Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Mistral Nemo

Mistral Nemo costs 5.2x less per output token than DeepSeek V4.1 Flash ($0.15 vs $0.78 per million). Updated October 21, 2026; 2 benchmarks have a result for both.

DeepSeek V4.1 FlashDeepSeek
Coding
62.5
Overall
24.7
Output $/M
$0.78
2
Mistral NemoMistral AI
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$0.15
0
vs boards won of 2 shared

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash or Mistral Nemo: which to pick

Only DeepSeek V4.1 Flash has a coding score, 62.5 on the Vibe Coding Index; Mistral Nemo has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Pick Mistral Nemo for output tokens 5.2x cheaper ($0.15 vs $0.78 per million).

Shared results
2
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash only
99
Mistral Nemo only
1
Like-for-like categories
2 of 9

Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 62.5 from 5 benchmarks, Mistral Nemo not benchmarked.
Widest category
Intelligence, 46.6 points apart on average over 1 shared benchmark.
Widest single gap
Epoch Capabilities Index: DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 155.9 against Mistral Nemo 118.7, 46.6 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash $0.78 against Mistral Nemo $0.15 per million output tokens, 5.2x apart.
Context window
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash takes 1.05M tokens, Mistral Nemo 131K.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryDeepSeek V4.1 FlashBarsMistral NemoTies
Intelligence10
General10
All shared boards20
CodingDirectional onlySix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index20 boards, none shared
Coding benchmarks for DeepSeek V4.1 Flash and Mistral Nemo
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4.1 FlashMistral NemoLeader
LiveBench coding90.2%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured
LMArena WebDev1618Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured
Terminal-Bench 4 (Vals AI)19.7%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured
Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI)84.7%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured
Code migration (Vals AI)45.6%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured
ProgramBench (Vals AI)0.5%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured
IOI (Vals AI)40.3%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured
Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals AI)74.5%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured
SWE-bench Multimodal (Vals AI)46.5%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured
Vibe Code Bench 1-100 (Vals AI)16.4%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured
SkillsBench (Vals AI)69.8%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured
CyberBench (Vals AI)73.7%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured
SciCode51.9%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured
FrontierCode43.9%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured
ALE-Bench1092.3Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured
LMArena Text: coding1502Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured
LMArena Text: software and IT1496Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured
LMArena WebDev: React1628Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured
LMArena WebDev: HTML1612Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured
LMArena WebDev: from an image1606Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured
Neither model has a result on the other 18 boards here
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index10
Intelligence benchmarks for DeepSeek V4.1 Flash and Mistral Nemo
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4.1 FlashMistral NemoLeader
AA Intelligence Index24.7Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured
Epoch Capabilities Index155.9118.7DeepSeek V4.1 Flash
Agentic workDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index12 boards, none shared
Agentic work benchmarks for DeepSeek V4.1 Flash and Mistral Nemo
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4.1 FlashMistral NemoLeader
LiveBench research86.8%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured
LiveBench browser84.0%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured
LiveBench long agentic40.1%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured
SREBench (Vals AI)0.8%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured
Finance Agent (Vals AI)53.5%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured
Tax Agent Bench (Vals AI)26.6%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured
Legal Research Bench (Vals AI)41.4%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured
Excel Modeling Benchmark (Vals AI)57.2%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured
BioMysteryBench (Vals AI)67.8%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured
Terminal-Bench-Science (Vals AI)0.0%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured
Vals Science Index29.6%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured
APEX-Agents39.5%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured
Neither model has a result on the other 27 boards here
ReasoningDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index13 boards, none shared
Reasoning benchmarks for DeepSeek V4.1 Flash and Mistral Nemo
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4.1 FlashMistral NemoLeader
LiveBench reasoning86.7%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured
MysteryMechanism (Vals AI)21.2%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)39.2%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured
GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run)89.8%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured
ARC-AGI94.5%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured
ARC-AGI-272.9%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured
Chess puzzles48.0%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured
Mystery game puzzles43.0%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts1483Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured
LMArena Text: expert1501Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts in English1488Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured
LMArena Vision: diagrams1297Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured
LMArena Vision: homework1307Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured
Neither model has a result on the other 8 boards here
MathDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index6 boards, none shared
Math benchmarks for DeepSeek V4.1 Flash and Mistral Nemo
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4.1 FlashMistral NemoLeader
OTIS Mock AIME98.3%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured
FrontierMath, tiers 1 to 367.4%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured
FrontierMath, tier 426.8%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured
ProofBench54.0%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured
LMArena Text: math1478Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured
LMArena Text: mathematical work1485Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured
Neither model has a result on the other 7 boards here
KnowledgeDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index8 boards, none shared
Knowledge benchmarks for DeepSeek V4.1 Flash and Mistral Nemo
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4.1 FlashMistral NemoLeader
LegalBench (Vals AI)83.3%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured
MedCode (Vals AI)41.2%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured
SimpleQA Verified42.9%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured
MMLUNot measured65.3%Only Mistral Nemo measured
LMArena Text: science1469Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare1484Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured
LMArena Text: legal and government1443Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured
LMArena Text: business and finance1461Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured
Neither model has a result on the other 9 boards here
Web designDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index9 boards, none shared
Web design benchmarks for DeepSeek V4.1 Flash and Mistral Nemo
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4.1 FlashMistral NemoLeader
Design Arena: websites1309Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured
Design Arena: UI components1315Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured
Design Arena: game dev1330Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured
Design Arena: data viz1290Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured
Design Arena: 3D1356Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured
Design Arena: all code categories1320Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured
Design Arena: SVG1244Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured
Design Arena: ASCII art1265Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured
LiveBench design79.2%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index10
General benchmarks for DeepSeek V4.1 Flash and Mistral Nemo
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4.1 FlashMistral NemoLeader
LiveBench data analysis79.3%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured
Public Benefits Bench (Vals AI)64.3%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured
SAGE (Vals AI)47.9%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured
MedScribe (Vals AI)85.5%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)84.0%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured
DTBench89.9%48.6%DeepSeek V4.1 Flash
LMCA47.0%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured
Surface Evolver Bench46.3%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured
Furniture assembly34.2%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured
LMArena Text1464Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured
LMArena Text: instruction following1473Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured
LMArena Text: creative writing1437Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured
LMArena Vision1278Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured
LMArena Text: English1473Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured
LMArena Text: non-English1449Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured
LMArena Text: Chinese1501Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured
LMArena Text: German1470Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured
LMArena Text: Japanese1432Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured
LMArena Text: Korean1436Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured
LMArena Text: French1465Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured
LMArena Text: Spanish1459Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured
LMArena Text: Russian1467Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured
LMArena Text: Polish1457Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured
LMArena Text: multi-turn1461Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured
LMArena Text: longer queries1473Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured
LMArena Text: writing and language1450Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured
LMArena Text: entertainment and media1445Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured
LMArena Vision: English1288Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured
LMArena Vision: Chinese1327Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured
LMArena Vision: reading text1282Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured
LMArena Vision: humor1260Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured
LMArena Vision: creative writing1275Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured
Neither model has a result on the other 14 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for DeepSeek V4.1 Flash and Mistral Nemo
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4.1 FlashMistral NemoLeader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash$0.0006Fits in one request
Mistral Nemo$0.0002Fits in one request

