured
LMArena Text: writing and language1450Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured
LMArena Text: entertainment and media1445Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured
LMArena Vision: English1288Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured
LMArena Vision: Chinese1327Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured
LMArena Vision: reading text1282Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured
LMArena Vision: humor1260Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured
LMArena Vision: creative writing1275Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured
Neither model has a result on the other 13 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for DeepSeek V4.1 Flash and Qwen3.5-9B
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4.1 FlashQwen3.5-9BLeader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash$0.0006Fits in one request
Qwen3.5-9B$0.0002Fits in one request

Qwen3.5-9B costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash$0.013Fits in one request
Qwen3.5-9B$0.0054Fits in one request

Qwen3.5-9B costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash$0.050Fits in one request
Qwen3.5-9B$0.021Fits in one request

Qwen3.5-9B costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of DeepSeek V4.1 Flash and Qwen3.5-9B
SpecificationDeepSeek V4.1 FlashQwen3.5-9B
MakerDeepSeekQwen
WeightsOpen weightsOpen weights
ReleasedSeptember 10, 2026March 10, 2026
Context window1.05M262K
Input $/Mtok$0.21$0.10
Output $/Mtok$0.78$0.15
Coding index62.5Not benchmarked
Independent measurements behind it50
Cost per solved taskNot computableNot computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is DeepSeek V4.1 Flash better than Qwen3.5-9B for coding?

Only DeepSeek V4.1 Flash has a coding score, 62.5 on the Vibe Coding Index; Qwen3.5-9B has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Pick Qwen3.5-9B for output tokens 5.2x cheaper ($0.15 vs $0.78 per million).

Which is cheaper, DeepSeek V4.1 Flash or Qwen3.5-9B?

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash costs $0.21 per million input tokens and $0.78 per million output tokens; Qwen3.5-9B costs $0.10 and $0.15. Cost per solved task is known for neither of them.

Which has the bigger context window, DeepSeek V4.1 Flash or Qwen3.5-9B?

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash, with 1.05M tokens against 262K.

How many benchmarks is the DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Qwen3.5-9B comparison based on?

9 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 21, 2026. DeepSeek V4.1 Flash's coding index rests on 5 independent benchmarks and Qwen3.5-9B's on 0. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next