Mistral Nemo costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash$0.013Fits in one request
Mistral Nemo$0.0080Fits in one request

Mistral Nemo costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash$0.050Fits in one request
Mistral Nemo$0.032Exceeds the context window

Mistral Nemo costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of DeepSeek V4.1 Flash and Mistral Nemo
SpecificationDeepSeek V4.1 FlashMistral Nemo
MakerDeepSeekMistral AI
WeightsOpen weightsOpen weights
ReleasedSeptember 10, 2026July 19, 2024
Context window1.05M131K
Input $/Mtok$0.21$0.15
Output $/Mtok$0.78$0.15
Coding index62.5Not benchmarked
Independent measurements behind it50
Cost per solved taskNot computableNot computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is DeepSeek V4.1 Flash better than Mistral Nemo for coding?

Only DeepSeek V4.1 Flash has a coding score, 62.5 on the Vibe Coding Index; Mistral Nemo has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Pick Mistral Nemo for output tokens 5.2x cheaper ($0.15 vs $0.78 per million).

Which is cheaper, DeepSeek V4.1 Flash or Mistral Nemo?

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash costs $0.21 per million input tokens and $0.78 per million output tokens; Mistral Nemo costs $0.15 and $0.15. Cost per solved task is known for neither of them.

Which has the bigger context window, DeepSeek V4.1 Flash or Mistral Nemo?

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash, with 1.05M tokens against 131K.

How many benchmarks is the DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Mistral Nemo comparison based on?

2 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 21, 2026. DeepSeek V4.1 Flash's coding index rests on 5 independent benchmarks and Mistral Nemo's on 0. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next